Phase II trial of weekly erlotinib dosing to reduce duodenal polyp burden associated with familial adenomatous polyposis.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for duodenal adenomas and cancer. Combination sulindac and erlotinib was previously shown to reduce duodenal polyp burden but was associated with a relatively high adverse event (AE) rate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a once weekly dosing schedule for erlotinib intervention improves the AE profile, while still providing efficacy with respect to reduced polyp burden, in participants with FAP. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-arm trial, enrolling 46 participants with FAP, conducted from October 2017 to September 2019 in eight academic cancer centres. EXPOSURES: Participants self-administered 350 mg of erlotinib by mouth, one time per week for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Duodenal polyp burden (sum of polyp diameters) was assessed in the proximal duodenum by esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed at baseline and 6 months, with mean per cent change defined as the primary efficacy outcome of interest. Rate of grade 2-3 AEs was evaluated as a co-primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included changes in total duodenal polyp count, along with changes in lower gastrointestinal (GI) polyp burden and count (for participants examined by optional lower endoscopy). RESULTS: Forty-six participants (mean age, 44.1 years (range, 18-68); women, 22 (48%)) were enrolled; 42 participants completed 6 months of intervention and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Duodenal polyp burden was significantly reduced after 6 months of weekly erlotinib intervention, with a mean per cent change of -29.6% (95% CI, -39.6% to -19.7%; p<0.0001). Similar results were observed in subgroup analyses defined by participants with advanced duodenal polyposis (Spigelman 3) at baseline (mean, -27%; 95% CI, -38.7% to -15.2%; p<0.0001). Post-intervention Spigelman stage was downstaged in 12% of the participants. Lower GI polyp number was also decreased after 6 months of intervention (median, -30.8%; IQR, -47.4% to 0.0%; p=0.0256). Grade 2 or 3 AEs were reported in 71.7% of subjects, with only two experiencing grade 3 toxicity at least possibly related to intervention. CONCLUSION: In this single-arm, multi-centre trial of participants with FAP, erlotinib one time per week resulted in markedly lower duodenal polyp burden, and modestly reduced lower GI polyp burden, after 6 months of intervention. While AEs were still reported by nearly three-quarters of all participants, these events were generally lower grade and well-tolerated. These findings support further investigation of erlotinib as an effective, acceptable cancer preventive agent for FAP-associated GI polyposis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02961374.

Incidence and prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in Lynch syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC). Although colonoscopy reduces CRC in LS, the protection is variable. We assessed the prevalence and incidence of neoplasia in LS during surveillance colonoscopy in the United States and factors associated with advanced neoplasia. METHODS: Patients with LS undergoing ≥1 surveillance colonoscopy and with no personal history of invasive CRC or colorectal surgery were included. Prevalent and incident neoplasia was defined as occurring <6 months before and ≥6 months after germline diagnosis of LS, respectively. We assessed advanced adenoma (AA), CRC, and the impact of mismatch repair pathogenic variant (PV) and typical LS cancer history (personal history of EC and/or family history of EC/CRC) on outcome. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (inclusive of 112 undergoing prevalent and incident surveillance) were included. The median examination interval and duration of prevalent and incident surveillance was .88 and 1.06 years and 3.1 and 4.6 years, respectively. Prevalent and incident AA were detected in 10.7% and 6.1% and invasive CRC in 0% and 2.3% of patients. All incident CRC occurred in MSH2 and MLH1 PV carriers and only 1 (.7%) while under surveillance in our center. AAs were detected in both LS cancer history cohorts and represented in all PVs. CONCLUSIONS: In a U.S. cohort of LS, advanced neoplasia rarely occurred over annual surveillance. CRC was diagnosed only in MSH2/MLH1 PV carriers. AAs occurred regardless of PV or LS cancer history. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Colorectal Cancer Risk and Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

While many organizations have published guidance on the approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk and certain high-risk groups, adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCC) who have a heightened risk of CRC are rarely included as a target group for enhanced CRC surveillance. The population of ASCC continues to grow due to increasingly effective cancer therapies and improved survival. With this increased survival comes an increased risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms, including CRC. Since there is little published guidance for CRC surveillance in ASCC and limited awareness of increased CRC risk among both physicians and patients, the objectives of our paper are to review the incidence of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, describe the clinical phenotypes of colorectal neoplasia in ASCC, review published surveillance strategies based on consensus-based survivorship guidelines, and outline areas for future research to optimize surveillance strategies.

Clinically actionable findings on surveillance EGD in asymptomatic patients with Lynch syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes patients to multiple cancers including of the gastric and small bowel. Data supporting EGD surveillance in LS are limited. Our aim is to describe upper GI (UGI) findings in asymptomatic LS patients undergoing EGD surveillance within a hereditary colorectal cancer registry. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients with LS who underwent ≥1 surveillance EGD were included. Demographics, genotype, and EGD findings were reviewed. The frequency of clinically actionable findings including neoplasia (cancer, adenomas), Barrett's esophagus (BE), Helicobacter pylori, and hyperplastic polyps >5 mm were assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients underwent 717 EGDs starting at a median age of 49.5 years. On average, each patient had 2 EGDs with an interval of 2.3 years between examinations. Clinically actionable findings were identified in 57 patients (17.6%). On baseline EGD 27.7% of findings were identified, with the remainder on surveillance EGD over an average of 3.5 years. Five asymptomatic patients (1.5%) had an UGI cancer detected during surveillance, all at early stage, including 1 patient each with BE-related esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric neuroendocrine tumor, and gastric adenocarcinoma and 2 patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. Two cancers were found on baseline EGD and 3 on follow-up EGD. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically actionable findings were found in approximately 1 in 6 asymptomatic patients with LS undergoing EGD surveillance. Five patients (1.5%) were diagnosed with cancer, all detected at an early stage. These data suggest that both baseline and follow-up EGD surveillance are effective in detecting early-stage UGI cancers in asymptomatic patients with LS.

Evaluation of Urinalysis-Based Screening for Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With Lynch Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% to 10% of patients with Lynch syndrome develop urothelial carcinoma. Current screening recommendations vary and are based on expert opinion. Practices need to be evaluated for clinical effectiveness. Our program utilizes urinalysis as a screening test, followed by additional evaluation of microscopic hematuria. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the clinical utility of a urinalysis-based screening approach for urothelial cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained cohort. SETTING: Patients with Lynch syndrome were managed at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis who had a screening urinalysis done as part of our institutional screening protocol (N = 204) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A single-institution hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome registry was queried for patients with Lynch syndrome who had been screened for urothelial carcinomas by urinalysis. Demographics, genotype, family history of urothelial carcinoma, urinalysis results, and subsequent screenings and final diagnosis were gathered for patients between 2008 and 2017. RESULTS: Two hundred four asymptomatic patients underwent screening by urinalysis. Nineteen patients (9.3%) had microscopic hematuria and were further evaluated with urine cytology, imaging, cystoscopy, and/or Urology consultation. None of the 19 patients with microscopic hematuria had urothelial carcinoma. During the same study period, 5 of 204 (2.4%) patients with Lynch syndrome were diagnosed with urothelial cancer, and all presented with symptoms between screening intervals. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study, and not all patients underwent the same secondary evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: No urothelial carcinomas were detected by screening urinalysis in our cohort of asymptomatic patients with Lynch syndrome. False-positive testing led to extensive, mostly uninformative, workups. If urothelial cancer screening is to continue, more effective screening approaches need to be identified. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B702. EVALUACIN DEL CRIBADO BASADO EN ANLISIS DE ORINA PARA CARCINOMA UROTELIAL EN PACIENTES CON SNDROME DE LYNCH: ANTECEDENTES:Aproximadamente el 5-10% de los pacientes con síndrome de Lynch desarrollan carcinoma urotelial. Las recomendaciones actuales de detección varían y se basan en la opinión de expertos. Las prácticas deben evaluarse para determinar su eficacia clínica. Nuestro programa utiliza el análisis de orina como prueba de detección, seguido de una evaluación adicional con hematuria microscópica.OBJETIVO:Determinar la utilidad clínica desde un enfoque de cribado basado en análisis de orina, para cánceres uroteliales en pacientes con síndrome de Lynch.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de una cohorte mantenida prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Pacientes con síndrome de Lynch atendidos en un centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Criterios de inclusión fueron todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de síndrome de Lynch realizándoles un análisis de orina de detección como parte de nuestro protocolo de detección institucional (N = 204).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Solicitando un registro de síndrome de cáncer colorrectal hereditario de una sola institución para pacientes con síndrome de Lynch previamente evaluados para carcinomas uroteliales mediante análisis de orina. Se recopilaron para los pacientes entre 2008 y 2017, datos demográficos, genotipo, antecedentes familiares de carcinoma urotelial, resultados del análisis de orina, posteriores exámenes de detección posteriores y diagnóstico final.RESULTADOS:Doscientos cuatro pacientes asintomáticos fueron sometidos a cribado mediante análisis de orina. Diecinueve pacientes (9,3%) tenían hematuria microscópica y fueron investigados más a fondo con citología de orina, imágenes, cistoscopia y / o consulta de urología. Ninguno de los 19 pacientes con hematuria microscópica tenían carcinoma urotelial. Durante el mismo período de estudio, 5 de 204 (2,4%) pacientes con síndrome de Lynch fueron diagnosticados con cáncer urotelial y todos presentaron presentando síntomas entre los intervalos de detección.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo y no todos los pacientes sometidos a la misma evaluación secundaria.CONCLUSIONES:No se detectaron carcinomas uroteliales mediante análisis de orina de detección en nuestra cohorte de pacientes asintomáticos con síndrome de Lynch. Las pruebas de falsos positivos. Condujeron a estudios exhaustivos y en su mayoría poco informativos. Si se desea continuar con la detección del cáncer de urotelio, es necesario identificar enfoques de detección más efectivos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B702.

Endoscopic Findings in Patients With PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome Undergoing Surveillance.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Phosphatase and tensin homolog hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) is an inherited disorder that increases the risk for cancer in multiple organ systems, including breast, endometrial, thyroid, and the gastrointestinal tract. Surveillance is recommended however there lacks data to describe the change in polyposis phenotype and cancer incidence over surveillance. Our aim is to describe the polyposis phenotype and cancer incidence in PHTS patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance. STUDY: PHTS patients, ages 17 through 89, who underwent at least 2 esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDs) or colonoscopies were identified. Number and sizes of polyps were noted, from which 5 categories were recreated. Incidence of colorectal and gastric cancer was evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included. Patients were clustered and classified into 1 of 5 categories: no polyps, few small polyps (<1 cm, < 10 polyps), few large polyps (≥1 cm, < 10 polyps), many small polyps (<1 cm, ≥10 polyps), many large polyps (≥1 cm, ≥10 polyps). There was no significant difference in polyp number or size on EGD (P=0.47 and 0.83, respectively) or colonoscopy (P=0.49 and 0.10, respectively) over the surveillance period (4.8±3.9 y for stomach and 5.6±4.4 y for colon). The average interval between endoscopies was 28±24 months for EGDs and 29±23 months for colonoscopies. A stage II transverse colon adenocarcinoma and stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma were identified. Standardized incidence rates for gastric and colon cancers were 5427 (P=0.0002) and 353 (P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PTHS individuals can be classified into polyposis phenotypes which do not change over an endoscopic surveillance period. Two cancers were associated with a large size polyp phenotype. Surveillance intervals should be determined by polyp size ≥1 cm and pathology.

Using chatbots to screen for heritable cancer syndromes in patients undergoing routine colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) syndromes account for 10% of colorectal cancers but remain underdiagnosed. This feasibility project tested the utility of an artificial intelligence-based chatbot deployed to patients scheduled for colonoscopy to identify HCRC risk factors, educate participants about HCRC and obtain consent to genetic testing as an extension of genetic counselling of appropriate subjects. Genetic counsellor (GC) and genetic counselling assistant (GCA) time spent per subject was also measured. METHODS: Patients scheduled for colonoscopy at Cleveland Clinic were invited via electronic medical record patient portal or letter prior to colonoscopy with a link to a chatbot administering the Colon Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (CCRAT) to screen for HCRC syndromes. Those with ≥1 positive response to a CCRAT question received chatbot-deployed genetic education and the option to receive genetic testing. An order for a 55-gene pan-cancer panel was placed for those consenting, and the subject had blood drawn on the day of colonoscopy. Results were disclosed by a GC or GCA by telephone. Subject demographics, progression through the chat, responses to CCRAT, personal and family history, genetic test results and communication with the subject were recorded. Descriptive statistics and two-tailed unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used. RESULTS: 506/4254 (11.9%) initiated and 487 (96.2%) completed the chat with the chatbot. 215 (44.1%) answered 'yes' to ≥1 CCRAT question and all completed pretest education. 129/181 (71.3%) subjects who consented completed testing, and 12 (9.3%) were found to have a germline pathogenic variant. Per subject, the GC spent a mean of 14.3 (SD 7.3) and the GCA a mean of 19.2 (SD 9.8) minutes. CONCLUSION: The use of a chatbot in this setting was a novel and feasible method, with the potential of increasing genetic screening and testing in individuals at risk of HCRC syndromes.

The Prevalence and Significance of Jejunal and Duodenal Bulb Polyposis After Duodenectomy in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, natural history, and severity of polyposis of the duodenal bulb and jejunum after duodenectomy in patients with FAP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Advanced duodenal polyposis stage in FAP requires consideration of duodenal resection to prevent cancer; pylorus-preserving approach of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) is preferred. Post-duodenectomy data indicate polyps occur in the duodenal bulb and the post-anastomotic jejunum, but limited data exists regarding their significance. METHODS: We identified consecutive FAP patients After duodenal resection, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, PSD, or segmental duodenectomy, at Cleveland Clinic. Medical records were used to determine time to diagnosis of duodenal bulb or jejunal polyps, length of follow up, and severity of polyposis including maximal Spigelman stage (SS) of jejunal polyposis (neo-SS). RESULTS: 64 patients with FAP underwent duodenectomy and endoscopic follow up. 28% underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 61% PSD, and 11% segmental duodenectomy. Postoperatively, 38/64 (59%) were diagnosed with jejunal polyposis, with median time to diagnosis of 55 months and follow up time of 127 months. Jejunal polyposis was advanced in 21% (neo- SS III or IV). Fifty percent were treated endoscopically, 1 patient required surgery. Jejunal polyp-free survival after duodenectomy differed by surgery type (P = 0.008). A total of 55/64 patients underwent a pylorus-preserving procedure, and 6/55 (11%) developed duodenal bulb polyps. All bulb polyps were large (>20 mm) and found after PSD. Endoscopic resection was unsuccessful in 5 patients, but no surgical intervention was required. CONCLUSIONS: Polyposis occurs in the remaining duodenal and jejunal mucosa in the majority of patients after surgical duodenectomy. Jejunal polyposis is advanced in 1 in 5 patients, but rarely requires surgery. Endoscopic management of jejunal polyposis seems feasible but has proven difficult for duodenal bulb polyps.

Risks, Benefits, and Effects on Management for Biopsy of the Papilla in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ampullary and duodenal cancer are the leading causes of death in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) after colectomy has been performed. Risk of duodenal cancer is determined based on Spigelman stage (SS) of duodenal polyposis. Guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of the duodenum and visualization of the papilla to stage duodenal polyposis. There is no consensus on whether biopsies should be routinely collected from duodenal papilla and findings included in SS. Additionally, there are no data on the risk of pancreatitis after biopsy collection from papilla of patients with FAP. We studied the incidence of pancreatitis after biopsy of the papilla in patients with FAP and effects of biopsy findings on SS. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with FAP at a single center from January 2011 through December 2018 with ≥1 endoscopy with biopsy of the papilla. Patients with history of foregut surgery were excluded. We identified 273 patients with FAP who had biopsies collected from papilla over 792 EGDs, with 1-8 independent exams with biopsy per patient. We collected demographic, endoscopic, and histology data from patients and calculated SS with vs without biopsy findings. Post-procedural pancreatitis was defined by 2 of the following: abdominal pain, lipase level 3-fold the upper limit of normal, or radiography findings consistent with pancreatitis within 7 days of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). RESULTS: Pancreatitis developed in 2 patients (0.73%): 1 after biopsy of a normal-appearing papilla and 1 after biopsy of an abnormal appearing papilla. Inclusions of biopsy data increased SS in 36 patients (13.2%), with consideration of prophylactic duodenectomy for 3.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatitis after biopsy of the duodenal papilla is rare. Histology data obtained from biopsy of the papilla in patients with FAP can change SS and affect patient management.

Association between baseline hyperplastic polyps and metachronous serrated lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Some data suggest that individuals with numerous, <10-mm, rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps (HPs) are at average risk for the development of metachronous advanced adenomatous neoplasia. Guidelines suggest that these individuals do not need surveillance colonoscopy and should be followed akin to individuals with a normal colonoscopy. Less is known of the risk of metachronous neoplasia because of ≥1 HPs <10 mm proximal to the sigmoid colon. We compared the risk of metachronous neoplasia between individuals with small HPs and those with normal colonoscopy, specifically addressing the impact of location and number of HPs on risk. METHODS: Colonoscopy and pathology reports from patients with ≥2 colonoscopies between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. Exclusions included inpatients; age <40 or >75 years; and family or personal history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, previous colorectal surgery, or a previous colonoscopy with any adenoma, sessile serrated lesion (SSL), or HP ≥10 mm. The risk of metachronous neoplasia, including adenomas and SSLs, was compared in individuals with a normal index colonoscopy and those with <10-mm HPs stratified by location and number of HPs. RESULTS: After exclusion, 1795 patients were included. At index colonoscopy, 82% (n = 1469) had a normal examination, 12% (219) had only 1, and 6% (107) had between 2 and 9 HPs <10 mm. Compared with patients with a normal index colonoscopy, patients with a proximal (odds ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-7.53) or distal HP (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.00) had an increased risk of metachronous SSLs but not adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with small proximal and distal HPs are at increased risk of metachronous SSLs. These preliminary findings warrant consideration during surveillance recommendations and future studies in larger cohorts.

Incidence and Management of Rectal Cuff and Anal Transitional Zone Neoplasia in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cuff and anal transitional zone neoplasia is an increasing challenge in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy. Its real incidence, range of severity, and treatment efficacy are poorly documented. OBJECTIVE: We sought to document the evolution of rectal cuff and anal transitional zone neoplasia and describe its management. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study collecting prospectively recorded data. SETTINGS: This study involved a hereditary colorectal cancer group in a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing primary restorative proctocolectomy at this institution were included. INTERVENTIONS: Surveillance pouchoscopy and treatment of rectal cuff/anal transitional zone neoplasia were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the presence and the severity of rectal cuff/anal transitional zone neoplasia. Excision by cautery, snare, mucosectomy, or redo pouch was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included: 52% were male (86/165) with a median age at restorative proctocolectomy of 31.0 years (SD 12.8). In 117 of 165, the proctocolectomy was their first operation and, in 48 of 165, it followed a colectomy. Of the patients, 83% (137/165) had stapled anastomosis; 17% had mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis; and 14% (23/165) were treated with sulindac at some point during their surveillance. Median follow-up was 10.1 years (interquartile range, 4.5-17.2) and the median number of pouchoscopies per patient was 4 (interquartile range, 2-8). Seventy-eight of 165 (47.3%) developed rectal cuff/anal transitional zone adenomas, more in the stapled group (52.3%; 72/137) than in the handsewn group (21.4%; 6/28; p < 0.005). Median time to adenoma was 4.5 years (interquartile range, 2.4-8.9). Three patients developed cancer under surveillance, and, in 3 other patients, cancers developed when screenings lapsed. Five patients developed symptomatic anal stenosis secondary to repeated surgeries (median, 9 procedures; range, 2-10). LIMITATIONS: There was no quality-of-life measurement in patients who developed rectal cuff/anal transitional zone neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cuff/anal transitional zone adenomas are more common than previously reported. Mild polyposis can be controlled endoscopically, but repeated procedures in a higher stage are associated with risk of anal stenosis. Compliance with surveillance is essential to avoid cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B594. INCIDENCIA Y TRATAMIENTO DE LA NEOPLASIA DEL REMANENTE RECTAL Y DE LA ZONA DE TRANSICIN ANAL EN PACIENTES CON POLIPOSIS ADENOMATOSA FAMILIAR: ANTECEDENTES:La neoplasia del remanente rectal y de la zona de transición anal presenta un desafío mayor en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar tratados con una proctocolectomía restaurativa. Su incidencia real, el espectro de la gravedad y la eficacia del tratamiento están mal documentados.OBJETIVO:Buscamos documentar la evolución de la neoplasia del remanente rectal y de la zona de transición anal y describir su tratamiento.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que recabó datos registrados prospectivamente.AMBITO:Un grupo con cáncer colorrectal hereditario de un importante centro médico académico.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes operados por primera vez de proctocolectomía restaurativa en nuestra institución.INTERVENCIONES:Endoscopía del pouch para vigilancia y tratamiento de la neoplasia del remanente rectal / zona de transición anal.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:La presencia y la gravedad de la neoplasia del remanente rectal / zona de transición anal. Resección con cauterio, asa, mucosectomía o rehacer el pouch.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 165 pacientes: 52% eran hombres (86/165) con una mediana de edad al momento de la proctocolectomía restaurativa de 31,0 años (DE 12,8). En 117/165 la proctocolectomía fue su primera cirugía y en 48/165 fue posterior a una colectomía. En 83% (137/165) tenía una anastomosis con engrapadora, 17% tenía mucosectomía y anastomosis con sutura manual (HS). El 14% de los pacientes (23/165) fueron tratados con sulindac en algún momento durante su vigilancia. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 10,1 años (IQR: 4,5, 17,2) y la mediana del número de endoscopías del pouch por paciente fue de 4. (IQR: 2, 8) 78/165 (47,3%) desarrollaron adenomas en la zona de transición anal /remanente rectal, mayor en el grupo con engrapadaora (52,3%; 72/137) comparado con el grupo con sutura manual (21,4%; 6/28) (p <0,005). La mediana del tiempo hasta el adenoma fue de 4,5 años (IQR: 2,4, 8,9). Tres pacientes que se encontraban en vigilancia desarrollaron cáncer y en 3, otros cánceres se desarrollaron transcurrida la vigilancia. 5 pacientes desarrollaron estenosis anal sintomática secundaria a múltiples cirugías (mediana de 9 procedimientos; rango 2-10).LIMITACIONES:Falta de medición de la calidad de vida en pacientes que desarrollaron neoplasia del remanente rectal / zona de transición anal.CONCLUSIONES:Los adenomas de la zona de transición anal / remanente rectal son más comunes de lo reportado anteriormente. La poliposis leve se puede tratar por endoscopía, pero procedimientos repetidos en estadíos mayores se asocian con el riesgo de estenosis anal. El apego a la vigilancia es fundamental para evitar el cáncer. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B594. (Traducción-Dr. Lisbeth Alarcon-Bernes).

Surveillance for pathology associated with cancer on endoscopy (SPACE): criteria to identify high-risk gastric polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric cancer is an extracolonic manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and is associated with high-risk gastric polyps. There are no known endoscopic criteria to identify these high-risk polyps. Our aim was to develop endoscopic criteria to identify high-risk polyps on endoscopy in FAP. METHODS: We prospectively collected 150 gastric polyps in consecutive patients undergoing surveillance EGD at the Cleveland Clinic. Pictures were taken of each polyp under narrow-band imaging and high-definition white light. In an exploratory phase, 5 endoscopists developed consensus criteria using the images to distinguish high-risk (pyloric gland adenoma, tubular adenoma, hyperplastic) from low-risk (fundic gland with low-grade or no dysplasia) polyps. In the assessment phase, endoscopists were blinded to polyp pathology and used the criteria to predict the individual polyp risk category. To measure diagnostic accuracy, we reported the mean sensitivity, specificity, and interrater agreement (κ). RESULTS: Consensus criteria were developed based on 16 low-risk and 9 high-risk polyps. The final 149 polyps consisted of 128 low-risk and 22 high-risk polyps (1 polyp was excluded from analysis). Using the criteria, the 5 endoscopists distinguished high- from low-risk polyps with a mean sensitivity and specificity of 79% (16.3%) and 78.8% (10.8%), respectively. The κ coefficient was .45, indicating moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: We developed endoscopic criteria to distinguish between high- and low-risk polyps associated with gastric cancer in FAP. The criteria provide guidance to endoscopists in targeting high-risk polyps while surveying the stomach of patients with proximal gastric polyposis.

Colonic Decompression Reduces Proximal Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction and Related Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic decompression is performed in inpatients for management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Evidence for its efficacy is limited to small descriptive studies published before the use of neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Furthermore, therapeutic end points were not defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the effectiveness of colonic decompression with standard medical therapy (supportive and pharmacologic therapy) to standard medical therapy alone. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, propensity-matched study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Inpatients with first diagnosis of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction between 2000 and 2016 were selected. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received colonic decompression as well as supportive and/or pharmacologic therapy. The control group did not receive colonic decompression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the resolution of overall colonic dilation on imaging 48 hours following colonic decompression or the initiation of standard medical therapy alone. Secondary outcomes included symptom improvement, colonic segment diameter percentage change, perforation, 30-day readmission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The standard medical therapy and colonic decompression groups included 61 and 83 patients. Of the patients who underwent colonic decompression, 47.7% had complete resolution of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction versus 19.9% of patients who underwent standard medical therapy (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mid or distal colon diameter reduction between groups. The 30-day readmission rate was 15.7% in the colonic decompression group versus 26.2% in the standard medical therapy group. No immediate adverse events were noted in either group. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 8.4% for the colonic decompression group and 14.8% in the standard medical therapy group. LIMITATIONS: The study was a retrospective review on a highly comorbid population. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic decompression is effective compared to standard medical therapy alone for proximal colonic dilation or symptoms associated with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. On segmental analysis, colonic decompression does not provide any additional benefit over standard medical therapy in improving transverse or distal colonic dilation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B32. LA DESCOMPRESIÓN COLÓNICA REDUCE LA PSEUDOOBSTRUCCIÓN COLÓNICA AGUDA PROXIMAL Y LOS SÍNTOMAS RELACIONADOS.: La descompresión colonica se realiza en pacientes hospitalizados para el tratamiento de la pseudoobstrucción colónica aguda. La evidencia de su eficacia se limita a pequeños estudios descriptivos antes del uso de neostigmina para la pseudoobstrucción colónica aguda. Además, los puntos finales terapéuticos no se definieron.El objetivo fue comparar la efectividad de la descompresión colónica mas el tratamiento médico estándar (tratamiento de apoyo y farmacológico) contra el tratamiento médico estándar solamente.Este es un estudio retrospectivo de propensión coincidente.El estudio se realizó en un centro de atención de tercer nivel.Pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de pseudoobstrucción colónica aguda entre 2000 y 2016.El grupo de intervención recibió descompresión colónica, así como tratamiento de apoyo o farmacológica. El grupo control no recibió descompresión colónica.La medida de resultado primaria fue la resolución de la dilatación colónica general en la imagen 48 horas después de la descompresión colónica o el inicio del tratamiento médico estándar solo. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron mejoría de los síntomas, cambio porcentual en el diámetro del segmento colónico, perforación, reingreso a los 30 días y mortalidad por cualquier causa.La terapia médica estándar y los grupos de descompresión colónica incluyeron 61 y 83 pacientes, respectivamente. El 47,7% de los pacientes con descompresión colónica tuvieron una resolución completa de la pseudoobstrucción colónica aguda frente al 19,9% de los pacientes con terapia médica estándar (p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias significativas en la reducción del diámetro del colon medio o distal entre los grupos. La tasa de reingreso a los 30 días fue del 15,7% en el grupo de descompresión colónica frente al 26,2% en el grupo de tratamiento médico estándar. No se observaron eventos adversos inmediatos en ninguno de los dos grupos. La mortalidad por cualquier causa a los 30 días fue del 8.4% para la descompresión del colon y del 14.8% en los grupos de terapia médica estándar.El estudio fue una revisión retrospectiva en una población altamente comórbida.La descompresión colónica es efectiva en comparación con el tratamiento médico estándar solo para la dilatación del colon proximal o los síntomas asociados con la pseudoobstrucción colónica aguda. En el análisis segmentario, la descompresión colónica no proporciona ningún beneficio adicional sobre el tratamiento médica estándar para mejorar la dilatación colónica transversal o distal. Vea el resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B32.

Endoscopic and histologic features associated with gastric cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric cancer (GC) is a newly described cancer risk in Western patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Little is known about clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic features associated with FAP-related GC. We compared these features in FAP patients with and without GC. METHODS: FAP patients were identified through the David G. Jagelman Inherited Colorectal Cancer Registries Cologene database. FAP patients with GC and randomly selected FAP patients without GC who had undergone at least 2 EGDs were analyzed. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic features were compared. RESULTS: Ten FAP patients with GC were identified, and 40 age-matched FAP control subjects were selected. No demographic differences were noted between patients and control subjects. All GC cases arose in the proximal stomach among gastric polyposis, with only 2 endoscopically visible. The prevalence of gastric polyposis was similar (100% vs 93%). Endoscopic features associated with GC included a carpeting of gastric polyps (100% vs 22.5%), solitary polyps >20 mm (100% vs 0%), and a polypoid mound of polyps (80% vs 0%; all P < .001). GC patients had a higher prevalence of gastric adenomas (30% vs 5%, P = .048) and polyps with high-grade dysplasia, including fundic gland polyps (50% vs 10%, P = .01) and pyloric gland adenomas (20% vs 0%, P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: We identified endoscopic features and advanced pathology present in the stomachs of Western patients with FAP who developed GC. Upper GI surveillance in FAP should include the stomach and awareness of features associated with GC. Optimal approaches to treatment of gastric polyposis and methods of identification of early GC precursors in FAP are needed.

Patient-Initiated Colonoscopy Scheduling Effectively Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We identified patients without medical record evidence of up-to-date colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and sent an invitation letter to self-schedule a colonoscopy without requiring prior primary care or gastroenterologist consultation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the response rate to the letter and factors associated with colonoscopy completion. METHODS: A computer algorithm invited patients not up to date with CRC screening, with an INR < 1.5, and living within 300 miles of the Cleveland Clinic main campus through a letter. Patients scheduled a colonoscopy through a dedicated phone line without any prior physician consultation. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were extracted from the EMR through natural language algorithms. We analyzed the percentage of patients who completed a colonoscopy within 6 months of sending the letter and factors associated with colonoscopy completion. RESULTS: A total of 145,717 letters were sent. 1451 patients were deceased and excluded from analysis. 3.8% (5442) of letter recipients completed a colonoscopy. The strongest factors associated with colonoscopy completion on multivariate analysis included family history of polyps (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.3, 4.2) or CRC (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7, 2.5). Other factors included younger age, male gender, married status, closer distance to endoscopy center, number of visits in the year prior, statin use, and diabetes. There were no immediate procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-initiated colonoscopy in response to letter invitation for CRC screening is effective and safe with safeguards established a priori. Consultation with a gastroenterologist or primary care physician is not necessary prior to colonoscopy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate patient-initiated colonoscopy for CRC cancer screening.