RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Mirvetuximab soravtansine may be a potentially effective therapeutic option for ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), but the prevalence of folate receptor alpha (FRα) overexpression in this tumor type is unknown. We sought to characterize FRα expression in LGSC and its association with clinical and molecular features. METHODS: FRα immunohistochemistry was performed on a tissue microarray comprised of 89 LGSCs and 42 ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs). Clinical tumor-normal panel-based sequencing was performed on 78 LGSCs. Associations between FRα-high status and clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Of 89 LGSCs, 36 (40%) were FRα-high (≥75% of viable tumor cells exhibiting moderate-to-strong membranous expression). Of 9 patients with LGSC and samples from different timepoints, 4 (44%) had discordant results, with conversion from FRα-negative to FRα-high in 3 (33%) cases. There was no association between FRα-high status with age, race, or progression-free/overall survival. A MAPK pathway genetic alteration, most commonly involving KRAS (n = 23), was present in 45 (58%) LGSCs. Those lacking MAPK pathway alterations were more likely to be FRα-high compared to MAPK-altered LGSCs (61% vs 20%, p < 0.001). In SBTs, FRα-high expression was associated with high-risk (micropapillary) histology and/or subsequent LGSC recurrence compared to conventional SBTs without malignant recurrence (53% vs 9%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies of FRα-directed therapy in patients with LGSC are warranted. Discordant FRα status at recurrence suggests potential benefit for retesting. A biomarker-driven approach to direct treatment selection in LGSC is recommended. As high FRα expression is more common amongst tumors lacking MAPK pathway genetic alterations, FRα testing to determine eligibility for mirvetuximab soravtansine therapy is particularly recommended for this subgroup.
Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso , Receptor 1 de Folato , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor 1 de Folato/genética , Receptor 1 de Folato/biosíntesis , Receptor 1 de Folato/metabolismo , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Clasificación del Tumor , Maitansina/análogos & derivados , Maitansina/uso terapéutico , Inmunohistoquímica , Anciano de 80 o más Años , InmunoconjugadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of molecular and pathologic factors with concurrent or recurrent ovarian disease to guide ovarian preservation in endometrioid endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients with endometrial cancer ≤50 years of age at diagnosis were grouped by elective oophorectomy versus ovarian preservation at staging (January 2010 to June 2021). Tumors were stratified by molecular sub-type and CTNNB1 mutational status with next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Germline data identified patients with Lynch syndrome. Associations between molecular/pathologic features and concurrent ovarian disease in patients electing oophorectomy were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. Associations with isolated ovarian recurrences in patients who chose ovarian preservation were examined using survival analyses. RESULTS: Among 317 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent bilateral oophorectomy, 27 (9%) had malignant ovarian tumors, of whom 11 (41%) had no gross ovarian involvement on intra-operative survey. For patients with sequencing, concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were diagnosed in 0/14 (0%) POLE, 2/48 (4%) copy number-low/no specific molecular profile, 10/22 (45%) microsatellite instability-high, and 3/6 (50%) copy number-high/TP53abnormal patients (p<0.001). Concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were present in 1/30 (3%) hotspot CTNNB1-mutated versus 10/60 (17%) wildtype/CTNNB1 non-hotspot mutated endometrial cancer patients (p=0.11) and 7/28 (25%) Lynch versus 7/74 (9%) non-Lynch syndrome patients (p=0.06). Concurrent malignant ovarian tumors were present in patients with higher grade endometrial cancer (5% grade 1 vs 20% grade 2 and 24% grade 3; p<0.001), present versus absent lymphovascular space invasion (20% vs 6%; p=0.004), positive versus negative pelvic washings (28% vs 7%; p=0.016), and ≥50% versus <50% myoinvasion (24% vs 7%; p=0.004). Of 103 patients who chose ovarian preservation, four had isolated ovarian recurrences (two had high-risk pathologic features and two had high-risk molecular features). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of molecular and pathologic data may improve risk stratification of pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer and enhance candidate selection for ovarian preservation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias Endometriales , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Endometrioide/genética , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirugía , Adulto , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Ovariectomía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , beta Catenina/genética , Selección de Paciente , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Low-grade serous carcinoma is a rare epithelial ovarian cancer subtype with distinct clinical, histologic, and molecular features. Improved understanding of this disease subtype has prompted recent advances in treatment options. Although low-grade serous carcinoma historically has been treated following a high-grade serous carcinoma paradigm, new data have called into question the utility of platinum retreatment, addressed the possibility of first-line hormonal treatment, and brought forth therapeutic options targeting the MAPK pathway and cyclin D kinase in low-grade tumors. Ongoing research efforts seek to leverage the unique features of low-grade serous carcinoma to refine treatment options for patients with this rare tumor subtype.
Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso , Neoplasias Ováricas , Nivel de Atención , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/terapia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/diagnóstico , Clasificación del Tumor , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Terapia Molecular DirigidaRESUMEN
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer was initially described as a distinct type of rare epithelial ovarian cancer 20 years ago; however, only recently have physicians begun to leverage the understanding of the clinical behavior and molecular profile of this disease for treatment. The use of routine next-generation sequencing has allowed a deeper understanding of the molecular drivers of this disease and shown how molecular alterations in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway genes such as KRAS and BRAF can affect overall prognosis and disease behavior. The use of targeted therapies, including MEK inhibitors, BRAF kinase inhibitors, and other investigational targeted therapies are changing the way this disease is viewed and treated. In addition, endocrine therapy can provide prolonged disease stability with generally mild toxicity, as well as promising response rates in recent studies examining combination therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the upfront and recurrent setting. Once seen merely as a chemo-resistant form of ovarian cancer, recent studies have worked to harness the unique features of low-grade serous ovarian cancer to provide individualized treatment options for patients with this disease.
Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/genética , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , MutaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data on platinum sensitivity of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) in the upfront setting is lacking, and there is limited and contradictory information on chemotherapy responses in recurrent disease. METHODS: Patients with LGSOC seen at a comprehensive cancer center from January 1, 1998 to September 30, 2021 were identified from institutional databases. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and to second- to fifth-line regimens was retrospectively characterized by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Wilcoxon rank-sum and two-tailed Fisher exact tests were employed. RESULTS: Of 50 patients, 12 received platinum doublets for suboptimal residual disease and 11 as NACT. Of 12 patients with suboptimal residual disease, seven (58%) achieved objective responses (five partial responses [PRs] and two complete responses); of the 11 patients who underwent NACT, one (9%) achieved a PR (p = .027). The 15 remaining patients had stable disease on first-line platinum chemotherapy. Of 44 patients who recurred, 20 had RECIST-evaluable responses to second-line and 27 to third-line chemotherapy. Objective response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy were 22% (two of nine) in the second line and 10% (one of 10) in the third. In second and third lines, highest response rates were observed with nonplatinum chemotherapy with bevacizumab, at 100% (two of two) and 30% (three of 10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Primary platinum-based chemotherapy has moderate activity in LGSOC and minimal activity in the recurrent setting, suggesting standard definitions of platinum sensitivity may not apply in LGSOC. In the second and third lines, nonplatinum chemotherapy/bevacizumab elicited the highest response rates.
Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who underwent secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCS) after up-front treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS). METHODS: Patients with high-grade EOC who underwent SCS from 2/1/2004-10/31/2021 were classified by up-front treatment. Clinical and treatment characteristics were compared between cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) following SCS were compared using a Cox model adjusted for stage, age at SCS, and number of years between end of chemotherapy and SCS. RESULTS: Of 374 patients, 62 (17%) underwent NACT-IDS and 312 (83%) PDS. Justification for NACT was disease extent (n = 57, 92%), comorbidities (n = 3, 5%), and thromboembolism (n = 2, 3%). The NACT-IDS cohort had a higher median age at SCS (64 years [IQR: 56-70] vs 59 years [IQR: 53-66]; P = .03), higher proportion of stage III/IV disease (100% vs 81%; P < .001), and shorter median interval between end of chemotherapy and SCS (1.5 years [IQR: 1.1-2.3] vs 1.9 years [IQR: 1.3-3.1]; P = .01). Achievement of complete gross resection at SCS did not differ between NACT-IDS and PDS (84% vs 88%; P = .18). PFS2 (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.83-1.71) and OS2 (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.57-1.63) did not vary by primary treatment modality after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more extensive disease at presentation, patients with high-grade EOC who recur after NACT-IDS seem to have similar surgical and survival outcomes after SCS compared to patients who recur after PDS, suggesting that prior NACT-IDS should not preclude SCS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We previously developed preoperative and pre-chemotherapy modified versions of the male International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic model and assessed it in female patients with germ cell tumors (GCTs). We sought to validate these modified IGCCCG (mIGCCCG) models in a new cohort. METHODS: We queried institutional databases for female patients with GCTs treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1/1/1990-6/1/2020. The mIGCCCG model classifies patients with non-dysgerminomas as good, intermediate, or poor risk based on tumor markers using male IGCCCG cutoffs and absence/presence of non-pulmonary/peritoneal visceral metastasis. In dysgerminomas, good- and intermediate-risk groups are defined by absence/presence of non-pulmonary/peritoneal visceral metastasis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for each group in the validation and combined original and validation cohorts. Associations between individual clinical factors and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 183 female patients with GCTs, clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar between the original (n = 93) and validation (n = 90) cohorts. In multivariable models, higher stage, older age, and non-dysgerminoma histology predicted worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Among 162 patients who received chemotherapy, preoperative and pre-chemotherapy mIGCCCG models were significantly associated with PFS and OS (p < 0.001 for all groups). With the preoperative model, 3-year PFS rates were 94%, 76%, and 50% in the good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, respectively; OS rates were 96%, 86%, and 52%, respectively. Even within stage groups, mIGCCCG risk classifications were associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A female-specific mIGCCCG risk model effectively stratifies patients and should be incorporated into clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Disgerminoma , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of the oral androgen receptor antagonist enzalutamide in patients with previously treated, recurrent, AR-positive (AR+) ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was a single-institution phase II study of patients with AR+ ovarian cancer with measurable disease with 1-3 prior lines of chemotherapy; patients were screened for enrollment from 11/2013-7/2018. Following consent, archival tissue was evaluated for AR+. Enrolled patients received daily enzalutamide 160 mg until progression of disease or treatment discontinuation. Adverse events were graded by CTCAE v4.0. Co-primary endpoints were 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: During the study period, 160 patients were screened and 59 (45 high-grade serous [HGS] and 14 low-grade serous [LGS]) consented to treatment on study. There was 1 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed partial response. The ORR was 1.7% (90% CI: 0.2-100%). The overall PFS6 rate (as binary) was 22% (90% CI: 15.1-100%). The 6-month PFS rate (as time to event) was 19.8% for HGS patients (90% CI: 12.7-100%) and 38.5% (90% CI: 21.7%-100%) for LGS patients. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 6 patients (one toxicity (Grade 3 rash) was considered a dose-limiting toxicity). One patient died of cardiac arrest after 42 days on treatment of a cardiac arrest not attributed to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary endpoint, with a PFS6 rate of 22% (n = 13); however, the overall response rate was low. Enzalutamide was well tolerated and may be a potential treatment option in select patients.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidad , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , New York , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Receptores Androgénicos/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The cost of cancer care is high and rising. Evidence of increased patient cost burden is prevalent in the medical literature and has been defined as "financial toxicity," the financial hardship and financial concerns experienced by patients because of a disease and its related treatments. With targeted therapies and growing out-of-pocket costs, patient financial toxicity is a growing concern among patients with gynecologic cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of financial toxicity and identify its risk factors in patients with gynecologic cancer treated at a large cancer center using objective data. STUDY DESIGN: Using institutional databases, we identified patients with gynecologic cancer treated from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients with a preinvasive disease were excluded. Financial toxicity was defined according to institutionally derived metrics as the presence of ≥1 of the following: ≥2 bills sent to collections, application or granting of a payment plan, settlement, bankruptcy, financial assistance program enrollment, or a finance-related social work visit. Clinical characteristics were gathered using a 2-year look-back from the time of the first financial toxicity event or a randomly selected treatment date for those not experiencing toxicity. Risk factors were assessed using chi-squared tests. All significant variables on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of the 4655 patients included in the analysis, 1155 (25%) experienced financial toxicity. In the univariate analysis, cervical cancer (35%), stage 3 or 4 disease (24% and 30%, respectively), younger age (35% for age <30 years), nonpartnered marital status (31%), Black (45%) or Hispanic (37%) race and ethnicity, self-pay (48%) or commercial insurance (30%), clinical trial participation (31%), more imaging studies (39% for ≥9), ≥1 emergency department visit (36%), longer inpatient stays (36% for ≥20 days), and more outpatient clinician visits (41% for ≥20 visits) were significantly associated with financial toxicity (P<.01). In multivariate analysis, younger age, nonpartnered marital status, Black and Hispanic race and ethnicity, commercial insurance, more imaging studies, and more outpatient physician visits were significantly associated with financial toxicity. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is an increasing problem for patients with gynecologic cancer. Our analysis, using objective measures of financial toxicity, has suggested that demographic factors and healthcare utilization metrics may be used to proactively identify at-risk patients for financial toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Estrés Financiero , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Adulto , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In 2018, evidence-based surgical guidelines were introduced to identify appropriate patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer for ovarian conservation. We sought to identify trends and demographic shifts associated with guideline implementation. METHODS: We identified women treated for endometrioid endometrial cancer at our institution from January 2010 to June 2021. Eligibility criteria included age ≤50 years, normal-appearing ovaries on preoperative imaging, no family history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome or Lynch syndrome, and no hormone receptor-positive malignancy. Trends in ovarian conservation were examined with the Cochran-Armitage trend test or in a logistic regression model. Associations between ovarian conservation and clinicodemographic factors before and after guideline implementation were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 420 women ≤50 years of age undergoing surgery for endometrioid endometrial cancer, 355 (85%) met the criteria for ovarian conservation-267 (75%) before and 88 (25%) after guideline implementation. Median patient age was 45 years (range 25-50); 62% were non-Hispanic White, 10% Hispanic White, 8% non-Hispanic Black, 0% Hispanic Black, and 20% Asian. Patients were significantly more likely to choose ovarian conservation after (48%) compared with before guideline implementation (21%) (p<0.001). Pre-guidelines, non-Hispanic White women were less likely to elect for ovarian conservation (12%) compared with non-Hispanic Black, Asian, or Hispanic White women (28%) (p=0.002). Similarly, older women were less likely to elect for ovarian conservation compared with younger women (p<0.001). There were no differences by obesity (p=0.68), marital status (p=0.86), or insurance (p=0.89). Post-guidelines, there were no differences in ovarian conservation between non-Hispanic White women (36%) and non-Hispanic Black, Asian, or Hispanic White women (50%) (p=0.56). Older women were still less likely to elect for ovarian conservationcompared with younger women (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After guideline implementation, ovarian conservation increased and uptake disparities across demographic groups decreased.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer with miliary disease spread is an aggressive phenotype lacking targeted management strategies. We sought to determine whether adjuvant intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy is beneficial in this disease setting. METHODS: Patient/tumor characteristics and survival data of patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent optimal primary debulking surgery from 01/2010 to 11/2014 were abstracted from records. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival curves, and outcomes were compared using log-rank tests. Factors significant on univariate analysis were combined into multivariate logistic regression survival models. RESULTS: Among 90 patients with miliary disease spread, 41 (46%) received IV/IP chemotherapy and 49 (54%) received IV chemotherapy. IV/IP chemotherapy, compared with IV chemotherapy, resulted in improved progression-free survival (PFS; 23.0 versus 12.0 months; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS; 52 versus 36 months; p = 0.002) in patients with miliary disease. Among 78 patients with nonmiliary disease spread, 23 (29%) underwent IV/IP chemotherapy and 55 (71%) underwent IV chemotherapy. There was no PFS or OS benefit associated with IV/IP chemotherapy over IV chemotherapy in these patients. On multivariate analysis, IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.15-0.53) and OS (HR, 0.33; 95% CI 0.18-0.61) in patients with miliary disease compared with those with nonmiliary disease (PFS [HR, 1.53; 95% CI 0.74-3.19]; OS [HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.70-3.09]). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with oncologic benefit in miliary disease spread. This survival benefit was not observed in nonmiliary disease.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Ováricas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe clinicopathologic and surgical factors associated with oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing tertiary cytoreduction and to present a clinical model to identify patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) who may benefit most from tertiary cytoreduction. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent tertiary cytoreduction at our institution from 1/1/1990-1/1/2019. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and compared using the log-rank test. Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to detect variables associated with survival. RESULTS: Of 114 patients who met inclusion criteria, 79 (69.2%) had high-grade serous tumors. Of patients with available genetic testing (n = 66), 22 (33%) harbored germline or somatic BRCA mutations. Fifty-eight women (50.9%) died of disease. Complete gross resection (CGR) at tertiary cytoreduction, treatment-free interval (TFI), and platinum sensitivity were all significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) and maintained significance on multivariate analysis (HR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.59-8.70; HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.85; and HR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.22-7.07, respectively). Postoperative treatment was not associated with a survival difference. Patients with HGSOC and a single site of recurrence who were ≥2 years from secondary cytoreduction had the longest survival after tertiary cytoreduction (median DSS, 79.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Proper patient selection for tertiary cytoreduction is essential. Those who achieve CGR likely derive the greatest benefit from tertiary surgery. Platinum sensitivity and prolonged TFI are also associated with improved DSS. Patients with HGSOC and single-site recurrence who were ≥2 years out from secondary cytoreduction had the longest DSS.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Somatic PTEN alterations are common in endometrial carcinoma (EC), but in rare cases PTEN mutations are associated with inherited syndromes. Here, we present a case of Cowden syndrome-associated EC. We discuss clinical, pathologic and molecular features of her tumor and PTEN-mutated EC, inherited syndromes predisposing to EC and PTEN-targeted therapies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Síndrome de Hamartoma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mutación , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/genética , Adulto , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/antagonistas & inhibidores , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/fisiología , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/fisiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) disproportionately benefits obese patients. METHODS: Data were collected from stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients treated between 01/2010-07/2015. We performed univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses with post-operative infection, readmission, any postoperative complication, and time to chemotherapy as outcomes. An interaction term was included in models, to determine if the effect of NACT on post-operative complications was influenced by obesity status. RESULTS: Of 507 patients, 115 (22.6%) were obese and 392 (77.3%) were non-obese (obese defined as BMI ≥30). Among obese patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs. NACT, rates of postoperative infection were 42.9% vs. 30.8% (p = 0.12), 30-day readmission 30.2% vs. 11.5% (p < 0.02), and any post-operative complication were 44.4% vs 30.8% (p = 0.133). Among non-obese patients undergoing PDS vs. NACT, rates of post-operative infection were 20.0% vs. 12.9% (p = 0.057), 30-day readmission 16.9% vs. 9.2% (p = 0.02), and any post-operative complication were 19.4% vs 28% (p = 0.044). Obesity was associated with post-operative infection (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.22-4.33), 30-day readmission/reoperation (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.08-3.21) and the development of any post-operative complication (OR 2.1; CI 1.13-3.74). However, there was not a significant interaction between obesity and NACT in any of the models predicting post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to use NACT should not be predicated on obesity alone, as the reduction in post-operative complications in obese patients is similar to non-obese patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Obesidad/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ovario/patología , Ovario/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) is a health care utilization database from publicly insured individuals that has been used for studies of drug safety in pregnancy. Claims-based algorithms for defining many important maternal and neonatal outcomes have not been validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate claims-based algorithms for identifying selected pregnancy outcomes in MAX using hospital medical records. METHODS: The medical records of mothers who delivered between 2000 and 2010 within a single large healthcare system were linked to their claims in MAX. Claims-based algorithms for placental abruption, preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, small for gestational age, and noncardiac congenital malformation were defined. Fifty randomly sampled cases for each outcome identified using these algorithms were selected, and their medical records were independently reviewed by two physicians to confirm the presence of the diagnosis of interest; disagreements were resolved by a third physician reviewer. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the claims-based algorithms were calculated using medical records as the gold standard. RESULTS: The linked cohort included 10,899 live-birth pregnancies. The PPV was 92% (95% CI, 82%-97%) for placental abruption, 82% (95% CI, 70%-91%) for preeclampsia, 74% (95% CI, 61%-85%) for postpartum hemorrhage, 92% (95% CI, 82%-97%) for small for gestational age, and 86% (95% CI, 74%-94%) for noncardiac congenital malformation. CONCLUSIONS: Across the perinatal outcomes considered, PPVs ranged between 74% and 92%. These PPVs can inform bias analyses that correct for outcome misclassification.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Medicaid/tendencias , Atención Perinatal/tendencias , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to review trends in colposcopy rates and diagnoses of high-grade dysplasia and cancer for the past 10 years at an academic colposcopy clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A registry of patients seen January 2008 to December 2018 at an academic colposcopy clinic was queried to examine trends in patient characteristics, cytology and histology results, and interventions during the study period, which coincided with the implementation of revised national guidelines. Differences in characteristics were examined with analysis of variance and χ tests. Trends in diagnoses were examined with logistic regression. Trends in interventions were modeled with binomial distribution, logit link, Poisson distribution, and log link. RESULTS: Among 5,103 women referred for abnormal pap testing, human papillomavirus, or dysplasia, the mean age increased over time (30.6 in 2008 to 38.4 in 2018, p < .0001) and fewer pregnant patients were served (11.3% in 2008 vs 2.8% in 2018, p < .0001). There were decreased rates of low-grade cytology (81.3% in 2008 vs 73.6% in 2018, p = .006) and increased rates of human papillomavirus positivity (4.1% in 2008 vs. 14.4% in 2018, p < .0001) on referral. Fewer colposcopies were performed per patient per year (1.2 in 2008 vs. 0.7 in 2018, p < .0001), and with this targeted intervention, there was an increased percentage of patients diagnosed with high-grade histology over time (adjusted p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over time, the number of colposcopies performed per patient decreased, especially in younger and pregnant women. Meanwhile, the percentage of patients diagnosed with high-grade histology increased, suggesting that guidelines decreased unnecessary procedures while increasing the percentage of patients diagnosed with precancerous lesions.
Asunto(s)
Colposcopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Boston/epidemiología , Demografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) affects infection, thrombosis, or survival rates in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS). METHODS: Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcome data were abstracted from records of stage IIIC-IV EOC patients managed with NACT-IDS from 01/2010-07/2015. Associations of PRBCT with morbidity and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 270 patients, 136 (50.4%) received PRBCT. Patients with preoperative anemia and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) were more likely to undergo PRBCT (OR,95%CI 1.80, 1.02-3.17) and (OR,95%CI 1.00, 1.002-1.004), respectively. There were no significant differences in PRBCT based on patient age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or stage. When compared to low complexity operations, patients with moderate and high complexity surgeries were more likely to receive PRBCT (OR,95%CI 1.81, 1.05-3.09) and (OR,95%CI 2.25, 1.13-4.50), respectively. On univariate analysis, PRBCT was associated with intraabdominal infection (OR,95%CI 8.31, 1.03-67.41), but not wound complications (OR,95%CI 1.57, 0.76-3.23) or venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE) (OR,95%CI 2.02, 0.49-8.23). After adjusting for surgical complexity and preoperative anemia, PRBCT was not independently associated with intraabdominal infection (OR,95%CI 7.66, 0.92-63.66), wound complications (OR,95%CI 1.70, 0.80-3.64), or VTE/PE (OR,95%CI 2.15, 0.51-9.09). When comparing patients undergoing PRBCT versus those who did not, there were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS) or median overall survival (OS) on univariate analysis after adjusting for age, stage and residual disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing NACT-IDS, intraabdominal infection, wound complication and VTE/PE rates are similar, regardless of PRBCT. PRBCT does not impact PFS or OS.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/sangre , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Embolia Pulmonar/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection affords the best prognosis at the time of interval debulking surgery. When complete surgical resection is unachievable, optimal residual disease is considered the next best alternative. Despite contradicting evidence on the survival benefit of interval debulking surgery if macroscopic residual disease remains, the current definition of "optimal" in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery is defined as largest diameter of disease measuring ≤1.0 cm, independent of the total volume of disease. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between volume and anatomic distribution of residual disease and oncologic outcomes among patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy then interval debulking surgery. For patients who did not undergo a complete surgical resection, a surrogate for volume of residual disease was used to assess oncologic outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patient demographics, operative characteristics, anatomic site of residual disease, and outcome data were collected from medical records of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery from January 2010 to July 2015. Among patients who did not undergo complete surgical resection but had ≤1 cm of residual disease, the number of anatomic sites (single location vs multiple locations) with residual disease was used as a surrogate for volume of residual disease. The effect of residual disease volume on progression-free survival and overall survival was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 270 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, 173 (64.1%) had complete surgical resection, 34 (12.6%) had ≤1 cm of residual disease in a single anatomic location, 47 (17.4%) had ≤1 cm of residual disease in multiple anatomic locations, and 16 (5.9%) were suboptimally debulked. Median progression-free survival for each group was 14, 12, 10, and 6 months, respectively (P<.001). Median overall survival for each group was: 58, 37, 26, and 33 months, respectively (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Following interval debulking surgery, patients with complete surgical resection have the best prognosis, followed by patients with ≤1 cm single-anatomic location disease. In contrast, despite being considered "optimally debulked," patients with ≤1 cm multiple-anatomic location disease have a survival similar to suboptimally debulked patients.