RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients who become clinically node-negative (cN0) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after lymphatic mapping with lymphoscintigraphy is not widely accepted; therefore, it has become a topic of international debate. OBJECTIVE: Our literature review aims to evaluate the current use of this surgical practice in a clinical setting and focuses on several studies published in the last six years which have contributed to the assessment of the feasibility and accuracy of this practice, highlighting its importance and oncological safety. We have considered the advantages and disadvantages of this technique compared to other suggested methods and strategies. We also evaluated the role of local irradiation therapy after SLNB and state-of-the-art SLN mapping in patients subjected to NACT. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Cochrane was conducted. All studies published in English from 2018 to August 2023 were evaluated. RESULTS: Breast units are moving towards a de-escalation of axillary surgery, even in the NACT setting. The effects of these procedures on local irradiation are not very clear. Several studies have evaluated the oncological outcome of SLNB procedures. However, none of the alternative techniques proposed to lower the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB are significant in terms of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we can state that lymphatic mapping with SLNB in cN+ BC patients who become clinically node-negative (ycN0) following NACT is a safe procedure, with a good prognosis and low axillary failure rates.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Femenino , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Terapia Neoadyuvante , PronósticoRESUMEN
Lymphoscintigraphy represents the "gold standard" for diagnosis of lymphedema, but an important limitation is the lack of procedural standardization. The aim of this Italian expert panel was to provide a procedural standard for lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphatic system disorders. Topic anaesthetic gels containing lidocaine should be avoided. Patients should remove compressive dressings. Total recommended activity for 99mTc-nanocolloid administration in adults is 74MBq, or 37MBq per limb and per investigated compartment, in single or multiple aliquots. 2-3 subcutaneous injections should be performed (II-III±I interdigital space of each hand/foot), avoiding intravascular injection. Deep lymphatic system of lower limbs should be evaluated in presence of dermal back-flow or lymphatic stasis (1-2 subfascial administrations in retro-malleolar or plantar region). Planar images should be acquired from injection site to liver with whole-body or serial static acquisitions 20' and 90' after subcutaneous administration. Additional information on lymphatic pathways is obtained after a quick and/or prolonged exercise protocol. SPECT/CT is recommended to study the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic territories. When required, deep lymphatic system of lower limbs should be evaluated with static acquisition 90' after subfascial administration. The report should describe administration and imaging procedure, exercise protocol, qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis (wash-out rate, transport index), potential sources of error. Due to the essential role fulfilled by lymphoscintigraphy in clinical management of primary and secondary lymphedema, an effort for the standardization of this technique should be made to provide the clinicians with a homogeneous and reliable technical methodology.