Contribution of PCR to Differential Diagnosis between Patients with Whipple Disease and Tropheryma whipplei Carriers.

Differentiation between Whipple disease (WD) patients and patients carrying Tropheryma whipplei but suffering from disease other than WD ("carriers") remains complex. We aimed to evaluate T. whipplei PCR among patients with WD and carriers in a large cohort at our referral clinical microbiology laboratory. This is an observational retrospective cohort study, including all patients between 2008 and 2020 with at least one positive result for T. whipplei using the real-time PCR RealCycler TRWH-UX kit. A total of 233 patients were included: 197 were considered carriers, and 36 had WD. Among the WD patients, 32 underwent biopsies, of which 18 (56%) had a positive periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. Among the 27 duodenal biopsy specimens, 13 (48%) were PAS positive. PCR results before antibiotic treatment were positive in both feces and saliva in 16/21 WD (76%) patients and 68/197 (35%) carriers (P < 0.001). Duodenal biopsy specimens yielded positive PCR in 20/22 (91%) WD patients and 27/72 (38%) carriers (P < 0.001). The cycle threshold (CT) value detected in duodenal biopsy specimens from WD patients was significantly lower than that of carriers (P < 0.001), regardless of the PAS staining results. For a diagnosis of WD, duodenal PCR sensitivity and specificity at a CT value below 30 were 52.4% and >99.9%, respectively. The high specificity of duodenal PCR with low CT values may help confirming the diagnosis of WD, especially in patients with negative PAS results in digestive biopsy specimens, who represent half of all patients. A low PCR CT value from a duodenal biopsy specimen provides valuable guidance, especially in patients with PAS-negative results.

Performance of clinical metagenomics in France: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) allows untargeted identification of a broad range of pathogens, including rare or novel microorganisms. Despite the recognition of mNGS as a valuable diagnostic tool for infections, the most relevant indications for this innovative strategy remain poorly defined. We aimed to assess the determinants of positivity and clinical utility of mNGS. METHODS: In this observational study, we prospectively performed short-read shotgun metagenomics analysis as a second-line test (in cases of negative first-line test or when the symptoms were not fully explained by initial positive results) or as a first-line test in life-threatening situations requiring urgent non-targeted pathogen identification at the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital (Paris, France). All sample types, clinical indications, and patient populations were included. Samples were accompanied by a mandatory form completed by the senior clinician or pathologist, on which the clinical level of suspected infection (defined as high or low) was indicated. We assessed the variables (gender, age, immune status, initial suspicion of infection, indication, and sample type) associated with mNGS pathogen detection using odds ratios (ORs) from multivariate logistic regression. Additional investigations were carried out using specific PCR or culture techniques, to confirm positive mNGS results, or when infectious suspicion was particularly high despite a negative mNGS result. FINDINGS: Between Oct 29, 2019, and Nov 7, 2022, we analysed 742 samples collected from 523 patients. The initial suspicion of infection was either high (n=470, 63%) or low (n=272, 37%). Causative or possibly causative pathogens were detected in 117 (25%) samples from patients with high initial suspicion of infection, versus nine (3%) samples analysed to rule out infection (OR 9·1, 95% CI 4·6-20·4; p<0·0001). We showed that mNGS had higher odds of detecting a causative or possibly causative pathogenic virus on CNS biopsies than CSF samples (4·1, 1·7-10·7; p=0·0025) and in samples from immunodeficient compared with immunocompetent individuals (2·4, 1·4-4·1; p=0·0013). Concordance with conventional confirmatory tests results was 103 (97%) of 106, when mNGS detected causative or possibly causative pathogens. Altogether, among 231 samples investigated by both mNGS and subsequent specific tests, discordant results were found in 69 (30%) samples, of which 58 (84%) were mNGS positive and specific tests negative, and 11 (16%) mNGS negative and specific tests positive. INTERPRETATION: Major determinants of pathogen detection by mNGS are immune status and initial level of suspicion of infection. These findings will contribute, along with future studies, to refining the positioning of mNGS in diagnostic and treatment decision-making algorithms. FUNDING: Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital and Institut Pasteur. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.