Intra-Patient Genomic Variations of Human Papillomavirus Type 31 in Cervical Cancer and Precancer.

Human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31) is detected less frequently in cervical cancer than two major causative types, HPV16 and HPV18. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of HPV31 genome sequences in cervical lesions collected from Japanese women. Of 52 HPV31-positive cervical specimens analyzed by deep sequencing, 43 samples yielded complete genome sequences of around 7900 base pairs and 9 samples yielded partially deleted genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis showed that HPV31 variant distribution was lineage A in 19 samples (36.5%), lineage B in 28 samples (53.8%), and lineage C in 5 samples (9.6%), indicating that lineage B variants are dominant among HPV31 infections in Japan. Deletions in the viral genome were found in the region from the E1 to L1 genes, but all the deleted genomes retained the E6/E7 genes. Among intra-patient nucleotide variations relative to a consensus genome sequence in each sample, C-to-T substitutions were most frequently detected, followed by T-to-C and C-to-A substitutions. High-frequency, intra-patient mutations (>10%) in cervical cancer samples were found in the E1, E2, and E7 genes, and all of them were nonsynonymous substitutions. The enrichment of high-frequency nonsynonymous substitutions strongly suggests that these intra-patient mutations are positively selected during the development of cervical cancer/precancer.

Transcription Factor Homeobox D9 Drives the Malignant Phenotype of HPV18-Positive Cervical Cancer Cells via Binding to the Viral Early Promoter.

Persistent infections with two types of human papillomaviruses (HPV), HPV16 and HPV18, are the most common cause of cervical cancer (CC). Two viral early genes, E6 and E7, are associated with tumor development, and expressions of E6 and E7 are primarily regulated by a single viral promoter: P97 in HPV16 and P105 in HPV18. We previously demonstrated that the homeobox D9 (HOXD9) transcription factor is responsible for the malignancy of HPV16-positive CC cell lines via binding to the P97 promoter. Here, we investigated whether HOXD9 is also involved in the regulation of the P105 promoter using two HPV18-positive CC cell lines, SKG-I and HeLa. Following the HOXD9 knockdown, cell viability was significantly reduced, and E6 expression was suppressed and was accompanied by increased protein levels of P53, while mRNA levels of TP53 did not change. E7 expression was also downregulated and, while mRNA levels of RB1 and E2F were unchanged, mRNA levels of E2F-target genes, MCM2 and PCNA, were decreased, which indicates that the HOXD9 knockdown downregulates E7 expression, thus leading to an inactivation of E2F and the cell-cycle arrest. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and promoter reporter assays confirmed that HOXD9 is directly associated with the P105 promoter. Collectively, our results reveal that HOXD9 drives the HPV18 early promoter activity to promote proliferation and immortalization of the CC cells.

Relationship between clinical markers of glycemia and glucose excursion evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

In order to evaluate the relationship between clinical markers of glycemia and glucose excursion, we performed 48-hour continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in 43 diabetic patients. For the clinical markers, HbA(1c), glycoalbumin (GA), and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) were measured, and for the parameters of glucose excursion from CGM, average glucose (AG), standard deviation of glucose (SD), the area under the curve for glucose levels >180 mg/dL (AUC(>180)), and the difference between the maximum and minimum glucose levels during 48 hours (DeltaG(48hr)) were analyzed. All patients were treated without any changes of the dosages of oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin for at least the previous 3 months with coefficient of variation (CV) of HbA(1c) less than 4 %. In results, while HbA(1c) did not show any single correlation with AG, SD, AUC(>180), or DeltaG(48hr), both GA and 1,5-AG were significantly related to all these parameters. Furthermore, GA significantly correlated to all CGM parameters, and SD significantly correlated to GA in multiple regression analyses. These results suggest that GA may be a different marker from HbA(1c) for diabetic complications, because GA, but not HbA(1c), may reflect not only short-term average glucose but also fluctuation of glucose.

No ghrelin response to oral glucose in diabetes mellitus with gastroparesis.

To investigate the role of ghrelin, an endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, in diabetic gastroparesis, we evaluated the plasma ghrelin profile during the oral glucose tolerance test in 55 patients with diabetes (men/women: 36/19, mean +/- SE of age: 55.1 +/- 1.7 years) with or without gastroparesis (diagnosed by the (13)C-acetate breath test). We also further examined cardiac autonomic neuropathy by assessing 24-hour variation of the R-R interval in randomly selected 32 patients with diabetes (men/women: 23/9, mean +/- SE of age: 54.2 +/- 2.5 years), and evaluated the influence of autonomic neuropathy on ghrelin. The fasting plasma ghrelin level was significantly lower in diabetes mellitus with gastroparesis than in healthy controls (7.9 +/- 0.7 fmol/ml versus 16.6 +/- 5.3 fmol/ml, p = 0.006). Patients with diabetes with gastroparesis showed no decrease of plasma ghrelin after glucose loading, unlike patients without gastroparesis or healthy controls. Diabetes mellitus with autonomic neuropathy, but not those without it, also showed no decrease of plasma ghrelin after glucose loading. Diabetic gastroparesis may be related to ghrelin-associated neurohormonal abnormalities, but the pathophysiological meaning of this abnormal ghrelin response needs further clarification.

Efficacy of low-dose rosuvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypo high-density lipoprotein cholesterolaemia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy of low-dose rosuvastatin for treating hypo high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterolaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia. METHODS: Patients with HDL-cholesterol (C) < 40 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) < 400 mg/dl who were receiving treatment with lipid-lowering drugs other than rosuvastatin (or previously untreated with lipid-lowering drugs) and with low-density lipoprotein [LDL]-C ≥ 120 mg/dl were included. Patients were treated with 2.5 or 5 mg rosuvastatin orally, once daily, to achieve the target LDL-C level specified in Japanese guidelines. Changes in total cholesterol, HDL-C, TG, LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and non-HDL-C at 3 and 6 months were prospectively analysed. Safety was evaluated by examining changes in hepatorenal function, glucose metabolism and creatine kinase. RESULTS: Out of 49 patients, all lipid parameters other than TG were significantly improved at 3 and 6 months. At 3 months, 83.3% of patients had achieved the target LDL-C level. Among nonlipid parameters, no changes were observed except for estimated glomerular filtration rate, which was improved by + 5.2% and + 9.6% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose rosuvastatin was effective in improving hypo-HDL cholesterolaemia and may have renoprotective effects.

Evaluation of whole-abdominal fat volume by 700-slice CT scanning and comparison with the umbilical fat area anthropometric indices.

BACKGROUND: The fat area at the umbilical region on CT scans is widely used to identify visceral obesity. However, whether it precisely represents the abdominal visceral fat volume is uncertain, because of technical difficulty in evaluating whole-abdominal visceral fat volume. In this study, we compared the whole-abdominal visceral fat and subcutaneous fat volumes with the visceral fat area at the umbilical region and anthropometric indices. METHODS: The study population consisted of 131 Japanese diabetic and non-diabetic subjects (72 males and 59 females) who underwent anthropometric measurements (height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference) and CT scanning from the top of the liver to the pelvic floor (about 700 slices) to analyze the whole-abdominal and umbilical contents of visceral and subcutaneous fat. RESULTS: The visceral fat volume of the male group was 1.3-fold higher than that of the female group, while the subcutaneous fat volume of the female group was 1.3-fold higher than that of the male group. The visceral fat area at the umbilical region was strongly correlated with visceral fat volume (r = 0.921 in males and 0.931 in females). Both visceral and subcutaneous fat volumes were strongly correlated with the waist circumference (r = 0.768 and 0.809 in males and 0.744 and 0.803 in females), but not with the BMI or waist/hip ratio. CONCLUSION: The visceral fat area at the umbilical region is an optimal indicator for whole-abdominal visceral fat volume, and the waist circumference is the anthropometric index that reflects visceral obesity more closely than BMI or the waist/hip ratio.