Vibrio species: development of EUCAST susceptibility testing methods and MIC and zone diameter distributions on which to determine clinical breakpoints.

OBJECTIVES: Most human infections caused by Vibrio spp. do not warrant antimicrobial treatment but in severe cases, targeted antimicrobial treatment can be lifesaving. For Vibrio spp., standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) guidelines with EUCAST methodology are lacking. In this study, we aimed to produce data suitable for EUCAST to establish clinical MIC breakpoints and zone diameter correlates for Vibrio spp. METHODS: An intercontinental collection (N = 524) comprising five important Vibrio spp. (V. alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus) was organized. All isolates were subjected to broth microdilution (BMD) against 11 antimicrobial agents according to ISO 20776-1 using unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton broth on freeze-dried Sensititre panels (Thermo Scientific, UK), and most isolates (n = 371) were also tested with disc diffusion according to EUCAST methodology for non-fastidious organisms. RESULTS: Aggregated results were used to generate MIC and zone diameter distributions and to prepare graphs of MIC-zone diameter correlation. Based on these results, the EUCAST Steering Committee determined clinical susceptible (S) and resistant (R) MIC (mg/L) breakpoints (S≤/R>) for the five Vibrio spp. for piperacillin/tazobactam (1/1), cefotaxime (0.25/0.25), ceftazidime (1/1), meropenem (0.5/0.5), ciprofloxacin (0.25/0.25), levofloxacin (0.25/0.25), azithromycin (4/4), doxycycline (0.5/0.5) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (0.25/0.25). The corresponding zone diameter breakpoints were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the validity of using standard BMD and EUCAST disc diffusion methodology for AST of five Vibrio spp., and generated suitable data to allow EUCAST to determine clinical MIC and zone diameter breakpoints for five pathogenic Vibrio spp., including both non-toxigenic and toxigenic V. cholerae.

Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans: development of EUCAST methods and generation of data on which to determine breakpoints.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical susceptibility breakpoints have been lacking for antimicrobial agents used for diphtheria. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods and create a dataset of MIC values and inhibition zone diameters (ZDs) from which breakpoints could be determined. METHODS: We included 400 recent clinical isolates equally distributed by species (Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans) and by national surveillance programmes (France and Germany). Non-duplicate toxigenic and non-toxigenic isolates were chosen to enable the inclusion of a diversity of susceptibility levels for the 13 agents tested. Broth microdilution and disc diffusion, using EUCAST methodology for fastidious organisms, were used. RESULTS: The distributions of MIC and ZD values were largely in agreement among methods and countries. Breakpoints to allow categorization of WT isolates as susceptible, i.e. susceptible (S) or susceptible, increased exposure (I) were determined for 12 agents. The data supported a breakpoint for benzylpenicillin and amoxicillin of resistant (R) > 1 mg/L since WT isolates were inhibited by 1 mg/L or less. WT isolates were categorized as I (S ≤ 0.001 mg/L) for benzylpenicillin, emphasizing the need for increased exposure, and S (S ≤ 1 mg/L) for amoxicillin. Erythromycin breakpoints were set at S ≤ 0.06 mg/L and R > 0.06 mg/L. The corresponding ZD breakpoints were determined for all agents except amoxicillin, for which categorization was based on benzylpenicillin results. CONCLUSIONS: This work provided a large set of antimicrobial susceptibility data for C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, using a harmonized methodology. The dataset allowed EUCAST and experts in the diphtheria field to develop evidence-based breakpoints in January 2023.

Contemporary Considerations for Establishing Reference Methods for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing.

Antibacterial susceptibility testing (AST) is performed to guide therapy, perform resistance surveillance studies, and support development of new antibacterial agents. For 5 decades, broth microdilution (BMD) has served as the reference method to assess in vitro activity of antibacterial agents against which both novel agents and diagnostic tests have been measured. BMD relies on in vitro inhibition or killing of bacteria. It is associated with several limitations: it is a poor mimic of the in vivo milieu of bacterial infections, requires multiple days to perform, and is associated with subtle, difficult to control variability. In addition, new reference methods will soon be needed for novel agents whose activity cannot be evaluated by BMD (e.g., those that target virulence). Any new reference methods must be standardized, correlated with clinical efficacy and be recognized internationally by researchers, industry, and regulators. Herein, we describe current reference methods for in vitro assessment of antibacterial activity and highlight key considerations for the generation of novel reference methods.

Evaluation of prolonged incubation time of 16-20 h with the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility disc diffusion testing method.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance rates are continuously increasing, driving the need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) results, especially in the treatment of bloodstream infections. The EUCAST RAST method performed directly from positive blood cultures with incubation times from 4 to 8 h was developed in 2018 and is now used in many laboratories. To increase the practicality of the method, an extended incubation time of 16 and 20 h was evaluated in this study. METHOD: Blood culture bottles were spiked with clinical isolates (n = 325) of the seven most important sepsis pathogens. The EUCAST RAST method was performed, extending the incubation time to 16 and 20 h. Broth microdilution (BMD) was used as a reference, except for screening tests where standard disc diffusion or presence of resistance genes was used. RESULTS: Inhibition zones were possible to read for all species-agent combinations. For 16 and 20 h, the MIC zone diameter correlations were sufficiently similar to allow establishment of common breakpoints for the time interval of 16-20 h. The proportion of isolates in the area of technical uncertainty was, on average, 6% for all species and the number of errors were low, with <1% false-resistant and <0.5% false-susceptible results. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, for EUCAST RAST, prolonging the recommended incubation to 16-20 h is possible and can be used as a complement when the intended shorter incubation is not possible to achieve. The introduction of the prolonged incubation will increase the usefulness of the EUCAST RAST method in clinical laboratories with limited opening hours.

Assessing the quality of the anaerobic environment - a method developed to support EUCAST disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria.

The purpose of this study is to establish a method for assessing the anaerobic environment for EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria on fastidious anaerobe agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB). The method utilizes the association between a decrease in the metronidazole disk zone diameter and increasing oxygen levels with an aerotolerant Clostridium perfringens strain DSM 25589 (CCUG 75076 and NCTC 14679). The C. perfringens strain was tested on FAA-HB with a McFarland 1 inoculum and a metronidazole 5 µg disk. FAA-HB was incubated for 16-20 h at 35-37°C. The association between oxygen levels (0, 0.16, 1, 2, and 4% oxygen) and the metronidazole zone diameter was determined. Reproducibility at 0% oxygen was investigated as part of a European multi-centre study of disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria. The median zone diameters (n=12) at each oxygen level were 29 mm (0%), 21 mm (0.16%), 16 mm (1%), 15 mm (2%), and 15 mm (4%). The metronidazole zone diameters at 0% oxygen from the multi-centre reproducibility-study had a median of 29 mm and a 95%-percentile range of 25-33 mm (n=236). Only one reading was below 25 mm. Based on our results, a zone diameter of ≥25 mm using a metronidazole 5 µg disk and the C. perfringens strain, tested with EUCAST recommendations, can be used to indicate that the anaerobic environment is of sufficient quality for culture and disk diffusion AST. EUCAST has included the method as part of the quality control for AST of anaerobic bacteria.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacteroides species by disk diffusion: The NordicAST Bacteroides study.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria has until recently been done by MIC methods. We have carried out a multi-centre evaluation of the newly validated EUCAST disk diffusion method for AST of Bacteroides spp. METHODS: A panel of 30 Bacteroides strains was assembled based on reference agar dilution MICs, resistance gene detection and quantification of cfiA carbapenemase gene expression. Nordic clinical microbiology laboratories (n = 45) performed disk diffusion on Fastidious Anaerobe Agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB) for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and metronidazole. RESULTS: A total of 43/45 (95.6%) laboratories carried out disk diffusion per protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.87 (0.80-0.93) for piperacillin-tazobactam, 0.95 (0.91-0.97) for meropenem and 0.89 (0.83-0.94) for metronidazole. For metronidazole, one media lot yielded smaller zones and higher variability than another. Piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem zone diameters correlated negatively with cfiA expression. A meropenem zone diameter of <28 mm in B. fragilis indicated presence of cfiA. Piperacillin-tazobactam had the most false susceptible results. Categorical errors for this antimicrobial were particularly prevalent in cfiA-positive strains, and piperacillin-tazobactam had the highest number of comments describing zone reading difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-laboratory agreement by disk diffusion was good or very good. The main challenges were media-related variability for metronidazole and categorical disagreement with the reference method for piperacillin-tazobactam in some cfiA-positive strains. An area of technical uncertainty specific for such strains may be warranted.

Cefiderocol: EUCAST criteria for disc diffusion and broth microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

OBJECTIVES: The reproducibility of cefiderocol MIC determination using broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted CAMHB (ID-CAMHB) was investigated, and the EUCAST disc diffusion (DD) method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing was developed and validated against reference BMD. METHODS: Cefiderocol values were determined for wild-type (WT) and non-WT isolates using BMD plates with ID-CAMHB (Thermo Scientific, Oakwood, USA) per EUCAST guidelines. DD was performed using standard EUCAST methodology on unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton agar with cefiderocol 30 µg discs. Control agents were included in all tests. MICs were correlated with zone diameters (ZD), and ZD breakpoints (BP) best corresponding to the MIC BPs were determined. Areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) were included where appropriate. External laboratory validation of cefiderocol DD was performed per the EUCAST SOP 9.2. RESULTS: MIC and ZD distributions for cefiderocol against WT isolates were established. Cefiderocol ZD BPs were set at susceptible ≥22 mm, resistant <22 mm for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ATUs were decided. For Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, ZD cut-off values of ≥17 mm and ≥20 mm corresponded to MIC values of ≤2 and ≤0.5 mg/L, respectively. Cefiderocol ZDs for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (target 27 mm) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (target 26 mm) were within ±3 mm of the target values. For DD, there was no problematic variation between discs, media or laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: DD is a robust and easy-to-perform method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing. For isolates with results in the ATU, an MIC test should be performed to confirm the results.

The EUCAST rapid disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles.

OBJECTIVES: With increasing antimicrobial resistance, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) becomes important, especially in patients with bloodstream infections. EUCAST decided to develop a standardized rapid method, based on EUCAST disc diffusion, to offer susceptibility reports within 4-8 h of a positive blood culture (BC). METHODS: BC bottles were spiked with clinical isolates (n = 332) of the seven most relevant sepsis pathogens with a variety of resistance mechanisms. RAST was performed directly from the bottle and zones read after 4, 6 and 8 h. Several variables were investigated, including the effect of using different BC bottles and of a 0-18 h delay between a positive signal and the performance of RAST. RESULTS: For five species, most inhibition zones could be read after 4 h. The proportion of results that could be interpreted increased from 75% at 4 h to 84% after 8 h. Categorical agreement against the reference method was good, with error rates of false susceptibility of 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.2% at 4, 6 and 8 h and false resistance of 1.2%, 0.2% and 0.1% at 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With the EUCAST RAST method, reliable AST results can be delivered within 4-8 h of positivity of BC bottles for seven important bloodstream infection pathogens. To reduce the occurrence of errors and to absorb the variability caused by using a non-standardized inoculum, material from different manufacturers and workflow-related delays, we have introduced an area in which interpretation is not permitted, the Area of Technical Uncertainty.

EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories.

OBJECTIVES: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. METHODS: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16-20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. CONCLUSIONS: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4-6 h of incubation.

Performance of the EUCAST disc diffusion method and two MIC methods in detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to meropenem: the NordicAST CPE study.

Objectives: To examine performance of EUCAST disc diffusion and supplementary MIC methods for detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to meropenem using EUCAST screening recommendations. Methods: Sixty-one Nordic laboratories delivered data on EUCAST disc diffusion (n = 61), semi-automated meropenem MIC (n = 23; VITEK2, n = 20 and Phoenix, n = 3) and gradient meropenem MIC (n = 58) methods. The strains (n = 27) included the major carbapenemase classes (A, n = 4; B, n = 9; D, n = 6) involved in the global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) and non-CPE strains (n = 8) covering a range of broth microdilution (BMD) meropenem MICs. Results: A triplicate Klebsiella variicola (meropenem MIC 0.5 mg/L) harbouring OXA-48 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 showed an overall good precision. Meropenem zone diameters below the EUCAST screening cut-off (<27 mm) were reported for strains with MIC ≥1 mg/L (n = 21), irrespective of resistance mechanism. For three strains (MIC = 0.5 mg/L) with OXA-48/-181, eight laboratories provided meropenem zone diameters above the screening cut-off. Very major errors (VMEs) were not observed. The overall distributions of major errors (MEs) and minor errors (mEs) were 9% and 36% (disc diffusion), 26% and 18% (VITEK2) and 7% and 20% (gradient MIC), respectively. Differences in ME and mE distributions between disc diffusion and MIC gradient tests compared with semi-automated methods were significant (P < 0.0001), using BMD MICs as a reference for categorization. Conclusions: The EUCAST disc diffusion method is a robust method to screen for CPE but isolates with meropenem MICs <1 mg/L pose challenges. The high ME rate in semi-automated methods might deter appropriate use of carbapenems in CPE infections with limited therapeutic options.

A novel PBP3 substitution in Haemophilus influenzae confers reduced aminopenicillin susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: Identification and characterization of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) with reduced susceptibility to ß-lactam antibiotics due to mutations in penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3) is a clinical challenge. We analyzed a blood isolate, NTHi93-57485, that was categorized as aminopenicillin resistant but lacked key amino acid substitutions in PBP3 that have previously been associated with reduced aminopenicillin susceptibility. The significance of an alternative amino acid substitution (Y528H) in this isolate was examined. RESULTS: Site-directed mutagenesis of a ß-lactam susceptible H. influenzae (NTHi3655) was performed to introduce the Y528H substitution into wild-type ftsI (encoding for PBP3). Disc diffusion screening and broth microdilution determination of MICs for ß-lactam agents were done with the NTHi3655-PBP3Y528H mutant and were compared with the NTHi3655 wild-type as well as the original clinical isolate NTHi93-57485. Introduction of the Y528H substitution in NTHi3655 resulted in positive screening for ß-lactam resistance. MICs for aminopenicillins were increased in the mutant compared to the wild-type. However, the mutant remained susceptible to aminopenicillins according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints (assuming intravenous treatment) and the introduction of Y528H alone did not increase the resistance to the same level as NTHi93-57485. None of the isolates had frame shift insertions in the acrR gene regulating the AcrAB efflux pump. CONCLUSIONS: In parallel to the previously well-described PBP3-substitutions R517H and N526K, we demonstrate that Y528H confers reduced aminopenicillin susceptibility.

Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Alcaligenes faecalis Related to Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media, Angola.

We found that 20 (10.6%) of 188 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media in Angola were co-colonized with fluoroquinolone-resistant Alcaligenes faecalis, commonly found in birds. A likely explanation for our findings was the use of bird feces by residents as a traditional remedy to prevent ear secretions caused by primary ear infection.

Haemophilus influenzae with Non-Beta-Lactamase-Mediated Beta-Lactam Resistance: Easy To Find but Hard To Categorize.

Haemophilus influenzae is a major pathogen, and beta-lactams are first-line drugs. Resistance due to altered penicillin-binding protein 3 (rPBP3) is frequent, and susceptibility testing of such strains is challenging. A collection of 154 beta-lactamase-negative isolates with a large proportion of rPBP3 (67.5%) was used to evaluate and compare Etest (Haemophilus test medium [HTM]) and disk diffusion (EUCAST method) for categorization of susceptibility to aminopenicillins and cefuroxime, using MICs generated with broth (HTM) microdilution and clinical breakpoints from CLSI and EUCAST as the gold standards. In addition, the proficiency of nine disks in screening for the rPBP3 genotype (N526K positive) was evaluated. By Etest, both essential and categorical agreement were generally poor (<70%), with high very major errors (VME) (CLSI, 13.0%; EUCAST, 34.3%) and falsely susceptible rates (FSR) (CLSI, 87.0%; EUCAST, 88.3%) for ampicillin. Ampicillin (2 µg) with adjusted (+2 mm) zone breakpoints was superior to Etest for categorization of susceptibility to ampicillin (agreement, 74.0%; VME, 11.0%; FSR, 28.3%). Conversely, Etest was superior to 30 µg cefuroxime for categorization of susceptibility to cefuroxime (agreement, 57.1% versus 60.4%; VME, 2.6% versus 9.7%; FSR, 7.1% versus 26.8%). Benzylpenicillin (1 unit) (EUCAST screening disk) and cefuroxime (5 µg) identified rPBP3 isolates with highest accuracies (95.5% and 92.2%, respectively). In conclusion, disk screening reliably detects rPBP3 H. influenzae, but false ampicillin susceptibility is frequent with routine methods. We suggest adding a comment recommending high-dose aminopenicillin therapy or the use of other agents for severe infections with screening-positive isolates that are susceptible to aminopenicillins by gradient or disk diffusion.

Development of a Pefloxacin Disk Diffusion Method for Detection of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Salmonella enterica.

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are among the drugs of choice for treatment of Salmonella infections. However, fluoroquinolone resistance is increasing in Salmonella due to chromosomal mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of the topoisomerase genes gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE and/or plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) mechanisms including qnr variants, aac(6')-Ib-cr, qepA, and oqxAB. Some of these mutations cause only subtle increases in the MIC, i.e., MICs ranging from 0.12 to 0.25 mg/liter for ciprofloxacin (just above the wild-type MIC of ≤0.06 mg/liter). These isolates are difficult to detect with standard ciprofloxacin disk diffusion, and plasmid-mediated resistance, such as qnr, is often not detected by the nalidixic acid screen test. We evaluated 16 quinolone/fluoroquinolone disks for their ability to detect low-level-resistant Salmonella enterica isolates that are not serotype Typhi. A total of 153 Salmonella isolates characterized for the presence (n = 104) or absence (n = 49) of gyrA and/or parC topoisomerase mutations, qnrA, qnrB, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6')-Ib-cr, or qepA genes were investigated. All isolates were MIC tested by broth microdilution against ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin and by disk diffusion using EUCAST or CLSI methodology. MIC determination correctly categorized all isolates as either wild-type isolates (MIC of ≤0.06 mg/liter and absence of resistance genes) or non-wild-type isolates (MIC of >0.06 mg/liter and presence of a resistance gene). Disk diffusion using these antibiotics and nalidixic acid failed to detect some low-level-resistant isolates, whereas the 5-µg pefloxacin disk correctly identified all resistant isolates. However, pefloxacin will not detect isolates having aac(6')-Ib-cr as the only resistance determinant. The pefloxacin disk assay was approved and implemented by EUCAST (in 2014) and CLSI (in 2015).

Performance of the EUCAST disk diffusion method, the CLSI agar screen method, and the Vitek 2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system for detection of clinical isolates of Enterococci with low- and medium-level VanB-type vancomycin resistance: a multicenter study.

Different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect low-level vancomycin resistance in enterococci were evaluated in a Scandinavian multicenter study (n=28). A phenotypically and genotypically well-characterized diverse collection of Enterococcus faecalis (n=12) and Enterococcus faecium (n=18) strains with and without nonsusceptibility to vancomycin was examined blindly in Danish (n=5), Norwegian (n=13), and Swedish (n=10) laboratories using the EUCAST disk diffusion method (n=28) and the CLSI agar screen (n=18) or the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) (n=5). The EUCAST disk diffusion method (very major error [VME] rate, 7.0%; sensitivity, 0.93; major error [ME] rate, 2.4%; specificity, 0.98) and CLSI agar screen (VME rate, 6.6%; sensitivity, 0.93; ME rate, 5.6%; specificity, 0.94) performed significantly better (P=0.02) than the Vitek 2 system (VME rate, 13%; sensitivity, 0.87; ME rate, 0%; specificity, 1). The performance of the EUCAST disk diffusion method was challenged by differences in vancomycin inhibition zone sizes as well as the experience of the personnel in interpreting fuzzy zone edges as an indication of vancomycin resistance. Laboratories using Oxoid agar (P<0.0001) or Merck Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (P=0.027) for the disk diffusion assay performed significantly better than did laboratories using BBL MH II medium. Laboratories using Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) agar for the CLSI agar screen performed significantly better (P=0.017) than did those using Oxoid BHI agar. In conclusion, both the EUCAST disk diffusion and CLSI agar screening methods performed acceptably (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.94 to 0.98) in the detection of VanB-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci with low-level resistance. Importantly, use of the CLSI agar screen requires careful monitoring of the vancomycin concentration in the plates. Moreover, disk diffusion methodology requires that personnel be trained in interpreting zone edges.

Cutibacterium avidum: A Potent and Underestimated Pathogen in Prosthetic Hip Joint Infections.

Cutibacterium avidum has recently been reported as a rare cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), contrary to Cutibacterium acnes, which is well established as a cause of PJIs, especially in shoulder arthroplasties. Two specific risk factors for PJI due to C. avidum have been reported: obesity and the skin incision approach. Here, we report four cases of hip PJIs caused by C. avidum admitted over a 30-month period at a single center. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the four C. avidum strains were all individual strains and did not originate from a common source, such as an outbreak. Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that the isolates were fully susceptible, and none carried known antibiotic resistance genes. In conclusion, the occurrence of four cases of PJI caused by C. avidum over a limited time at a single center may indicate that this pathogen is underestimated and is either emerging or more common than previously recognized. The patients presented overt signs of infection during surgery, indicating that C. avidum is a virulent pathogen. None of the previously reported risk factors for C. avidum PJI applied to these patients as only one was obese and none were operated on using a direct anterior skin incision approach.

European multi-centre study to establish MIC and zone diameter epidemiological cut-off values for Bacillusanthracis.

OBJECTIVES: Bacillus anthracis clinical breakpoints, representing a systematic approach to guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antimicrobial treatments, are not part of the guidance from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). This is because defined distributions of MIC values and of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) have been lacking. In this study, a Europe-wide network of laboratories in collaboration with EUCAST, aimed at establishing standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods, wild-type MIC distributions, and ECOFFs for ten therapeutically relevant antimicrobials. METHODS: About 335 B. anthracis isolates were tested by broth microdilution and disc diffusion methodologies. MIC and inhibition zone diameters were curated according to EUCAST SOP 10.2 and the results were submitted to EUCAST for ECOFFs and clinical breakpoint determination. RESULTS: Broth microdilution and disc diffusion data distributions revealed putative wild-type distributions for the tested agents. For each antimicrobial agent, ECOFFs were defined. Three highly resistant strains with MIC values of 32 mg/L benzylpenicillin were found. MIC values slightly above the defined ECOFFs were observed in a few isolates, indicating the presence of resistance mechanisms to doxycycline, tetracycline, and amoxicillin. DISCUSSION: B. anthracis antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were used by EUCAST to determine ECOFFs for ten antimicrobial agents. The MIC distributions were used in the process of determining clinical breakpoints. The ECOFFs can be used for the sensitive detection of isolates with resistance mechanisms, and for monitoring resistance development. Genetic changes causing phenotypic shifts in isolates displaying slightly elevated MICs remain to be investigated.

Performance of automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the detection of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria: a NordicAST study.

Automated testing of antimicrobial susceptibility is common in clinical microbiology laboratories but their ability to detect low-level resistance has been questioned. This Nordic multicentre study aimed to evaluate the performance of commercially available automated AST systems. A phenotypically well-characterised collection of gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli (n = 7), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7)) with and without resistance mechanisms was examined by Danish (n = 1), Finnish (n = 6), Norwegian (n = 16) and Swedish (n = 5) laboratories. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 12 antimicrobials with automated systems and compared with MICs obtained with gold standard broth microdilution. The automated systems used were VITEK 2 (n = 23), Phoenix (n = 4), MicroScan (n = 1), and ARIS (n = 1). Very major errors were identified for six antimicrobials; cefotaxime (6.9%), meropenem (0.4%), ciprofloxacin (0.7%), ertapenem (4.3%), amikacin (3.4%) and colistin (6.4%). Categorical agreement of MIC for the automated systems compared to broth microdilution ranged from 83% for imipenem to 100% for ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The analysis revealed several important antimicrobials where resistance was underestimated, potentially with significant consequences in patient treatment. The results cast doubt on the use of automated AST in the management of patients with serious infections and suggests that more work is needed to define their limitations.

The European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance in anaerobic bacteria is increasing and there is a link between inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and poor clinical outcome in the treatment of infections caused by anaerobic bacteria. Accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria is therefore of critical importance. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has recently described a disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for anaerobic bacteria using fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (HB). This method was previously validated for Bacteroides spp. only. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of FAA-HB for disc diffusion and also for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria. METHODS: Clinical isolates, including 54 Bacteroides/Phocaeicola/Parabacteroides spp., 49 Prevotella spp., 51 Fusobacterium necrophorum, 58 Clostridium perfringens, and 54 Cutibacterium acnes were evaluated against six antimicrobial agents. MICs were determined by agar dilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology, modified to use FAA-HB as recommended by EUCAST, instead of supplemented Brucella agar, and disc diffusion was performed on FAA-HB following EUCAST methodology. RESULTS: Results for quality control strains were reproducible, with 99.3% of zones within range. Disc diffusion by EUCAST methodology was able to distinguish between susceptible and resistant isolates of anaerobic bacteria for benzylpenicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole (98.7% correct categorization). No isolates resistant to vancomycin were tested, but zone diameters correctly categorized the susceptible isolates, and there was a logical relationship between MICs and inhibition zones. DISCUSSION: The recently published EUCAST method for disc diffusion for anaerobic bacteria based on FAA-HB is a reproducible and accurate method for susceptibility testing of frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.