Evaluation of Ceftazidime Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Association With Cephalosporin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Cefotaxime shortage in 2015 led to increased ceftazidime use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to explore whether ceftazidime increases risk for development of resistant gram-negative organisms. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of NICU patients with cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella species, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia between January1, 2015 and August 31, 2020. Isolates were excluded if obtained from same patient and source within 90 days or if patient ≤7 days of life or admitted from a referring hospital. Data collection included demographics and clinical parameters, and culture/susceptibility data. The primary objective was comparison of pathogens and clinical parameters in those with and without third-generation cephalosporin resistance. The secondary objectives included a comparison between those with and without ceftazidime exposure and identification of factors associated with resistance. Comparisons were made using χ2, Fisher exact tests, or Wilcoxon tests. A logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for resistance. RESULTS: Overall, 349 isolates, representing 215 patients, were included. The most common source was endotracheal (n = 192, 55.0%) and pathogens were E coli (31.8%) and P aeruginosa (29.2%). Overall, 12.3% (n = 43) were resistant and these were obtained after longer parenteral nutrition (PN), central line access, and antibiotic days versus susceptible isolates. Higher resistance was noted after ceftazidime exposure versus no exposure, 19.1% versus 6.6%. Each day of ceftazidime was associated with 13% greater odds of P aeruginosa resistance (adjusted odds ratio: 1.13 [95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.23]). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Ceftazidime duration was associated with increased risk for P aeruginosa resistance. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in critically ill adults with Gram-negative bacteraemia.

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) in ICU patients and identify risk factors for repeat positive cultures. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults with Gram-negative BSI between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. Critically ill patients with one or more blood cultures positive for a Gram-negative organism were included. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed with an alpha of 0.05. Results: A total of 148 critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI were included, with 42 patients (28.4%) having one or more positive FUBCs. The majority (66.2%) were admitted to a medical ICU. The most common organisms isolated were Escherichia coli (n = 56, 37.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 26, 17.6%). Significant patient risk factors associated with a positive FUBC on univariate regression included: MDR organisms, immunocompromised status, fever, vasopressor use at time of FUBC, lack of source control attainment, and higher quick Pitt bacteraemia score. Multivariable penalized logistic regression indicated that lack of source control containment and less time from index to FUBC remained significantly associated with repeat positive FUBC. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the use of FUBC for Gram-negative BSI in exclusively ICU patients. Risk factors for repeat positive FUBC in this population include lack of source control and less time between index and FUBC. Prospective studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of FUBCs in critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI.