Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Australas J Dermatol ; 65(5): 472-475, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699896

RESUMEN

We present a case of a 47-year-old male with severe atopic dermatitis and metastatic renal cell carcinoma managed successfully with dupilumab. This case further supports the safety of dupilumab in patients with active malignancy, an area currently with limited data.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Dermatitis Atópica , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Masculino , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología
2.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 20(10): 1289-1302, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36210056

RESUMEN

A fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a common cutaneous adverse drug reaction which occurs following administration of an offending drug. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the list of drugs causing FDE, with a focus on emerging drug culprits reported since the start of the century. Across published literature, triggers for FDE are widely varied. The most frequently implicated drugs include analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] and paracetamol) and antibiotics. Co-trimoxazole is perhaps the most well described single agent. Since the start of the century there have been over 200 drugs named in case reports on FDE. Newer, novel agents of note include cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors, fluconazole, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Other implicated drugs include vaccines, such as various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Drugs incriminated in FDE vary based on the geographical region studied and prescribing patterns at a given time. Newer drugs continue to enter the market and are playing an increasing role in the field of FDE. Awareness of rarer culprits and emerging novel agents can help identify a trigger, allowing for prompt withdrawal of the causative agent, preventing recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Erupciones por Medicamentos , Humanos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Ciclooxigenasa 2/uso terapéutico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/efectos adversos
4.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 21(12): 1591-1601, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092162

RESUMEN

Introduction: This review assesses current evidence supporting dose de-escalated rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris, compared to standard protocols. Primary outcome measures were remission and relapse rates. Adverse effects, cumulative steroid dosages, and serological markers of disease activity were also reported.Areas covered: A literature search was performed to look for reports describing the use of de-escalated rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris. Results from heterogenous studies showed a large variation in remission and relapse rates. Complete remission rates from de-escalated treatment ranged from 41.7 to 100.0%, while rates in the control groups ranged from 60.0 to 90.9%. Relapse rates varied from 8.0 to 81.3% in the de-escalated group and from 0.0 to 72.4% in the control group. Of the 165 patients included in this report, only two major adverse effects were reported.Expert Opinion: Overall, dose de-escalated rituximab protocols reported to date appear effective and safe. However, it is unclear if treatment effect parallels that of standard regimens in regard to disease control in the long term. A lower limit of effective dosing for rituximab in pemphigus vulgaris has not yet been reached or defined. The role for and timing of repeated cycles of low-dose rituximab therapy require further exploration.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Pénfigo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Pénfigo/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA