RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence synthesis in the field of occupational safety and health (OSH) has been continuously growing over the last two decades. With over 100 systematic reviews now published, the Cochrane Work Review group has played an important role in this development and the Cochrane Thematic Group 'Work & Health & Social Security' was established recently to combine evidence from both the OSH and insurance medicine fields. Worldwide, many organizations produce and synthesize evidence in OSH that can complement and support each other. We believe that a global network including Cochrane and others can collaborate on methods development and in the production, synthesis, use and dissemination of different types of evidence even more effectively. AIMS: To determine if establishing a global network for evidence synthesis in OSH is feasible. METHODS: We conducted a survey of international and national institutions between November 2022 and January 2023 using LimeSurvey. Participants included representatives of affiliated and sustaining members of the International Commission on Occupational Health, national institutes for OSH, academia and other international organizations. RESULTS: From 151 invitations, we received responses from 57 representatives of 54 organizations. Representatives reported that their organization will contribute financially on an annual basis (nâ =â 1) or provide in-kind support (nâ =â 10), and will probably be able to provide financial or in-kind support (nâ =â 25). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility criterion was met and an international network is being established.
Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Humanos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sickness absence rates vary widely across a large acute NHS Trust, with the highest rates in some of the largest directorates. AIMS: This study was aimed to identify factors associated with sickness absence in teams and to inform interventions to improve staff health and well-being. METHODS: Using 2018 data from the electronic staff record and NHS Staff Survey, we examined variables associated with cost centre sickness absence rates, perceived abuse and staff engagement scores using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Data were available for 9362/15 423 (61%) of staff. Cost centre sickness absence was significantly positively associated with predominance of nursing and midwifery staff (ß = 0.28 [0.012-0.55]) and significantly inversely associated with predominance of medical and dental staff (ß = -0.94 [-1.2 to -0.65]) and proportion white (ß = -1.11 [-1.9 to -0.37]). Cost centre sickness absence was not significantly associated with staff engagement, reported abuse, age or higher headcount. Cost centre staff engagement was significantly positively associated with proportion white (ß = 0.98 [0.42-1.6]). Reported abuse by managers (ß = -13 [-22 to -4.2]) and by colleagues (ß = -24 [-35 to -12]) was significantly inversely associated with proportion white. Reported abuse by colleagues was significantly associated with predominance of medical and dental (ß = 7.6 [2.3-13]) and nursing and midwifery staff (ß = 9.1 [4.4-14]). CONCLUSIONS: These observed associations of sickness absence, staff engagement and perceived abuse with job mix and ethnicity should be further explored. Individual or team-level data, rather than cost centre-level data, might more meaningfully elucidate why sickness absence rates vary between groups of staff.
Asunto(s)
Ausencia por Enfermedad , Medicina Estatal , Absentismo , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that occupational exposure to endotoxins protects against lung cancer. To explore this hypothesis further, the follow-up of mortality of a cohort of 3551 workers, who were employed in the British cotton industry during 1966-1971, was extended by 23 years. METHODS: Subjects had originally been recruited to a survey of respiratory disease, which collected information about occupation and smoking habits. Cumulative exposures to endotoxins were estimated from data on endotoxin levels by work areas in cotton mills. Risks of lung cancer were estimated using survival modelling. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2018 deaths were recorded before the age of 90 years, including 128 deaths from lung cancer. After adjustment for smoking, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for cumulative endotoxin exposures of ≤30,000, >30,000 and ≤200,000, >200,000 and ≤400,000, >400,000 and ≤600,000 and >600,000 endotoxin units (EU) m(-3) years were 1, 0.8 (0.5-1.6), 0.7 (0.4-1.3), 0.6 (0.3-1.0) and 0.5 (0.3-0.9), respectively (P for trend=0.005). CONCLUSION: Our findings strengthen the evidence that occupational exposure to endotoxins protects against lung cancer, and suggest that the effect depends on cumulative dose and persists after exposure ceases.
Asunto(s)
Endotoxinas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional , Fumar , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Fibra de Algodón , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Industrias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This paper studies the mortality and cancer morbidity of the 470 male workers involved in tackling the 1957 Sellafield Windscale fire or its subsequent clean-up. Workers were followed up for 50 years to 2007, extending the follow-up of a previously published cohort study on the Windscale fire by 10 years. The size of the study population is small, but the cohort is of interest because of the involvement of the workers in the accident. Significant excesses of deaths from diseases of the circulatory system (standardised mortality ratio (SMR) = 120, 95% CI = 103-138; 194 deaths) driven by ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (SMR = 133, 95% CI = 112-157, 141 deaths) were found when compared with the population of England and Wales but not when compared with the population of Northwest England (SMR = 105, 95% CI = 90-120 and SMR = 115, 95% CI = 97-136 respectively). When compared with those workers in post at the time of the fire but not directly involved in the fire the mortality rate from IHD among those involved in tackling the fire was raised but not statistically significantly (rate ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.92-1.33). A RR of 1.11 is consistent with an excess relative risk of 0.65 Sv(-1) as reported in an earlier study of non-cancer mortality in the British Nuclear Fuels plc cohort of which these workers are a small but significant part. There was a statistically significant difference in lung cancer mortality (RR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.05-4.52) rates between workers who had received higher recorded external doses during the fire and those who had received lower external doses. Comparison of the mortality rates of workers directly involved in the accident with workers in post, but not so involved, showed no significant differences overall. On the basis of the use of a propensity score the average effect of involvement in the Windscale fire on all causes of death was - 2.13% (se = 3.64%, p = 0.56) though this difference is not statistically significant. The average effect of involvement in the Windscale fire was - 5.53% (se = 3.81, p = 0.15) for all cancers mortality and 6.60% (se = 4.03%, p = 0.10) for IHD mortality though neither figure was statistically significant. This analysis of the mortality and cancer morbidity experience of those Sellafield workers involved in the 1957 Windscale fire does not reveal any measurable effect of the fire upon their health. Although this study has low statistical power for detecting small adverse effects, due to the relatively small number of workers, it does provide reassurance that no significant health effects are associated with the 1957 Windscale fire even after 50 years of follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Reactores Nucleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Glicoles de Etileno/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Causalidad , Glicoles de Etileno/análisis , Humanos , Incidencia , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Factores de Riesgo , Semiconductores , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
The British mesothelioma register contains all deaths from 1968 to 2001 where mesothelioma was mentioned on the death certificate. These data were used to predict the future burden of mesothelioma mortality in Great Britain. Poisson regression analysis was used to model male mesothelioma deaths from 1968 to 2001 as a function of the rise and fall of asbestos exposure during the 20th century, and hence to predict numbers of male deaths in the years 2002-2050. The annual number of mesothelioma deaths in Great Britain has risen increasingly rapidly from 153 deaths in 1968 to 1848 in 2001 and, using our preferred model, is predicted to peak at around 1950 to 2450 deaths per year between 2011 and 2015. Following this peak, the number of deaths is expected to decline rapidly. The eventual death rate will depend on the background level and any residual asbestos exposure. Between 1968 and 2050, there will have been approximately 90,000 deaths from mesothelioma in Great Britain, 65,000 of which will occur after 2001.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/efectos adversos , Predicción , Mesotelioma/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clusters of disease arising in workplaces cause concern among the management of the company, the workers affected and their families and friends. Chance is the most likely explanation for their occurrence, although a number of real workplace hazards have been identified through their observation and investigation. Employers have a duty to investigate such occurrences in order to assess whether some unknown or unidentified hazard is at work and to take the appropriate action. Several papers have been published over the last 15 years or so that set out a method for investigating workplace clusters of disease. Aims This paper presents the steps in the approach taken by the Health & Safety Executive in Great Britain. METHOD: An initial step identifies the relevant stakeholders at the outset, in order to maintain a realistic expectation of what the investigation can hope to achieve and to open a dialogue. The main steps in the assessment are: (1) identifying cases; (2) determining the other parameters of the investigation; (3) statistically assessing the cluster; (4) examining potential exposures and assessing their biological plausibility; and (5) determining the overall significance of the cluster. The approach is illustrated throughout by examples.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Planificación en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) conducted a study to examine the risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) in British female semiconductor industry workers, following reports from the USA which suggested an association between risk of SAB and work in fabrication rooms and/or exposure to ethylene glycol ethers. METHODS: A nested case-control study based on 2,207 women who had worked at eight manufacturing sites during a 5-year retrospective time frame was established; 36 cases were matched with 80 controls. RESULTS: The overall SAB rate in the industry was 10.0%. (65 SABs/651 pregnancies) The crude odds ratio (OR) for fabrication work was 0.65 (95% CI 0.30-1.40). This was essentially unchanged after adjustment for a range of potential confounding factors in the first 3 months of pregnancy and was reduced to 0.58 (95% CI 0.26-1.30) after adjustment for smoking in the previous 12 months. There were no statistically significantly elevated ORs for any work group or any specific chemical or physical exposure in the industry. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of an increased risk of SAB in the British semiconductor industry. Am. J. Ind. Med. 36:557-572, 1999. Published 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.