RESUMEN
Neurosurgery for intractable psychiatric conditions has seen a resurgence with the increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Although DBS promises reversible neuromodulation and has become more popular than older lesioning methods, lesioning might still be preferred in specific cases. Here, we review the evidence for DBS and lesions in the treatment of intractable neuropsychiatric conditions and consider the factors that favour the continued use of lesioning procedures in appropriately selected cases. Broadly, systemic factors including comparative effectiveness, cost, and ethical arguments support an ongoing role for lesioning. Such a role is also supported by practical considerations including patient experiences of this type of therapy, the relative intensity of follow-up care, access to sparse or specialised follow-up care, and relative infection risk. Overall, we argue that neurosurgical lesion procedures remain an important alternative to DBS and their continued availability is necessary to fulfil the imperatives of mental health parity and enhance access to effective mental health treatments. Nonetheless, the efficacy of DBS and recent advances in closed-loop stimulation and remote programming might provide solutions to some of the challenges associated with wider use of electrical neuromodulation. Concerns about the scarcity of high-level evidence for the efficacy of lesioning procedures as well as the potential irreversible adverse effects of lesioning remain to be addressed.