Phase II trial of vaginal cuff brachytherapy followed by dose-dense chemotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer patients with enriched, high-intermediate risk factors for recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) followed by 3 cycles of dose dense paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy (ddTC) in enriched, high-intermediate risk (H-IR) patients with early stage endometrial cancer following hysterectomy. METHODS: A phase II trial of early stage endometrial cancer patients treated with VCB (2100 cGy) followed by three cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6) and dose dense paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) weekly within 12-weeks of surgery was conducted. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients completing both VCB and ddTC. Secondary outcomes include short and long-term toxicities, recurrence rate and sites, and progression free survival. Toxicity assessments were patient reported as well as those resulting in delays or dose modifications. RESULTS: A total of 32 evaluable patients with median age of 64.5 years were included. Most patients were endometrioid histology (18/32, 56.3%) and fully staged (21/32, 65.6%) to stage Ib (18/32, 56.3%). In total, 27/32 (84.4%) patients completed treatment per protocol. Protocol non-completion included renal insufficiency, paclitaxel reaction, and treatment refusal. Median time to VCB completion was 11 days with all patients completing three fractions of VCB. Acute toxicities with VCB included grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal, genitourinary and fatigue symptoms. Acute toxicities associated with ddTC included infusion reaction and neutropenia. Most reported long-term toxicities were grade 1 or 2 and resolved with time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with VCB followed by three cycles of ddTC is well-tolerated with promising utility for treatment in enriched high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer patients. Recurrence-free and overall survival outcomes are not yet mature.

A phase 1b dose escalation study of ipafricept (OMP54F28) in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The WNT pathway is an important oncologic driver of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The first-in-class recombinant fusion protein ipafricept (IPA) blocks Wnt signaling through binding of Wnt ligands. This phase Ib trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RPh2) for IPA in combination with taxane and platinum therapy (C/P). METHODS: Dose escalation started with a standard 3 + 3 design for IPA/C/P with q3w intravenous IPA on Day 1, in cycles 1 to 6 with C (AUC = 5 mg/ml·min) and P (175 mg/m2). For enhanced bone safety the trial was revised to 6-patient cohorts with a q3w regimen of IPA on Day 1 and C/P on Day 3 (IPA → C/P). RESULTS: 37 patients have been treated; 30 of whom were treated following protocol revision to q3w IPA(D1) → C/P(D3) (2 & 4 mg/kg). IPA-related TEAEs that occurred in ≥15% included: fatigue (40%); nausea (35%); diarrhea and decreased appetite (22%) each; dysgeusia (19%); and vomiting (16.2%). 22% reported ≥1 IPA related TEAE Grade ≥3 the most common of which was neutropenia at 16%. There were no DLTs; the MTD was not reached. The maximum administered dose based on bone safety was 6 mg/kg. The overall response rate (ORR) was 75.7%. Median PFS was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.5-14.2) and OS 33 months (95% CI 23.4-NR). CONCLUSIONS: IPA is well tolerated in combination with sequential C/P. ORR, PFS and OS are comparable to historical data but bone toxicity at efficacy doses of this particular Wnt inhibitor limit further development in EOC.

The pro-inflammatory effect of obesity on high grade serous ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a known generator of chronic inflammation but has an uncertain role in ovarian carcinogenesis and survival. Pro-inflammatory cytokines have previously been associated with poor outcomes. Given the established links, we sought to determine whether obesity and pro-inflammatory cytokines affect platinum sensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) for high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) who had available pre-operative serum. Oncologic and treatment characteristics were recorded and analyzed using SAS version 9.3. Bioplex reagent kit was used to measure serum cytokine concentrations. RESULTS: 86 patients met study criteria. Most were Caucasian (88%) and non-diabetic (92%). All patients had advanced stage (III/IV) disease and received chemotherapy after PDS. In univariate analysis, lower VEGF (p=0.013) was associated with longer overall survival (OS). Low IL-8 level (p=0.053) was marginally associated with platinum resistant disease. After adjusting for covariates including residual disease and maintenance therapy, IL-8 was no longer associated with platinum sensitive status (p=0.13), VEGF remained associated with OS (low vs. high HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, p=0.018), and higher IL-12 was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, p=0.031). CONCLUSION: In HGSC, pro-inflammatory cytokines are influenced by obesity, as differing inter-cytokine correlations were observed based on BMI, possibly due to dysregulation between cytokines in the setting of obesity. Differences in survival and platinum sensitivity were not noted. Future studies are warranted to determine whether obesity may be a modifiable risk factor for poorer outcomes due to differing immune response.

Initiation of a formalized precision medicine program in gynecologic oncology.

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to better incorporate precision medicine into clinical practice, we initiated a pilot project to screen, discuss, and genetically characterize patients with metastatic or recurrent gynecologic malignancies for whom no curative standard of care exists. METHODS: In 7/2014, we initiated a multi-disciplinary Precision Medicine Board (PMB) whose purpose was to apply molecular profiling to select and prioritize early phase clinical trial enrollment for high-risk gynecologic malignancies. Additional objectives were to record outcomes and enable scientific discussions of mutations which may foster local translational research. FoundationOne was the preferred genomic platform; results were reviewed by a team comprised of disease site specialists, phase I trialists, and basic and translational scientists affiliated with the Gynecologic Cancer Program. A detailed database for each patient was created and is followed prospectively for treatment use and resultant outcomes. RESULTS: To date, we have presented 62 cases with interpretable FoundationOne testing on 60 tumor samples (31 ovarian, 18 uterine, 9 cervical, and 4 other female genital tract). Significant genomic alterations were commonly found in all tumor types (median: 3); TP53 (45%) and PIK3CA (27%) were the most frequently noted mutations; however, molecular profiling resulted in identification of few actionable mutations (6%). To date, we have matched 4 patients on therapies based on actionable mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant function of our PMB is establishment of a forum to enhance research while providing clinical care for refractory malignancies. We have matched patients with specific mutations to ongoing trials and are developing investigator-initiated studies based on trends within genomic profiling results. Longer-term follow up will be required to determine the success of this strategy.

Primary and acquired platinum-resistance among women with high grade serous ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Women with primary platinum resistant (PPR) high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are known to have a poor prognosis. Less is known regarding outcomes in patients with acquired platinum resistance (APR). The goal of this study was to evaluate survival in both PPR and APR patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of HGSOC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 was performed. Descriptive statistics summarized clinical characteristics and demographics. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The association of OS and clinical factors was modeled using Cox proportional-hazards. RESULTS: Of the 330 patients identified, 81 (25%) had PPR. Of the remaining women, 55 (22%) developed APR. Median PFS of PPR patients was 4.2months and median OS was 17.8months. On multivariate analysis, the number of biologic agents received was the only predictor of OS. Patients with APR had a median PFS of 14.2months and a median OS of 56months. OS from the date of platinum resistance was 21.9months, though this was not different than PPR patients (p=0.19). Multivariate analysis found cancer stage and clinical trial participation to be associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum resistance confers a poor prognosis in the APR and PPR setting. The number of biologic agents received is the strongest predictor of OS among women with PPR. Cancer stage and clinical trial participation predicts OS in patients with APR. Providing opportunities to participate in clinical trials, especially those involving targeted therapy, should be a priority in these populations.

A phase I study of IV doxorubicin plus intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel and IV or IP cisplatin in endometrial cancer patients at high risk for peritoneal failure (GOG 9920): an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a modified paclitaxel/doxorubicin/cisplatin (TAP) regimen which incorporated intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel or IP paclitaxel/cisplatin in advanced endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients (pts) with FIGO (1998) Stage IIIA/IIIC with positive cytologic washings/ascites, adnexa, or serosa or Stage IV (intraperitoneal disease spread), histologically confirmed endometrial cancer were eligible. The study was designed as a phase I, 3+3 dose escalation study evaluating 5 dose levels (DL). All pts received cycles 1-2 with IV TAP, and cycles 3-6 with IV/IP therapy, on a 21day schedule. Adverse events were evaluated on cycles 3-4 for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and dose escalation decisions. RESULTS: Twenty-one pts were enrolled, of which 17 were evaluable for DLT. Most pts had Stage IV disease (76%) and serous/clear cell histology (59%). The MTD was determined to be DL 3 (cycles 3-6 including paclitaxel 90mg/m(2) IP, doxorubicin 45mg/m(2) IV, cisplatin 50mg/m(2)). Three DLT events occurred and were related to grades 3-4 metabolic toxicities. There was one grade 2 sensory neuropathy event and myelosupression was tolerable without the use of G-CSF. 88% of evaluable pts completed 6cycles of therapy. With a median follow-up of 22months, 46% of patients remain progression-free at 2years. CONCLUSION: We described an IV/IP based modification of a standard TAP regimen in endometrial cancer. Based on the high rate of completing 6cycles of therapy, low rates of neuropathy, and promising PFS, further study of IP therapy in endometrial cancer is warranted.

Referrals to phase I clinical trials in a gynecologic oncology unit.

OBJECTIVES: Previous reviews of phase I clinical trials report limited response rates. Development of novel biologic agents and trials designs have increased these rates. A contemporary appraisal of phase I clinical trials in gynecologic malignancies could help validate these findings. METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed records for 410 patients with gynecologic malignancies treated in a phase I unit, January 1999 to October 2012. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients enrolled in 43 different phase I trials, 17 phase Ia, 17 phase Ib dose escalation and 9 dose expansion. 9 trials (21%) investigated unique cytotoxic delivery methods, 15 (35%) conventional cytotoxic plus novel agents and 19 (44%) novel agents alone. For patients treated in the first-line setting, 90 (74.4%) achieved CR, 20 (16.5%) PR, 9 (7.4%) SD and 2 (1.7%) PD, yielding an overall response rate of 90.9%. In patients treated for recurrent disease, 2 (1.6%) achieved CR, 11 (8.9%) PR, 57 (46.0%) SD and 54 (43.5%) PD, yielding a response rate of 11% and an overall clinical benefit rate of 57%. Response rate for molecular targeted therapies was 11.5% with an overall clinical benefit rate of 46.2%. Patients with prior anti-angiogenic exposure had comparable median PFS to those who had not been previously exposed (3.5 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Results support referral of gynecologic cancer patients for phase I clinical trials. Patients with advanced, heavily pretreated disease fare at least as well as they do on phase II trials and a proportion of them can attain an objective response or stabilization of their disease.

Phase II trial of vaginal cuff brachytherapy followed by chemotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer patients with high-intermediate risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patterns of failure for early stage, high-intermediate risk (H-IR) patients in a phase II trial with adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) and three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Surgically staged patients with stage I-IIb endometrial cancer with H-IR factors were treated with VCB (2100cGy) followed by three cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)). The primary endpoint was PFS at 2 years, with toxicity and sites of failure as secondary endpoints. Toxicity was assessed by patient report (CTCAE v. 3) as well as by delays or dose modifications in treatment. RESULTS: All patients completed VCB and 19/23 (83%) completed both VCB and 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Mean time to complete VCB was 14.5 days with minimal acute toxicity noted. At 6 months, all toxicity related to VCB had resolved. In total 60 cycles of chemotherapy were given, with one dose reduction (1.6%) for grade 2 neuropathy and seven delays (11.6%) in treatment due to hematologic toxicity. At a median follow-up of 44.5 months, 91% of patients remained progression free at 2 years. Four patients experienced a recurrence; they recurred both locally and distant. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy with VCB and chemotherapy is well tolerated in a population of patients with H-IR endometrial carcinoma and provides 2 year PFS of 91%. A randomized trial is currently underway to assess whether combined VCB and chemotherapy reduces the rate of recurrence compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in this patient population.

Measurements of adiposity as clinical biomarkers for first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of reliable indicators to predict who will benefit most from anti-angiogenic therapy, such as bevacizumab. Recognizing obesity is associated with increased levels of VEGF, the main target of bevacizumab, we sought to assess if adiposity, measured in terms of BMI, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and visceral fat area (VFA) was prognostic. METHODS: Reviewed 46 patients with advanced EOC who received primary treatment with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (N=21) or chemotherapy alone (N=25) for whom complete records, CT prior to the first cycle of chemo, and serum were available. CT was used to measure SFA and VFA by radiologists blinded to outcomes. ELISA was used to measure serum levels of VEGF and angiopoietin-2 in the bevacizumab group. RESULTS: BMI, SFA, and VFA were dichotomized using the median and categorized as "high" or "low". In the bevacizumab group median PFS was shorter for patients with high BMI (9.8 vs. 24.7months, p=0.03), while in the chemotherapy group median PFS was similar between high and low BMI (17.6 vs. 11.9months, p=0.19). In the bevacizumab group patients with a high BMI had higher median levels of VEGF and angiopoietin-2, 371.9 vs. 191.4pg/ml (p=0.05) and 45.9 vs. 16.6pg/ml (p=0.09) respectively. On multivariate analysis neither BMI, SFA, nor VFA were associated with PFS (p=0.13, p=0.86, p=0.16 respectively) or OS (p=0.14, p=0.93, p=0.28 respectively) in the chemotherapy group. However, in the bevacizumab group BMI was significantly associated with PFS (p=0.02); accounting for confounders adjusted HR for high vs. low BMI was 5.16 (95% CI 1.31-20.24). Additionally in the bevacizumab group SFA was significantly associated with OS (p=0.03); accounting for confounders adjusted HR for high vs. low SFA was 3.58 (95% CI 1.12-11.43). CONCLUSION: Results provide the first evidence in EOC that patients with high levels of adiposity may not derive benefit from bevacizumab and that measurements of adiposity are likely to be a useful biomarker.

A phase II trial of brivanib in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Brivanib, an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) was investigated as a single agent in a phase II trial to assess the activity and tolerability in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent EMC after receiving one to two prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and performance status of ≤2. Treatment consisted of brivanib 800 mg orally every day until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at six months and objective tumor response. Expression of multiple angiogenic proteins and FGFR2 mutation status was assessed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients were eligible and evaluable. Median age was 64 years. Twenty-four patients (55.8%) received prior radiation. Median number of cycles was two (range 1-24). No GI perforations but one rectal fistula were seen. Nine patients had grade 3 hypertension, with one experiencing grade 4 confusion. Eight patients (18.6%; 90% CI 9.6%-31.7%) had responses (one CR and seven PRs), and 13 patients (30.2%; 90% CI 18.9%-43.9%) were PFS at six months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 10.7 months, respectively. When modeled jointly, VEGF and angiopoietin-2 expression may diametrically predict PFS. Estrogen receptor-α (ER) expression was positively correlated with OS. CONCLUSION: Brivanib is reasonably well tolerated and worthy of further investigation based on PFS at six months in recurrent or persistent EMC.

The survival detriment of venous thromboembolism with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chronology with respect to surgery on survival with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: An IRB approved, retrospective review was performed of patients treated for Stage I-IV EOC from 1996 to 2011. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess associations between VTE and the primary outcomes of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). SAS 9.3 was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: 586 patients met study criteria. Median age was 63 years (range, 17-94); median BMI was 27.1 kg/m(2) (range, 13.7-67.0). Most tumors were high grade serous (68.3%) and advanced stage (III/IV, 75.4%). 3.7% had a preoperative VTE; 13.2% had a postoperative VTE. Upon multivariate analysis adjusting for age, stage, histology, performance status, and residual disease, preoperative VTE was predictive of OS (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.6-6.1, p=0.001) but not PFS (p=0.55). Postoperative VTE was associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.02, p=0.03) and OS (HR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.6, p=0.001). When VTE timing was modeled, preoperative VTE (HR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8-6.9, p<0.001) and postoperative VTE after primary therapy (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, p=0.001) were predictive of OS. CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative VTE appear to have a detrimental effect on OS with EOC. When modeled as a binary variable, postoperative VTE attenuated PFS; however, when VTE timing was modeled, postoperative VTE was not associated with PFS. It is unclear whether VTE is an inherent poor prognostic marker or if improved VTE prophylaxis and treatment may enable similar survival to patients without these events.

Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.

OBJECTIVE: Although the epidemiology of typical endometrial carcinomas (grades 1-2 endometrioid or Type I) is well established, less is known regarding higher grade endometrioid or non-endometrioid carcinomas (Type II). Within a large Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG-210), which included central pathology review, we investigated the etiologic heterogeneity of endometrial cancers by comparing risk factors for different histologic categories. METHODS: Based on epidemiologic questionnaire data, risk factor associations, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated comparing grade 3 endometrioid and Type II cancers (including histologic subtypes) to grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers. RESULTS: Compared with 2244 grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers, women with Type II cancers (321 serous, 141 carcinosarcomas, 77 clear cell, 42 mixed epithelial with serous or clear cell components) were older; more often non-white, multiparous, current smokers; and less often obese. Risk factors for grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (n=354) were generally similar to those identified for Type II cancers, although patients with grade 3 endometrioid tumors more often had histories of breast cancer without tamoxifen exposure while those with Type II tumors were more frequently treated with tamoxifen. Patients with serous cancers and carcinosarcomas more frequently had breast cancer histories with tamoxifen treatment compared to patients with other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for aggressive endometrial cancers, including grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, appear to differ from lower grade endometrioid carcinomas. Our findings support etiologic differences between Type I and II endometrial cancers as well as additional heterogeneity within Type II cancers.

Inpatient versus outpatient management of neutropenic fever in gynecologic oncology patients: is risk stratification useful?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of risk stratification of gynecologic oncology patients with neutropenic fever (NF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of gynecologic cancer patients admitted with NF from 2007 to 2011 was performed, wherein demographic, oncologic, and NF characteristics (hospitalization length, complications, and death) were collected. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score was calculated; low risk was considered ≥ 21. SAS 9.2 was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients met the study criteria. Most (92%) were Caucasian and had advanced stage disease (71%). Primary tumors were 58% ovary, 35% endometrium, and 6% cervix. All patients were receiving chemotherapy on admission (72% for primary, 28% for recurrent disease). Forty-eight percent had a positive culture, and most (58%) positive cultures were urine. Seventy-six percent of patients were considered low risk. High-risk patients were more likely to have a severe complication (10% versus 50%, p=0.0003), multiple severe complications (3% versus 20%, p=0.0278), ICU admission (2% versus 40%, p<0.0001), overall mortality (2% versus 15%, p=0.0417), and death due to neutropenic fever (0% versus 15%, p=0.0124). MASCC had a positive predictive value of 50% and negative predictive value of 90%. The median MASCC score for all patients was 22 (range, 11-26), but the median MASCC score for those with death or a severe complication was 17 (range, 11-24). CONCLUSION: Based on this pilot data, MASCC score appears promising in determining suitability for outpatient management of NF in gynecologic oncology patients. Prospective study is ongoing to confirm safety and determine impact on cost.

Distance traveled for treatment of cervical cancer: who travels the farthest, and does it impact outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of distance from residence to treatment center on disease characteristics and recurrence of cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review of patients treated for cervical cancer during 2006-2011 was performed. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Distance traveled from home to treatment facility was calculated and categorized. Recurrence and follow-up data were extracted; progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated. SAS version 9.2 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients met the study criteria; 75% were Caucasian. Forty-nine percent used tobacco. Twenty-five percent had stage III/IV disease. Insurance type was 46% private, 25% Medicaid, 20% Medicare, and 9% uninsured. Distance between residence and hospital was less than 15 miles (29%), 15 to 30 miles (21%), 30 to 50 miles (17%), and more than 50 miles (33%). Median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 1-65). Caucasians were more likely to travel more than 30 miles to a treatment center (P = 0.018) Non-Caucasians were less likely to have private insurance (P = 0.0005) and more likely to recur (P = 0.0045). Recurrence was highest (50%) in African Americans. Travel of more than 30 miles was not associated with age, stage, histology, tobacco abuse, employment, clinical trial enrollment, primary chemoradiation for stage IB disease, or delayed radiation. Travel of more than 30 miles was associated with government insurance (P = 0.029) and a trend toward unemployment (P = 0.059). Four-year progression-free survival (53% vs 52%; P = 0.992) and overall survival (57% vs 62%; P = 0.73) were similar between less than or more than 30-mile travel. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of the patients reside more than 30 miles from treating hospital. Despite farther travel, stage of disease, clinical trial enrollment, treatment type, radiation completion, and recurrence rates were similar among patients with cervical cancer. Non-Caucasians are less likely to travel more than 30 miles.

Serum profiling to distinguish early- and late-stage ovarian cancer patients from disease-free individuals.

Sera mass spectrometry (MS) peak differences were analyzed from 35 ovarian cancer patients and 16 disease-free individuals. "Leave one out" cross validation was used to assign "% cancer peaks" in control and ovarian cancer sera samples. Sera MS discriminated stage I/II and stage III/V ovarian cancer patients versus controls with ROC curve area values of 0.82 and 0.92. Test sensitivities for ovarian cancer stage I/II and III/V were 80% and 93% respectively. These results indicate that MS is useful for distinguishing sera from early-stage ovarian cancer patients, and has potential as a test for early detection of this disease.

A phase I study of concurrent weekly topotecan and cisplatin chemotherapy with whole pelvic radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and acute dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of intravenous topotecan administered with weekly cisplatin during pelvic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated at one of two dose levels receiving intravenous topotecan at 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin at either 30 or 40 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks concurrently with pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy. The primary endpoint for the escalation study was acute dose-limiting toxicities occurring within 30 days of completing radiation therapy. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting >24h in one patient and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in another patient occurred at the first dose level of weekly topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). This necessitated de-escalation to weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) in combination with topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and pelvic radiation. This dose level was tolerable in 6 evaluable patients with only one DLT consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 abdominal pain and grade 3 elevated gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). CONCLUSIONS: In women with locally advanced cervical cancer, intravenous topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy were tolerable. Further expansion of the feasibility cohort of this study was suspended based on the results of a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of platinum combinations in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer.

A phase II trial of thalidomide in patients with refractory uterine carcinosarcoma and correlation with biomarkers of angiogenesis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of thalidomide in previously-treated, measurable, persistent or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus, and to explore associations between angiogenic markers with patient demographics and clinical outcome. METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients were treated until disease progression or toxicity intervened with daily starting dose of 200 mg thalidomide/day that was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks to a target dose of 1000 mg/day. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS)≥6 months (primary), toxicity, response, overall PFS and survival. Pre- and post-treatment plasma were evaluated for a panel of angiogenic biomarkers and assessed against clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 55 enrolled patients, 45 were evaluable for toxicity and survival. Two patients (4%; 90% CI 1-13%) experienced a partial response, and 8 (18%; 90% CI 9-30%) had PFS≥6 months. Median PFS was 1.9 months and median survival was 5.9 months. Grade 2-3 sensory neuropathy was noted in 6 patients, and 4, 3, and 3 patients experienced grade 3 sedation, fatigue, and constipation, respectively. Three patients had grade 4 adverse events (2 thromboembolic, 1 anemia). High pre-treatment VEGFA levels were associated with poorer PFS and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with thalidomide met the protocol specified goal of prolonging PFS at 6 months. However, based on results with newer agents, the activity was insufficient to support further investigation. Association between pre-treatment VEGFA and prognosis in this population supports further evaluation of anti-angiogenic therapies in uterine carcinosarcoma.

A phase II evaluation of aflibercept in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: Aflibercept targets vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor. We evaluated activity and toxicity of aflibercept in recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer patients. Biomarkers and association with clinical characteristics and outcome were explored. METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable disease; 1-2 prior cytotoxic regimens; performance status 0-2. Aflibercept 4 mg/kg IV q14 days (28-day cycles) was administered until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and tumor response rate. A flexible two-stage group sequential design to detect 20% increases in the proportion of patients responding or enduring PFS6 with 90% power (α=10%) was employed. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled; five were excluded: wrong primary (2), second primary (1), wrong cell type (1); and never treated (1). Median age was 64 (range 48-83). Eighteen patients (41%) had two prior regimens; 27 (61%) had prior radiation. The PFS6 rate was 41%; three patients (7%, 90% CI: 2-17) had partial response. Of note, 10 patients (23%) met the PFS6 endpoint without starting a subsequent therapy; the remaining eight patients discontinued therapy for toxicity and started another therapy before 6 months elapsed. Median PFS and overall survival were 2.9 months and 14.6 months, respectively. Significant grade 3/4 toxicities were: cardiovascular (23%/5%), constitutional (7%/0), hemorrhage (2%/5%), metabolic (7%/2%), and pain (18%/0). Two treatment-related deaths were recorded: GI perforation (1), and arterial rupture (1). FGF1 expression was associated with response. CONCLUSIONS: Aflibercept met pretrial activity parameters, but was associated with significant toxicity at this dose and schedule in this population.

Phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin combined with intravenous paclitaxel in patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer.

BACKGROUND.: The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity of cisplatin-based intraperitoneal (IP)/intravenous (IV) treatment using a modified version of the IP/IV arm of GOG 172. METHODS.: Patients with stage IC-IV and recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with D1 paclitaxel (IV at 135 mg/m², 3-h infusion) and cisplatin (IP at 50 mg/m²) and D8 cisplatin (IP at 50 mg/m²) every 21 days for 6 cycles. The primary outcome measure was completion of 6 cycles. Toxicity was assessed using the CTCAE, v.3.0 as well as subjective reporting by patients after each cycle. RESULTS.: Twenty-one patients completed 87 cycles of chemotherapy with IP cisplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel. Eleven patients (52%) were able to complete all 6 cycles. Reasons for failing to complete treatment: progression of disease (n=3), grade 3-4 ototoxicity (n=2), IP port complication (n=1), grade 4 fatigue (n=1), small bowel obstruction (n=1), severe paclitaxel reaction (n=1) and one patient refused further treatment (n=1). Dose reductions of paclitaxel (135 mg/m² to 110 mg/m²) were implemented per protocol for neutropenia (n=3) at a frequency of 3.75%. Dose delays were noted prior to 9 cycles for neutropenia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=1), elevated creatinine (n=1), and grade 3 rash (n=1) at a frequency of 10%. CONCLUSIONS.: Although only 52% of patients were able to complete 6 cycles of cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy, significant reductions in cisplatin-related metabolic toxicity and catheter-related complications were noted.

Phase II trial of cetuximab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had cervical cancer, measurable disease, and GOG performance status ≤2. Treatment consisted of cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and response. The study used a 2-stage group sequential design. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were entered with 3 exclusions, leaving 35 evaluable for analysis. Thirty-one patients (88.6%) received prior radiation as well as either 1 (n=25, 71.4%) or 2 (n=10) prior cytotoxic regimens. Twenty-four patients (68.6%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Grade 3 adverse events possibly related to cetuximab included dermatologic (n=5), GI (n=4), anemia (n=2), constitutional (n=3), infection (n=2), vascular (n=2), pain (n=2), and pulmonary, neurological, vomiting and metabolic (n=1 each). No clinical responses were detected. Five patients (14.3%; two-sided 90% CI, 5.8% to 30%) survived without progression for at least 6 months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 1.97 and 6.7 months, respectively. In this study, all patients with PFS at 6 months harbored tumors with squamous cell histology. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab is well tolerated but has limited activity in this population. Cetuximab activity may be limited to patients with squamous cell histology.