RESUMEN
Emerging zoonoses have had a serious impact on human and animal health in recent decades. More often than not, these disease outbreaks have taken public health by surprise because we have failed to shift the epidemiological curve to the far left and detect zoonoses in animal populations prior to spillover to people. Not only can animals serve as valuable sentinels for emerging zoonoses but also much can be gained by the study of the animals themselves.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/veterinaria , Brotes de Enfermedades , Especies Centinela , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Animales , Aves/virología , Quirópteros/virología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/patología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/transmisión , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/transmisión , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/veterinaria , Salud Pública , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/epidemiología , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/transmisión , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/veterinaria , Zoonosis/patologíaRESUMEN
The West Nile virus outbreak of 1999 revealed many weaknesses in this country's ability to respond to disease threats that cross species lines. There were issues of poor communication among human, domestic animal, and wildlife health agencies that delayed diagnosis; a lack of diagnostic capacity of wildlife agencies at the state level; the exclusion of captive wildlife from any surveillance efforts; an inability to visualize the geospatial relationship between the human and avian outbreaks in a timely manner; and marked disparities of funding levels across agencies. Wildlife has played an important role in recent emerging infectious diseases, and it is clear that a One Health approach will be necessary to respond to future threats. The question is, are we any better prepared to recognize and respond to a wildlife-related emerging infectious disease than we were 14 years ago? Have the lessons of WNV been learned?