RESUMEN
(1) Introduction: A significant proportion of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) have normal (NCA) or non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). This study retrospectively tested the incidence of re-catheterization, and long-term outcomes of this population in patients aged over 50 years. (2) Methods: We identified all patients above 50 years of age with NOCAD who underwent their first CAG at our center between January 2008 and December 2019. Patients were evaluated for their baseline characteristics, risk factors profile, and indication for CAG. Patients undergoing repeat CAG after the index procedure were assessed for the above, including the primary preventive pharmacotherapy prescribed. (3) Results: A total of 1939 patients were reported to have NOCAD. Of these, 1756 (90%) patients (62% males, median age 66 (56-75) years) had no repeat angiography (group 1). Repeat angiography was performed in 10%: 136 (7%) proved futile (median time for repeat angiography 5 (3-8) years) (group 3), and 47 (3%) ended with angioplasty (median time for repeat angiography 4 (3-6) years) (group 2). Male gender, BMI above 30 (23% vs. 13%), hypertension (68% vs. 57%), diabetes (28% vs. 17%) and smoking (36% vs. 19%) were significantly higher in the interventional group. Regression analysis showed both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and hyperlipidemia were significantly associated with repeat CAG. The indication for the first CAG was mainly symptoms related. In the interventional repeat angiography (n = 47) the incidence of troponin positive cases increased from 8.2% before intervention to 57.5%, 50% being ST elevation cases. The symptoms-related cases went from 36.7% to 18.4%. Intriguingly, 85% of the interventional group were not prescribed statin and/or aspirin on a regular basis, and/or did not adhere to treatment. (4) Conclusions: NOCAD is a frequent occurrence. The threshold for repeat angiography must be higher, better reserved to troponin positive cases. Moreover, patients must be handled according to their risk profile, not being mistakenly reassured by a snapshot benign coronary angiography.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The heart team approach is highly advocated for in treatment decision making in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Nevertheless, many centers lack on-site cardiac surgical services (CSS)/formal heart team. Our local alternative is of remote surgical consultation without a structured image sharing platform. In our understanding, the incidence of anatomical complete revascularization (ACR) under this daily practice, and its clinical impact, has not been discussed before. METHODS: We analyzed 477 consecutive patients who were surgically revascularized between January 2009 and March 2018 for MVD, after remote surgical consultation. Unstable, late arrival, and ST elevation patients were excluded (n = 163). ACR was considered grafting all anatomic lesions > 50%. Syntax score (SS) calculation and ACR categorization were determined by an independent interventionalist using diagnostic angiograms and available operative reports (n = 267). Patients' outcomes were assessed in relation to multiple clinical variables including troponin result and the revascularization status. RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 64 years, and mean SS-II was 27.3 ± 11. At the 4-year follow-up, the observed mortality (11.8% and 12.9%, with troponin-positive and -negative groups, respectively), myocardial infarction (11.8%), and repeat revascularization (9.8%) were higher than those predicted using a nomogram depicting the predicted 4-year mortality as a function of the SYNTAX II Score (5.3%, 8.8%, and 3.5%, respectively, p = 0.02). ACR was reported in 33% of 267 available patients' reports. After multivariate adjustment ACR was the only variable associated with a significant increase in 4-year mortality (12.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Partial revascularization in the absence of on-site CSS and a structured heart team platform is a frequent occurrence. Not surprisingly, this occurrence was associated with a higher risk for mid-term mortality. An upfront, structured, virtual, heart team interface is mandatory to particularly prioritize the completeness of revascularization when considering the optimal revascularization mode.