Low-dose naproxen interferes with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy subjects: recommendations to minimize the functional consequences.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether low-dose naproxen sodium (220 mg twice a day) interferes with aspirin's antiplatelet effect in healthy subjects. METHODS: We performed a crossover, open-label study in 9 healthy volunteers. They received for 6 days 3 different treatments separated by 14 days of washout: 1) naproxen 2 hours before aspirin, 2) aspirin 2 hours before naproxen, and 3) aspirin alone. The primary end point was the assessment of serum thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)) 24 hours after the administration of naproxen 2 hours before aspirin on day 6 of treatment. In 5 volunteers, the rate of recovery of TXB(2) generation (up to 72 hours after drug discontinuation) was assessed in serum and in platelet-rich plasma stimulated with arachidonic acid (AA) or collagen. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after the last dosing on day 6 in volunteers receiving aspirin alone or aspirin before naproxen, serum TXB(2) was almost completely inhibited (median [range] 99.1% [97.4-99.4%] and 99.1% [98.0-99.7%], respectively). Naproxen given before aspirin caused a slightly lower inhibition of serum TXB(2) (median [range] 98.0% [90.6-99.4%]) than aspirin alone (P = 0.0007) or aspirin before naproxen (P = 0.0045). All treatments produced a maximal inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation. At 24 hours, compared with baseline, collagen-induced platelet aggregation was still inhibited by aspirin alone (P = 0.0003), but not by aspirin given 2 hours before or after naproxen. Compared with administration of aspirin alone, the sequential administration of naproxen and aspirin caused a significant parallel upward shift of the regression lines describing the recovery of platelet TXB(2). CONCLUSION: Sequential administration of 220 mg naproxen twice a day and low-dose aspirin interferes with the irreversible inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase 1 afforded by aspirin. The interaction was smaller when giving naproxen 2 hours after aspirin. The clinical consequences of these 2 schedules of administration of aspirin with naproxen remain to be studied in randomized clinical trials.

Pharmacodynamic interaction of naproxen with low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the occurrence of pharmacodynamic interaction between low-dose aspirin and naproxen. BACKGROUND: The uncertainty of cardioprotection by naproxen has encouraged its combination with aspirin in patients with arthritis and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: The incubation of washed platelets with naproxen for 5 min before the addition of aspirin reduced the irreversible inhibition of thromboxane (TX)B(2) production by aspirin. The pharmacodynamic interaction between the two drugs was then investigated in four healthy volunteers who received aspirin (100 mg daily) for 6 days and then the combination of aspirin and naproxen for further 6 days: aspirin 2 h before naproxen (500 mg, twice-daily dosing). After 14 days of washout, naproxen was given 2 h before aspirin for further 6 days. RESULTS: The inhibition of serum TXB(2) production (index of platelet cyclooxygenase [COX]-1 activity) and platelet aggregation ex vivo and urinary 11-dehydro-TXB(2) levels (index of TXB(2) biosynthesis in vivo) by aspirin alone (99 +/- 0.2%, 95 +/- 0.6%, and 81 +/- 4%, respectively) was not significantly altered by the co-administration of naproxen, given either 2 h after aspirin or in reverse order. In a second study, the concurrent administration of a single dose of aspirin and naproxen did not affect platelet TXB(2) production and aggregation at 1 h after dosing, when aspirin alone causes maximal inhibitory effect. Moreover, the rapid recovery of platelet COX-1 activity and function supports the occurrence of a pharmacodynamic interaction between naproxen and aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Naproxen interfered with the inhibitory effect of aspirin on platelet COX-1 activity and function. This pharmacodynamic interaction might undermine the sustained inhibition of platelet COX-1 that is necessary for aspirin's cardioprotective effects.

Clinical pharmacology of platelet, monocyte, and vascular cyclooxygenase inhibition by naproxen and low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The current controversy on the potential cardioprotective effect of naproxen prompted us to evaluate the extent and duration of platelet, monocyte, and vascular cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition by naproxen compared with low-dose aspirin. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a crossover, open-label study of low-dose aspirin (100 mg/d) or naproxen (500 mg BID) administered to 9 healthy subjects for 6 days. The effects on thromboxane (TX) and prostacyclin biosynthesis were assessed up to 24 hours after oral dosing. Serum TXB2, plasma prostaglandin (PG) E2, and urinary 11-dehydro-TXB2 and 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) were measured by previously validated radioimmunoassays. The administration of naproxen or aspirin caused a similar suppression of whole-blood TXB2 production, an index of platelet COX-1 activity ex vivo, by 94+/-3% and 99+/-0.3% (mean+/-SD), respectively, and of the urinary excretion of 11-dehydro-TXB2, an index of systemic biosynthesis of TXA2 in vivo, by 85+/-8% and 78+/-7%, respectively, that persisted throughout the dosing interval. Naproxen, in contrast to aspirin, significantly reduced systemic prostacyclin biosynthesis by 77+/-19%, consistent with differential inhibition of monocyte COX-2 activity measured ex vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The regular administration of naproxen 500 mg BID can mimic the antiplatelet COX-1 effect of low-dose aspirin. Naproxen, unlike aspirin, decreased prostacyclin biosynthesis in vivo.

Human pharmacology of naproxen sodium.

We compared the variability in degree and recovery from steady-state inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 ex vivo and in vivo and platelet aggregation by naproxen sodium at 220 versus 440 mg b.i.d. and low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects. Six healthy subjects received consecutively naproxen sodium (220 and 440 mg b.i.d.) and aspirin (100 mg daily) for 6 days, separated by washout periods of 2 weeks. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition was determined using ex vivo and in vivo indices of enzymatic activity: 1) the measurement of serum thromboxane (TX)B(2) levels and whole-blood lipopolysaccharide-stimulated prostaglandin (PG)E(2) levels, markers of COX-1 in platelets and COX-2 in monocytes, respectively; 2) the measurement of urinary 11-dehydro-TXB(2) and 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) levels, markers of systemic TXA(2) biosynthesis (mostly COX-1-derived) and prostacyclin biosynthesis (mostly COX-2-derived), respectively. Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation was also studied. The maximal inhibition of platelet COX-1 (95.9 +/- 5.1 and 99.2 +/- 0.4%) and AA-induced platelet aggregation (92 +/- 3.5 and 93.7 +/- 1.5%) obtained at 2 h after dosing with naproxen sodium at 220 and 440 mg b.i.d., respectively, was indistinguishable from aspirin, but at 12 and 24 h after dosing, we detected marked variability, which was higher with naproxen sodium at 220 mg than at 440 mg b.i.d. Assessment of the ratio of inhibition of urinary 11-dehydro-TXB(2) versus 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) showed that the treatments caused a more profound inhibition of TXA(2) than prostacyclin biosynthesis in vivo throughout dosing interval. In conclusion, neither of the two naproxen doses mimed the persistent and complete inhibition of platelet COX-1 activity obtained by aspirin, but marked heterogeneity was mitigated by the higher dose of the drug.

Red blood cells may contribute to hypercoagulability in uraemia via enhanced surface exposure of phosphatidylserine.

BACKGROUND: The exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer leaflet of the erythrocyte membrane may have several pathophysiological consequences, including the development of a procoagulant phenotype, a finding that seems relevant to the thrombotic risk seen in many disorders. METHODS: Because PS externalization increases in erythrocytes from patients suffering from chronic uraemia, which is frequently associated with a prothrombotic state, the possible relationship between erythrocyte PS exposure, erythrocyte procoagulant activity and plasma levels of several haemostatic markers was studied in a group of haemodialysed patients. RESULTS: Uraemic erythrocytes displayed increased procoagulant activity, which proved to be correlated directly with erythrocyte PS exposure. Pre-incubation of uraemic erythrocytes with annexin V, a protein with high affinity and specificity for PS, strongly inhibited in vitro thrombin generation induced by erythrocytes as compared with untreated red cells. Thrombin generation and activation of fibrinolysis were found to occur in uraemic patients, as substantiated by increased plasma levels of markers for thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment F1.2 and thrombin-antithrombin complex) and fibrinolysis (D-dimer and plasmin-antiplasmin complex), respectively. Significant correlations between prothrombin fragment F1.2 and D-dimer suggested that hyperfibrinolysis was secondary to thrombin generation. Correlations were also found between erythrocyte PS levels and plasma levels of haemostatic markers, including prothrombin fragment F1.2 (P = 0.007), thrombin-antithrombin complex (P = 0.00009), plasmin-antiplasmin complex (P = 0.0009) and D-dimer (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that increased PS exposure may cause a pathological erythrocyte procoagulant phenotype, which may be a factor inducing a hypercoagulable state in uraemia.

Platelet activation markers in patients with nephrotic syndrome. A comparative study of different platelet function tests.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Enhanced platelet reactivity may play a significant role in the genesis of the hypercoagulable state of nephrotic syndrome. However, the role of platelet function testing in nephrosis is controversial, partly because the methods used to assess platelet function (platelet aggregation and immunoassays of plasma beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4) have such marked methodological problems. In the present study, we evaluated several tests assessing platelet function in 18 adult patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function. METHODS: Platelet function was assessed by measurement of plasma beta-thromboglobulin (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA), plasma P-selectin (ELISA), circulating platelets exposing the activation-dependent antigens P-selectin (CD62P) and lysosomal GP53 (CD63) (flow cytometry), and by aggregation response to agonists such as ADP and collagen. Results were compared to those obtained in a group of 16 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: Levels of plasma beta-thromboglobulin (p = 0.001), plasma P-selectin (p < 0.001), and CD62P/CD63-positive platelets (p < 0.001 for both) were increased in nephrotic patients as compared to healthy controls. Platelet hyperaggregability in vitro was found in 13/18 patients. The reproducibility of platelet activation markers, as assessed by blood sample collection a week later from all patients, was found to be higher for plasma P-selectin (Spearman correlation coefficient, R = 0.99) and circulating activated platelets (CD62P: R = 0.97; CD63: R = 0.96) than for plasma beta-thromboglobulin (R = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Pronounced platelet activation takes place in nephrotic syndrome and may contribute to the hypercoagulability of nephrosis. Whole blood flow cytometry assay of platelet activation and plasma P-selectin assay may represent useful tests to assess the hypercoagulable state in nephrotic patients.