Loss of TLR3 and its downstream signaling accelerates acinar cell damage in the acute phase of pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is accompanied by acinar cell damage releasing potential toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) ligands. So far, TLR3 is known as a pattern recognition receptor in the immune signaling cascade triggering a type I interferon response. In addition, TLR3 signaling contributes to programmed cell death through the activation of caspase 8. However, the functional role of TLR3 and its downstream toll-like receptor adaptor molecule 1 (TICAM1) in the inflamed pancreas is unknown. METHODS: To uncover the role of TLR3 signaling in acute pancreatitis, we induced a cerulein-mediated pancreatitis in Tlr3 and Ticam1 knockout (KO) mice and in wildtype animals. The exocrine damage was determined by blood serum analysis and histological examination. Immunohistochemistry, gene expression and immunoblot analysis were conducted to study TLR3 function. RESULTS: After the induction of an acute pancreatitis, wildtype mice showed a high endosomal TLR3 expression in acinar cells. In comparison to wildtype and Ticam1 KO mice, Tlr3 KO mice exhibited the highest severity of pancreatitis with an increased NF-κB activation and elevated expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines Il6 and Tnf, although the amount of infiltrating immune cells was unaffected. Additionally, we detected a strong elevation of acinar cell necrosis and reduced levels of cleaved caspase 8 in Tlr3 and Ticam1 KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: TLR3 and its downstream adaptor TICAM1 are important mediators of acinar cell damage in acute pancreatitis. They possess a critical role in programmed cell death and our data suggest that TLR3 signaling controls the onset and severity of acute pancreatitis.

Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a pre-malignant lesion, potentially leading to vaginal cancer. It is a rare disease, representing less than 1% of all intraepithelial neoplasia of the female genital tract. Similar to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), there are three different grades of VAIN. VAIN 1 is also known as a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), whereas VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 both represent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Risk factors for the development of VAIN are similar to those for cervical neoplasia, i.e. promiscuity, starting sexual activity at an early age, tobacco consumption and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). However, compared to other intraepithelial neoplasia such as CIN or VIN (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia), there still is little understanding about the natural course of VAIN and its capacity for pro- or regression. Furthermore, there is controversial data about the HPV detection rate in VAIN lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN, who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 at the University Women´s Hospital of Heidelberg Germany, were included in this study. The biopsies of all participating patients were subjected to HPV genotyping. GP-E6/E7 Nested Multiplex PCR (NMPCR) was used to identify and genotype HPV. Eighteen pairs of type-specific nested PCR primers were assessed to detect the following "high-risk" HPV genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68, as well as the "low-risk" genotypes 6/11, 42, 43 and 44. The data was analyzed with the software SAS (Statistical Analysis System). RESULTS: All 67 cases were eligible for DNA analysis. The median age was 53 years. The largest group with 53% (n = 36) was formed by women, who were first diagnosed with VAIN between the age of 41 to 60 years. 50% (n = 37) of the patients presented a VAIN in the upper 1/3 of the vagina. 58 (87%) were diagnosed with HSIL (VAIN). The median age in patients with LSIL (VAIN) was 53 years and in patients with HSIL (VAIN) 53.5 years. 12 women (18%) had an immunosuppression. HPV positivity was confirmed in 37 patients (55%). Except for a single patient, who had a triple infection with HPV types 6/11, 16 and 68, only infections with one single HPV genotype were detected. An infection with the HPV genotypes 31, 39, 45, 51, 58, 59, 66, 42, 43 and 44 couldn't be found in any of the patients. In 28 patients with diagnosed VAIN, an infection with HPV 16 could be shown, 24 (86%) of them were diagnosed with a HSIL (VAIN). 16 (24%) women presented condylomata and 13 of them (81%) had a positive HPV status. However, only 47% of the women without condylomata presented a positive HPV status, resulting in a significant correlation (p = 0.0164) between condylomata and HPV infection. In 28 of all 67 patients (42%), recurrence of the neoplasia occurred. CONCLUSION: HPV 16 is the main virus-type to be associated with the development of a VAIN. Also, HPV 16 infection, VIN or condylomata acuminata in the past medical history seemed to be significant factors for early relapse.