RESUMEN
Case 1: An 71-year-old man underwent chemotherapy with S-1 plus trastuzumab to treat type 3 gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4b[Panc], N3, H0, CY1, P0, M1). For anemia and active bleeding from the tumor, transcatheter arterial embolization(TAE)was performed with metallic coils on the splenic artery. Infarction of the spleen and left pleural effusion were observed. Second-line paclitaxel(PTX)chemotherapy was administered 4 weeks after TAE. Case 2: An 76-year-old man underwent chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin to treat type 3 gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4a, N3, H0, P1, M1). For anemia and active bleeding from the tumor, TAE with gelatin sponge(Serescure®)was performed on the left and right gastric artery. Radiotherapy(31 Gy)with S-1 was performed because TAE was not effective for bleeding. After chemoradiotherapy, nab-PTX was administered. Case 3: An 74- year-old man underwent second-line chemotherapy with nab-PTX to treat type 4 advanced gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4a, N3, H1, P0, M1). For progression of anemia due to tumor bleeding, TAE with gelatin sponge(Serescure®)was performed on the left gastric artery. TAE was effective, and he was discharged from the hospital. In 2 of 3 cases, hemostasis was achieved by TAE. Therefore, TAE is effective to decrease bleeding from gastric cancer during chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Anciano , Embolización Terapéutica , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
An 80-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with appetite loss in December 2014. Gastroduodenal scope, abdominal computed tomography(CT), and laparoscopy revealed type 4 advanced gastric cancer(poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) with multiple lymph node(LN)involvement and multiple peritoneal metastasis. S-1(80mg/body)was administrated between January 2015 and September 2015 in the outpatient clinic. A partial response was obtained, but a gastric tumor, ascites, and LN re-growth were observed. Since October 2015, paclitaxel(PTX)(70mg/m2; day 1, 8, and 15)and ramucir- umab(RAM)(8mg/kg; day 1 and 15)have been administered. After 2 courses, bi-weekly PTX plus RAM were continued for grade 3 neutropenia and grade 2 anorexia. The tumor and LNs partially responded, and the ascites disappeared. With this dosage and administration schedule, the partial response(PR)was maintained for approximately 8 months without any severe adverse reactions. This successful case might indicate that it is important for elderly patients with gastric cancer that progressed with prior chemotherapy regimens to consider appropriate reduction of the PTX dosage, schedule, and continuation of RAM.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Humanos , Masculino , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , RamucirumabRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The REGARD and RAINBOW trials showed that ramucirumab(RAM)alone and RAM plus paclitaxel(PTX) were effective therapies for advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RAM alone and PTX plus RAM in such patients. METHODS: Patients who were received RAM at 8mg/kg or RAM plus PTX at 80mg/m2(on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle)between June 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in this study. We compared the clinical outcome of RAM alone(RAM group, n=10)with that of RAM plus PTX(PTX+RAM group, n=13). RESULTS: The RAM group contained many more patients with poor performance status or prior chemotherapy of 2 or more regimens than the PTX+RAM group. All patients in both groups received chemotherapy on an outpatient basis. One case of grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events was found in the RAM group and 6 cases were found in the PTX+RAM group. The overall response rate was 10% in the RAM group and 30% in the PTX+RAM group. Progression-free survival was 54 days in the RAM group and 187 days in the PTX+RAM group(p=0.0374). Overall survival was 158 days in the RAM group and was not reached in the PTX+RAM group(p=0.1091). CONCLUSIONS: RAM alone and RAM plus PTX can be administered safely on an outpatient basis and are beneficial for advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , RamucirumabRESUMEN
A woman in her 50s underwent distal gastrectomy and D1+b dissection in December 2005 for early gastric cancer that was diagnosed as a signet-ring-cell carcinoma, fStage â ¡ (T1a, N2, H0, P0, CY0, M0) with 12 lymph node metastases in the second field. Multiple bone metastases were diagnosed on the basis of CT and bone scintigraphy findings and serum ALP elevation (2,743 IU/L) I n December 2010. Fourteen courses of S-1 plus CDDP and 4 mg of zoledronate were administered from January to September in 2011. Pancytopenia, D-dimmer elevation, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes were observed in October 2012, indicating she had bone marrow metastasis. She was treated with a transfusion, anti-DIC therapy, and paclitaxel. She died from gastric cancer in December 2012. We report a rare case of recurrence with bone metastasis from early gastric cancer. S-1 plus CDDP chemotherapy and zoledronate therapy is an effective treatments for multiple bone metastases from gastric cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
A man in his 70s underwent distal gastrectomy and D1 dissection with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in March 2009 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. He was diagnosed with signet-ring cell carcinoma, Stage â £(T4a, N3a, H0, P1, CY1, M1) and R2. Seventeen cycles of S-1 plus CDDP were administered from April 2009 to December 2010 and 19 cycles of S-1 monotherapy were administered from January 2011 to March 2014. He developed peritoneal recurrence with serum tumor marker elevation in May 2014. Stenosis of the common bile duct, hydronephrosis, and rectal stenosis in Ra-Rs was observed in June 2014. A bile duct stent and a double J catheter was inserted. A colonic stent (NitiTM, 22 mm×6 cm) was also inserted. He could eat after the surgery and was discharged from the hospital. We suggest that a colonic stent is an effective treatment for colon stenosis due to peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer.