RESUMEN
Mastocytosis is a group of disorders characterized by the pathologic accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. One example of mastocytosis is urticaria pigmentosa, which presents with mastocytomas that can cause hives and, when irritated, pruritus. To our knowledge, we are describing the first case of urticaria pigmentosa without pruritus. The patient had a positive Darier's sign, stated that they never felt itchy, and denied ever using a topical steroid or antihistamine. Although our patient declined additional testing, patients like this may benefit from a detailed evaluation of their sensory system through both quantitative sensory testing and genetic analysis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3): doi:10.36849/JDD.7558e.
Asunto(s)
Urticaria Pigmentosa , Urticaria , Humanos , Urticaria Pigmentosa/diagnóstico , Prurito/diagnóstico , Prurito/etiología , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Mastocitos , EmocionesRESUMEN
AIMS: Sugammadex rapidly reverses moderate and deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade at doses of 4 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, respectively. Sugammadex is renally eliminated. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of sugammadex in subjects with renal impairment versus those with normal renal function. METHODS: This open-label, two-part, phase 1 study included adults with moderate (creatinine clearance (CLcr) 30 - < 50 mL/min) and severe (CLcr < 30 mL/min) renal impairment and healthy controls (CLcr ≥ 80 mL/min). A single intravenous (IV) bolus injection of sugammadex 4 mg/kg was administered into a peripheral vein over 10 seconds directly by straight needle in part 1 (n = 24; 8/group), and via an IV catheter followed by a saline flush in part 2 (n = 18; 6/group). Plasma concentrations of sugammadex were collected after drug administration. Due to dosing issues in part 1, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for part 2 only. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 18 subjects. Mean sugammadex exposure (AUC0-∞) in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment was 2.42- and 5.42-times, respectively, that of healthy controls. Clearance decreased and apparent terminal half-life was prolonged with increasing renal dysfunction. Similar Cmax values were observed in subjects with renal impairment and healthy controls. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex exposure is increased in subjects with moderate and severe renal insufficiency due to progressively decreased clearance as a function of worsening renal function. Sugammadex 4 mg/kg was well tolerated in subjects with renal impairment, with a safety profile similar to that of healthy subjects. These results indicate that dose adjustment of sugammadex is not required in patients with moderate renal impairment; however, current safety experience is insufficient to support the use of sugammadex in patients with CLcr < 30 mL/min.â©.
Asunto(s)
Riñón/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , gamma-Ciclodextrinas/farmacocinética , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , SugammadexRESUMEN
Gefapixant (MK-7264, AF-219) is a first-in-class P2X3 antagonist in development for refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Gefapixant is primarily cleared by renal excretion. To assess the importance of the multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) and MATE2K transporters in the elimination of gefapixant, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted evaluating the effect of coadministration of a single dose of pyrimethamine, a competitive inhibitor of MATE1 and MATE2K, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of gefapixant in healthy participants. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. In this open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study, a 45-mg dose of gefapixant was administered to 12 participants in period 1. After a 7-day washout, a 50-mg dose of pyrimethamine was administered 3 hours before a 45-mg dose of gefapixant in period 2. Compared with the administration of gefapixant alone, concomitant dosing of gefapixant with pyrimethamine increased the total gefapixant plasma exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity) by 24%, reduced gefapixant renal clearance by 30%, and increased gefapixant mean terminal half-life from 7.7 to 10.3 hours. The most frequently reported adverse events were dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and dry mouth; all adverse events were considered of mild intensity and resolved by the end of the study. These results support that MATE1 and/or MATE2K contribute to the renal clearance of gefapixant, but the effect of inhibition of these transporters on gefapixant pharmacokinetics is not considered clinically meaningful.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2X , Pirimetamina , Humanos , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas , Receptores Purinérgicos P2X3 , SulfonamidasRESUMEN
Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. We investigated the effect of renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefapixant 50 mg in an open-label, single-dose study enrolling participants with moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 6) RI, end-stage renal disease (ESRD; n = 6) under hemodialysis (HD) and non-HD conditions, and healthy matched controls (n = 6). Serial plasma and urine samples for gefapixant concentrations were collected at selected time points over 72 and 48 hours after dosing, respectively. Linear regression analysis predicted a 1.87-, 2.79-, and 3.76-fold higher exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) for participants with mild, moderate, and severe RI, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Categorical analysis exhibited a 2.98-, 4.43-, and 4.74-fold higher exposure for participants with moderate RI, severe RI, and ESRD, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Apparent oral clearance and renal clearance was lower in participants with various degrees of RI, by 66% to 90%, compared with healthy matched control participants, explaining the increased gefapixant exposure with increasing degrees of renal impairment. Gefapixant area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration decreased by ≈25% under HD conditions compared to non-HD conditions. Single-dose administration of gefapixant was generally well tolerated in this study. The data from this trial informed the enrollment of phase 3 clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of gefapixant in >2000 participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Those efficacy and safety data, combined with analysis of population pharmacokinetics from across the entire development program, will be used to evaluate the magnitude of the renal impairment effect in the refractory or unexplained chronic cough population and to determine any dose adjustment recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Insuficiencia Renal , Enfermedad Crónica , Tos/inducido químicamente , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2X/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas , Receptores Purinérgicos P2X3 , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , SulfonamidasRESUMEN
Gefapixant (MK-7264) is a first-in-class, selective antagonist of the P2X3 purinergic receptor currently being investigated as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough. In non-clinical studies, gefapixant was eliminated primarily by renal excretion of the parent drug. The objective of this study was to assess the disposition of gefapixant in humans. The absorption, metabolism, and excretion profiles of gefapixant were assessed after oral administration of a single dose of [14 C]gefapixant to six healthy adult males. Following a single-oral [14 C]gefapixant dose to healthy adult males, the mass balance was achieved, with 98.9% of the administered radioactivity recovered in urine and feces. Elimination of gefapixant occurred primarily via renal excretion of the intact drug (64%); metabolism was a minor pathway of elimination of gefapixant (12% and 2% recovered in urine and feces, respectively). Single-dose administration of [14 C]gefapixant 50 mg was generally well tolerated in healthy adult males. The fraction of the anticipated therapeutic oral dose of gefapixant absorbed is estimated to be at least 78%. Gefapixant is expected to be the major circulating drug-related material in plasma, and the majority of the dosed drug will be excreted unchanged in urine.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2X/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adulto , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2X/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2X/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Receptores Purinérgicos P2X3/efectos de los fármacos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Atogepant is a potent, selective, oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist in development for migraine prevention. The chemical structure of atogepant is distinct from previous CGRP receptor antagonists, which were associated with elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in clinical trials. Here, we report the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of a once-daily supratherapeutic dose (170 mg) of atogepant for 28 days from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I trial in healthy participants. Overall safety, hepatic safety, and plasma PK parameters were evaluated. Thirty-four participants aged 23-55 years enrolled; 28 (82.4%) completed the study in accordance with the protocol. Multiple doses of 170 mg atogepant for 28 consecutive days were generally well-tolerated. All adverse events (AEs; reported in 87.0% of the atogepant group; 72.7%, placebo) were mild in severity except one serious AE of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to a bicycle accident and not considered related to treatment. There were two discontinuations due to AEs, both with atogepant, one considered possibly related to treatment. Over 28 days of treatment, no participant receiving atogepant had an ALT elevation above 1.5 × upper limit of normal. Change from baseline in serum ALT levels was not different between atogepant and placebo. Atogepant is rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration, ~ 2 hours) with an apparent terminal half-life of ~ 11 hours, and no evidence of accumulation after once-daily dosing. Overall, atogepant at a high oral dose is safe and well-tolerated in healthy participants with no clinically meaningful elevations in ALT.
Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Espiro/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Hígado/enzimología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Placebos/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/farmacocinética , Compuestos de Espiro/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Espiro/farmacocinética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The incidence of migraine is higher among women than men and peaks during the reproductive years, when contraceptive medication use is common. Atogepant, a potent, selective antagonist of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor-in development for migraine prevention-is thus likely to be used by women taking oral contraceptives. This phase 1, open-label, single-center, 2-period, fixed-sequence study examined the effect of multiple-dose atogepant 60 mg once daily on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive, ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg and levonorgestrel 0.15 mg (EE/LNG), in healthy postmenopausal or oophorectomized women. For participants in period 1, a single dose of EE/LNG was followed by a 7-day washout. In period 2, atogepant was given once daily on days 1-17; an oral dose of EE/LNG was coadministered with atogepant on day 14. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for EE and LNG were assessed following administration with and without atogepant. Twenty-six participants aged 45-64 years enrolled; 22 completed the study in accordance with the protocol. The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) of LNG was increased by 19% when administered with atogepant. Coadministration of atogepant and a single dose of EE/LNG did not substantially alter the pharmacokinetics of EE; the â¼19% increase in plasma AUC0-∞ of LNG is not anticipated to be clinically significant. Overall, atogepant alone and in combination with EE/LNG was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/farmacocinética , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/farmacocinética , Etinilestradiol/farmacocinética , Levonorgestrel/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Área Bajo la Curva , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/sangre , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/sangre , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/sangre , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Levonorgestrel/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis after administration of sugammadex. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Sugammadex clinical development program and post-marketing experience. PATIENTS: Surgical patients and healthy volunteers who received sugammadex or placebo/comparator with anesthesia and/or neuromuscular blockade (NMB). INTERVENTIONS: Sugammadex administered as 2.0â¯mg/kg at reappearance of the second twitch, 4.0â¯mg/kg at 1-2 post-tetanic count, or 16.0â¯mg/kg at 3â¯min after rocuronium 1.2â¯mg/kg. MEASUREMENTS: Three analytical methods were used: 1) automated MedDRA queries; 2) searches of adverse events (AEs) consistent with treatment-related hypersensitivity reactions as diagnosed by the investigator; and 3) a retrospective adjudication of AEs suggestive of hypersensitivity by a blinded, independent adjudication committee (AC). In addition, a search of all post-marketing reports of events of hypersensitivity was performed, and events were retrospectively adjudicated by an independent AC. Anaphylaxis was determined according to Sampson Criterion 1. MAIN RESULTS: The pooled dataset included 3519 unique subjects who received sugammadex and 544 who received placebo. The automated MedDRA query method showed no apparent increase in hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with sugammadex as compared to placebo or neostigmine. Similarly, there was a low overall incidence of AEs of treatment-related hypersensitivity (<1%), with no differences between sugammadex and placebo or neostigmine. Finally, the retrospective adjudication of AEs suggestive of hypersensitivity showed a low incidence of hypersensitivity (0.56% and 0.21% for sugammadex 2â¯mg/kg and 4â¯mg/kg, respectively), with an incidence similar to subjects who received placebo (0.55%). There were no confirmed cases of anaphylaxis in the pooled studies. During post-marketing use, spontaneous reports of anaphylaxis occurred with approximately 0.01% of sugammadex doses. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects who received sugammadex with general anesthesia and/or NMB had a low overall incidence of hypersensitivity, with no apparent increase in hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis with sugammadex as compared to placebo or neostigmine.