Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 176-179, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31995548

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: While the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) can use agency-wide emergency activation to respond to a hepatitis A virus-infected food handler, there is a need to identify alternative responses that conserve scarce resources. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs incurred by DOHMH of responding to a hepatitis A case in restaurant food handlers using an agency-wide emergency activation (2015) versus the cost of collaborating with a private network of urgent care clinics (2017). DESIGN: We partially evaluate the costs incurred by DOHMH of responding to a hepatitis A case in a restaurant food handler using agency-wide emergency activation (2015) with the cost of collaborating with a private network of urgent care clinics (2017) estimated for a scenario in which DOHMH incurred the retail cost of services rendered. RESULTS: Costs incurred by DOHMH for emergency activation were $65 831 ($238 per restaurant employee evaluated) of which DOHMH personnel services accounted for 85% ($55 854). Costs of collaboration would have totaled $50 914 ($253 per restaurant employee evaluated) of which personnel services accounted for 6% ($3146). CONCLUSIONS: Accounting for incident size, collaborating with the clinic network was more expensive than agency-wide emergency activation, though required fewer DOHMH personnel services.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Hepatitis A/economía , Salud Pública/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Manipulación de Alimentos , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Virus de la Hepatitis A/patogenicidad , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Restaurantes/organización & administración , Restaurantes/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 23(6): 571-576, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166179

RESUMEN

During 2013, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) received reports of 6 hepatitis A cases among food handlers. We describe our decision-making process for public notification, type of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) offered, and lessons learned. For 3 cases, public notification was issued and DOHMH offered only hepatitis A vaccine as PEP. Subsequent outbreaks resulted from 1 case for which no public notification was issued or PEP offered, and 1 for which public notification was issued and PEP was offered too late. DOHMH continues to use environmental assessments to guide public notification decisions and offer only hepatitis A vaccine as PEP after public notification but recognizes the need to evaluate each situation individually. The PEP strategy employed by DOHMH should be considered because hepatitis A vaccine is immunogenic in all age groups, can be obtained by local jurisdictions more quickly, and is logistically easier to administer in mass clinics than immunoglobulin.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Servicios de Alimentación , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Salud Pública/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Servicios de Alimentación/normas , Hepatitis A/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Profilaxis Posexposición , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(4): 525-31, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24656328

RESUMEN

In 2009, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene delivered influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (pH1N1) vaccine to health care providers, who were required to report all administered doses to the Citywide Immunization Registry. Using data from this registry and a provider survey, we estimated the number of all pH1N1 vaccine doses administered. Of 2.8 million doses distributed during October 1, 2009-March 4, 2010, a total of 988,298 doses were administered and reported; another 172,289 doses were administered but not reported, for a total of 1,160,587 doses administered during this period. Reported doses represented an estimated 80%-85% of actual doses administered. Reporting by a wide range of provider types was feasible during a pandemic. Pediatric-care providers had the highest reporting rate (93%). Other private-care providers who routinely did not report vaccinations indicated that they had few, if any, problems, thereby suggesting that mandatory reporting of all vaccines would be feasible.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Vacunación/métodos
5.
Health Secur ; 16(4): 274-279, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30133374

RESUMEN

Individuals exposed to spores of B. anthracis must take a course of antibiotics as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent inhalation anthrax. During an anthrax event, public health authorities are responsible for conducting dispensing operations to offer PEP to exposed individuals. Jurisdictions have developed antibiotic PEP screening algorithms to determine which antibiotic is appropriate for each individual. Variability exists with regard to screening questions and dispensing decisions based on responses to those questions. It is likely that individuals with similar profiles will receive different antibiotics based solely on the jurisdiction in which they receive their PEP. This lack of consistency among jurisdictions may lead to a loss of confidence in the public health response among the public, the healthcare community, the media, and government leaders, which could compromise the response itself. We present New York City's planning assumptions, screening algorithm, a rationale for our screening questions, and our reasons for excluding screening questions asked by other jurisdictions. We hope that our efforts may assist others in developing and refining their algorithms and associated public messaging and encourage standardization with neighboring jurisdictions where appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Carbunco/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Guías como Asunto , Profilaxis Posexposición/normas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacillus anthracis , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York
6.
Public Health Nurs ; 21(4): 306-15, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15260835
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA