Efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in severe COVID-19 disease: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used in severe COVID-19 disease to eliminate the cytokine storm. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of TPE in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 disease compared to standard treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane database and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP). The random-effect model was used to calculate the risk ratio and standardized mean difference (SMD) as pooled effect size for the difference in mortality and length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The risk of bias and publication bias were assessed in R version 4.1.0. The certainty of the evidence was calculated using the GradePro tool. RESULTS: The database identified 382 participants from six studies, including one randomized control trial. Egger's test did not detect any publication bias (p = 0.178). The random model analysis for mortality evaluated a risk ratio of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28-0.52) with a significant reduction in the TPE group. The certainty of the evidence was moderate, with a risk ratio of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24-0.49). Length of ICU stays between TPE versus standard care showed an SMD of 0.08 (95% CI: -0.38, 0.55) and was not significant. CONCLUSION: The length of ICU stay in the TPE group was not different from standard care. However, this meta-analysis revealed a significant benefit of TPE in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 disease compared to standard treatment.

Spectrum of Bacterial Pathogens in Critical COVID-19 Patients Admitted in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Hospital During the First and Second Wave of the Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study intends to compare the clinical characteristics and the prevalence and spectrum of bacterial pathogens in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU during the first and second waves at a tertiary care, teaching and referral hospital of eastern India. METHOD: This is a hospital-based retrospective study which analysed demographic details, clinical profile and bacterial culture results of severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted in intensive care units (ICU) during April -Oct 2020 (1st wave) and April -July 2021 (2nd wave). RESULT: The patients admitted during the 2nd wave were comparatively older and had multiple comorbidities compared to the 1st wave. (23.8%) (45/189) and 50% (173/346) of the COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU developed bacterial infection during the 1st and 2nd wave respectively. Overall, there was predominance of multidrug resistant Gram negative bacilli in both the waves. There was increased isolation of intrinsic colistin resistant microorganisms. CONCLUSION: Multidrug resistant Gram negative bacterial infections, remain a dreaded complication in severe and critically ill hospitalised COVID-19 patients requiring ICU care and high usage of colistin spirals the emergence and spread of pathogens intrinsically resistant to colistin.

Reckoning the Inhaled Sedation in Critically Ill Patients (INSTINCT) Study.

How to cite this article: Karim HMR, Mitra JK. Reckoning the Inhaled Sedation in Critically Ill Patients (INSTINCT) Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(11):1227-1228.

Home Care of Tracheostomized Chronically Critically Ill Patients: A Study of Caregivers' Burden and Comparison with the Burden of Palliative Care Patients in India.

Introduction: Chronically critically ill (CCI) patients often have high costs of care and poor outcomes. Disease management programs offering home care may reduce costs but need buy-in from informal caregivers. An understanding of caregiver burden in this population is lacking. We aimed to study the caregiver burden, its change over time, and factors affecting it, in post-ICU tracheostomized patients. We compared the caregiver burden among CCI carers to that of palliative caregivers. Materials and methods: Informal caregivers of thirty chronically critically ill tracheostomized patients (CGcci) were administered the Caregivers Burden Scale (CBS) tool at discharge, 2 and 4 weeks after discharge. A one-point assessment of burden was made in 30 caregivers of patients enrolled in Pain and Palliative care clinic (CGpc). Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to analyze score of CGcci over time and compared to the burden in physical, psychologic, economic, time, and social domains between groups. Results: All 60 caregivers were young (33-35 years), predominantly male, and children of the patients. Both CGcci and CGpc had moderate burden score of 60.5 (14.7) vs 61.5 (13), respectively. Physical burden (11.5 vs 8) was greater in CGcci (p = 0.001) compared to psychologic domain (10 vs 12.5) in CGpc (p = 0.01). Burden score over all domains in CGcci decreased rapidly from 67.5 (8) to 55 (16.5) (p = 0.001) in the first month after discharge. Conclusion: Burden of care among caregivers of tracheostomized chronically critically ill patients is comparable to those of palliative caregivers and reduces significantly with time. CTRI: 2020/11/029443 (registered on: 27/11/2020). How to cite this article: Hansda U, Tripathy S, Sahoo AK, Panda I, Shetty AP, Mitra JK, et al. Home Care of Tracheostomized Chronically Critically Ill Patients: A Study of Caregivers' Burden and Comparison with the Burden of Palliative Care Patients in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):579-583.

The role of a combination of N-acetylcysteine and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to standard therapy in acute organophosphate poisoning: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Mortality in acute organophosphate (OP) poisoning remains high despite current standard therapy with atropine and oximes. Due to dose-limiting side effects of atropine, novel therapies are targeting other putative mechanisms of injury, including oxidative damage, to reduce atropine dosage. Objectives: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) have different mechanisms of actions and should act synergistically in OP poisoning. In this study, we wanted to evaluate whether this novel combination, used as an adjuvant to standard care, could improve clinical outcomes. Methods: The study was conducted in the Emergency Department and ICU of AIIMS Bhubaneswar (a tertiary care center and government teaching institute) between July 2019 and July 2021. Eighty-eight adult patients with history and clinical features of acute OP poisoning were randomly allocated (1:1) into two groups. The Study group received 600 mg NAC via nasogastric tube thrice daily for 3 days plus a single dose of 4 g Inj. MgSO4 IV on first day and the Control group received suitably matched placebo (double-blinding) - in addition to standard care in both the groups. The primary outcome measure was to compare the total dose of Inj. Atropine required (cumulative over the entire treatment duration) between the control group and the study group receiving NAC and MgSO4. The secondary outcome measures were lengths of ICU and hospital stays, need and duration of mechanical ventilation, the differences in BuChE activity, oxidative stress biomarkers - MDA and GSH levels, the incidences of adverse effects including delayed sequalae like intermediate syndrome and OPIDN, and comparison of mortality between the two groups. Results: Data from 43 patients in Control and 42 patients in Study group was finally analyzed. The baseline parameters were comparable. Total atropine requirements were lower in the Study group [175.33 ± 81.25 mg (150.01-200.65)] compared to the Control [210.63 ± 102.29 mg (179.15-242.11)] [Mean ± SD (95% CI)], but was not statistically significant. No significant differences in any of the other clinical or biochemical parameters were noted. Conclusion: The N-acetylcysteine and MgSO4 combination as adjuvants failed to significantly reduce atropine requirements, ICU/hospital stay, mechanical ventilatory requirements, mortality and did not offer protection against oxidative damage.

Postoperative Pain Relief Following Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) provides superior analgesia compared to placebo in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), using reduction in postoperative opioid consumption, delay in rescue analgesia demand and reduction of pain scores as outcome measures. METHODS: 34 adult (18-60 years) ASA I and II patients undergoing unilateral PCNL were randomized into two groups (Bupivacaine and Saline) - both receiving ipsilateral ESPB at L1 vertebral level with either 20 ml 0.25% Inj. Bupivacaine or 20 ml normal saline respectively, at the start of the surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measure was total 24-hour rescue opioid analgesic requirement, while time to first demand of rescue analgesic and pain scores at 2, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The 24-hour requirement of rescue analgesic Tramadol was significantly lower (53.5 ± 29.6 vs 121.2 ± 51.1 mg) [mean ± SD] (P = .001) and time to first demand of rescue analgesia was more (14.1 ± 8.4 vs 6.0 ± 5.6 hours) [mean ± SD] (P = .001) in the Bupivacaine group as compared to placebo. The pain scores were significantly lower in the Bupivacaine group at 12-hour post-operatively [4 (3,4) vs 5.5 (5,6)] [median (IQR)] (P = .001), while the stone-load, surgical duration and intraoperative opioid use were comparable between the two groups and no block-related complications were noted in any patient. CONCLUSION: Post-PCNL, ipsilateral lumbar ESPB reduced 24-hour opioid consumption and delayed time to demand for rescue analgesia as compared to placebo.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Anesthesiologists: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: In the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline health-care workers (HCWs) including anesthesiologists have been fatigued due to long working hours in critical care units or operation theaters and necessity to remain available on call at odd hours. In addition, the exposure to numerous diseased and morbid patients throughout the prolonged pandemic period has predisposed them to psychological distress. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study to evaluate the depression and anxiety among the HCWs during COVID. The demographic and general information of 237 HCWs across India, through an online survey was collected and analyzed. Results: The male: female ratio of the studied population was 53:47. In addition, 50% of the participants were aged <35 years, and 80% of participants were married and living with family and parents. The consultants working in combined (COVID and non-COVID) areas exhibited maximum participation in the survey, with 80% of them involved in aerosol-generating procedures. Of the total, 73.1% of participants exhibited depression, 45.8% of participants exhibited anxiety, 36.2% of participants exhibited stress, and 25.3% of participants exhibited disturbed sleep patterns. Conclusions: Most HCWs on COVID-19 duty exhibited emotional disorders such as anxiety, depression, stress, and insomnia. Addressing risk factors identified in the present study with targeted interventions and psychosocial support will allow health-care workers to cope better.

Timing of Exposure to ICU Diaries and Its Impact on Mental Health, Memories, and Quality of Life: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial.

Optimal time for ICU diary delivery and impact on mental health (MH), anxiety-depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), quality of life (QOL), and memories is unclear. We evaluated the effect of ICU diaries, dispatched at different time points, on outcomes in an Indian cohort. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A 1,000-bedded teaching hospital in East India. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated (>24 hr) adults were recruited, excluding those dead or incapable of meaningful-communication at discharge or follow-up. Eighty-three patients, aged 46.2 ± 17.2 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores 13.7 ± 4.9 were assessed. Length of ICU stay was 8.2 ± 7.1 days with 3.7 ± 3.2 ventilator days. INTERVENTION: Of 820 screened, 164 had diaries created. Including photographs, diaries were comaintained by healthcare workers and family members. Ninety patients were randomized at 1-month follow-up: diary sent to 45 at 1 month (group ID1) and to 45 at 3 months (ID3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anxiety-depression, memory, and QOL were assessed telephonically or home visits by a psychologist using the Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) and other tools at ICU discharge, 1-month (prerandomization), and 3 months of discharge. ID3 was reassessed after receiving diaries at 3.5 months. Primary outcome was anxiety-depression; secondary outcomes included PTSS, QOL, and memories. There was 100% follow-up. At 3 months, ID1 patients had a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in HADS from baseline when compared with ID3 that had not received diaries (4.16 ± 2.9 vs 2.15 ± 1.8; 95% CI, 2.8-1.2). PTSS scores were likewise better (p < 0.001). ID3 patients demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.01) in QOL and memories along with HADS and PTSS when assessed at 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: ICU diaries improve MH but not QOL when delivered at 1 month and assessed 2 months thereafter. Assessed after 15 days, delayed exposure at 3 months significantly improved QOL and memories in addition to MH.

Prophylactic Drain Versus No Drain in Curative Gastric Cancer Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has questioned the placement of prophylactic drain after curative gastrectomy. A 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis did not find convincing evidence of routine drain placement in gastrectomy, but the quality of evidence was questioned. The present study compared short-term outcomes of prophylactic drain placement versus no drain in gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: The study is a prospective, non-inferiority, and randomized controlled trial. Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach undergoing curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was included in the study. Randomization was done intra-operatively. The primary outcome was a postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the return of bowel function, achieving adequate enteral feeding, re-surgery, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were registered, of which 108 patients underwent curative surgery, and were randomized to 54 patients in each group. The median age was 55 years (range: 23-78) and 58.5 years (range: 35-80) in the drain and no drain group. No significant difference was noticed in primary or secondary outcomes in both groups. CONCLUSION: Avoid placing a prophylactic drain is not inferior to drain placement following gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for stomach adenocarcinoma. So, routine prophylactic drain placement can be avoided.

Effect of preoperative dexmedetomidine nebulization on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, has been used for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy but not through the nebulized route. We evaluated the effects of preoperative dexmedetomidine nebulization on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation and examined the intraoperative anesthetic-analgesic requirements and recovery outcomes. METHODS: Overall, 120 American Society of Anesthesiologists I & II adult patients (of either gender) undergoing elective surgeries and requiring tracheal intubation, were randomized to receive nebulized dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg in 3-4 ml of 0.9% saline) or 0.9% saline (3-4 ml), 30 min before anesthesia induction. Heart rate (HR) and non-invasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) were monitored for 10 min following laryngoscopy. RESULTS: After laryngoscopy, linear mixed effect modelling showed significantly lower trend of increase in HR in the dexmedetomidine group versus saline (P = 0.012); however, there was no difference in the SBP changes between the two groups (P = 0.904). Induction dose of propofol (P < 0.001), intraoperative fentanyl consumption (P = 0.007), and isoflurane requirements (P = 0.013) were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group. There was no difference in the 2 h incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (P = 0.612) or sore-throat (P = 0.741). CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized dexmedetomidine at 1 µg/kg attenuated the increase in HR but not SBP following laryngoscopy and reduced the intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic consumption. There was no effect on early PONV, sore-throat, or increase in incidence of adverse effects. Nebulized dexmedetomidine may represent a favorable alternative to the intravenous route in short duration surgeries.

Intensive care unit (ICU) diaries and the experiences of patients' families: a grounded theory approach in a lower middle-income country (LMIC).

OBJECTIVE: An intensive care unit (ICU) diary is a relatively new concept in low middle-income countries (LMICs). Illiteracy and socio-cultural inhibitions may affect the use and utility of this intervention, which has proven beneficial to patients and their families in high income countries (HICs). We aimed to explore how families of ICU patients experienced ICU diaries in our set up by using the Grounded Theory (GT) approach. A relatively new research tool, this enables exploration of a phenomenon to build theories in areas hitherto uncharted. METHOD: A clinical psychologist did 29 in-depth interviews of relatives of 13 patients admitted in the ICU for > 24 h for whom an ICU diary was being maintained. We used a three-step coding process- open, axial, and selective coding, followed by the formulation of a theory embedded in the data. RESULTS: We found that the younger relatives of ICU patients accepted the idea better (age 30, SD 6) Half (48%) had education between 5th to 10th standards. Emergent themes suggested that for the family members, reading and writing the diary brought novelty, acted as a communication enabler, spiritual truss, and improved knowledge leading to change in perspective about the health care system. It also became a bridge to community bonding after patient discharge. Starting with appreciating the novelty of 'diary entries,' which was a new and exciting concept, family members used the diaries to communicate with health care workers (to gain information and understanding about the disease and treatment) and the patient to express their love and to maintain a connection. The diary acted as a confessional for hopes, fears, guilt, and faith for many members. As a tool, it enabled them to understand medical personnel as human beings and to appreciate their efforts, effectively improving confidence in the system. Finally, upon returning home, the diary was a crowd puller for extended family and neighbors encouraging discussions and enhancing bonding and information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a good acceptance of ICU diaries by family members in our ICU. With less literate, admitted 'shy 'members, in a society where 'diary writing' is not culturally rampant, the appreciation for the novel concept was universal. We see a place for these interventions not only at the patient/ family level but also as a means to 'correct' the image of health care workers in our society by humanizing ourselves to the end-user- the patient and his family.

Diagnostic accuracy of delirium assessment methods in critical care patients.

PURPOSE: Delirium is a disorder of decreased ability to focus, sustain or shift attention, change in cognition and or perception. The main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) among the nursing and medical staff in a multidisciplinary ICU. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Three hundred ten verbally communicating and non-communicating patients (mean age in years 47.9, standard deviation [SD] 14.5, mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 13.8, SD 6.4) were assessed by a psychiatrist, nurse and intensivist for delirium. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. RESULTS: CAM-ICU showed higher sensitivity and DOR (84%, 86.1) compared to ICDSC (78%, 36.9). ICDSC had specificity and positive predictive value (94.5%, 92%) equal to that of CAM-ICU. For both the assessment methods (CAM-ICU and ICDSC), DORs for intensivists (120.5, 53.0) were relatively higher than nurses (67.0, 27.0). CONCLUSIONS: In our mixed ICU population, CAM-ICU remained more sensitive than ICDSC. Though sensitivity and DOR were higher for medical staff, other diagnostic parameters were similar for both medical and nursing staff.

Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin in eclampsia - Maternal and foetal outcome - A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Eclampsia manifests as seizures and is unique to the pregnant state. It remains an important cause of maternal mortality especially in resource-challenged countries that lack access to prenatal care. AIMS: The aim of our study was to compare maternal and foetal outcomes in mothers with eclampsia with the administration of either magnesium sulphate or phenytoin in a resource- challenged situation. METHOD: The work was conducted from January 2012 to December 2012. A total of 80 patients were assigned alternately to two groups - one group was treated with magnesium sulphate (Group-M; n=40), and the other treated with phenytoin (Group-P; n=40) (Figure 1). The magnesium sulphate was administered according to Pritchard's regimen; phenytoin administered according to Ryan's regimen. With either regimen, anticonvulsant therapy was continued for 24 hours postpartum or 24 hours after the last convulsion, whichever was later. RESULTS: Fifty-four per cent of patients regained consciousness within eight hours of treatment onset in Group-P compared to 5.3 per cent in Group-M (p=0.0001, χ(2)=19.24). Seven patients in Group-P had recurrence of convulsions as compared to none of the 40 women assigned to Group-M (p=0.032, χ(2)=4.62). The incidence of Caesarean section was greater (62.5 per cent) in Group-M compared to Group-P (25 per cent; p=0.001, χ(2)= 9.96). No statistically significant differences were found in the foetal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Phenytoin use may be reconsidered in selective cases in low and middle income countries (LMIC) as it has been found simpler to use, has several benefits and also curtails treatment cost. Magnesium sulphate is substantially more effective than phenytoin with regard to recurrence of convulsions. Proper training in the management of eclampsia should be given to all health care workers to ensure appropriate management of eclamptic mothers. Thus, the treatment of this disease calls for more research especially in resource-challenged settings.