Development and validation of AI-assisted transcriptomic signatures to personalize adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: After surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), patients are predominantly treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, commonly consisting of gemcitabine (GEM)-based regimens or the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) regimen. While mFFX regimen has been shown to be more effective than GEM-based regimens, it is also associated with higher toxicity. Current treatment decisions are based on patient performance status rather than on the molecular characteristics of the tumor. To address this gap, the goal of this study was to develop drug-specific transcriptomic signatures for personalized chemotherapy treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used PDAC datasets from preclinical models, encompassing chemotherapy response profiles for the mFFX regimen components. From them we identified specific gene transcripts associated with chemotherapy response. Three transcriptomic artificial intelligence signatures were obtained by combining independent component analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-random forest approach. We integrated a previously developed GEM signature with three newly developed ones. The machine learning strategy employed to enhance these signatures incorporates transcriptomic features from the tumor microenvironment, leading to the development of the 'Pancreas-View' tool ultimately clinically validated in a cohort of 343 patients from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial. RESULTS: Patients who were predicted to be sensitive to the administered drugs (n = 164; 47.8%) had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than the other patients. The median DFS in the mFFX-sensitive group treated with mFFX was 50.0 months [stratified hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.44, P < 0.001] and 33.7 months (stratified HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.59, P < 0.001) in the GEM-sensitive group when treated with GEM. Comparatively patients with signature predictions unmatched with the treatments (n = 86; 25.1%) or those resistant to all drugs (n = 93; 27.1%) had shorter DFS (10.6 and 10.8 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a transcriptome-based tool that was developed using preclinical models and machine learning to accurately predict sensitivity to mFFX and GEM.

Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001-02).

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) frequently occurs in elderly patients. However, data from a geriatric tailored randomized trial about tolerance to and the efficacy of doublet chemotherapy (CT) with irinotecan in the elderly are lacking. The benefit of first-line CT intensification remains an issue in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elderly patients (75+) with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design (four arms) to receive 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)-based CT, either alone (FU: LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU2) or in combination with irinotecan [IRI: LV5FU2-irinotecan or simplified LV5FU2-irinotecan (FOLFIRI)]. The CLASSIC arm was defined as LV5FU2 or LV5FU2-irinotecan and the SIMPLIFIED arm as simplified LV5FU2 or FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From June 2003 to May 2010, 71 patients were randomly assigned to LV5FU2, 71 to simplified LV5FU2, 70 to LV5FU2-irinotecan and 70 to FOLFIRI. The median age was 80 years (range 75-92 years). No significant difference was observed for the median PFS: FU 5.2 months versus IRI 7.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84 (0.66-1.07), P = 0.15 and CLASSIC 6.5 months versus SIMPLIFIED 6.0 months, HR = 0.85 (0.67-1.09), P = 0.19. The ORR was superior in IRI (P = 0.0003): FU 21.1% versus IRI 41.7% and in CLASSIC (P = 0.04): CLASSIC 37.1% versus SIMPLIFIED 25.6%. Median OS was 14.2 months in FU versus 13.3 months in IRI, HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.24) and 15.2 months in CLASSIC versus 11.4 months in SIMPLIFIED, HR = 0.71 (0.55-0.92). More patients presented grade 3-4 toxicities in IRI (52.2% versus 76.3%). CONCLUSION: In this elderly population, adding irinotecan to an infusional 5-FU-based CT did not significantly increase either PFS or OS. Classic LV5FU2 was associated with an improved OS compared with simplified LV5FU2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00303771.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Europe and worldwide, with the peak incidence in patients >70 years of age. However, as the treatment algorithms for the treatment of patients with CRC become ever more complex, it is clear that a significant percentage of older CRC patients (>70 years) are being less than optimally treated. This document provides a summary of an International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) task force meeting convened in Paris in 2013 to update the existing expert recommendations for the treatment of older (geriatric) CRC patients published in 2009 and includes overviews of the recent data on epidemiology, geriatric assessment as it relates to surgery and oncology, and the ability of older CRC patients to tolerate surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment of their metastatic disease including palliative chemotherapy with and without the use of the biologics, and finally the use of adjuvant and palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of older rectal cancer patients. An overview of each area was presented by one of the task force experts and comments invited from other task force members.

Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial.

BACKGROUND: The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. RESULTS of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. METHODS: Adult patients with any type of metastatic cancer who failed standard therapy were eligible for the study. The molecular profile was performed on a mandatory biopsy, and included mutations and gene copy number alteration analyses using high-throughput technologies, as well as the determination of oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Biopsy was safely performed in 95 of the first 100 included patients. Median time between the biopsy and the therapeutic decision taken during a weekly molecular biology board was 26 days. Mutations, gene copy number alterations, and IHC analyses were successful in 63 (66%), 65 (68%), and 87 (92%) patients, respectively. A druggable molecular abnormality was present in 38 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a comprehensive tumour molecular profile was safe, feasible, and compatible with clinical practice in refractory cancer patients.

Efficacy of venlafaxine for the prevention and relief of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: results of EFFOX, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity is dose limiting and may present as acute symptoms and/or cumulative peripheral neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to May 2008, patients with oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity were randomized into a double-blind study, to receive either venlafaxine 50 mg 1 h prior oxaliplatin infusion and venlafaxine extended release 37.5 mg b.i.d. from day 2 to day 11 or placebo. Neurotoxicity was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity and experienced relief under treatment, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and the oxaliplatin-specific neurotoxicity scale. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 100% relief under treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (27 males, median age: 67.6 years). Most patients had colorectal cancer (72.9%). Median number of cycles administered at inclusion was 4.5 (mean cumulative oxaliplatin dose: 684.6 mg). Twenty out of 24 patients in arm A (venlafaxine) and 22 out of 24 patients in arm B (placebo) were assessable for neurotoxicity. Based on the NRS, full relief was more frequent in the venlafaxine arm: 31.3% versus 5.3% (P=0.03). Venlafaxine side-effects included grade 1-2 nausea (43.1%) and asthenia (39.2%) without grade 3-4 events. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine has clinical activity against oxaliplatin-induced acute neurosensory toxicity.

New strategies and designs in pancreatic cancer research: consensus guidelines report from a European expert panel.

Although the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a huge challenge, it is entering a new era with the development of new strategies and trial designs. Because there is an increasing number of novel therapeutic agents and potential combinations available to test in patients with PDAC, the identification of robust prognostic and predictive markers and of new targets and relevant pathways is a top priority as well as the design of adequate trials incorporating molecular-driven hypothesis. We presently report a consensus strategy for research in pancreatic cancer that was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from different European institutions and collaborative groups involved in pancreatic cancer. The expert panel embraces the concept of exploratory early proof of concept studies, based on the prediction of response to novel agents and combinations, and randomised phase II studies permitting the selection of the best therapeutic approach to go forward into phase III, where the recommended primary end point remains overall survival. Trials should contain as many translational components as possible, relying on standardised tissue and blood processing and robust biobanking, and including dynamic imaging. Attention should not only be paid to the pancreatic cancer cells but also to microenvironmental factors and stem/stellate cells.

Relevance of biopsy-derived pancreatic organoids in the development of efficient transcriptomic signatures to predict adjuvant chemosensitivity in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are frequently treated by chemotherapy. Even if personalized therapy based on molecular analysis can be performed for some tumors, PDAC regimens selection is still mainly based on patients' performance status and expected efficacy. Therefore, the establishment of molecular predictors of chemotherapeutic efficacy could potentially improve prognosis by tailoring treatments. We have recently developed an RNA-based signature that predicts the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine using 38 PDAC primary cell cultures. While demonstrated its efficiency, a significant association with the classical/basal-like PDAC spectrum was observed. We hypothesized that this flaw was due to the basal-like biased phenotype of cellular models used in our strategy. To overcome this limitation, we generated a prospective cohort of 27 consecutive biopsied derived pancreatic organoids (BDPO) and include them in the signature identification strategy. As BDPO's do not have the same biased phenotype as primary cell cultures we expect they can compensate one with each other and cover a broader range of molecular phenotypes. We then obtained an improved signature predicting gemcitabine sensibility that was validated in a cohort of 300 resected PDAC patients that have or have not received adjuvant gemcitabine. We demonstrated a significant association between the improved signature and the overall and disease-free survival in patients predicted as sensitive and treated with adjuvant gemcitabine. We propose then that including BDPO along primary cell cultures represent a powerful strategy that helps to overcome primary cell cultures limitations producing unbiased RNA-based signatures predictive of adjuvant treatments in PDAC.

Chemotherapy of advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicenter AGEO study.

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of poor prognosis. Data on the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced SBA are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with advanced SBA who received frontline chemotherapy from 1996 to 2008 were eligible for this retrospective multicenter study. RESULTS: Ninety-three consecutive patients were included. In the entire population, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 6.6 and 15.1 months, respectively. Median PFS times among patients treated with LV5FU2 (n = 10), FOLFOX (n = 48), FOLFIRI (n = 19) and LV5FU2-cisplatin (n = 16) were 7.7, 6.9, 6.0 and 4.8 months, respectively, while median OS times were 13.5, 17.8, 10.6 and 9.3 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, World Health Organization performance status (PS) (P < 0.0001) and elevated serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.02) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (P = 0.03) were the only variables significantly associated with poor OS. In the subgroup of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, multivariate analysis showed that LV5FU2-cisplatin was associated with poorer PFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P = 0.02) compared with FOLFOX. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of chemotherapy in advanced SBA. Baseline PS and CEA and CA 19-9 levels were the main prognostic factors. FOLFOX seems to be the most effective platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.

Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the commonest malignancies of Western countries, with approximately half the incidence occurring in patients >70 years of age. Elderly CRC patients, however, are understaged, undertreated and underrepresented in clinical trials. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology created a task force with a view to assessing the potential for developing guidelines for the treatment of elderly (geriatric) CRC patients. A review of the evidence presented by the task force members confirmed the paucity of clinical trial data in elderly people and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. However, recommendations have been proposed on the basis of the available data and on the emerging evidence that treatment outcomes for fit, elderly CRC patients can be similar to those of younger patients. It is hoped that these will pave the way for formal treatment guidelines based upon solid scientific evidence in the future.

Thirteen-month registration of patients with gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours in France.

The prevalence, clinical profiles and management of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours (GEP) in France are not known. From August 1, 2001 to September 1, 2002, standardized records on patients with GEP were prospectively completed in 87 participating centres. The total group amounted to 668 patients (median age: 56 years, range: 12-89). WHO performance status was 0/1 for 80.2% of patients. The primary sites were the small bowel and colon (288), pancreas (211), unknown (77), stomach (33), non-digestive primary sites (24), appendix (20), rectum-anus (12), and oesophagus or cardia (3). GEP were functional in 260 patients (39%). Most pancreatic tumours were non-functional (72%). Metastatic disease was observed in 73.4% of cases. Most tumours (85.8%) were well or moderately differentiated. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was performed in only 55% of patients. The following treatment modalities were employed: resection of primary tumour: 66%; systemic chemotherapy: 41%; somatostatin analogues: 44 and 26% for GEP of small intestine and pancreas, respectively; interferon: 12%, and intra-arterial hepatic (chemo)embolization in 23 and 15% of GEP arising from the midgut and pancreas, respectively. Despite their low prevalence, well-differentiated GEP represent a significant and heterogeneous clinical group, which warrants improved medical education, referral to expert centres at an early stage, and the design of prospective therapeutic trials.

[Targeted biotherapy: a revolution in the management of patients with colorectal cancer?]. / Cancers colorectaux avant et après les biothérapies: une révolution dans la prise en charge des patients?

In metastatic colorectal cancers (CRC), progress of chemotherapies in 40 years greatly increased their median survival from 6 to 8 months to 20 months. The first step of this development has been: the discovery of 5-fluorouracil, its optimisation by folinic acid and continuous perfusions. In the years 1990 to 2000, oxaliplatin and irinotecan opened the era of polychemotherapies. Their use in fisrt line treatment is not mandatory for all patients for whom chemotherapy may only have a palliative role without need for high response rates as for patients with symptomatic metastases or metastases hardly resectable. Targeted therapies have increased the life expectancy of the metastatic CRC and for some of them to facilitate secondary resections. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, in combination with an irinotecan based regimen increased dramatically the life expectancy with an acceptable toxicity, at least in patients of less than 70 years old. Efficacy of bevacizumab has also been demonstrated in combination with oxaliplatin based regimen (XELOX and FOLFOX) in first and second line, and in combination with 5-fluorouracil alone. Presently, bevacizumab is the most used targeted therapies in first line chemotherapy in combination with FOLFIRI, FOLFOX or XELOX. Cetuximab and panitumumab have first demonstrated their efficacy in the population of fully resistant patients to chemotherapies with a progression free survival gain of about 4 months as single treatment (cetuximab and panitumumab) or combined to irinotecan (cetuximab). Two studies have demonstrated that the adjonction of cetuximab in the first line treatment to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX increased the response rates. The presence of epithelial growth factor receptors (EGFR) at the cell'surface in immunohistochemistry is not a prerequisite for responses to cetuximab and panitumumab, and only patients with tumors without mutation of oncogene KRAS (60% of patients) are able to respond to anti-EGFR. This activity for the KRAS non mutated population has also been demonstrated in patients resistant to chemotherapy, compared to best supportive cases with panitumumab and with cetuximab. Thus, utilisation of anti-EGFR is only authorized in non mutated KRAS tumors and for the first time in metastatic CRC, we have the possibility to enrich the population in selecting non mutated KRAS population and to treat only patients having increased chance of response and of secondary resections of initially non resectable metastases. The cost of these targeted therapies is elevated and we need to find factors which will allow a personalized medicine with the dual selection of the good drug for the right patients.

Second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility and potential benefits in a retrospective series of 117 patients.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is effective in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC), but the benefits of second- and third-line chemotherapy remain unclear. METHODS: We studied all patients followed consecutively for metastatic PAC, and registered at our institution between 1997 and 2006. We retrospectively analyzed the following data in terms of chemotherapy: tumor response; time to tumor progression (TTP) for each line; and overall survival (OS). Efficacy of second-line regimens was assessed using the growth modulation index (GMI). RESULTS: Out of 117 patients, 99 (85%) received at least one line of chemotherapy, 53 (45%) received two lines and 24 (21%) had three or more lines. Median OS was 6.7 months for all 117 patients, 1.8 months for 18 patients who never received chemotherapy, 4.6 months for 46 patients who received one-line chemotherapy and 11.5 months for 53 patients who received at least two lines. Median OS from the beginning of the second-line was 4.7 months. The GMI demonstrated beneficial effects of second-line treatment on disease progression, with a GMI greater than 1.33 in 57% (30/53) of patients. CONCLUSION: More than half the patients with metastatic PAC progression while receiving one-line chemotherapy achieved better disease control on receiving two lines of treatment.

Cancer survival in England and Wales at the end of the 20th century.

Survival has risen steadily since the 1970s for most cancers in adults in England and Wales, but persistent inequalities exist between those living in affluent and deprived areas. These differences are not seen for children. For many of the common adult cancers, these inequalities in survival (the 'deprivation gap') became more marked in the 1990s. This volume presents extended analyses of survival for adults diagnosed during the 14 years 1986-1999 and followed up to 2001, including trends in overall survival in England and Wales and trends in the deprivation gap in survival. The analyses include individual tumour data for 2.2 million cancer patients. This article outlines the structure of the supplement - an article for each of the 20 most common cancers in adults, followed by an expert commentary from one of the leading UK clinicians specialising in malignancies of that organ or system. The available data, quality control and methods of analysis are described here, rather than repeated in each of the 20 articles. We open the discussion between clinicians and epidemiologists on how to interpret the observed trends and inequalities in cancer survival, and we highlight some of the most important contrasts in these very different points of view. Survival improved substantially for adult cancer patients in England and Wales up to the end of the 20th century. Although socioeconomic inequalities in survival are remarkably persistent, the overall patterns suggest that these inequalities are largely avoidable.

Tritherapy with fluorouracil/leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX): a phase II study in colorectal cancer patients with non-resectable liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To assess the rate of R(0) resection of liver metastases achieved after chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven primary colorectal cancer and bidimensionally measurable liver metastasis, not fully resectable based on technical inability to achieve R(0) resection, but potentially resectable after tumor reduction, were given FOLFIRINOX: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 180 mg/m(2), leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) and fluorouracil 46-h continuous IV infusion 2,400 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Response rate before surgery was 70.6% (95%CI: 52.5-84.9). Twenty-eight patients (82.4%) underwent hepatic resection and nine achieved R(0) resection [26.5% (95% CI: 12.9-44.4%)]. The rate of clinical complete remission after surgery was 79.4%. Two-year overall survival was 83%. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (64.8%), diarrhea (29.4%), fatigue (23.5%), abdominal cramps (14.7%), neuropathy and nausea (11.8% each), and AST/ALT elevation (14.7/11.8%). Only one patient experienced febrile neutropenia, four patients withdrew due to toxicity and no toxic death was observed. CONCLUSION: FOLFIRINOX, with an acceptable toxicity profile, shows a high response rate in liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The rate of hepatic resection in patients initially not resectable, is attractive and warrants further assessment of this regimen in randomized studies compared to standard regimens.

[Antiangiogenic agents and gastrointestinal cancers]. / Les antiangiogéniques en oncologie digestive.

The role of angiogenesis in tumor development and the identification of VEGF as a key factor in this process have recently led to the development of anti-angiogenic agents in the treatment of cancer. Among them, the major are those targeting the VEGF pathway, including anti-VEGF antibodies (bevacizumab) and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (vatalanib, sorafenib, sunitinib...). Other therapeutic strategies inhibiting angiogenesis are under investigation, targeting the VEGF pathway or other crucial steps of angiogenesis. In digestive oncology, bevacizumab was the first anti-angiogenic agent to be registered in the fist-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in which it was proved to be efficient in combination with a 5-fluorouracile (5FU)/acide folinique (AF) with or without irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Sunitinib and sorafenib have more recently been shown to be active in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. Side effects associated with these anti-angiogenic agents are not those usually observed with conventional anticancer drugs and require a specific management. Many anti-angiogenic agents are currently under investigation in digestive tumors, opening new prospects but also raising many questions.

Survival from uveal melanoma in England and Wales 1986 to 2001.

PURPOSE: To analyse survival from uveal melanoma diagnosed in England and Wales between 1986-1999 and followed up to 2001. METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Registry at the Office for National Statistics were analysed. The data were compiled from population-based cancer registries covering all of England and Wales for all adults (aged 15-99) diagnosed with primary ocular malignancy, excluding eyelid tumours. Level of poverty was based on the national classification of area of residence at time of diagnosis. Regression models explored the influence of sex, age, and level of poverty on relative survival for patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma during successive calendar periods. RESULTS: Of 5,519 adults identified with primary ocular malignancy, 4,717 had melanoma, of which 4,308 (91%) were eligible for analysis. Two-thirds (67%) of the ocular melanomas were uveal, 5% conjunctival, and 2% orbital; the subsite was unspecified in 26%. Relative survival from uveal melanoma was 95% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. There was no statistically significant variation in 1-year or 5-year survival by sex or poverty level and no significant trend over time. Older patients had significantly worse survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides national population-based survival estimates for England and Wales for uveal melanoma, the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Five-year relative survival, an important indicator of the quality of cancer care, has not improved since the 1980s. Greater age, but not gender or level of poverty, is associated with a poorer prognosis. A standardised classification of uveal melanoma is required to improve reporting to cancer registries. Further research is required to explore reasons for lower relative survival in older persons.

No evidence of somatic FGFR3 mutation in various types of carcinoma.

Germline specific point mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) are associated with autosomal dominant human skeletal dysplasia and craniosynostosis syndromes. Mutations identical to the germinal activating mutations found in severe skeletal dysplasias have been identified in certain types of cancer: at low frequency in multiple myeloma and cervix carcinoma and at high frequency in bladder carcinoma. We analysed, by SSCP and sequencing, the prevalence of FGFR3 mutations in 116 primary tumours of various types (upper aerodigestive tract, oesophagus, stomach, lung and skin). The regions analysed encompassed all FGFR3 point mutations previously described in severe skeletal dysplasia and cancers. No mutations were detected in the tumour types examined, suggesting that FGFR3 mutations are restricted to a few tumour types, the evidence to date suggesting that they are very specific to bladder carcinomas.

The treatment of undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

The aggressiveness of poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors is similar to small-cell lung cancer within a median survival of 6 months without treatment. Most patients have metastatic disease and poor condition at the time of diagnosis, and cannot be approached surgically with curative intent. Moertel et al. [Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin, Cancer 1991;68:227--232] reported an objective response rate of 67% with a chemotherapy regimen combining etoposide plus cisplatin, with a median survival of 19 months and a median time to progression of 11 months. Since this publication, this regimen has been considered as the reference treatment for poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. A French retrospective study has recently confirmed the high chemosensitivity of those tumors. However, the prognosis remains poor with a 2-year survival lower than 20% and other therapeutic approaches should be developed.

Antitumour activity of somatostatin analogues in progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

A few studies have suggested an antitumour activity of somatostatin analogues in neuroendocrine tumours (NET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumour efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with documented progressive tumours. 35 consecutive patients with documented tumour progression were treated with somatostatin analogues. Patients were classified into two groups. In Group 1, tumours were progressing rapidly (an increase of 50% or more in the lesion surface area in 3 months) and in Group 2, tumours were progressing more slowly (an increase of less than 50% in the lesion surface area in 3 months but greater than 25% in 6 months). Treatment consisted of subcutaneous (s.c.) octreotide, 100 microg thrice daily for 17 patients, intramuscular lanreotide, 30 mg/every 14 days for 11 patients and for 7 patients both somatostatin analogues were used successively during the follow-up. Primary tumour sites were the small intestine (n=12), pancreas (n=13), lungs (n=5), and other sites (n=5). 18 patients had the carcinoid syndrome with flushing and/or diarrhoea. The median duration of treatment was 7 months. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients due to side-effects. One patient (3%) achieved a partial response and the disease was stabilised in 20 patients (57%) for a median duration of 11 months (6-48 months). Stabilisation of patients in Group 1 was significantly less frequent at 6 months than that of patients in Group 2 (4/12 and 13/17 respectively, P<0.02). Somatostatin analogue treatment resulted in one partial response (3%) and 20 cases of stabilisation (57%) in 35 patients with progressive NET. A slow tumour growth rate before treatment is predictive of a good response to somatostatin analogues which could be considered an option for first-line treatment.

Chemotherapy for colon cancer in a well-defined French population: is it under- or over-prescribed?

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy in TNM stage III and palliative chemotherapy are effective treatments for colon cancer. AIM: To determine changes over a 10-year period in the practice of adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy for colon cancer in a well-defined French population. METHODS: Some 4093 patients with colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1989 and 1998 were studied. To estimate the independent effect of the studied variables, a non-conditional logistical regression was performed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with stage II disease treated with adjuvant chemotherapy increased from 2.3% (1989-90) to 20.5% (1997-98). The corresponding figures for stage III patients were 7.1% and 54.9%. This increase was particularly marked in younger patients, with 47.3% of stage II and 86.1% of stage III patients under the age of 65 years being treated in the 1997-98 period, compared with 4.9% and 24.4% of those over 75 years for the same period (P < 0.0001). The use of palliative chemotherapy increased over time from 13.6% (1989-90) to 38.9% (1997-98). Again, this increase was more dramatic in the younger age group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy has increased for stage II disease despite the absence of proven effectiveness. Both adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy are still under-prescribed in patients over the age of 75 years.