The association of vaping and electronic cigarette use with postoperative hypoxemia and respiratory complications: a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Initially introduced as a safer alternative to smoking, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and vaping have since been associated with lung injury. Nevertheless, there is limited perioperative data on their potential contribution to the harmful effects of mechanical ventilation on the lungs. We hypothesized that, in adults undergoing noncardiothoracic surgeries, preoperative vaping/e-cigarette use is associated with hypoxemia during the first postoperative hour, and with an increased incidence of intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in which we included patients reporting as vapers/e-cigarette users within one year before surgery as the exposure group, and nonvapers as the control group. The primary outcome was the time-weighted average (TWA) SpO2/FIO2 ratio in the postanesthesia care unit during the first postoperative hour. The secondary outcome was a composite of intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary complications until discharge. We used entropy balancing to adjust for confounding, and fit weighted linear regression and logistic regression models to estimate treatment effects. RESULTS: A total of 110,940 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 1,941 of these were vapers/e-cigarette users. The average treatment effect on the treated for TWA SpO2/FIO2 ratio (N = 109,217) was estimated to be a mean difference of 4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 8; P = 0.007). This is equivalent to a 4% change in SpO2 at a 30% FIO2 (or at a fixed FIO2). The difference was statistically significant. The average treatment effect on the treated for experiencing intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary complications (N = 110,940) was an odds ratio of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.54; P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Vaping/e-cigarette use was neither associated with clinically significant hypoxemia during the first hour in the postanesthesia care unit nor with an increase in pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, our findings cannot definitively exclude the deleterious effects of vaping and e-cigarette use on the lungs, and anesthesiologists should consider potential perioperative complications.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Initialement introduites comme une alternative plus sécuritaire au tabagisme, les cigarettes électroniques et le vapotage ont depuis été associés à des lésions pulmonaires. Néanmoins, il existe peu de données périopératoires concernant leur contribution potentielle aux effets nocifs de la ventilation mécanique sur les poumons. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que, chez les adultes bénéficiant de chirurgies non cardiothoraciques, l'utilisation préopératoire de vapotage/de cigarette électronique était associée à une hypoxémie au cours de la première heure postopératoire et à une incidence accrue de complications pulmonaires peropératoires et postopératoires. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective dans laquelle nous avons inclus les patient·es déclarant avoir vapoté ou utilisé des cigarettes électroniques dans l'année précédant la chirurgie comme groupe d'exposition, et les personnes ne vapotant pas comme groupe témoin. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le rapport de SpO2/FIO2 moyen pondéré dans le temps en salle de réveil pendant la première heure postopératoire. Le critère d'évaluation secondaire était un mélange de complications pulmonaires peropératoires et postopératoires jusqu'au congé de l'hôpital. Nous avons utilisé l'équilibrage d'entropie pour ajuster les facteurs de confusion et ajusté les modèles de régression linéaire pondérée et de régression logistique pour estimer les effets du traitement. RéSULTATS: Au total, 110 940 patient·es répondaient aux critères d'inclusion, dont 1941 étaient des vapoteurs ou vapoteuses/utilisaient des cigarettes électroniques. L'effet moyen du traitement sur le rapport de SpO2/FIO2 moyen pondéré dans le temps des personnes traitées (N = 109 217) a été estimé à une différence moyenne de 4 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1 à 8; P = 0,007). Cela équivaut à une variation de 4 % de la SpO2 à 30% FIO2 (ou à une FIO2 fixe). La différence était statistiquement significative. L'effet moyen du traitement sur les personnes traitées pour des complications pulmonaires peropératoires et postopératoires (N = 110 940) était un rapport de cotes de 1,04 (IC 95 %, 0,71 à 1,54; P = 0,84). CONCLUSION: L'utilisation du vapotage et de la cigarette électronique n'était associée ni à une hypoxémie cliniquement significative au cours de la première heure en salle de réveil, ni à une augmentation des complications pulmonaires. Néanmoins, nos résultats ne peuvent exclure de manière définitive les effets délétères du vapotage et de l'utilisation de la cigarette électronique sur les poumons, et les anesthésiologistes devraient tenir compte des complications périopératoires potentielles.

Nociception Level Index-Guided Intraoperative Analgesia for Improved Postoperative Recovery: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Nociception is the physiological response to nociceptive stimuli, normally experienced as pain. During general anesthesia, patients experience and respond to nociceptive stimuli by increasing blood pressure and heart rate if not controlled by preemptive analgesia. The PMD-200 system from Medasense (Ramat Gan, Israel) evaluates the balance between nociceptive stimuli and analgesia during general anesthesia and generates the nociception level (NOL) index from a single finger probe. NOL is a unitless index ranging from 0 to 100, with values exceeding 25 indicating that nociception exceeds analgesia. We aimed to demonstrate that titrating intraoperative opioid administration to keep NOL <25 optimizes intraoperative opioid dosing. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that pain scores during the initial 60 minutes of recovery are lower in patients managed with NOL-guided fentanyl than in patients given fentanyl per clinical routine. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-center trial of patients having major abdominal open and laparoscopic surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intraoperative NOL-guided fentanyl administration or fentanyl given per clinical routine. The primary outcome was pain score (0-10 verbal response scale) at 10-minute intervals during the initial 60 minutes of recovery. Our secondary outcome was a measure of adequate analgesia, defined as a pain score <5, assessed separately at each interval. RESULTS: With a planned maximum sample size of 144, the study was stopped for futility after enrolling 72 patients from November 2020 to October 2021. Thirty-five patients were assigned to NOL-guided analgesic dosing and 37 to routine care. Patients in the NOL group spent significantly less time with a NOL index >25 (median reduction [95% confidence interval {CI}] of 14 [4-25] minutes) were given nearly twice as much intraoperative fentanyl (median [quartiles] 500 [330, 780] vs 300 [200, 330] µg), and required about half as much morphine in the recovery period (3.3 [0, 8] vs 7.7 [0, 13] mg). However, in the primary outcome analysis, NOL did not reduce pain scores in the first 60 minutes after awakening, assessed in a linear mixed effects model with mean (standard error [SE]) of 4.12 (0.59) for NOL and 4.04 (0.58) for routine care, and estimated difference in means of 0.08 (-1.43, 1.58), P = .895. CONCLUSIONS: More intraoperative fentanyl was given in NOL-guided patients, but NOL guidance did not reduce initial postoperative pain scores.

Generalizability of nociception level as a measure of intraoperative nociceptive stimulation: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nociception-guided intraoperative opioid administration might help reduce postoperative pain. A commonly used and validated nociception monitor system is nociception level (NOL), which provides the nociception index, ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no nociception and 100 representing extreme nociception. We tested the hypothesis that NOL responses are similar in men and women given remifentanil and fentanyl, across various types of anesthesia, as a function of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status designations, and over a range of ages and body morphologies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of trial data from eight prospective NOL validation studies. Among 522 noncardiac surgical patients enrolled in these studies, 447 were included in our analysis. We assessed NOL responses to various noxious and non-noxious stimuli. RESULTS: The average NOL in response to 315 noxious stimuli was 47 ± 15 (95% CI = 45-49). The average NOL in response to 361 non-noxious stimuli was 10 ± 12 (95% CI = 9-11). NOL responses were similar in men and women, in patients given remifentanil and fentanyl, across various types of anesthesia, as a function of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status designations, and over a range of ages and body morphologies. CONCLUSION: Nociception level appears to provide accurate estimates of intraoperative nociception over a broad range of patients and anesthetic conditions.