Applying a Competency-Based Medical Education Framework to Development of Residents' Feedback Skills.

OBJECTIVE: Feedback is a critically important tool in medical education. This pilot program applies and evaluates a competency-based approach to develop residents' skills in providing feedback to medical students. METHODS: In 2018-2019, a competency-based resident feedback skills program incorporating videorecording of skills, multi-source feedback using assessment tools with validity evidence, and sequential deliberate practice was piloted in a single-center, prospective study at the University of Rochester. Study participants included eight second-year psychiatry residents and 23 third-year clerkship students. After an introduction to foundational feedback concepts in didactic sessions, residents were videorecorded providing feedback to medical students. Recordings were reviewed with a faculty member for feedback. Skills were assessed by students who had received resident feedback, residents, and faculty utilizing a tool with validity evidence. Observations were repeated a total of three times. RESULTS: Mean feedback scores increased from 2.70 at the first feedback observation, to 2.77 at the second feedback observation, to 2.89 at the third feedback observation (maximum 3.00 points). The differences between the first and third sessions (0.19) and second and third sessions (0.12) were statistically significant (p values were < .001 and .007, with SE of 0.4 and 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The observed competency-based feedback skills training program for residents using sequential, multi-source review and feedback was feasible and effective. Direct observation is a key component of high-quality feedback, and videorecording is an efficient methodology for observations, enabling both direct observation by the assessor and opportunity for enhanced self-assessment by residents viewing themselves in the feedback encounter.

Correction: Clinical reasoning education in the clerkship years: A cross-disciplinary national needs assessment.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273250.].

Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition.

Teaching and learning of clinical reasoning are core principles of medical education. However, little guidance exists for faculty leaders to navigate curricular transitions between pre-clerkship and clerkship curricular phases. This study compares how educational leaders in these two phases understand clinical reasoning instruction. Previously reported cross-sectional surveys of pre-clerkship clinical skills course directors, and clerkship leaders were compared. Comparisons focused on perceived importance of a number of core clinical reasoning concepts, barriers to clinical reasoning instruction, level of familiarity across the undergraduate medical curriculum, and inclusion of clinical reasoning instruction in each area of the curriculum. Analyses were performed using the Mann Whitney U test. Both sets of leaders rated lack of curricular time as the largest barrier to teaching clinical reasoning. Clerkship leaders also noted a lack of faculty with skills to teach clinical reasoning concepts as a significant barrier (p < 0.02), while pre-clerkship leaders were more likely to perceive that these concepts were too advanced for their students (p < 0.001). Pre-clerkship leaders reported a higher level of familiarity with the clerkship curriculum than clerkship leaders reported of the pre-clerkship curriculum (p < 0.001). As faculty transition students from the pre-clerkship to the clerkship phase, a shared understanding of what is taught and when, accompanied by successful faculty development, may aid the development of longitudinal, milestone-based clinical reasoning instruction.