WHO target product profiles to shape global research and development.

Research and development leading to new and improved health products is essential for achieving healthier lives for populations worldwide. However, new products in development do not always match the global need for products for neglected diseases and populations. To promote research, provide an incentive for investment and align products with the needs of end-users, research needs to be better coordinated and prioritized. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed target product profiles that define the characteristics required in new health products to address the greatest public health needs. A WHO target product profile document presents a need and provides guidance on what to include to consider access and equity as part of the research and development plan from the outset. WHO has also set up the Target Product Profile Directory, a free-to-use online database of characteristics used to describe desired health products, including medicines, vaccines, diagnostic tools and medical equipment. Here we describe the process of developing a WHO target product profile, and the benefits of this type of guidance. We urge product developers to share product profiles addressing unmet needs in public health, to help in progress towards global targets for better health and well-being.

Promouvoir la santé des populations à travers le monde va de pair avec la recherche-développement responsable de la conception et de l'optimisation de produits sanitaires. Pourtant, les nouveaux produits à l'étude ne répondent pas toujours aux exigences mondiales des populations et maladies négligées. En vue de promouvoir la recherche, de favoriser les investissements et d'aligner les produits sur les besoins des utilisateurs finaux, les travaux doivent être mieux coordonnés et leurs priorités, mieux définies. L'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) a donc élaboré des profils de produits cibles qui déterminent les caractéristiques requises pour les nouveaux produits sanitaires, afin qu'ils correspondent davantage aux besoins les plus criants en matière de santé publique. Un profil de produit cible établi par l'OMS est un document qui met en évidence un besoin et fournit des indications sur les aspects à prendre en compte pour garantir l'accès et l'équité dès le départ dans le plan de recherche-développement. L'OMS a également publié un Répertoire des profils de produits cibles, une base de données en ligne consultable gratuitement qui reprend les caractéristiques employées pour décrire les produits sanitaires souhaités (médicaments, vaccins, outils diagnostiques et équipements médicaux). Dans le présent document, nous détaillons le processus de développement d'un profil de produit cible par l'OMS, mais aussi les avantages que comportent de telles indications. Nous encourageons vivement les laboratoires à partager les profils de produits qui répondent à des besoins non satisfaits en matière de santé publique, afin de contribuer à avancer vers les objectifs mondiaux de santé et de bien-être.

La investigación y el desarrollo de productos sanitarios nuevos y mejorados son esenciales para que las poblaciones de todo el mundo vivan más sanas. Sin embargo, los productos nuevos en desarrollo no siempre se ajustan a las necesidades mundiales de productos para enfermedades y poblaciones desatendidas. Para promover la investigación, incentivar la inversión y adaptar los productos a las necesidades de los usuarios finales, es necesario coordinar mejor la investigación y establecer prioridades. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha elaborado perfiles de productos específicos que definen las características que deben reunir los productos sanitarios nuevos para satisfacer las principales necesidades de salud pública. Un documento de perfil de producto específico de la OMS presenta una necesidad y ofrece orientación sobre lo que debe incluirse para tener en cuenta el acceso y la equidad como parte del plan de investigación y desarrollo desde el principio. La OMS también ha creado el Directorio de Perfiles de Productos Específicos, una base de datos en línea de uso gratuito con las características utilizadas para describir los productos sanitarios deseados, incluidos medicamentos, vacunas, herramientas de diagnóstico y equipos médicos. En el presente documento, describimos el proceso de elaboración de un perfil de producto específico de la OMS y las ventajas de este tipo de orientación. Instamos a los desarrolladores de productos a compartir perfiles de productos que aborden necesidades no cubiertas en salud pública para contribuir al avance hacia los objetivos mundiales de mejora de la salud y el bienestar.

Phase 1 Trials of rVSV Ebola Vaccine in Africa and Europe.

BACKGROUND: The replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-based vaccine expressing a Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) glycoprotein was selected for rapid safety and immunogenicity testing before its use in West Africa. METHODS: We performed three open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trials and one randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 1 trial to assess the safety, side-effect profile, and immunogenicity of rVSV-ZEBOV at various doses in 158 healthy adults in Europe and Africa. All participants were injected with doses of vaccine ranging from 300,000 to 50 million plaque-forming units (PFU) or placebo. RESULTS: No serious vaccine-related adverse events were reported. Mild-to-moderate early-onset reactogenicity was frequent but transient (median, 1 day). Fever was observed in up to 30% of vaccinees. Vaccine viremia was detected within 3 days in 123 of the 130 participants (95%) receiving 3 million PFU or more; rVSV was not detected in saliva or urine. In the second week after injection, arthritis affecting one to four joints developed in 11 of 51 participants (22%) in Geneva, with pain lasting a median of 8 days (interquartile range, 4 to 87); 2 self-limited cases occurred in 60 participants (3%) in Hamburg, Germany, and Kilifi, Kenya. The virus was identified in one synovial-fluid aspirate and in skin vesicles of 2 other vaccinees, showing peripheral viral replication in the second week after immunization. ZEBOV-glycoprotein-specific antibody responses were detected in all the participants, with similar glycoprotein-binding antibody titers but significantly higher neutralizing antibody titers at higher doses. Glycoprotein-binding antibody titers were sustained through 180 days in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: In these studies, rVSV-ZEBOV was reactogenic but immunogenic after a single dose and warrants further evaluation for safety and efficacy. (Funded by the Wellcome Trust and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02283099, NCT02287480, and NCT02296983; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR201411000919191.).

Safety and immunogenicity of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine in adults and children in Lambaréné, Gabon: A phase I randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine prevented Ebola virus disease when used at 2 × 107 plaque-forming units (PFU) in a trial in Guinea. This study provides further safety and immunogenicity data. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A randomised, open-label phase I trial in Lambaréné, Gabon, studied 5 single intramuscular vaccine doses of 3 × 103, 3 × 104, 3 × 105, 3 × 106, or 2 × 107 PFU in 115 adults and a dose of 2 × 107 PFU in 20 adolescents and 20 children. The primary objective was safety and tolerability 28 days post-injection. Immunogenicity, viraemia, and shedding post-vaccination were evaluated as secondary objectives. In adults, mild-to-moderate adverse events were frequent, but there were no serious or severe adverse events related to vaccination. Before vaccination, Zaire Ebola virus (ZEBOV)-glycoprotein (GP)-specific and ZEBOV antibodies were detected in 11% and 27% of adults, respectively. In adults, 74%-100% of individuals who received a dose 3 × 104, 3 × 105, 3 × 106, or 2 × 107 PFU had a ≥4.0-fold increase in geometric mean titres (GMTs) of ZEBOV-GP-specific antibodies at day 28, reaching GMTs of 489 (95% CI: 264-908), 556 (95% CI: 280-1,101), 1,245 (95% CI: 899-1,724), and 1,503 (95% CI: 931-2,426), respectively. Twenty-two percent of adults had a ≥4-fold increase of ZEBOV antibodies, with GMTs at day 28 of 1,015 (647-1,591), 1,887 (1,154-3,085), 1,445 (1,013-2,062), and 3,958 (2,249-6,967) for the same doses, respectively. These antibodies persisted up to day 180 for doses ≥3 × 105 PFU. Adults with antibodies before vaccination had higher GMTs throughout. Neutralising antibodies were detected in more than 50% of participants at doses ≥3 × 105 PFU. As in adults, no serious or severe adverse events related to vaccine occurred in adolescents or children. At day 2, vaccine RNA titres were higher for adolescents and children than adults. At day 7, 78% of adolescents and 35% of children had recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus RNA detectable in saliva. The vaccine induced high GMTs of ZEBOV-GP-specific antibodies at day 28 in adolescents, 1,428 (95% CI: 1,025-1,989), and children, 1,620 (95% CI: 806-3,259), and in both groups antibody titres increased up to day 180. The absence of a control group, lack of stratification for baseline antibody status, and imbalances in male/female ratio are the main limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the acceptable safety and immunogenicity profile of the 2 × 107 PFU dose in adults and support consideration of lower doses for paediatric populations and those who request boosting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201411000919191.

Stability of a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Vectored Ebola Vaccine.

The live attenuated vesicular stomatitis virus-vectored Ebola vaccine rVSV-ZEBOV is currently undergoing clinical trials in West Africa. The vaccine is to be stored at -70°C or less. Since maintaining the cold chain is challenging in rural areas, the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine's short-term and long-term stability at different temperatures was examined. Different dilutions were tested since the optimal vaccine dosage had not yet been determined at the start of this experiment. The results demonstrate that the original vaccine formulation was stable for 1 week at 4°C and for 24 hours at 25°C. The stability of the vaccine was compromised by both high temperatures and dilution.

Toward Developing a Preventive MERS-CoV Vaccine-Report from a Workshop Organized by the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health and the International Vaccine Institute, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, November 14-15, 2015.

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) remains a serious international public health threat. With the goal of accelerating the development of countermeasures against MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV), funding agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and researchers across the world assembled in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on November 14-15, 2015, to discuss vaccine development challenges. The meeting was spearheaded by the Saudi Ministry of Health and co-organized by the International Vaccine Institute, South Korea. Accelerating the development of a preventive vaccine requires a better understanding of MERS epidemiology, transmission, and pathogenesis in humans and animals. A combination of rodent and nonhuman primate models should be considered in evaluating and developing preventive and therapeutic vaccine candidates. Dromedary camels should be considered for the development of veterinary vaccines. Several vaccine technology platforms targeting the MERS-CoV spike protein were discussed. Mechanisms to maximize investment, provide robust data, and affect public health are urgently needed.

Malaria vaccine research and development: the role of the WHO MALVAC committee.

The WHO Malaria Vaccine Advisory Committee (MALVAC) provides advice to WHO on strategic priorities, activities and technical issues related to global efforts to develop vaccines against malaria. MALVAC convened a series of meetings to obtain expert, impartial consensus views on the priorities and best practice for vaccine-related research and development strategies. The technical areas covered during these consultations included: guidance on clinical trial design for candidate sporozoite and asexual blood stage vaccines; measures of efficacy of malaria vaccines in Phase IIb and Phase III trials; standardization of immunoassays; the challenges of developing assays and designing trials for interventions against malaria transmission; modelling impact of anti-malarial interventions; whole organism malaria vaccines, and Plasmodium vivax vaccine-related research and evaluation. These informed discussions and opinions are summarized here to provide guidance on harmonization of strategies to help ensure high standards of practice and comparability between centres and the outcome of vaccine trials.

A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table.

Development and Phase 3 testing of the most advanced malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, indicates that malaria vaccine R&D is moving into a new phase. Field trials of several research malaria vaccines have also confirmed that it is possible to impact the host-parasite relationship through vaccine-induced immune responses to multiple antigenic targets using different platforms. Other approaches have been appropriately tested but turned out to be disappointing after clinical evaluation. As the malaria community considers the potential role of a first-generation malaria vaccine in malaria control efforts, it is an apposite time to carefully document terminated and ongoing malaria vaccine research projects so that lessons learned can be applied to increase the chances of success for second-generation malaria vaccines over the next 10 years. The most comprehensive resource of malaria vaccine projects is a spreadsheet compiled by WHO thanks to the input from funding agencies, sponsors and investigators worldwide. This spreadsheet, available from WHO's website, is known as "the rainbow table". By summarizing the published and some unpublished information available for each project on the rainbow table, the most comprehensive review of malaria vaccine projects to be published in the last several years is provided below.

MALVAC 2012 scientific forum: accelerating development of second-generation malaria vaccines.

The World Health Organization (WHO) convened a malaria vaccines committee (MALVAC) scientific forum from 20 to 21 February 2012 in Geneva, Switzerland, to review the global malaria vaccine portfolio, to gain consensus on approaches to accelerate second-generation malaria vaccine development, and to discuss the need to update the vision and strategic goal of the Malaria Vaccine Technology Roadmap. This article summarizes the forum, which included reviews of leading Plasmodium falciparum vaccine candidates for pre-erythrocytic vaccines, blood-stage vaccines, and transmission-blocking vaccines. Other major topics included vaccine candidates against Plasmodium vivax, clinical trial site capacity development in Africa, trial design considerations for a second-generation malaria vaccine, adjuvant selection, and regulatory oversight functions including vaccine licensure.

WHO International Standard for evaluation of the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines: call for urgent action by the scientific community.

The first WHO International Standard and International Reference Panel for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin were established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in December, 2020. The WHO International Antibody Standards are intended to serve as global reference reagents, against which national reference preparations or secondary standards can be calibrated. Calibration will facilitate comparison of results of assays (eg, of the neutralising antibody response to candidate COVID-19 vaccines) conducted in different countries. Use of these standards is expected to contribute to better understanding of the immune response, and particularly of the correlates of protection. This Personal View provides some technical details of the WHO Antibody Standards for SARS-CoV-2, focusing specifically on the use of these standards for the evaluation of the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines, rather than other applications (eg, diagnostic or therapeutic). The explanation with regard to why rapid adoption of the standards is crucial is also included, as well as how funders, journals, regulators, and ethics committees could drive adoption in the interest of public health.