RESUMEN
Background: Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt amyloidosis) is primarily diagnosed in elderly men but diagnoses in younger patients and women have recently increased. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine age- and sex-related differences in patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis enrolled in the THAOS (Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey). Methods: THAOS was a global, longitudinal, observational survey of patients with transthyretin amyloidosis, including both hereditary and wild-type disease, and asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic transthyretin gene variants. Patient characteristics at enrollment were analyzed by age at enrollment and sex (data cutoff date: August 1, 2022). Results: Of 1,251 patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis, 13.7%, 49.1%, 34.5%, and 2.8% were aged <70 years, 70 to 79 years, 80 to 89 years, and ≥90 years, respectively. The proportion of women increased with age, from 4.1% in patients aged <70 years to 14.3% in patients aged ≥90 years. In the respective age groups, median time from symptom onset to diagnosis overall (male, female) was 1.7 (1.3, 5.2), 2.0 (2.0, 2.2), 1.8 (1.9, 0.8), and 0.7 (0.6, 2.5) years. A Karnofsky Performance Status score ≤70 was observed in 17.1%, 30.1%, 46.1%, and 44.4% of patients aged <70 years, 70 to 79 years, 80 to 89 years, and ≥90 years, respectively. Conclusions: In this THAOS analysis of patients with ATTRwt amyloidosis, patients were diagnosed an average of 2 years after symptom onset, with the greatest diagnostic delay in women aged <70 years at 5 years. Patients were predominantly men, but the proportion of women increased with age. A substantial proportion of patients had significant functional impairment regardless of age. (Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcome Survey [THAOS]; NCT00628745).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although sudden death (SD) is a recognized complication of cardiac amyloidosis, there is scarce data about its incidence, mechanisms, and predictors. The aim of this study was to describe incidence of SD and to analyze possible risk factors. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ATTR or AL cardiac amyloidosis evaluated at two European centers were identified. SD was defined as unexpected death in clinically stable patients. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess risk factors in univariate analysis. Those statistically significant were then assessed through age-adjusted multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Analysis included 784 patients, 569 with ATTR amyloidosis (mean age 74.1 ± 12.1 years) and 215 with AL amyloidosis (mean age 64.5 ± 10.8 years). After a median follow-up of 1.9 years, SD rate at 2 years was 1.8% in ATTR. Previous pacemaker implantation (PPM) was associated with increased risk after age-adjusted analysis (HR 4.97; 95%CI: 1.39-17.7; p = 0.01). SD rate in AL amyloidosis patients at 2 years was 8.0% after a median follow-up of 1.2 years. Betablockers and NYHA III-IV were independently associated with an increased risk after age-adjusted multivariate analysis (HR 7.06 95%CI (2.31-21.5) p = 0.001) and (HR 4.56 95%CI (1.51-13.8) p = 0.007) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SD is more frequent in AL than in ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. SD is associated with different risk factors in both entities.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Genotype and left ventricular scar on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are increasingly recognized as risk markers for adverse outcomes in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the combined influence of genotype and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in assessing prognosis in a large cohort of patients with DCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Outcomes of 600 patients with DCM (53.3 ± 14.1 years, 66% male) who underwent clinical CMR and genetic testing were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoints were end-stage heart failure (ESHF) and malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA). During a median follow-up of 2.7 years (interquartile range 1.3-4.9), 24 (4.00%) and 48 (8.00%) patients had ESHF and MVA, respectively. In total, 242 (40.3%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (positive genotype) and 151 (25.2%) had LGE. In survival analysis, positive LGE was associated with MVA and ESHF (both, p < 0.001) while positive genotype was associated with ESHF (p = 0.034) but not with MVA (p = 0.102). Classification of patients according to genotype (G+/G-) and LGE presence (L+/L-) revealed progressively increasing events across L-/G-, L-/G+, L+/G- and L+/G+ groups and resulted in optimized MVA and ESHF prediction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Hazard ratios for MVA and ESHF in patients with either L+ or G+ compared with those with L-/G- were 4.71 (95% confidence interval: 2.11-10.50, p < 0.001) and 7.92 (95% confidence interval: 1.86-33.78, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Classification of patients with DCM according to genotype and LGE improves MVA and ESHF prediction. Scar assessment with CMR and genotyping should be considered to select patients for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement.