Anti-EMP2 diabody blocks epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) and FAK mediated collagen gel contraction in ARPE-19 cells.

Epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) regulates collagen gel contraction by the retinal pigment epithelium cell line ARPE-19 by modulating FAK activation. Collagen gel contraction is one in vitro model for an aberrant wound healing response, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), which occurs as a complication of severe ocular trauma. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether EMP2 specific recombinant diabody decreases activation of FAK and collagen gel contraction in ARPE-19. Anti-EMP2 diabody was recombinantly constructed from a human phage library-derived clone selected for reactivity against an extracellular domain of human EMP2. ARPE-19 cells were exposed to an anti-EMP2 or control diabody, and toxicity, adhesion, and migration were assessed respectively through toluidine blue exclusion, binding to collagen type 1, and a migration assay. Collagen gel contraction was assessed using an in vitro assay. FAK activation was evaluated using Western blot. Exposure to anti-EMP2 diabody, resulted in a 75% reduction in EMP2 protein levels at 4 h. No significant toxicity was observed with anti-EMP2 diabody at levels that maximally reduced EMP2. Anti-EMP2 diabody, but not control diabody, significantly reduced collagen gel contraction (p < 0.001), without changes in adhesion or migration. Concordantly, anti-EMP2 diabody as compared to a control diabody reduced collagen stimulated FAK activation (p = 0.01). Anti-EMP2 diabody decreases EMP2 protein levels, FAK activation, and collagen gel contraction by ARPE-19 cells without an adverse effect on cell survival. Modulation of EMP2 using anti-EMP2 diabody could be a new approach for targeting EMP2 and pathologic consequences associated with EMP2.

Steroid hormone regulation of EMP2 expression and localization in the endometrium.

BACKGROUND: The tetraspan protein epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2), which mediates surface display of diverse proteins, is required for endometrial competence in blastocyst implantation, and is uniquely correlated with poor survival from endometrial adenocarcinoma tumors. Because EMP2 is differentially expressed in the various stages of the murine and human estrous cycle, we tested the hypothesis that the steroid hormones progesterone and estrogen influence EMP2 expression and localization. METHODS: Frozen human proliferative and secretory endometrium were collected and analyzed for EMP2 expression using SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis. The response of EMP2 to progesterone and estradiol was determined using a combination of real-time PCR, SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis, and confocal immunofluorescence in the human endometrial carcinoma cell line RL95-2. To confirm the in vitro results, ovariectomized mice were treated with progesterone or estradiol, and EMP2 expression was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Within normal human endometrium, EMP2 expression is upregulated in the secretory phase relative to the proliferative phase. To understand the role of steroid hormones on EMP2 expression, we utilized RL95-2 cells, which express both estrogen and progesterone receptors. In RL95-2 cells, both estradiol and progesterone induced EMP2 mRNA expression, but only progesterone induced EMP2 protein expression. To compare steroid hormone regulation of EMP2 between humans and mice, we analyzed EMP2 expression in ovarectomized mice. Similar to results observed in humans, progesterone upregulated endometrial EMP2 expression and induced EMP2 translocation to the plasma membrane. Estradiol did not promote translocation to the cell surface, but moderately induced EMP2 expression in cytoplasmic compartments in vivo. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that targeting of EMP2 to specific locations under the influence of these steroid hormones may be important for integrating the molecular responses required for implantation competence.

Epithelial Membrane Protein-2 in Human Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy and Epiretinal Membranes.

PURPOSE: To determine the level of epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) expression in preretinal membranes from surgical patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) or epiretinal membranes (ERMs). EMP2, an integrin regulator, is expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium and understanding EMP2 expression in human retinal disease may help determine whether EMP2 is a potential therapeutic target. METHODS: Preretinal membranes were collected during surgical vitrectomies after obtaining consents. The membranes were fixed, processed, sectioned, and protein expression of EMP2 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The staining intensity (SI) and percentage of positive cells (PP) in membranes were compared by masked observers. Membranes were categorized by their cause and type including inflammatory and traumatic. RESULTS: All of the membranes stained positive for EMP2. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy-induced membranes (all causes) showed greater expression of EMP2 than ERMs with higher SI (1.81 vs. 1.38; P = 0.07) and PP (2.08 vs. 1.54; P = 0.09). However all the PVR subgroups had similar levels of EMP2 expression without statistically significant differences by Kruskal-Wallis test. Inflammatory PVR had higher expression of EMP2 than ERMs (SI of 2.58 vs. 1.38); however, this was not statistically significant. No correlation was found between duration of PVR membrane and EMP2 expression. EMP2 was detected by RT-PCR in all samples (n = 6) tested. CONCLUSIONS: All studied ERMs and PVR membranes express EMP2. Levels of EMP2 trended higher in all PVR subgroups than in ERMs, especially in inflammatory and traumatic PVR. Future studies are needed to determine the role of EMP2 in the pathogenesis and treatment of various retinal conditions including PVR.

Epithelial membrane protein 2 controls VEGF expression in ARPE-19 cells.

PURPOSE: VEGF production by RPE cells has been shown to be important in regulating aberrant angiogenesis in the retina, which is responsible for multiple types of ocular pathology. EMP2 is highly expressed in the RPE and has been shown to regulate FAK activation, which is implicated in VEGF expression in other cell lines. The purpose of this study was to determine whether EMP2 regulates VEGF expression in the RPE cell line, ARPE-19. METHODS: ARPE-19 cells were engineered to overexpress EMP2. EMP2 siRNA was used to decrease EMP2 expression. The small molecule inhibitor PP2 was used to inhibit FAK activation. VEGF levels were measured by Western blot and ELISA. Functional differences in secreted VEGF were assayed using HUVEC migration. RESULTS: VEGF expression levels correlated with levels of EMP2. An increase of VEGF by 150% was observed in EMP2 overexpressing cells as compared with ARPE-19 cells. Concordantly, EMP2 knockdown resulted in a 57% decrease in VEGF expression. HUVEC migration (P = 0.01) and vessel tube formation (P < 0.01) were significantly increased when exposed to cell culture supernatants from EMP2 overexpressing cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes a novel connection between EMP2 and VEGF and may reflect either a direct effect through the tetraspan web or an indirect change through FAK activation. This connection is functionally significant. In addition to the direct use of anti-VEGF antibodies, modulation of EMP2 with impact on VEGF is potentially a distinct therapeutic target for the treatment of neovascularization associated with retinal diseases that involve pathologic angiogenesis.

Epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) and experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

PURPOSE: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is believed to result in part from de-differentiation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with cellular migration in the vitreous cavity, membrane formation, and contraction in an aberrant wound-healing strategy. In an in vitro collagen-gel contraction assay, epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) controls contraction through activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in a RPE cell line (ARPE-19). The purpose of this study was to investigate how blocking or altering the level of EMP2 expression changed clinical PVR in an in vivo model. METHODS: Using the ARPE-19 cell line, the levels of EMP2 modulated through stable transfections of an EMP2 overexpressing construct, EMP2 ribozyme, or vector alone. These transfected cell lines were used in a rabbit model of PVR. The severity of PVR was classified by two masked observers. An EMP2 blocking antibody was also used to decrease functional EMP2 in the PVR model. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate EMP2 expression in vivo. RESULTS: The transfectants with lower levels of EMP2 had significantly less PVR severity than the degree of PVR induced by wild-type cells (p = 0.05). Also, the transfectants with a low-level of EMP2 expression showed a strong trend of less PVR severity than the high-levels EMP2 transfectants (p = 0.06). Blocking EMP2 with a specific polyclonal antibody significantly decreased the level of PVR severity (p = 0.02). PVR membranes were found to be positive for EMP2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo studies support a direct correlation between EMP2 expression and severity of PVR. These results validate the potential for controlling RPE biology through a change in EMP2 expression, and provide a potential therapeutic target for this disease.

Rewiring integrin-mediated signaling and cellular response with the peripheral myelin protein 22 and epithelial membrane protein 2 components of the tetraspan web.

PURPOSE: Integrin-mediated collagen gel contraction by ARPE-19 is an in vitro model for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), an aberrant wound healing response after retinal detachment or ocular trauma. Expression of the tetraspan protein epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) controls gel contraction through FAK activation. Peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22), another member of the tetraspan web, is closely related to EMP2. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PMP22 also controls the contractile phase associated with PVR. METHODS: Integrin expression, adhesion, and protein expression were assessed, respectively, through flow cytometry, binding to collagen types I and IV, and Western blot analysis. Collagen gel contraction was assessed using an in vitro assay. RESULTS: Overexpression of PMP22 in ARPE-19 cells (ARPE-19/PMP22) resulted in increased collagen adhesion. Gel contraction, however, was reduced by greater than 50% in ARPE-19/PMP22 cells (P < 0.001). In contrast to the FAK activation observed by increasing EMP2 expression, PMP22 overexpression led to increased AKT activation. The decrease in gel contraction by the ARPE-19/PMP22 cells was partially reversed through either PMP22 siRNA or by blockade of AKT. CONCLUSIONS: Relative expression of EMP2 or PMP22 within the tetraspan web drives a cellular response toward a FAK- or AKT-dependent pathway, respectively. EMP2 and PMP22 differentially regulate collagen gel contraction in the ARPE-19 cell line. The implication of this finding adds a new dimension to the concept of the tetraspan web, in which the abundance of individual tetraspan family members differentially regulates signal transduction and the downstream cellular response.

FAK activation and the role of epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) in collagen gel contraction.

PURPOSE: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) occurs in approximately 10% of patients after retinal detachment. PVR results from a multiphase process that leads to an aberrant wound-healing strategy with contractile cellular forces and tractional retinal detachment (TRD). Epithelial membrane protein (EMP) 2 controls cell surface expression and function of integrin isoforms associated with cellular contraction in many cell types. Since EMP2 is highly expressed in retinal pigment epithelium, this study investigates the role of EMP2 in collagen gel contraction. METHODS: EMP2 expression was recombinantly modified in the ARPE-19 cell line. Cell surface integrin expression was assessed by flow cytometry. Collagen gel contraction was assessed by using an in vitro assay and the percentage of contraction was quantified. Proliferation and migration were measured by BrdU incorporation and a wound-healing assay, respectively. Cellular invasion was investigated with polycarbonate membranes coated with collagen. RESULTS: EMP2 expression levels correlated positively with the ability to contract collagen gels. Compared with wild-type ARPE-19 cells, the cells with increased EMP2 expression exhibited enhanced contraction (P = 0.02), and decreased EMP2 expression concomitantly resulted in decreased contraction (P = 0.002). EMP2 overexpression resulted in reduced proliferation, migration, and integrin alpha1 and alpha2 integrin expression. EMP2 overexpression was associated with a 70% increase in FAK activation (P = 0.0003) and relative resistance of gel contraction to inhibitors of FAK/Src activation. CONCLUSIONS: ARPE-19-mediated collagen gel contraction is a multistep process that requires integrin ligation and activation of the FAK/Src complex. EMP2 positively modulates collagen gel contraction by ARPE-19 cells through increased FAK activation.

Functional consequences of interactions between FAK and epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2).

PURPOSE: Collagen gel contraction by ARPE-19 is controlled by epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) through focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation. The purpose of this study was to test the role of EMP2 in the cellular context of FAK activation. METHODS: The ARPE-19 cell line was recombinantly modified to increase the expression of EMP2 and was used in this study. Quantification of FAK and Src phosphorylation was determined with Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates with the use of specific antibodies for different target sites of phosphorylation. Coimmunoprecipitation of whole cell lysates with an antibody against EMP2, followed by Western blot analysis and identification of FAK, was performed. Focal adhesions and their relationship to EMP2 were identified with immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. F-actin distribution was identified using fluorescence microscopy, and alpha- smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) expression was quantified with Western blot analysis and specific antibodies. Adhesion to collagen type I was determined with a binding assay. RESULTS: EMP2 overexpression led to increased FAK phosphorylation at all measured phosphorylation sites. Coimmunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy provided evidence for a physical association between EMP2 and FAK. Increased EMP2 was also associated with altered distribution of focal adhesions, changes in actin organization, increased alpha-SMA expression, and increased adherence to a collagen-coated surface. CONCLUSIONS: The EMP2-FAK association represents a novel protein-protein interaction, not previously reported, that demonstrates significant functional cellular responses in the context of in vitro models of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Collagen gel contraction by ARPE-19 cells is mediated by a FAK-Src dependent pathway.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) may result in part from de-differentiation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in an aberrant wound-healing strategy. An in vitro model of PVR, collagen gel contraction by RPE, likely requires integrin engagement and activation as an important initial step. The purpose of this study was to identify the important associated integrins and signal transduction pathway. The retinal pigment epithelial cell line ARPE-19 was used in these studies. Cell surface integrin expression was assessed using flow cytometry. An in vitro contraction assay was performed and the percent contraction quantified at specific time intervals using image capture (Gel Doc) and NIH Image software. Cells were pretreated with either small molecule inhibitors of signal transduction pathways or monoclonal antibodies with specificity for specific integrin isoforms. Transient transfections with a FAK siRNA were used to decrease FAK expression. ARPE-19 cells express alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3 integrin, isoforms involved in collagen ligation. Cell surface integrin blockade using anti-integrin alpha2 (P=0.02), alpha3 (P=0.01), or a combination of alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3 (P=0.001) antibodies significantly reduced collagen gel contraction. Inhibition of the FAK-Src complex, but not MEK or PI3K, significantly decreased contraction (P=0.0001). FAK siRNA transient transfection significantly reduced FAK protein expression by 71% (P=0.02) and concordantly decreased gel contraction (P=0.0001). RPE-mediated collagen gel contraction is a multi-step process. Integrin ligation and FAK-Src activation is necessary for collagen gel contraction produced by the ARPE-19 cell line. Validation of these observations in primary RPE cells may suggest new targets for therapeutic intervention in PVR.