Safety of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis as used in clinical practice: results from the ARTIS programme.

OBJECTIVE: Longitudinal clinical registry-infrastructures such as Anti-Rheumatic Therapies in Sweden (ARTIS) allow simultaneous comparison of the safety of individual immunomodulatory drugs used in clinical practice, with consistent definitions of treatment cohorts, follow-up and outcomes. Our objective was to assess and compare incidence rates of key safety outcomes for individual targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), updating previous reports and including newer treatments including Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi). METHODS: Nationwide register-based cohort study including all patients with RA in Sweden registered as starting any b/tsDMARD 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2020, followed until 30 June 2021 (N=20 117). The incidence rates of selected outcomes, identified through national healthcare registers, were compared between individual b/tsDMARDs, adjusted for confounding by demographics, RA disease characteristics and comorbidity. RESULTS: There were marked differences in treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (rates per 1000 person-years ranged from 18 on rituximab to 57 on tofacitinib), but few significant differences were observed for the serious adverse events under study. Neither cardiovascular events nor general serious infections were more frequent on baricitinib or tofacitinib versus bDMARDs, but JAKi were associated with higher rates of hospital-treated herpes zoster (HR vs etanercept, 3.82 (95% CI 2.05 to 7.09) and 4.00 (1.59 to 10.06)). Low number of events limited some comparisons, in particular for sarilumab and tofacitinib. CONCLUSION: Data from ARTIS supports that the b/tsDMARDs currently used to treat RA have acceptable and largely similar safety profiles, but differences exist in particular concerning tolerability and specific infection risks.

Familial aggregation and heritability of ankylosing spondylitis - a Swedish nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: AS is known to be a highly heritable disease, but previous studies on the magnitude of the familial aggregation and heritability of AS have been small and inconclusive, with familial relative risks ranging from 17 to 94. We aimed to improve estimates of these factors by studying families of all subjects diagnosed with AS in Sweden over a period of 16 years and to investigate if familial risks vary by sex or type of relative. METHODS: In a nested case-control study, we identified AS index patients from the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (SRQ) between 2001 and 2016. Each index patient was matched on age and sex to up to 50 general population controls. First-degree relatives of index patients and controls were identified through the Multi-Generation Register, with disease status ascertained in the NPR and SRQ. Familial risks were defined as odds ratios (ORs) of having AS when exposed to a first-degree relative with AS, using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall familial OR for AS was 19.4 (95% CI 18.1, 20.8). Estimates were similar for different relative types and by sex, but having more than one affected relative resulted in a higher risk [OR 68.0 (95% CI 51.3, 90.1)]. Heritability, estimated by assuming sibling risks were completely due to genetics, was 77% (95% CI 73, 80). CONCLUSION: Although the familial risk and heritability of AS are higher than for most other diseases, we report estimates that are substantially lower than commonly referenced numbers for AS from other populations.

Association of childhood infections and perinatal factors with ankylosing spondylitis: a Swedish nationwide case-control and sibling study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify perinatal and early-life risk factors for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), controlling for family-shared confounding with a sibling comparison design. METHODS: In this nationwide, register-based case-control study, we identified 5612 AS cases from the Swedish National Patient Register, and matched them with 22 042 individuals without inflammatory arthritis from the general population. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AS in relation to childhood infections and a broad range of perinatal factors including fetal growth. Significant associations were further tested in a sibling comparison analysis, including 3965 patients with AS and their 6070 siblings without a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant associations between any studied fetal growth-related factor or other perinatal factors and the risk of developing AS. In contrast, having older siblings (adjusted OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.22 for one vs no older sibling) and history of a childhood tonsillectomy (adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.49) were associated with AS in the case-control analysis, results that also held in the sibling comparison. Serious childhood infection and multiple birth were significantly associated with AS in the case-control sample, but estimates were attenuated in the sibling comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Having older siblings and a history of tonsillectomy in childhood were independently associated with development of AS, even after adjustment for family-shared factors in a sibling comparison analysis. This strengthens the hypothesis that childhood infections play a role in the aetiology of AS.

Temporal trends in adverse pregnancy outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis in Sweden: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth in women with axial spondyloarthritis is scarce and conflicting, with more research needed to guide policy and clinical practice. We aimed to assess the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a large cohort of women with axial spondyloarthritis, and to investigate how outcomes varied over time and in relation to anti-rheumatic treatment. METHODS: In this register-based cohort study, we included births in Sweden between April 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2020, to women with axial spondyloarthritis and general population comparators, matched 1:10 on year of delivery, maternal age, and parity. Our main data source was the Medical Birth Register (MBR), which includes over 98% of births in Sweden and prospectively collects data on antenatal care, delivery, and foetal outcomes. The information in MBR was linked to other registers, including the National Patient Register, the Prescribed Drug Register, and registers with demographic data. Our main outcomes were the relative risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, analysed using modified Poisson regression. We also studied how the frequency of certain adverse outcomes, as well as disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatments, changed over the study period by linear regression and loess plots. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2020, 1580 births in women with axial spondyloarthritis recorded in MBR fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were matched with 15 792 comparator births. Among the 1580 births in women with axial spondyloarthritis, we found increased risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1·43, 95% CI 1·13-1·80), pre-eclampsia (1·44, 1·08-1·92), elective caesarean delivery (1·59, 1·37-1·84), and serious infant infection (1·29, 1·05-1·59) compared with births in general population comparators. The risks of preterm birth, infant infection, and caesarean delivery decreased by around 0·5 percentage points annually during the study period, while the use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors during pregnancy increased. INTERPRETATION: In view of remaining concerns regarding safety of the use of biological DMARDs during pregnancy, we saw a reassuring trend in which pregnancy outcomes improved over time in the axial spondyloarthritis group, concurrent with increased use of biological DMARDs. If the current rate of improvement is maintained, women with axial spondyloarthritis treated in accordance with clinical guidelines might eventually not be at an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. FUNDING: Swedish Research Council and The Swedish Rheumatism Association.

Poor performance of the rapid test for human brucellosis in health facilities in Kenya.

Human brucellosis is considered to be an important but typically under-diagnosed cause of febrile illness in many low and middle-income countries. In Kenya, and throughout East Africa, laboratory diagnosis for the disease is based primarily on the febrile antigen Brucella agglutination test (FBAT), yet few studies of the diagnostic accuracy of this test exist. Assessment of the performance of the FBAT is essential for its appropriate clinical use, as well as for evaluating surveillance data reported by public health systems. To assess FBAT performance, we collected sera from people with symptoms compatible with brucellosis attending two health facilities in Busia County, Kenya. Sera were tested using the FBAT and results compared with those from the Rose Bengal Test (RBT), an assay with well-known performance characteristics. Positives on either test were confirmed using the classical serum agglutination test (SAT)-Coombs test combination and a rapid IgM/IgG lateral flow immunochromatography assay (LFA). A questionnaire focussing on known risk factors for exposure to Brucella spp. was also conducted, and relationships with FBAT positivity examined using logistic regression. Out of 825 recruited individuals, 162 (19.6%) were classified as positive using the FBAT. In contrast, only eight (1.0%) were positive using the RBT. Of the 162 FBAT positives, one (0.62%) had an atypical agglutination in SAT and three (1.9%) showed low Coombs titres. Out of 148 FBAT positive individuals tested using the LFA, five (3.4%) were IgM positive and none were IgG positive. Poor or no correlation was observed between FBAT results and most established risk factors for Brucella infection. We observed substantial disagreement between the FBAT and a number of well-known serological tests, with the majority of reactive FBAT results appearing to be false positives. Poor FBAT specificity, combined with a lack of confirmatory testing, strongly suggests overdiagnosis of brucellosis is common in this low prevalence setting. This is expected to have important economic impacts on affected patients subjected to the long and likely unnecessary courses of multiple antibiotics required for treatment of the disease.