Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(1S Suppl 1): e615-e624, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This real-world study assessed the impact of golimumab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ulcerative colitis over 12 months in Greece. METHODS: GO-LIFE was a noninterventional, prospective, multicenter, 12-month study. Patients who had moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis were naïve to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) therapy and had failed previous conventional therapy. Patients received golimumab as per label. The primary endpoint was patients achieving inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire 32-item (IBDQ-32) remission at 12 months. Secondary endpoints, at 6 and 12 months, included patients achieving IBDQ-32 response; the mean change in the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM) and the work productivity and activity impairment in ulcerative colitis (WPAI:UC) questionnaires; changes in healthcare utilization; patients achieving clinical response and remission; adherence rates and the percentage of patients who discontinued golimumab. RESULTS: IBDQ-32 remission was achieved by 76.9% of patients at 12 months. Mean changes in all TSQM and WPAI:UC domain scores at 12 months were statistically significant. Clinical remission was achieved by 49.4 and 50.6% of patients at 6 and 12 months, and clinical response by 59.3 and 56.8%, respectively. All patients but one (80/81) had high adherence (≥80%) to golimumab treatment over 12 months. Ulcerative colitis-related health care resource utilization was reduced during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world settings, treatment with golimumab resulted in meaningful improvements in HRQoL and other PROs, and in disease activity at 6 and 12 months in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who were naïve to anti-TNFa therapy.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Calidad de Vida , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Grecia , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(7): 773-776, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an independent risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which is associated significantly with disease severity. We aimed to determine the rates of CDI among hospitalized IBD patients in major tertiary referral hospitals in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of stool cultures from hospitalized patients investigated for diarrhea, during 2016, tested for CDI with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B. RESULTS: In total, 6932 patients were tested for CDI; 894 were positive for GDH (12.89%) and 339 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (4.89%). The prevalence of CDI among all hospitalized patients was 1.6/1000 patient-days. Among these, there were 401 IBD patients, and 62 were positive for GDH (15.46%) and 30 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (7.48%). The prevalence of CDI in IBD patients was 2.5/1000 patient-days, significantly higher than in non-IBD hospitalized patients (30/401 vs. 309/6531, P=0.013). Among the 30 IBD patients (ulcerative colitis=18, Crohn's disease=12) with CDI, six were receiving biologics, three were on corticosteroids [one combined with azathioprine (AZA) and one combined with 5-ASA], nine were on AZA monotherapy and 12 were on 5-ASA monotherapy. The prevalence of CDI among patients receiving AZA monotherapy was significantly higher than in patients receiving other medications (9/68 vs. 21/333, P=0.047). Mild CDI (n=28) was treated with metronidazole and/or vancomycin, whereas severe CDI (n=2) was treated with vancomycin. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CDI is higher in hospitalized IBD patients than those without IBD and AZA monotherapy increases the risk of CDI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Toxinas Bacterianas/análisis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Diarrea , Enterotoxinas/análisis , Heces/química , Femenino , Glutamato Deshidrogenasa/análisis , Grecia/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Mesalamina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA