Knowledge and social beliefs of malaria and prevention strategies among itinerant Nomadic Arabs, Fulanis and Dagazada groups in Chad: a mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Nomadic populations in Chad are at increased risk of contracting malaria because of their lifestyle. Being highly mobile they are often excluded from disease control programmes, and access to preventive measures and treatment is more difficult. Effective malaria control interventions take account of local modes of transmission, patterns of care-seeking behaviour and community perceptions of cause and prevention practices. There is currently little information about malaria knowledge and perceptions among nomadic groups in Chad, or their awareness of malaria control interventions and this study sought to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: A mixed methods study, including a cross-sectional survey with men and women (n = 78) to determine the level of knowledge and use of malaria prevention strategies among Arabs, Peuls and Dagazada nomadic groups. Three focus group discussions were conducted with women to explore their representation of malaria and knowledge of preventive methods. Key informant interviews were held with leaders of nomadic groups (n = 6) to understand perception of malaria risk among itinerant communities. RESULTS: Nomads are aware of the risk of malaria, recognize the symptoms and have local explanations for the disease. Reported use of preventive interventions such as Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) for children and Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) of malaria in pregnancy was very low. However, 42.3% of respondents reported owning at least one LLIN and 60% said they slept under an LLIN the night before the survey. In case of a malaria episode, nomads seek clinicians, informal drug sellers in the street or market for self-medication, or traditional medicine depending on their financial means. Interviews with nomad leaders and discussions with women provide key themes on: (i) social representation of malaria risk and (ii) social representation of malaria and (iii) perspectives on malaria prevention and (iv) malaria treatment practices. CONCLUSION: The nomadic groups included in this study are aware of risk of malaria and their level of exposure. Local interpretations of the cause of malaria could be addressed through tailored and appropriate health education. Except for LLINs, malaria prevention interventions are not well known or used. Financial barriers lowered access to both mosquito nets and malaria treatment. Reducing the barriers highlighted in this study will improve access to the healthcare system for nomadic groups, and increase the opportunity to create awareness of and improve uptake of SMC and IPT among women and children.

Knowledge and practices surrounding malaria and LLIN use among Arab, Dazagada and Fulani pastoral nomads in Chad.

BACKGROUND: Chadian pastoral nomads are highly exposed to malaria due to their lifestyle and their mobility between various endemic areas. To inform strategies to reduce nomads' risk of malaria and associated morbidity and mortality, it is important to understand the factors associated to their knowledge of malaria transmission and prevention practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional study among Arab, Dazagada and Fulani pastoral nomadic groups was conducted in February and October 2021. A validated structured electronic questionnaire was administered to assess knowledge of malaria. Attitudes and malaria prevention practices were assessed on the basis of perception of the causes of malaria and the use of a long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) the day before the survey. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression with covariates adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 278 nomads aged 20 to 65 years were included in the study. Overall, 90.7% of participants surveyed had a good knowledge of malaria. Fulani respondents were more likely to have a good knowledge of malaria than Arab respondents (Adjusted Odd ratio (AOR): 5.00, 95% CI: 1.04-24.03) and households possessing a LLIN were more likely to have a good knowledge of malaria (AOR: 9.66, 95% CI: 1.24-75.36). Most nomad households surveyed reported sleeping under a mosquito net the night before the survey (87.1%) while 98.9% owned a LLIN. Daza respondents (AOR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.56) were less likely to use LLINs than Arab respondents. The middle (AOR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.17-6.62) and wealthier households (AOR: 6.68, 95% CI: 3.19-14.01) were more likely to use LLINs. Knowledge of malaria was associated with the use of LLIN (AOR: 12.77, 95% CI: 1.58-102.99). CONCLUSION: There remains a need to improve nomads' understanding of Plasmodium falciparum-carrying mosquitoes as the vector for malaria transmission and the quality of information provided. Knowledge of malaria and its prevention strategies in nomadic setting lead to the use of LLINs. Further reductions in malaria morbidity can be achieved by improving nomads' access to LLINs. This study can inform on the design policies to improve nomadic communities' knowledge of malaria prevention and promoting LLIN use as requested by the national policy against malaria.