RESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDUE) is one of the main global causes of kidney failure. Genetic studies may identify an etiology in these patients, but few studies have implemented genetic testing of CKDUE in a population-based series of patients, which was the focus of the GENSEN Study. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 818 patients aged≤45 years at 51 Spanish centers with CKDUE, and either an estimated glomerular filtration rate of<15mL/min/1.73m2 or treatment with maintenance dialysis or transplantation. OBSERVATIONS: Genetic testing for 529 genes associated with inherited nephropathies using high-throughput sequencing (HTS). Pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic (P/LP) gene variants concordant with the inheritance pattern were detected in 203 patients (24.8%). Variants in type IV collagen genes were the most frequent (COL4A5, COL4A4, COL4A3; 35% of total gene variants), followed by NPHP1, PAX2, UMOD, MUC1, and INF2 (7.3%, 5.9%, 2.5%, 2.5%, and 2.5%, respectively). Overall, 87 novel variants classified as P/LP were identified. The top 5 most common previously undiagnosed diseases were Alport syndrome spectrum (35% of total positive reports), genetic podocytopathies (19%), nephronophthisis (11%), autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (7%), and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT, 5%). A family history of kidney disease was reported by 191 participants (23.3%) and by 65 of 203 patients (32.0%) with P/LP variants. LIMITATIONS: Missing data, and selection bias resulting from voluntary enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic testing with HTS identified a genetic cause of kidney disease in approximately one quarter of young patients with CKDUE and advanced kidney disease. These findings suggest that genetic studies are a potentially useful tool for the evaluation of people with CKDUE. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The cause of kidney disease is unknown for 1 in 5 patients requiring kidney replacement therapy, reflecting possible prior missed treatment opportunities. We assessed the diagnostic utility of genetic testing in children and adults aged≤45 years with either an estimated glomerular filtration rate of<15mL/min/1.73m2 or treatment with maintenance dialysis or transplantation. Genetic testing identified the cause of kidney disease in approximately 1 in 4 patients without a previously known cause of kidney disease, suggesting that genetic studies are a potentially useful tool for the evaluation of these patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D status has been implicated in COVID-19 disease. The objective of the COVID-VIT-D trial was to investigate if an oral bolus of cholecalciferol (100,000 IU) administered at hospital admission influences the outcomes of moderate-severe COVID-19 disease. In the same cohort, the association between baseline serum calcidiol levels with the same outcomes was also analysed. METHODS: The COVID-VIT-D is a multicentre, international, randomised, open label, clinical trial conducted throughout 1 year. Patients older than 18 years with moderate-severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospitalisation were included. At admission, patients were randomised 1:1 to receive a single oral bolus of cholecalciferol (n=274) or nothing (n=269). Patients were followed from admission to discharge or death. Length of hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: In the randomised trial, comorbidities, biomarkers, symptoms and drugs used did not differ between groups. Median serum calcidiol in the cholecalciferol and control groups were 17.0 vs. 16.1 ng/mL at admission and 29.0 vs. 16.4 ng/mL at discharge, respectively. The median length of hospitalisation (10.0 [95%CI 9.0-10.5] vs. 9.5 [95%CI 9.0-10.5] days), admission to ICU (17.2% [95%CI 13.0-22.3] vs. 16.4% [95%CI 12.3-21.4]) and death rate (8.0% [95%CI 5.2-12.1] vs. 5.6% [95%CI 3.3-9.2]) did not differ between the cholecalciferol and control group. In the cohort analyses, the highest serum calcidiol category at admission (>25ng/mL) was associated with lower percentage of pulmonary involvement and better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The randomised clinical trial showed the administration of an oral bolus of 100,000 IU of cholecalciferol at hospital admission did not improve the outcomes of the COVID-19 disease. A cohort analysis showed that serum calcidiol at hospital admission was associated with outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COVID-VIT-D trial was authorised by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health products (AEMPS) and registered in European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT 2020-002274-28) and in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04552951 ).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colecalciferol , Método Doble Ciego , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina DAsunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/complicaciones , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Fenotipo , Diálisis Renal , Síndrome de Rubinstein-Taybi/complicacionesRESUMEN
Although intravenous iron has proved to optimize the efficacy of EPOrHu in hemodialysis patients, hitherto no consensus exists with respect to the best regimen of intravenous iron administration. We started a prospective randomized study in 26 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis who had adequate iron metabolism indices (serum ferritin >100 microg/l; %TSAT >20%; %HypoE <10% and CHr >26 pg) and were in the maintenance phase of EPOrHu administration (target hemoglobin obtained >10 g/dl). All patients were receiving sodium ferric gluconate (Ferrlecit) intermittently prior to the study and after a 1-month wash-out period where iron was not administered patients were randomized to receive the same previous dose of intravenous iron either in a continuous (6.25-21.3 mg in every hemodialysis session) or an intermittent regimen (62.5 mg every 1-4 weeks, not modifying the previous schedule of administration). At 16 weeks, the continuous group showed a significant increment in serum Hb (11.83 +/- 1.12 g/dl) with respect to baseline (10.96 +/- 1.31 g/dl) (p < 0.05), whereas no differences were obtained in intermittent group (baseline: 11.16 +/- 1.03 g/dl; 16 weeks: 11.14 +/- 0.90 g/dl, NS). In contrast with the intermittent group, serum ferritin increased significantly in the continuous group (16 weeks: 508 +/- 157 microg/l; baseline: 368 +/- 56 microg/l; p < 0.05), whereas %TSAT and CHr did not modified during the study in both groups. %HypoE increased significantly with respect to baseline values in the continuous group (p < 0.05) and close to significantly different in the intermittent group (p = 0.06). Our study suggests that hemodialysis patients in the maintenance phase of EPOrHu administration would obtain further benefit in terms of serum hemoglobin level with a continuous intravenous serum ferric gluconate regimen, at least in the short term.