Reducing cardiovascular risk with immunomodulators: a randomised active comparator trial among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Recent large-scale randomised trials demonstrate that immunomodulators reduce cardiovascular (CV) events among the general population. However, it is uncertain whether these effects apply to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and if certain treatment strategies in RA reduce CV risk to a greater extent. METHODS: Patients with active RA despite use of methotrexate were randomly assigned to addition of a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (TNFi) or addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy) for 24 weeks. Baseline and follow-up 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT scans were assessed for change in arterial inflammation, an index of CV risk, measured as an arterial target-to-background ratio (TBR) in the carotid arteries and aorta. RESULTS: 115 patients completed the protocol. The two treatment groups were well balanced with a median age of 58 years, 71% women, 57% seropositive and a baseline disease activity score in 28 joints of 4.8 (IQR 4.0, 5.6). Baseline TBR was similar across the two groups. Significant TBR reductions were observed in both groups-ΔTNFi: -0.24 (SD=0.51), Δtriple therapy: -0.19 (SD=0.51)-without difference between groups (difference in Δs: -0.02, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.15, p=0.79). While disease activity was significantly reduced across both treatment groups, there was no association with change in TBR (ß=0.04, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.10). CONCLUSION: We found that addition of either a TNFi or triple therapy resulted in clinically important improvements in vascular inflammation. However, the addition of a TNFi did not reduce arterial inflammation more than triple therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02374021.

User experience with a voice-enabled smartphone app to collect patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease, requiring frequent patient-provider interaction and self-monitoring. We developed a novel mobile health smartphone app with a voice-enabled feature to help patients virtually track disease activity and ask general questions about RA. METHODS: With a user-centered design (UCD) approach, we developed a voice-enabled app (VEA) which was then tested in two focus groups of patients (n=8) and one with providers (n=4). Voice enablement and a question and answer (Q & A) library function were previously requested by patients. Based on focus group feedback, the VEA was refined and tested with 26 patients for 56 days. The VEA asked patients to fill in daily patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complete the trial with a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients in the VEA trial, 77% were female and 50% were aged 55 and older. Adherence to daily PROs during the 56-day trial was 66%, with <1% of PROs completed using the voice-enabled feature. PROMIS short forms and RADAI-5 PROs remained stable. Of the 22 satisfaction survey respondents, 86% were satisfied with their overall experience with the app and 18.5% were satisfied with voice enablement. The voice assistant had an 86% success rate at understanding and answering interactions regarding surveys and a 44% success rate regarding Q & A interactions. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel VEA through a UCD framework and conducted pilot testing. Adherence was moderate and RADAI-5 and PROMIS measures were stable. Based on satisfaction results, PROs may not be the best use of voice enablement technology.