Quality of life changes over time and predictors in a large head and neck patients' cohort: secondary analysis from an Italian multi-center longitudinal, prospective, observational study-a study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) head and neck working group.

PURPOSE: The present study examined the longitudinal trajectories, through hierarchical modeling, of quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer, specifically symptoms burden, during radiotherapy, and in the follow-up period (1, 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy), through the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck questionnaire, formed by three factors. Furthermore, analyses were conducted controlling for socio-demographic as well as clinical characteristics. METHODS: Multi-level mixed-effects linear regression was used to estimate the association between quality of life and time, age, gender, household, educational level, employment status, ECOG performance status, human papilloma virus (HPV) status, surgery, chemotherapy, alcohol intake, and smoking. RESULTS: Among the 166 participants, time resulted to be a predictor of all the three questionnaire factors, namely, general and specific related symptoms and interference with daily life. Moreover, regarding symptom interference with daily activities factor, HPV-positive status played a significant role. Considering only HPV-negative patients, only time predicted patients' quality of life. Differently, among HPV-positive patients, other variables, such as gender, educational level, alcohol use, surgery, age at diagnosis, employment status, and ECOG status, resulted significant. CONCLUSION: It was evident that quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer declined during RT, whereas it slowly improved after ending treatment. Our results clarified the role of some socio-demographic and clinical variables, for instance, HPV, which would allow to develop treatments tailored to each patient.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Swallowing (SWOARs)-Sparing IMRT in Head and Neck Cancers: Primary Results from a Prospective Study Endorsed by the Head and Neck Study Group (HNSG) of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate changes in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores in patients affected by naso- and oropharynx cancer after definitive radiochemotherapy (ChemoRT) using swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT. METHODS: MDADI questionnaires were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. MDADI scores were categorized as follows: ≥ 80 "optimal," 80-60 "adequate," < 60 "poor" deglutition-related quality of life (QoL) group, and dichotomized as "optimal" vs "adequate/poor" for the analysis. A mean MDADI composite (MDADI-C) change of 10 points was considered as minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled of which 47 were considered for the analysis. At baseline, 26 (55%) were "optimal" and 21 (45%) were "adequate/poor." The mean baseline MDADI-C score was 93.6 dropping to 81 at 6 months (p = 0.013) and slightly rising to 85.5 at 12 months (p = 0.321) for the "optimal" group. Indeed, the mean baseline MDADI-C score was 64.3 rising to 77.5 at 6 months (p = 0.006) and stabilizing at 76 at 12 months (p = 0.999) for the "adequate/poor" group. A statistically significant but not clinically relevant worsening of the MDADI-C score was reported for the "optimal" group, whereas both a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement of the MDADI-C score were reported for the "adequate/poor" group from before to post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a doubly clinical benefit of dose optimization to SWOARs to minimize the RT sequalae in patients with a baseline "optimal" deglutition-related QoL and to recover from cancer dysphagia in those with a baseline "adequate/poor" deglutition-related QoL.

Nasopharyngeal cancer: the impact of guidelines and teaching on radiation target volume delineation.

Target volume delineation in the radiation treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer is challenging due to several reasons such as the complex anatomy of the site, the need for the elective coverage of definite anatomical regions, the curative intent of treatment and the rarity of the disease, especially in non-endemic areas. We aimed to analyze the impact of educational interactive teaching courses on target volume delineation accuracy between Italian radiation oncology centers. Only one contour dataset per center was admitted. The educational course consisted in three parts: (1) The completely anonymized image dataset of a T4N1 nasopharyngeal cancer patient was shared between centers before the course with the request of target volume and organs at risk delineation; (2) the course was held online with dedicated multidisciplinary sessions on nasopharyngeal anatomy, nasopharyngeal cancer pattern of diffusion and on the description and explanation of international contouring guidelines. At the end of the course, the participating centers were asked to resubmit the contours with appropriate corrections; (3) the pre- and post-course contours were analyzed and quantitatively and qualitatively compared with the benchmark contours delineated by the panel of experts. The analysis of the 19 pre- and post-contours submitted by the participating centers revealed a significant improvement in the Dice similarity index in all the clinical target volumes (CTV1, CTV2 and CTV3) passing from 0.67, 0.51 and 0.48 to 0.69, 0.65 and 0.52, respectively. The organs at risk delineation was also improved. The qualitative analysis consisted in the evaluation of the inclusion of the proper anatomical regions in the target volumes; it was conducted following internationally validated guidelines of contouring for nasopharyngeal radiation treatment. All the sites were properly included in target volume delineation by >50% of the centers after correction. A significant improvement was registered for the skull base, the sphenoid sinus and the nodal levels. These results demonstrated the important role that educational courses with interactive sessions could have in such a challenging task as target volume delineation in modern radiation oncology.

Metastatic salivary gland carcinoma: A role for stereotactic body radiation therapy? A study of AIRO-Head and Neck working group.

OBJECTIVES: The role of radiotherapy (RT) for oligometastases is currently established in different oncological settings but data on salivary gland cancer (SGC) are lacking. We evaluated the role of RT in oligometastatic SGC patients, focusing on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicentric study of oligometastatic SGC treated with palliative RT or SBRT. Endpoints included response evaluation and local control (LC). RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2016, 64 patients were collected from 9 Italian Cancer Centers, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Working Group. 37 patients (57.8%) were suffering from adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and 27 patients (42.2%) had non-ACC. Thirty-four patients underwent palliative RT (53,1%), and 30 received SBRT (46,9%). Most common metastatic sites were bone for palliative RT and lung for SBRT. Among patients treated with SBRT, an objective response or a stability was observed in all treated lesions. After a median follow-up of 29.2 months (range 2.3-117.1), LC at 12 months was 57.5% for patients treated with SBRT and was higher in ACC subgroup. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the potential role of SBRT in the management of oligometastatic SGC patients to control limited burden of disease considering the absence of effective systemic therapies.

Weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy in elderly non-resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of inoperable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck region is still debated. CASE REPORT: We report an original case of cure of cSCC of the head and neck region with weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy with megavoltage electrons prescribed for locally advanced inoperable disease. RESULTS: Weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy assured complete regression and was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The real efficacy of this treatment in the therapeutic arsenal remains to be defined. A clinical trial is ongoing to test the use of 8 weekly fractions of 8 Gy hypofractionated RT regimens in non-resectable cSCC cases.

A snapshot on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) head and neck working group.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the paper was to assess real-life experience in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in radiotherapy departments and to evaluate the variability in terms of adherence to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In May 2020, an anonymous 30-question online survey, comparing acute phase of outbreak and pre-COVID-19 period, was conducted. Two sections exploited changes in general management of HNC patients and different HNC primary tumors, addressing specific statements from ASTRO ESTRO consensus statement as well. RESULTS: Eighty-eight questionnaires were included in the demographic/clinical workflow analysis, and 64 were analyzed for treatment management. Forty-eight percent of radiotherapy departments became part of oncologic hubs. First consultations reduced, and patients were addressed to other centers in 33.8 and 18.3% of cases, respectively. Telematic consultations were used in 50% of follow-up visits and 73.9% of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. There were no practical changes in the management of patients affected by different primitive HNCs. Hypofractionation was not favored over conventional schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to pre-COVID era, the clinical workflow was highly re-organized, whereas there were no consistent changes in RT indications and schedules.

Radiation Therapy and Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: State of the Art.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article aims to provide an update on literature data related to mandibular osteoradionecrosis (MORN) secondary to the irradiation of the head and neck region. RECENT FINDINGS: Radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in the contemporary management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and, despite intensity-modulated technique (IMRT), mandibular osteoradionecrosis (MORN) remains a significant RT-related complication. Based on its clinical manifestation, MORN can negatively affect patients' quality of life. Preventive interventions should be prioritized. This manuscript is expected to represent an opportunity to guide a clear proposal for clinical measures in the individual MORN situations.

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Treatment Approach in Elderly Patients.

Independently of age, evidence-based guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). But actually, elderly patients are grossly underrepresented in clinical trials, accounting < 10% of enrolled cases. Therefore, LARC management in elderly patients remains a crucial issue in daily practice, especially due to their frailty. Multiple clinical factors, including general health status, cognitive status, co-morbidity, disability, and life expectancy should be considered to understand the complexities of geriatric assessment and then define therapy. We use a patient-centered approach in order to tailor the optimal treatment strategy. We treat fit elderly patients as younger patients, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas, in vulnerable and frail patients, we propose standard CRT (vulnerable patients) or radiotherapy alone (frail patients).

Prognostic Significance of the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Non-Human Papilloma Virus-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (N/L) on non-human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: N/L was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of N/L and other clinical factors on survival outcomes. High/low N/L groups were defined as > 4.7 and ≤4.7, respectively. RESULTS: Data of 57 consecutive patients with non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer were analyzed. The 3-year disease-free survival was 79 versus 36.9% in favor of the low N/L group (p = 0.04). The 5-year overall survival was 71.6 versus 53.3% in the low N/L and high N/L group, respectively (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: N/L could play an important role in non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer progression and indicate prognosis.

Prognostic significance of inflammatory-related parameters in patients with anal canal cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between inflammatory-related parameters and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in anal canal cancer population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients diagnosed with anal canal carcinoma and treated with curative intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were included. Data about pre-treatment complete blood count were collected. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), fibrinogen (F), and a combination of these (F-NLR score) were correlated with OS. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were enrolled. In multivariate analysis, the strongest OS prognostic factor was NLR, with a hazard ratio (HR) for low NLR compared to high NLR of 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.01-14.12). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with high NLR, F, and F-NLR had significantly shorter OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study providing evidence that elevated pre-treatment NLR, F, and F-NLR score significantly correlate with worse survival outcomes in patients with anal canal carcinoma. In view of our findings, future clinical trials in anal canal cancer patients are warranted to verify our results.

Inter-observer variability of clinical target volume delineation in definitive radiotherapy of neck lymph node metastases from unknown primary. A cooperative study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Group.

BACKGROUND: This study, promoted by Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Group, aimed to assess the current national practice of target volume delineation on a case of neck lymph node metastases from unknown primary evaluating inter-observer variability, in a setting of primary radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case of metastatic neck lymph node from occult primary was proposed to 17 radiation oncologists. A national reference RT center was identified and considered as benchmark. Participants were requested to delineate target volumes. A structured questionnaire was administered. A comparison between following parameters of the CTVs was performed: centroids distances, Dice similarity index (DSI), Jaccard index and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Volume expressed in cubic centimeters and CTVs cranio-caudal extension were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixteen of 17 radiation oncologists recommended three CTVs dose levels. (CTV HD, CTV ID and CTV LD); CTV ID was not delineated by one of the participants and by the reference center. The distance between the reference centroid and the mean centroid of CTVs HD was 1.09 cm (0.36-3.99 cm); for CTV LD, a mean centroids distance of 2.45 (0.27-4.83 cm) was found, and for CTV HD, mean DSI is 0.48 and mean Jaccard index is 0.32 and MDA was 8.89 mm. CTV LD showed a mean DSI of 0.46, mean Jaccard index of 0.31 and MDA of 14.87 when compared to the reference. CONCLUSION: Many aspects concerning treatment optimization of cervical nodes metastases from occult primary remain unclear, and we found a notable heterogeneity of global radiotherapy management reporting discordances both in target volume delineation and volume prescription.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer: role of perfusion parameters in the assessment of response to treatment.

PURPOSE: To correlate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters to tumor grading and to assess their reliability in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients (24 male; mean age, 67.3 ± 8.1 years) with histologically proven LARC who had undergone 3-Tesla DCE-MRI before (MRI_1) and after CRT (MRI_2) between August 2015 and February 2016 were included in this retrospective study. DCE-MRI parameters at MRI_1 and MRI_2 were extracted by two board certified radiologists in consensus reading with Olea Sphere 2.3 software using the extended Tofts model. Based on DCE-MRI results, patients were divided in complete responders (CR) and non-complete responders (nCR) and the perfusion parameters were correlated to tumor grading and pCR. RESULTS: Wash-out and Kep at MRI_1 showed significant correlation with LARC grading (P = 0.004 and 0.01, respectively). Ve showed a significant increase between MRI_1 (0.47 ± 0.27) and MRI_2 (0.63 ± 0.23; P = 0.007). Ktrans measured at MRI_1 was significantly higher in CR (0.66 ± 0.48) compared to nCR (0.53 ± 0.34, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Wash-out and Kep measured before CRT correlate with LARC grading. Ve changes during CRT, while Ktrans measured before CRT may predict the response to therapy. Therefore, DCE-MRI parameters can predict tumor aggressiveness and CRT efficacy, playing a role as imaging biomarkers in patients with LARC.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Carcinoma: Long-Term Results Based on Consistent Time-to-Event Endpoints.

AIM: To report the long-term results after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal carcinoma, using consistent time-to-event endpoints. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anal carcinoma patient charts were reviewed. All patients received definitive CRT. Overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and anal dysfunction-free survival (ADFS) were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 65 patients were included. CRT was well tolerated, with only 24.6% grade ≥3 acute toxicity. Overall, the 5-year OS, LFFS, LRFFS, and DMFS were 75.3, 60.2, 74.2, and 66.2%, respectively. Early complete clinical response and tumor stage at diagnosis were the strongest predictors of OS (p = 0.04) and local failure (p = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of anal cancers, excellent ADFS and OS, and valid LFFS, LRFFS, and DMFS can be achieved with definitive CRT. Adequacy of time-to-event endpoints is paramount.

Radiation therapy in indolent primary cutaneous B cell lymphoma: a single institute experience.

To report the clinical results after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for indolent primary cutaneous B cell lymphoma (pcBCL). The data concerning all patients treated for indolent pcBCL with RT with a curative intent between 1992 and 2012 were reviewed. All cases were (re)classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. A total of 42 patients with biopsy-proven primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (pcFCL) and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (pcMZL) were included. The median follow-up is 9.5 years. Treatment with RT resulted in complete response (CR) in all patients. Eight patients showed one or multiple relapses confined to the skin. No in-field recurrences were observed. For the entire cohort, the 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 71.1% and 87.1%, respectively. Univariate (UA) and multivariate (MA) analysis revealed extra-trunk primary lesion (MA) and multiple lesions (UA) as unfavorable prognostic factors. The 5-year RFS rate for patients with trunk lesion was 89.4% versus 66.9% for those with other location (p = 0.02). The 5-year RFS rates were 83.5 and 57.1% in case of single and multiple lesions (p = 0.04). An excellent survival can be achieved with definitive RT in indolent pcBCL. Patients with multiple and extra-trunk primary cutaneous lesions probably warrants intensification of therapy. Prospective studies are mandatory.

Re-irradiation with curative intent in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a national survey of usual practice on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO).

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a national survey investigating the pattern of practice of curative re-irradiation (ReRT) for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: In March 2016, a 22-item, 4-section questionnaire was sent to all Italian Radiation Oncology centers. Sections were focused on assessing the expertise level of each center and collecting specific information on reRT prescription modalities in the adjuvant and definitive settings. RESULTS: Overall, 77 centers completed the survey. The majority (50/77, 64.9%) of participating radiation oncologists were senior consultants (> 10 years of experience). Of the responding centers, 63 (81.8%) performed curative ReRT, while 14 (18.1%) did not, mainly (5/14, 35.7%) due to the avoidance of severe toxicity. The use of adjuvant ReRT was reported by less than half of the interviewed radiation oncologists (36/77, 46.7%). In case of unresectable local recurrence, definitive ReRT was claimed to be adopted in 55/77 (71.4%) for non-nasopharyngeal and 47/77 (61%) for nasopharyngeal cancer. The preferred treatment technique was Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). When IMRT was applied, the most common (19/55 responders, 34.5%) selection of treatment volume consisted of the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) + 0.5 cm margin to account for microscopic disease. CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of definitive evidence-based recommendations, a possible consideration for ReRT in case of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancer was reported by over 80% of radiation oncologists taking part in the national survey.

A comparison of swallowing dysfunction after three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy : A systematic review by the Italian Head and Neck Radiotherapy Study Group.

PURPOSE: Dysphagia is one of the most important treatment-related side effects in head and neck cancer (HNC), as it can lead to severe life-threating complications such as aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) could reduce swallowing dysfunction by producing a concave dose distribution and reducing doses to the swallowing-related organs at risk (SWOARs). The aim of this study was to review the current literature in order to compare swallowing outcomes between IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies on swallowing outcomes, both clinically and/or instrumentally assessed, after 3DCRT and IMRT. Dysphagia-specific quality of life and objective instrumental data are summarized and discussed. RESULTS: A total of 262 papers were retrieved from the searched databases. An additional 23 papers were retrieved by hand-searching the reference lists. Ultimately, 22 papers were identified which discussed swallowing outcomes after 3DCRT and IMRT for HNC. No outcomes from randomized trials were identified. CONCLUSION: Despite several methodological limitations, reports from the current literature seem to suggest better swallowing outcomes with IMRT compared to 3DCRT. Further improvements are likely to result from the increased use of IMRT plans optimized for SWOAR sparing.

Pulsed-Dose Rate Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecologic malignancy. The aim of this review is to outline clinical practice recommendations, to suggest a technical solution, and to advise doses selection for pulsed-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy in EC. Electronic bibliographic databases, including PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Library, were searched for articles in English. Clinical guidelines and systematic reviews were also considered. The appropriate therapeutic approach should consider risk factors for tumor relapse and PDR brachytherapy and have a convincing role in this multidisciplinary scenario. Performing PDR brachytherapy in EC requires robust training and experience.

Clinical benefit of adding oxaliplatin to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis : Oxaliplatin in neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant fluoropirimidine (5FU)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Whether addition of oxaliplatin (OXP) will further improve clinical outcomes is still debated. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the role of OXP in this patient population. METHODS: Literature searches were carried out in PubMed, Medline and Scopus databases. End points were overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local failure (LF) and distant failure (DF). Odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random effects model. RESULTS: Four randomized trials were included. Patients treated with OXP-5FU CRT had significantly decreased DF (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.97; p = 0.03) compared to standard CRT. OS, DFS and LF were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: OXP significantly decreased DF, but does not improve OS e DFS compared to 5FU CRT. Precise role of OXP in neoadjuvant setting of LARC remains to be determined.

Second cancer incidence in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma treated with methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin regimen with or without rituximab and mediastinal radiotherapy: Results from a monoinstitutional cohort analysis of long-term survivors.

Our aim is to assess the incidence of second cancer in long-time surviving primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients treated with combined radiochemoimmunotherapy (standard methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin with rituximab and mediastinal radiation therapy at a dose of 30 to 36 Gy). For this purpose, 92 points were evaluated. After a median overall survival of 137 months (range 76-212), we recorded second cancer in 3 of 80 long-surviving patients (3.75%) with cumulative incidence of 3.47% at 15 years and 11% at 17 years, with a 17-year second cancer-free survival of 82%. We observed 2 papillary thyroid cancers with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 7.97 and an absolute excess risk (AER) of 17. 84 and 1 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an SIR of 66.53 and an AER of 10.05. No breast cancer occurred. Although we should take into account the limits of the proposed statistical analysis, combined modality treatment was related to a significant SIR and AER for thyroid cancer and acute myeloid leukemia.

Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Role of Radiation Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to present the current radiation therapy status in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) and explore potential solution to improve clinical outcomes in this setting of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed search was performed. An attempt was made to include all relevant studies. Pertinent references cited in selected articles were also considered. RESULTS: The role of radiation therapy in recurrent OC needs to be defined. This is the largest reported analysis of published data. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy is the mainstay of recurrent OC treatment but prognosis remains very poor, and novel therapies are required to be integrated into this consolidated treatment regimen. Radiation therapy represents a valid alternative approach, even if no clear guidelines are available concerning it.