Significant others in inflammatory arthritis: roles, influences, and challenges-a scoping review.

Improving self-management in individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) is crucial for effective disease management. However, current recommendations primarily focus on interventions for the diagnosed individuals, overlooking the potential impact of their significant others on their self-management abilities. This review aims to fill this gap by identifying and mapping relevant research employing both qualitative and quantitative design to provide a broader understanding of the potential of significant others in relation to IA management. We examined studies published from 2007 to 2024 that explore our research questions using electronic databases and grey literature searches. Two independent reviewers meticulously screened and categorized the studies based on a developed framework employing basic content analysis. Out of 20.925 studies, 43 were included: 22 quantitative studies (including 1 educational trial), 20 qualitative studies, and 1 mixed-methods study. Our analysis of the included studies revealed that significant others predominantly provided practical and emotional support and could positively or negatively influence the person with IAs self-management abilities. Additionally, significant others reported their own feelings of emotional distress and expressed the need for knowledge, skills and social support enabling them to provide better support while taking care of them self. Greater focus on the significant others of those diagnosed with IA in their provision of support to this patient group may both improve the people with IA self-management skills and address significant others' reported needs. Future studies should explore the impact of such initiatives through randomized controlled trials.

Safety and Patient Experience With Early Mobilization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Immobilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for preventing access-related complications. However, the length of bed rest varies, and possible complications and patient experience remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, our aim was to investigate safety and efficacy after bed rest after TAVR. METHODS: This single-center randomized trial included 298 patients. Patients were randomized to standard 6 hours (n = 149) or 3 hours (n = 149) of bed rest after TAVR. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of access-related bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥ 2), hematoma (>5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, and vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported back pain, rated ≥6 on a numeric rating scale 24 hours post procedure. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary safety endpoint, patient-reported pain, urination problems, and comfort. RESULTS: The primary safety endpoint occurred in 14 (9.4%) and 12 (8.1%) patients in the 6-hour and 3-hour immobilization groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.79]; P = .68). There were no significant differences in individual bleeding or vascular complication endpoints. Patients with 3 hours of bed rest reported less back pain (P < .001), fewer urination problems (P < .001), and better comfort (P < .001) than patients with 6 hours of bed rest. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization as early as 3 hours after TAVR was shown to be safe, not resulting in a higher rate of bleeding or vascular complications as compared with 6 hours of bed rest. However, there was a difference in patient-reported back pain, urination problems, and comfort, favoring early mobilization.

Association Between Risk Factors and Readmission for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Catheter Ablation: Results From the Nationwide DenHeart Study.

BACKGROUND: Because of high readmission rates for patients treated with ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), there is great value in nurses knowing which risk factors make the largest contribution to readmission. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to (1) describe potential risk factors at discharge and (2) describe the associations of risk factors with readmission from 60 days to 1 year after discharge. METHODS: Data from a national cross-sectional survey exploring patient-reported outcomes were used in conjunction with data from national health registers. This study included patients who had an ablation for AF during a single calendar year. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and questions on risk factors were included. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected through registers, and readmissions were examined at 1 year. RESULTS: In total, 929 of 1320 (response rate, 70%) eligible patients treated with ablation for AF completed the survey. One year after ablation, there were 333 (36%) acute readmissions for AF and 401 (43%) planned readmissions for AF. Readmissions were associated with ischemic heart disease, anxiety, and depression. CONCLUSION: High observed readmission rates were associated with risk factors that included anxiety and depression. Postablation care should address these risk factors.

Is It Safe to Mobilize Patients Very Early After Transfemoral Coronary Procedures? (SAMOVAR): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are performed via the femoral or radial arteries. In patients examined via transfemoral access, closure devices facilitate hemostasis, but it is unknown whether it is safe to mobilize these patients immediately and how acceptable this may be in terms of patient comfort. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate bleeding complications in patients mobilized immediately after transfemoral CAG or PCI compared with patients on bed rest (BR) for 2 hours after the procedure and, furthermore, to investigate patient comfort in relation to mobilization and BR. METHODS: SAMOVAR was a noninferiority trial with patients randomized to immediate mobilization (IM) or 2 hours of BR after transfemoral CAG or PCI and use of the AngioSeal as a closure device and reversal of heparin effect. The primary end point was development of hematoma greater than 5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, or bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Secondary end points were oozing from the puncture site, small hematoma, and patient comfort. RESULTS: Of 2027 patients (IM, 1010; BR, 1017), 40% underwent PCI. The primary outcome was recorded in 0.7% patients randomized to IM versus 0.5% in BR ( P = .58). There was no difference in the incidence of small hematoma, whereas persistent oozing was seen slightly more often after IM compared with BR (12% vs 9%, P = .04). Patients mobilized immediately reported less back pain and micturition problems ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had CAG and PCI performed through transfemoral access, reversal of anticoagulation and use of closure devices allowed IM with low rates of complications and improved patient comfort.