Mortality Following Treatment With and Without Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Dialysis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mortality after treatment with a paclitaxel (PTX)-coated device and with uncoated devices of iliac, femoropopliteal, and below-the-knee lesions in dialysis patients. METHODS: Retrospective mortality analysis of dialysis patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent treatment of iliac, femoropopliteal, and/or infrapopliteal lesions with PTX-coated or uncoated devices. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 1125 dialysis patients were treated with iliac and/or femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal lesions. In all, 359 patients were selected for this retrospective analysis. Of those, 122 patients were treated with uncoated devices without crossover to a PTX-coated device during follow-up and 237 patients were treated with a PTX-coated device. Mean follow-up time was 27.38±24.76 months (range=0-103). For the entire cohort, the overall mortality was 95.1% after uncoated treatment and 75.9% after PTX treatment (p<0.001). After propensity score matching (n=119), overall mortality was 95.0% after uncoated treatment and 78.2% after PTX treatment (p<0.001). For the entire cohort, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age (p=0.002) and critical limb ischemia (p<0.001) as independent predictors for mortality. PTX treatment was a protective factor for mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Mortality in dialysis patients is in general high and higher after use of uncoated devices compared with PTX-coated devices. Mortality predictors were risk factors and disease severity but not PTX treatment. CLINICAL IMPACT: After the publication of Katsanos's metaanalyses, the uncertainty regarding PTX device safety in peripheral interventions in patients mainly without end-stage renal insufficiency was initially considerable. The present study for the first time investigates the potential long-term mortality risk of dialysis patients following PTX device treatment of PAD. In contrast to a recent meta-analysis, this real-world study could show a better survival after PTX treatment in comparison to uncoated devices.

Association of lipoprotein(a) with intrinsic and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, genetically determined, and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Laboratory data have suggested an interaction of Lp(a) with platelet function, potentially caused by its interaction with platelet receptors. So far, the potential association of Lp(a) with platelet activation and reactivity has not been proven in larger clinical cohorts. This study analyzed intrinsic platelet reactivity before loading with clopidogrel 600 mg and on-treatment platelet reactivity tested 24 h following loading in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Platelet reactivity was tested by optical aggregometry following stimulation with collagen or adenosine diphosphate as well as by flow cytometry. Lp(a) levels were directly measured in all patients from fresh samples. The present analysis included 1912 patients. Lp(a) levels ranged between 0 and 332 mg/dl. There was a significant association of rising levels of Lp(a) with a higher prevalence of a history of ischemic heart disease (p < 0.001) and more extensive coronary artery disease (p = 0.001). Results for intrinsic (p = 0.80) and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (p = 0.81) did not differ between quartiles of Lp(a) levels. Flow cytometry analyses of expression of different platelet surface proteins (CD41, CD62P or PAC-1) confirmed these findings. Correlation analyses of levels of Lp(a) with any of the tested platelet activation markers did not show any correlation. The present data do not support the hypothesis of an interaction of Lp(a) with platelet reactivity.

Mortality Following Treatment with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Real World Utilization: Correlation to Total Lifetime Dosage?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the all-cause mortality after treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices depending on paclitaxel exposure in real-world practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of mortality of patients with at least a 3-year follow-up was performed. Patients were categorized into terciles according to the paclitaxel dosage received during the index procedure and every subsequent intervention. The incidence of mortality of these patients was compared with that of a paclitaxel-naïve control group. RESULTS: In total, 2,376 patients were treated with drug-coated devices and 980 patients with uncoated devices. The overall all-cause mortality rate at a mean follow-up of 46.27 months ± 24.71 was 29.2% (n = 696) for the paclitaxel group and 49.4% (n = 484) for the paclitaxel-naive control group. The mortality rate between the groups according to the initial paclitaxel exposure was not significantly different (P = .205). In comparison to the group of surviving patients, the total lifetime paclitaxel dosage was lower in the group of patients who died (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world retrospective analysis, long-term mortality was not correlated with the paclitaxel exposure during the index procedure. Regarding the total paclitaxel exposure, lower mortality was observed in the highest tercile of paclitaxel exposure.

Evaluation of mortality following paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with ulcerations and gangrene - a single center experience.

Background: A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggested an increased long-term mortality risk following femoropopliteal angioplasty using paclitaxel coated devices. To assess the long-term mortality after paclitaxel drug-coated (DCB) and uncoated balloon angioplasty (POBA) of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with ulcerations and gangrene in real world practice. Patients and methods: A retrospective mortality analysis of patients with at least 3-year follow-up who underwent balloon based endovascular therapy of femoropopliteal lesions was performed. Results: Overall 624 patients with femoropopliteal lesions were included in this study. Of those, 197 patients were treated with POBA without crossover to a paclitaxel coated device during follow-up and 427 patients with DCB angioplasty. Mean follow-up time was 33.3 ± 25.4 months. Mortality incidence was 81.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 76.1-86.8) after POBA and 59.0% (95% CI: 54.6-63.9) after DCB (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed type of treatment (POBA vs. DCB, (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.332, 95% CI: 0.215-0.514, p < 0.001), age per year (HR: 1.065, 95% CI: 1.046-1.087, p < 0.001), coronary heart disease (HR: 1.969, 95% CI: 1.323-2.930, p = 0.001), renal insufficiency (HR: 1.583, 95% CI: 1.079-2.323, p = 0.019), stroke (HR: 2.505, 95% CI: 1.431-4.384, p = 0.001) as predictors for all-cause mortality. In the subgroup excluding octogenarians, mortality predictors were type of treatment (HR: 0.463, 95% CI: 0.269-0.796, p = 0.005), age per year (HR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.002-1.069, p = 0.038), coronary heart disease (HR: 2.082, 95% CI: 1.274-3.400, p = 0.003), stroke (HR: 2.203, 95% CI: 1.156-4.197, p = 0.016) and renal insufficiency (HR: 2.201, 95% CI: 1.357-3.571, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This monocentric retrospective analysis showed no survival disadvantage for patients in Rutherford-Becker stage 5 after treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloons.

Evaluation of mortality following paclitaxel drug-coated stent angioplasty of femoropopliteal lesions in real world.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term mortality after paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty and use of uncoated devices of femoropopliteal lesions in real world practice. BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported an increased risk of long-term mortality after femoropopliteal angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated devices. METHODS: Retrospective mortality analysis of claudicants Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) 1-4 who underwent DES angioplasty or uncoated balloon or stent angioplasty of femoropopliteal lesions with a follow-up of 3-7 years. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016 8,377 patients were treated with femoropopliteal lesions. This analysis included 599 patients. Three-hundred-three patients were treated with an uncoated device and 296 patients with a DES. The mean follow-up period was 51.80 ± 23.40 months (range 0-84). For the entire cohort mortality incidence was 32.3% after uncoated treatment and 22.6% after DES (p < .033). For the entire cohort multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age (p < .001), diabetes mellitus (p = .010), renal insufficiency (p = .001) and RBC 4 (p < .001) as independent predictors for mortality. After propensity score matching mortality incidence was 32.5% after uncoated treatment and 24.1% after DES (p = .264). After propensity score matching, independent mortality predictors were age (p < .001), hyperlipidemia (p = .035), diabetes mellitus (p = .018) and RBC 4 (p < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that higher paclitaxel dosage was associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: In real world, long-term mortality rate was lower after DES angioplasty than after treatment with uncoated devices. Mortality predictors were co-morbidities, risk factors, and disease severity.

Effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on cardiac function in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a disease with limited evidence-based treatment options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) offer benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their impact in HFpEF remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the effect of MRA on echocardiographic, functional, and systemic parameters in patients with HFpEF by a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov , and Cochrane Clinical Trial Collection to identify randomized controlled trials that (a) compared MRA versus placebo/control in patients with HFpEF and (b) reported echocardiographic, functional, and/or systemic parameters relevant to HFpEF. Studies were excluded if: they enrolled asymptomatic patients; patients with HFrEF; patients after an acute coronary event; compared MRA to another active comparator; or reported a follow-up of less than 6 months. Primary outcomes were changes in echocardiographic parameters. Secondary end-points were changes in functional capacity, quality of life measures, and systemic parameters. Quantitative analysis was performed by generating forest plots and calculating effect sizes by random-effect models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed through Q and I2 statistics. Nine trials with 1164 patients were included. MRA significantly decreased E/e' (mean difference - 1.37, 95% confidence interval - 1.72 to - 1.02), E/A (- 0.04, - 0.08 to 0.00), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (- 0.78 mm, - 1.34 to - 0.22), left atrial volume index (- 1.12 ml/m2, - 1.91 to - 0.33), 6-min walk test distance (- 11.56 m, - 21 to - 2.13), systolic (- 4.75 mmHg, - 8.94 to - 0.56) and diastolic blood pressure (- 2.91 mmHg, - 4.15 to - 1.67), and increased levels of serum potassium (0.23 mmol/L, 0.19 to 0.28) when compared with placebo/control. In patients with HFpEF, MRA treatment significantly improves indices of cardiac structure and function, suggesting a decrease in left ventricular filling pressure and reverse cardiac remodeling. MRA increase serum potassium and decrease blood pressure; however, a small decrease in 6-min-walk distance is also noted. Larger prospective studies are warranted to provide definitive answers on the effect of MRA in patients with HFpEF.

Need for pacemaker implantation in patients with normal QRS duration immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: We sought to assess the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with QRS <120 ms in electrocardiogram (ECG) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 1139 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI between 2008 and 2016, receiving different valve types. All patients were surveyed by continuous ECG monitoring for 48 h, 12-lead ECGs starting immediately after procedure, as well as 24-h Holter recording the day before discharge. Indication for PPI was at the discretion of the attending physician. Among 760 patients with QRS <120 ms prior to the TAVI procedure, 400 patients showed QRS <120 ms immediately after procedure, whereas 360 patients had QRS ≥120 ms. In the group with QRS <120 ms, PPI was performed in 34 patients [8.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-11.2%] during the first week. Eight of the PPIs in the group with QRS <120 ms (2%; CI 0.8-3.5%) fulfilled Class I indications for PPI after TAVI, whereas 26 PPIs had different indications [left bundle branch block, sick sinus, low-grade atrioventricular (AV) block]. Complete AV block developed in three patients of the group of QRS <120 ms (0.75%; CI 0.0-1.7%), which in all cases occurred after the 48 h-surveillance period. During 1-year follow-up, 11 PPIs were performed (2.8%; CI 1.2-4.5%), thereof three PPI for Class I indications including one complete AV block. CONCLUSION: In patients with QRS duration <120 ms immediately after TAVI, the risk for complete AV block was low during the first week after TAVI and 1-year follow-up.

Epigenetics in cardiac development, function, and disease.

Substantial new knowledge has accrued, over the past few years, concerning the epigenetic regulation of heart development and disease. Epigenetic mechanisms comprise DNA methylation, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs. Many of these processes have been ascertained to influence the tight spatiotemporal control of gene expression during cardiac development. Nevertheless, the relative contribution of each mechanism and their potentially complex interplay remain largely unexplored. Cardiac development and disease are linked through the reactivation of fetal genes upon cardiac hypertrophy and failure. In cardiac disease, changes in gene expression are accompanied and influenced by distinct changes in histone modifications. Detailed knowledge about the epigenetic pathways of cardiac development and function is expected ultimately to lead to novel therapeutic strategies for heart disease and regenerative medicine.

Matched comparison of uncoated and paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for isolated popliteal lesions excluding bail-out stenting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) in isolated popliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: The benefit of using DCB in femoropopliteal arteries including the proximal popliteal artery has been demonstrated, but has not yet been evaluated for isolated popliteal lesions. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study includes patients requiring treatment with DCB of isolated popliteal lesions. Two cohorts matched (Plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) versus DCB) by their baseline and lesion characteristics were compared. Lesions receiving bail-out stents were excluded. Primary endpoint was the 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the procedural success and complication rate, primary patency, changes in Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI). RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were included in this study. More than one third of the patients had critical limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) (35 % (POBA) versus 40.4 % (DCB), p = 0.354. The technical success rate of the procedure was 85.1 % (n = 40/47) in the DCB group and 83.3 % (n = 60) in the POBA group (p = 0.510). There were three complications in the POBA group (5.0 %) but none in the DCB group (p = 0.172). After 12 months, in the entire cohort 14 patients (13.1 %) had to undergo a TLR. The TLR-free survival was 81.7 % in the POBA and 93.6 % in the DCB group (p = 0.060). Primary patency rates after POBA and DCB were 65.1 % and 87.5 % at 6 months (p = 0.024), respectively. At 12 months, the patency rates were 71.7 % and 85.1 % (p = 0.076), respectively. For both treatment arms, there was a significant improvement in ABI and RBC compared to baseline. Four patients from the DCB group and two from the POBA group received a minor amputation (p = 0.232). One patient in the DCB group died within 12 months. CONCLUSION: After one year the use of DCB is by trend more effective for the treatment of isolated popliteal stenosis compared to POBA. A larger scale prospective study is mandatory.

Clopidogrel pretreatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction does not affect platelet reactivity after subsequent prasugrel-loading: platelet reactivity in an observational study.

Current guidelines recommend prasugrel or ticagrelor for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whereas available data support ticagrelor independent of pretreatment with clopidogrel, corresponding data for prasugrel are missing. Here, we investigated platelet reactivity after loading with prasugrel in clopidogrel-naïve vs. clopidogrel-pretreated patients. Forty-seven consecutive patients with STEMI referred for primary PCI were enrolled. Use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and known contraindications to prasugrel served as exclusion criteria. A total of 31 patients were already treated with a loading dose of clopidogrel 600 mg by the emergency medical system before admission, while 16 patients were P2Y12 antagonist naïve. All patients received a loading dose of prasugrel 60 mg immediately before PCI. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced platelet reactivity was determined by VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay, by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and by multiple electrode impedance aggregometry (MEIA; Multiplate™ analyser). No differences in platelet reactivity were observed at day 1 after PCI between the bolus-on-bolus treatment regimen and single prasugrel loading. Platelet reactivity was profoundly decreased to 10 [8-31] platelet reactivity unit (PRU; median [interquartile range]) in patients on clopidogrel + prasugrel vs. 9 [6-60] PRU in patients on prasugrel only (p = 0.916). Consistent results were obtained by LTA and MEIA. The proportion of patients reaching a MEIA associated with increased risk bleeding (<188 AU*min) was also similar between the two study groups. The level of platelet reactivity at day 1 after the 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel was independent of pretreatment with clopidogrel. Our results do not support withholding prasugrel in patients pretreated with clopidogrel who undergo PCI for STEMI.