RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) can be difficult to manage in paediatric patients, with few licensed treatments in this age group. Dupilumab is approved for AD in children older than 6 months. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a real-life cohort of paediatric AD patients in Spain. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective real-life study on the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients aged 2 to 18 years old with moderate-to-severe AD was conducted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analysed, and effectiveness (EASI, IGA, DLQI, NRS itch), safety, and drug survival measures were assessed. A comparison of our results with other real-world outcomes and with clinical trials was made. RESULTS: Data from 243 patients from 19 centres was collected, with a mean follow-up of 85 weeks. Dupilumab exhibited significant effectiveness, with marked reductions in severity scores from week 4. By week 16, 79.4% of patients reached EASI75 and 40.5% reached EASI90. Mean percentage reduction in EASI was 79.7%. Increasing improvements were observed until week 52, with 85.8% and 49.6% achieving EASI75 and EASI90, respectively. Forty-three patients developed adverse events (AE) (43/243, 17.7%), being the most frequent ocular surface diseases (20/243, 8.2%), injection site reactions (8/243, 3.3%) and facial redness (7/243, 2.9%). Drug survival was high (96.9% and 93.1% after 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively), with only 19 (19/243, 7.8%) patients interrupting treatment: 7 (7/243, 2.9%) due to AE, 2 (2/243, 0.82%) due to secondary failure, 5 (5/243, 2.1%) were lost to follow-up and 5 (5/243, 2.1%) entered remission and stopped treatment. CONCLUSION: Real-life use of dupilumab in paediatric AD showcased sustained effectiveness, high drug survival, and acceptable safety profiles. Longer-term studies are crucial for AE surveillance and how to manage disease remission.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The increasing use of biologics in the treatment of inflammatory diseases has led to more cases of leishmaniasis in patients subjected to iatrogenic immunosuppression. The main objective was to describe the characteristics of the patients with cutaneous (CL) or mucocutaneous (MCL) leishmaniasis who were receiving a biological therapy at the time of diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was design based on a cohort of patients diagnosed with CL or MCL. All patients who were being treated with biologicals were included. For each case, two matched non-exposed patients were included for comparison. RESULTS: 38 patients were diagnosed with CL or MCL while being treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. Leishmaniasis presented more frequently as a plaque (58.3%) with a larger median lesion size (2.5 cm), ulceration (92.1%), and required a greater median number of intralesional meglumine antimoniate infiltrations (3 doses) (P < 0.05) than in non-exposed patients. We found no systemic involvement in patients being treated with anti-TNF-α. We did not find differences regarding the treatment characteristics whether biologic therapy was modified or not. CONCLUSIONS: Although management should be individualized, maintenance of biologic therapy does not seem to interfere with treatment of CL or MCL.