Percutaneous treatment of mechanical mitral valve thrombosis.

A 75-year-old female was found to have mechanical mitral valve thrombosis complicated by severe mitral stenosis, pulmonary edema, and right heart failure. She was at prohibitive risk for surgical intervention. She did not tolerate thrombolysis due to bleeding. We performed percutaneous intervention with cerebral protection with subsequent restoration of mechanical mitral valve function, resolution of the mitral valve stenosis, and no neurologic complications.

Society of thoracic surgeons risk score and left atrial pressure for predicting clinical outcomes among transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair patients.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the performance of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score among transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate STS score accuracy, and the incremental value of post-procedural left atrial pressure (LAP). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of TEER patients between 2013 and 2020. Patients were allocated into 3 groups: high (≥8% [n = 298, 31%]), intermediate (4%-8% [n = 318, 33%]), and low (<4% [n = 344, 36%]). Primary outcomes included 1-year mortality or cardiovascular hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to determine the hazard ratio of the primary outcome, and STS score accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic. A spline curve was used to display the relationship between LAP and the primary endpoint. Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) was used to determine the incremental value of LAP. RESULTS: We included 960 patients, primarily elderly (79 [70-85]), with a median STS risk of 5.6 (3-9). High-risk patients were older (83 [75-89], 81 [74-87], 72 [64-79], p < 0.001), and had more comorbidities compared to intermediate and low-risk groups. Upon Cox regression, STS score (high vs. low: HR 2.5 [1.7-3.8]; Intermediate vs. low: HR 1.8 [1.2-2.7] and LAP HR 1.03 [1.01-1.06], p = 0.007) were associated with the outcome. C statistics analysis revealed low accuracy of the STS score (AUC-0.61 [0.58-0.65, p < 0.001]). Continuous NRI analysis indicated an improvement in risk prediction of 17% (6.9-26.2), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: STS risk score has low accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes after TEER. Adding LAP measurements can improve reclassification and identify those prone to adverse outcomes.

Quality of Life, Procedural Success, and Clinical Outcomes following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.

Background: Limited data exist regarding the association between the quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes following transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of QoL assessment following TMVr and to characterize those who had procedural success, yet reported a low Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) score. Methods: We reported the experience of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center patients between 2013 and 2020. Patients were allocated into four groups according to the 30-day KCCQ: <25, 25-49, 50-74, and ≥75. Primary outcome included 1-year all-cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. We also examined the association between QoL and the primary outcome in those with procedural success. Results: A total of 555 patients were included in our analysis, median follow-up of 650 days (IQR 243-1113). The lower KCCQ groups had a higher prevalence of functional mitral regurgitation (65%, 60%, 56%, and 43%, p = 0.001), as well as a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) score. These groups had a significantly higher occurrence of 1-year all-cause death or HF hospitalizations in a stepwise fashion (40%, 22%, 16%, and 10%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed 30-day KCCQ as the strongest predictor of the 1-year primary outcome (HR 0.98, 95%CI (0.97-0.99), p = 0.006). Approximately a quarter of patients with procedural success had a low KCCQ score. These patients had a higher rate of the combined 1-year outcome regardless of procedural success or failure. Conclusion: QoL following TMVr is a powerful prognostic factor. KCCQ assessment is an important indicator for identifying patients prone to adverse outcomes even after procedural success.

Self-expanding intra-annular versus commercially available transcatheter heart valves in high and extreme risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (PORTICO IDE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Randomised trial data assessing the safety and efficacy of the self-expanding intra-annular Portico transcatheter aortic valve system (Abbott Structural Heart, St Paul, MN, USA) compared with any commercially available valves are needed to compare performance among designs. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (the Portico Re-sheathable Transcatheter Aortic Valve System US Investigational Device Exemption trial [PORTICO IDE]), high and extreme risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were recruited from 52 medical centres experienced in performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the USA and Australia. Patients were eligible if they were aged 21 years or older, in New York Heart Association functional class II or higher, and had severe native aortic stenosis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted block randomisation (block sizes of 2 and 4) and stratified by clinical investigational site, surgical risk cohort, and vascular access method, to transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the first generation Portico valve and delivery system or a commercially available valve (either an intra-annular balloon-expandable Edwards-SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, or SAPIEN 3 valve [Edwards LifeSciences, Irvine, CA, USA]; or a supra-annular self-expanding CoreValve, Evolut-R, or Evolut-PRO valve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA]). Investigational site staff, implanting physician, and study participant were unmasked to treatment assignment. Core laboratories and clinical event assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, or major vascular complication at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 1 year. Clinical outcomes and valve performance were assessed up to 2 years after the procedure. Primary analyses were by intention to treat and the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate event rates. The non-inferiority margin was 8·5% for primary safety and 8·0% for primary efficacy endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02000115, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between May 30 and Sept 12, 2014, and between Aug 21, 2015, and Oct 10, 2017, with recruitment paused for 11 months by the funder, we recruited 1034 patients, of whom 750 were eligible and randomly assigned to the Portico valve group (n=381) or commercially available valve group (n=369). Mean age was 83 years (SD 7) and 395 (52·7%) patients were female. For the primary safety endpoint at 30 days, the event rate was higher in the Portico valve group than in the commercial valve group (52 [13·8%] vs 35 [9·6%]; absolute difference 4·2, 95% CI -0·4 to 8·8 [upper confidence bound {UCB} 8·1%]; pnon-inferiority=0·034, psuperiority=0·071). At 1 year, the rates of the primary efficacy endpoint were similar between the groups (55 [14·8%] in the Portico group vs 48 [13·4%] in the commercial valve group; difference 1·5%, 95% CI -3·6 to 6·5 [UCB 5·7%]; pnon-inferiority=0·0058, psuperiority=0·50). At 2 years, rates of death (80 [22·3%] vs 70 [20·2%]; p=0·40) or disabling stroke (10 [3·1%] vs 16 [5·0%]; p=0·23) were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION: The Portico valve was associated with similar rates of death or disabling stroke at 2 years compared with commercial valves, but was associated with higher rates of the primary composite safety endpoint including death at 30 days. The first-generation Portico valve and delivery system did not offer advantages over other commercially available valves. FUNDING: Abbott.

Cleft mitral leaflets and severe mitral regurgitation: Testing the limits of percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Repair of mitral regurgitation (MR) with the MitraClip device (Abbot Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) to treat degenerative MR is associated with improved acute and long-term outcomes. There is an increasing adoption of the device and operators are now testing the limits of the therapy even for unfavorable anatomies. Isolated cleft mitral leaflets are rare but represent a challenge to percutaneous repair. We present two cases of successful repair of severe MR and cleft mitral leaflets. In the first case, a 52-year-old male with a dilated cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction (EF) of 15% presented in decompensated heart failure. Workup revealed a pseudo-cleft anterior mitral leaflet and a cleft posterior leaflet. A strategy to treat the restricted posterior leaflet lateral of the posterior cleft with a provisional second clip resulted in trace residual MR with only one clip, and an EF improvement to 50% at 2-month follow-up. In the second case, an 80-year-old male with a history of obstructive CAD with a normal EF but severe MR and a restricted anterior leaflet presented with severe shortness of breath. An initial strategy to grasp the middle of the valve was unsuccessful due to the cleft. Instead, two clips were placed side-by-side on either side of the cleft resulting in trivial residual MR. Despite challenging anatomy percutaneous repair can allow for dramatic reduction in MR, resulting in significant left ventricular remodeling and improvement of EF and cardiac output.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Extremely Large Annulus and SAPIEN 3 Dimensions Based on Post-Procedural Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and an extra-large annulus (ELA) area (>683 mm2) can rarely be treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) because of the size limitation of the transcatheter heart valves. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of TAVR using a 29-mm SAPIEN3 (S3) valve in patients with ELA and S3-dimensions by post-procedural computed tomography (post-CT). Methods and Results: We included 261 patients undergoing TAVR using a 29-mm S3: 30 patients with ELA and 231 with non-ELA were identified. S3-dimensions were evaluated at the S3 inflow and annulus level by post-CT in 129 patients. The ELA group had a greater aortic annulus area measured by pre-procedural CT (737.3±54.7 vs. 578.4±41.9 mm2, P<0.0001), higher balloon inflation volume (36 vs. 33 mL, P<0.0001), a larger S3 area at inflow by post-CT (729.6±42.2 vs. 682.2±35.0 mm2, P<0.001), and a correlation between the inflation volume and S3 area (r=0.71, P=0.0005). No differences were observed between groups in paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) ≥mild (43.3% vs. 27.6%, P=0.09), PAR ≥moderate (3.3% vs. 1.3%, P=0.39) or 1-year mortality (10.0% vs. 9.1%, P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR using a 29-mm S3 with extra inflation of the delivery balloon can be considered as a treatment option for patients with severe AS and ELA.

Outcomes of Self-Expanding vs. Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves for the Treatment of Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses　- A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) replacement within failed bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves is a feasible therapeutic option. However, data comparing the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of VIV replacement with supra-annular self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) are limited. Methods and Results: Outcomes of 40 and 95 patients treated with supra-annular self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV, respectively, were compared after propensity score matching, which yielded 37 pairs of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Postprocedural mean gradient was significantly lower in the self-expanding THV group than in the balloon-expandable THV group (12.1±6.1 mmHg vs. 19.0±7.3 mmHg, P<0.001). The incidence of at least mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) was comparable between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV groups (21.6% vs. 10.8%, P=0.39). In the self-expanding THV group, the new-generation THV showed a trend towards a lower incidence of at least mild AR compared with the early-generation THV (12.5% vs. 38.5%, P=0.07). A similar trend was observed in the balloon-expandable THV group (4.2% vs. 23.1%, P=0.08). There was no significant difference between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable THV groups in the cumulative 2-year all-cause mortality rates (22.4% vs. 43.4%, log-rank P=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The supra-annular self-expanding THV was associated with a lower postprocedural mean gradient compared with balloon-expandable THV in patients undergoing aortic VIV replacement.

Outcome of paravalvular leak repair after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a balloon-expandable prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Significant paravalvular leak (PVL) occurs in up to 13% of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis. Transcatheter PVL repair has emerged as a less invasive alternative for this problem. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of transcatheter PVL repair after TAVR with balloon-expandable valve. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 15 patients who underwent 16 PVL repair procedures after the TAVR at our center. Procedural characteristics, results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. The association of PVL repairs with subsequent hospitalizations and mortality was assessed and compared to 57 patients who did not undergo repair for at least moderate PVL after TAVR. RESULTS: The PVL repair was successful in 13 (87%) patients, without significant procedure or device related complications. In patients with successful PVL repair, there was an improvement in symptom status, subsequent hospitalizations, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels. There was 1 (out of 13, 8%) death in the group of patients who successfully underwent PVL repair whereas 24 (out of 57, 42%) patients died during follow up in the group that did not undergo repair of their PVL. Similarly, there was significant reduction in the subsequent heart failure related hospitalization after the PVL repair, compared with the patients who did not undergo PVL repair (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Transcatheter repair of PVL after TAVR can be safely and effectively accomplished in carefully selected patients, and may lead to reduction in hospitalizations, improvement in symptoms, and long-term survival. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Different Valve Types in Elliptic Aortic Annuli.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of an elliptic annulus on acute device success rates following self-expanding (SE) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR.Methods and Results:Outcomes were assessed using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Aortic annulus ratio (AAR) was measured as short axis diameter/long axis diameter. Mean AAR was 0.81±0.06. Patients were therefore divided into 2 groups: AAR <0.82 and AAR ≥0.82. For circular annuli (AAR ≥0.82; 363 patients), high device success rates were achieved in both valve groups (SE valve, 90.5% vs. BE valve, 95.0%, P=0.14). Conversely, for AAR <0.82 (374 patients), SE valves had lower device success rates than BE valves (82.5% vs. 95.3%, P=0.002). For elliptic annuli, SE-TAVR was an independent predictor of unsuccessful device implantation (OR, 6.34, P<0.001). Nonetheless, increased oversizing of SE valves for elliptic annuli was associated with an exponential rise in device success (threshold ≥17.5%; area under the curve, 0.83) but not for BE-TAVR. Furthermore, optimally oversized SE valves and BE valves had a similarly high device success for elliptic annuli (SE valve, 96.2% vs. BE valve, 95.3%). CONCLUSIONS: For circular annuli, similarly high device success was achieved for the 2 valve types. Conversely, for elliptic annuli, SE valves had a lower device success than BE valves. Device success following optimal oversizing of SE valves, however, was similar to that for BE valves.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Different Valve Designs for Severe Device Landing Zone Calcification.

Severe device landing zone calcification (DLZ-CA) predicted paravalvular leak (PVL) and post-dilatation (PD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to determine the influence of DLZ-CA on PVL or PD rates after SAPIEN XT (XT) versus CoreValve (CV).We analyzed patients undergoing TAVI who had severe DLZ-CA. Severe DLZ-CA defined the upper left ventricular outflow tract calcification; the cross-sectional region 2 mm inferior to the annular plane. PVL was evaluated at 30days using transthoracic echocardiography. Overall, 133 patients had XT-TAVI and the remaining 41 patients had CV-TAVI. Two patients had annulus injury in the XT group (oversizing 20.2% and 20.5% for two XT cases). PD was less frequently performed in the XT group (34.1% versus 12.8%; P = 0.002), but PVL rates were similar between both groups (42.1% versus 41.5% for the XT and CV groups, respectively; P = 0.94). Importantly, excessive oversizing or the degree of filling volume was not associated with decreased PVL after XT-TAVI (P = non-significant for all). On multivariate analysis, CV-TAVI was found to be one of the independent predictors of need for PD (Odds ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 8.53, P = 0.003).In the setting of severe DLZ-CA, XT and CV have similar rates of PVL but XT had less need for PD. Excessive oversizing with XT carries a risk of root injury which could be further increased by DLZ-CA.

Impact of body mass index on the outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on short- and midterm outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Although obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular mortality, numerous studies reported a beneficial effect of obesity on survival in patients with cardiovascular disease and in patients after cardiac interventions. Moreover, all previous reports examining the relation between BMI and outcomes following TAVI have underscored the "obesity paradox" in these patients. METHODS: During a 3 year period, 805 patients with severe aortic stenosis that underwent TAVI at our institute were evaluated. Based on baseline BMI, patients were classified as normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2) ), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m(2) ), or obese (≥30 kg/m(2) ). TAVI endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. RESULTS: Obese patients were significantly younger, had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and chronic lung disease, and had lower prevalence of frailty. Device success was similar between the 3 groups. All-cause mortality up to 30 days was 2.9% (10/340) vs 4.5% (12/268) vs 0.5% (1/186) in patients with normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively (p = 0.048). In a multivariable model, overweight and obese patients had similar overall mortality compared to patients with normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for the existence of an obesity paradox following TAVI. Correction for possible confounders such as frailty in the present cohort may explain the discrepancy between the current report and the previous reports that suggested a protective effect for increased BMI following TAVI. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with extreme aortic valve calcification.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the procedural and short-term clinical outcome of performing balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with extremely calcified aortic valves. BACKGROUND: Quantity of aortic valve calcification predicts rates of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Nonetheless, short-term outcomes of balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with extremely high calcified aortic valves have not been previously described. METHODS: We studied patients with severe aortic stenosis that underwent balloon-expandable TAVR and had a pre-procedural non-contrast CT. Twenty patients that had aortic valve calcification score (AVCS) of more than 8,000 Agatston Units were compared to 279 patients with lower calcification scores. TAVR endpoints, device success and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. RESULTS: Device success was 80% in the extremely high calcification group compared to 95.3% in patients with less calcified aortic valves (P = 0.004). There was significantly more postprocedural PVR in the extreme calcification group: 50%, 35%, 10%, 5% vs. 72.4%, 25.8%, 1.8%, 0% for no/trace, mild, moderate and severe PVR, respectively (P < 0.001). There was one case of ascending aortic perforation resulting in intramural hematoma that resolved with no treatment. In-hospital mortality, new pacemaker implantation and major complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon-expandable TAVR in patients with extremely calcified aortic valve is associated with lower device success and greater risk of PVR. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Major thrombocytopenia after balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prognostic implications and comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the magnitude and clinical importance of thrombocytopenia post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia has been observed after TAVR but has not been well studied. METHODS: Major thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 10(9) /L) was studied following aortic valve interventions in a single center. Changes in platelets were compared in 246 patients undergoing balloon-expandable TAVR and a similar population of 57 cases undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR in the US PARTNER IA trial). RESULTS: An early drop in platelets was seen on the day of intervention. The drop day 1 post procedure was similar but slightly greater with SAVR vs. TAVR. In both platelet counts continued to drop, reaching a nadir of approximately 50-60% of the baseline platelet count at day 2-3, starting to recover after day 5. Early major thrombocytopenia occurred post TAVR in 37% of patients but was not significantly related to major bleeding (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.51-1.60, P = 0.69) or risk of stroke (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.16-2.20, P = 0.45); there was a trend to greater acute kidney injury (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.95-3.26, P = 0.073) and mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.98-2.22, P = 0.065). Major thrombocytopenia was persistent in 7.7% of patients and this was independently associated with mortality (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.63-8.16, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Post-TAVR thrombocytopenia is a common phenomenon and its magnitude appears similar to that seen after SAVR. It is most often transient, not associated with adverse sequelae and, unless persistent, should be managed in an expectant fashion. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Complete percutaneous approach for arterial access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison with surgical cut-down and closure.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the immediate safety and feasibility of complete percutaneous access/closure of arteriotomy for device deployment compared to the surgical approach for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: The percutaneous approach for arterial access for device deployment in transfemoral TAVR is a potential alternative to the surgical approach. METHODS: In 274 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR using Edward Sapien heart valve, 140 had a complete percutaneous approach using a "pre-closure" technique whereas 134 had surgical cut-down/repair for arterial access/closure of device deployment. Immediate vascular access/closure success, associated complications and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: While overall acute success of access/closure and in-hospital access-related events were similar, significant isolated stenosis/dissection at the access site developed more frequently in the percutaneous group (7.1% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.007). Contrary, wound infections requiring prolonged antibiotics use or surgical debridement occurred more frequently in the surgical group (0.7% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.007). Although the rate of major vascular complications was not different, the surgical group developed more frequent minor bleeding (27.1% vs. 38.8%, P = 0.04) and underwent transfusion of packed red blood cells of ≤3 units (25.7% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.002). Median hospital stay was shorter in the percutaneous group (3 days vs. 4 days, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous approach is a feasible access/closure method with a potential of lowering access site infection and bleeding, and shortening hospital stay, while maintaining similar rates of major vascular complications compared to the surgical approach.

Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Staged Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Residual significant mitral regurgitation (MR) can increase the risk of adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The clinical benefits of staged transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) after TAVR remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of staged TEER for residual significant MR after TAVR. This observational study included 314 consecutive patients with chronic residual grade 3+ or 4+ MR at the 30-day follow-up after TAVR, with 104 patients (33.1%) treated with staged TEER (TEER group) and 210 (66.9%) with medical therapy alone. The primary composite outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 2 years. Additional analysis, including changes in MR grade and the New York Association functional classification, and subgroup outcome comparisons based on MR etiology were also conducted. In our study, the rate of primary composite outcome was lower in the TEER group than in the medical therapy alone group (33.7% vs 48.1%, p = 0.015). Significant improvement in MR grade and New York Association class was observed in the TEER group after 2 years. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that in patients with degenerative MR, a lower incidence of composite outcome and heart failure hospitalization was observed in the TEER group (hazard ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.53, p <0.001). In conclusion, staged TEER after TAVR was associated with reduced MR and improved clinical outcomes. The clinical significance of MR after TAVR should be carefully evaluated, and TEER should be considered for patients with significant residual MR, particularly, those with degenerative MR.

TAVR-in-TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve for paravalvular leak.

Introduction: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a severe complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can lead to poor outcomes. TAVR-in-TAVR is a promising treatment for PVL; however, reports on its safety or efficacy are limited. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable prostheses for PVLs after TAVR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable Sapien prostheses for PVL after an initial TAVR at our institution. The procedural success, in-hospital complications, all-cause mortality, and echocardiographic data for up to 2 years post-surgery were evaluated. Results: In total, 31 patients with a mean age of 81.1 ± 7.9 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.8 ± 5.4% were identified. The procedural success rate of TAVR-in-TAVR was 96.8% (30/31). No in-hospital deaths, cardiac tamponade, or conversion to sternotomy occurred. Re-intervention was performed in only one patient (3.2%) during hospitalization. The all-cause mortality rates at 30 days and 2 years were 0% and 16.1%, respectively. A significant reduction in the PVL rate was observed at 30 days compared with that at baseline (p < 0.01). Discussion: Our findings suggest that TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable prostheses is safe and effective for PVL after TAVR with low complication rates and acceptable long-term outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.

The ALPHA phase 1 study: pulmonary ArteriaL hypertension treated with CardiosPHere-Derived allogeneic stem cells.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a progressive condition with no cure. Even with pharmacologic advances, survival remains poor. Lung pathology on PAH therapies still shows impressive occlusive arteriolar remodelling and plexiform lesions. Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are heart-derived progenitor cells exhibiting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, are anti -fibrotic, anti-oxidative and anti-apoptotic to potentially impact several aspects of PAH pathobiology. In preclinical trials CDCs reduced right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure, RV hypertrophy, pulmonary arteriolar wall thickness and inflammation. METHODS: The ALPHA study was a Phase 1a/b study in which CDCs were infused into patients with Idiopathic (I)PAH, Heritable (H) HPAH, PAH-connective tissue disease (CTD) and PAH-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The study was IRB approved and DSMB monitored. Phase 1a, was an open label study (n = 6). Phase 1b was a double-blind placebo-controlled study (n = 20) in which half received 100 million CDCs (the maximum feasible dose from manufacturing perspective) and half placebo (PLAC) infusions. Right heart catheterization (RHC) and cardiac MR imaging (cMR) were performed at baseline and at 4 months post infusion. Patients were followed over a year. FINDINGS: No short-term clinical safety adverse events (AE) were related to the IP, the primary outcome measure. There were no adverse hemodynamic, gas exchange, rhythm or other clinical events following infusion and in the 1st 23 h monitored in hospital. There were no long-term AEs over 12 months noted, including unrelated limited hospitalizations. No immunologic short or long-term AEs were noted. We examined exploratory outcomes across multiple domains to determine encouraging signals to motivate future advanced phase testing. Phase 1a data showed encouraging observations for both 50 and 100 million CDC doses. Several encouraging findings favouring CDCs (n = 16) compared to placebo (n = 10) were noted. On cMR, the RV end diastolic volume (RVEDV) and index (RVEDVI) decreased with CDCs with a rise in the PLAC group. The 6-min walk distance was increased 2 months post infusion in the CDC group compared with PLAC. With PLAC, diffusing capacity (DLCO) decreased at 4 months but was unchanged with CDCs. Serum creatinine decreased with CDCs at 4 months. Encouraging observations favouring CDCs were also noted for RV fractional area change on echo and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) on cMR at 4 months. No differences were observed for mean pulmonary artery pressures or pulmonary vascular resistance. Review of long-term data to 12 months showed continued decline in DLCO for the PLAC cohort at 6 months with no change through 12 months. By contrast, CDC subjects showed an unchanged DLCO over 12-months. For parameters exhibiting early encouraging exploratory findings in CDC subjects, no further improvement was noted in long-term follow up through 12 months. INTERPRETATION: Intravenous CDCs were safe in both the short and long term in PAH subjects and thus may be safe in larger cohorts, in line with our extensive track record of safety in clinical trials for other conditions. Further, CDCs exhibited encouraging exploratory findings across several domains. Repeat dosing (quarterly, over one year) of intravenous CDCs has been reported to yield highly significant sustained disease-modifying bioactivity in subjects with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Because only single CDC doses were used here, the findings represent a lower limit estimate of CDC's potential in PAH. Upcoming phase 2 studies would logically use a repeat dosing paradigm. FUNDING: California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). Project Number: CLIN2-09444.

Pre-emptive positioning of a coronary stent in the left anterior descending artery for left main protection: a prerequisite for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for failing stentless bioprostheses?

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation in high-risk patients with degenerative surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is a novel application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement technology. Although transcatheter aortic VIV procedure is clinically effective in most patients, it is a more demanding procedure in terms of the technical aspects of procedural planning. VIV carries a higher risk of coronary occlusion which is associated with a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. We hereby report a technique of pre-emptive left main (LM) protection, by positioning a coronary stent in the proximal left anterior descending artery prior to VIV implantation. The patient treated was considered to be at an increased risk of LM occlusion as a result of the procedure. The technique was performed in anticipation of emergent bailout stenting of the LM. As predicted, the LM occluded during the procedure and LM protection facilitated the safe and effective treatment of an otherwise life-threatening procedure.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Narrative Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and the cause of thromboembolic events in elderly patients worldwide. AF is associated with a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to cardiac emboli, primarily from left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Oral anticoagulation therapy is the standard treatment to effectively reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with AF. However, anticoagulation treatment increases bleeding risk. LAA closure (LAAC) has recently been introduced as a feasible mechanical preventive intervention for thromboembolic events while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Transcatheter LAAC devices have evolved in the past decade, and several ongoing trials have demonstrated the improvements of safety and outcomes in newer generation devices. This review summarizes the current perspectives and outcomes regarding LAAC as an alternative to pharmacologic therapy.

Predicting the risk of iliofemoral vascular complication in complex transfemoral-TAVR using new generation transcatheter devices.

Objective: Design a predictive risk model for minimizing iliofemoral vascular complications (IVC) in a contemporary era of transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). Background: IVC remains a common complication of TF-TAVR despite the technological improvement in the new-generation transcatheter systems (NGTS) and enclosed poor outcomes and quality of life. Currently, there is no accepted tool to assess the IVC risk for calcified and tortuous vessels. Methods: We reconstructed CT images of 516 propensity-matched TF-TAVR patients using the NGTS to design a predictive anatomical model for IVC and validated it on a new cohort of 609 patients. Age, sex, peripheral artery disease, valve size, and type were used to balance the matched cohort. Results: IVC occurred in 214 (7.2%) patients. Sheath size (p = 0.02), the sum of angles (SOA) (p < .0001), number of curves (NOC) (p < .0001), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (p < .001), and sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratio (SFAR) (p = 0.012) were significant predictors for IVC. An indexed risk score (CSI) consisting of multiplying the SOA and NOC divided by the MLD showed 84.3% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity, when set to >100, in predicting IVC (C-stat 0.936, 95% CI 0.911-0.959, p < 0.001). Adding SFAR > 1.00 in a tree model increased the overall accuracy to 97.7%. In the validation cohort, the model predicted 89.5% of the IVC cases with an overall 89.5% sensitivity, 98.9% specificity, and 94.2% accuracy (C-stat 0.842, 95% CI 0.904-0.980, p < .0001). Conclusion: Our CT-based validated-model is the most accurate and easy-to-use tool assessing IVC risk and should be used for calcified and tortuous vessels in preprocedural planning.