Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Post-Diagnostic Care for People with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: When Help Is Needed in a "No-Man's Land".

Background: Post-diagnostic care for people with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) typically involves multiple professions and disjointed care pathways not specifically designed to aid VCI needs. Objective: Exploring perspectives of healthcare professionals on post-diagnostic care for people with VCI. Methods: We conducted a qualitative focus group study. We used purposive sampling to include healthcare professionals in different compositions of primary and secondary care professionals per focus group. Thematic saturation was reached after seven focus groups. Transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Forty participants were included in seven focus groups (4-8 participants). Results showed knowledge and awareness of VCI as prerequisites for adequate post-diagnostic care, and for pre-diagnostic detection of people with VCI (theme 1). In light of perceived lack of differentiation between cognitive disorders, participants shared specific advice regarding post-diagnostic care for people with VCI and informal caregivers (theme 2). Participants thought current care for VCI was fragmented and recommended further integration of care and collaboration across settings (theme 3). Conclusions: People with VCI and their caregivers risk getting stuck in a "no man's land" between post-diagnostic care pathways; challenges lie in acknowledgement of VCI and associated symptoms, and alignment between healthcare professionals. Education about the symptoms and consequences of VCI, to healthcare professionals, people with VCI and caregivers, may increase awareness of VCI and thereby better target care. Specific attention for symptoms common in VCI could further tailor care and reduce caregiver burden. Integration could be enhanced by combining expertise of dementia and stroke/rehabilitation pathways.

Outcome of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature.

Introduction: Survival rates of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) seem extremely poor, and the available literature on the matter is scarce. Accordingly, there is a limited understanding of poor treatment outcomes seen in this population.Areas covered: We provide an overview of the available literature with respect to treatment outcomes of pediatric AML in LMICs yielding poor outcomes compared to high-income countries. Moreover, treatment outcomes vary markedly between LMICs. In addition, there is a wide variation among studies in how treatment outcomes are reported and analyzed.Expert opinion: The substantially inferior treatment outcomes of pediatric AML in LMICs emphasize the unprecedented importance of global initiatives and international collaborations to improve the survival of these patients. A coordinated approach is necessary to carry out country-specific situational analyses. These analyses will result in operational plans on how to structurally implement childhood cancer registries, align healthcare infrastructure, build on capacities, and provide universal health coverage in LMICs. In addition, we strongly recommend that, in the future, LMICs document, analyze, and publish pediatric AML treatment outcomes in a more structured and uniform manner.