Nigrostriatal blood-brain barrier opening in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: The nigrostriatal system is especially vulnerable to neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD) and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a limiting factor for delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. This pilot study aimed to demonstrate safety, feasibility and tissue penetration (by 18F-Choline-positron emission tomography (PET)) of MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) simultaneous BBB opening (BBB-O) in the substantia nigra (SN) and putamen in PD. METHODS: Three patients underwent MRgFUS for midbrain and putamen BBB-O. Patients were evaluated clinically and underwent brain MRI with gadolinium (baseline, 24 hours, 14 days and 3 months postprocedure). In two patients, BBB-O was repeated after 2-3 weeks, and 18F-Choline-PET was performed immediately after. RESULTS: The right SN and putamen were simultaneously opened unilaterally in 3 patients once and the left SN in 1 patient in a different session. No severe clinical or neuroimaging adverse events developed in any patient. 18F-Choline-PET uptake was enhanced in the targeted SN and putamen regions. CONCLUSION: BBB-O of the nigrostriatal system is a feasible and well-tolerated approach in patients with PD. 18F-Choline-PET uptake indicates penetration into the parenchyma after BBB-O, which suggests that the opening is functionally effective. This minimally invasive technique could facilitate delivery of putative neurorestorative molecules to brain regions vulnerable to neurodegeneration.

Unilateral focused ultrasound subthalamotomy in early Parkinson's disease: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral focused ultrasound subthalamotomy (FUS-STN) improves motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD) in moderately advanced patients. The less invasive nature of FUS makes its early application in PD feasible. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of unilateral FUS-STN in patients with PD of less than 5 years from diagnosis (early PD). METHODS: Prospective, open-label study. Eligible patients with early PD had highly asymmetrical cardinal features. The primary outcome was safety, defined as treatment-related adverse events at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included efficacy, assessed as motor improvement in the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), motor fluctuations, non-motor symptoms, daily living activities, quality of life, medication and patients' impression of change. RESULTS: Twelve patients with PD (median age 52.0 (IQR 49.8-55.3) years, median time from diagnosis 3.0 (2.1-3.9) years) underwent unilateral FUS-STN. Within 2 weeks after treatment, five patients developed dyskinesia on the treated side, all resolved after levodopa dose adjustment. One patient developed mild contralateral motor weakness which fully resolved in 4 weeks. One patient developed dystonic foot and another hand and foot dystonia. The latter impaired gait and became functionally disabling initially. Both cases were well controlled with botulinum toxin injections. The off-medication motor MDS-UPDRS score for the treated side improved at 12 months by 68.7% (from 14.5 to 4.0, p=0.002), and the total motor MDS-UPDRS improved by 49.0% (from 26.5 to 13.0, p=0.002). Eleven patients (92%) reported global improvement 12 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: Unilateral FUS-STN may be safe and effective to treat motor manifestations in patients with early PD. A larger confirmatory trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04692116.

Update in the clinical application of focused ultrasound.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most recent evidence about the clinical applicability of transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), including clinical evidence and indications, recent technical developments for its use and future prospects. RECENT FINDINGS: Unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy for both essential and parkinsonian tremors is an approved and well established therapy. Recent studies have focused on its long-term safety and efficacy as well as technical advances for refining the approach. Moreover, ultrasound has expanded its application in Parkinson's disease, with clinical trials successfully targeting other brain regions like the subthalamic nucleus, the globus pallidus and the pallidothalamic tract, providing benefits for features that thalamotomy neglects. New indications, such as focal dystonia or neuropsychiatric conditions (namely obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression) have also been explored, with encouraging preliminary results. Finally, the application of ultrasound in low-intensity modality allows other approaches like focal blood-brain barrier opening and neuromodulation, which promise to be highly relevant in translational research. SUMMARY: MRgFUS is a growing emergent technique. Its application in clinical routine is becoming widely accepted as a therapeutic option. Novel approaches and new potential applications are anticipated.

The Impact of Immunosuppression and Autoimmune Disease on Severe Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Immunosuppression (IS) and autoimmune disease (AD) are prevalent in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their impact on its clinical course is unknown. We investigated relationships between IS, AD, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Data on consecutive admissions for COVID-19 were extracted retrospectively from medical records. Patients were assigned to one of four cohorts, according to whether or not they had an AD (AD and NAD) or were immunosuppressed (IS and NIS). The primary endpoint was development of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); secondary endpoints included death, and a composite of mechanical ventilation (MV) or death. A total of 789 patients were included: 569 (72.1%) male, 76 (9.6%) with an AD, and 63 (8.0%) with IS. Relative to the NIS-NAD cohort, patients in the IS-AD cohort had a significantly reduced risk of severe ARDS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.80; p = 0.008). No significant relationships between IS or AD status and either death or the composite of MV and death were identified, although a trend towards higher mortality was identified in the IS-NAD cohort (aHR vs NIS-NAD 1.71; 95% CI 0.94-3.12; p = 0.081). Patients in this cohort also had higher median serum levels of interleukin-6 compared with IS-AD patients (98.2 vs 21.6 pg/mL; p = 0.0328) and NIS-NAD patients (29.1 pg/mL; p = 0.0057). In conclusion, among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, those receiving immunosuppressive treatment for an AD may have a reduced risk of developing severe ARDS.

Non-severe immunosuppression might be associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19: A pilot study.

The role of immunosuppression among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has not been elucidated and management may be challenging. This observational study included confirmed COVID-19 patients. The primary endpoint was the development of moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Time to moderate-severe ARDS, the need for mechanical or noninvasive ventilation (MV/NIV), death, and a composite of death or MV/NIV were secondary endpoints. Of 138 patients included, 27 (19.6%) were immunosuppressed (IS) and 95 (68.8%) were male, with a median (IQR) age of 68 (54-78) years. A significantly lower proportion of IS patients (25.9%) compared to non-IS patients (52.3%) developed moderate-severe ARDS, in both unadjusted (0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.83; p = .017) and adjusted (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.80; p = .019) analyses. After stratifying by pathologies, only IS patients with autoimmune diseases remained significant (aOR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.98; p = .046). Nonsignificant trends toward a longer time to moderate or severe ARDS, a lower need for MV/NIV, and a lower risk of death or MV/NIV were detected among IS. In our cohort of COVID-19 patients, nonsevere immunosuppression was associated with a lower risk of moderate-severe ARDS, especially among AD. This suggests a potential protective effect from a hypothesized hyper-inflammatory response.

High versus standard doses of corticosteroids in severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Despite the increasing evidence of the benefit of corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, no data are available about the potential role of high doses of steroids for these patients. We evaluated the mortality, the risk of need for mechanical ventilation (MV), or death and the risk of developing a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between high (HD) and standard doses (SD) among patients with a severe COVID-19. All consecutive confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to a single center were selected, including those treated with steroids and an ARDS. Patients were allocated to the HD (≥ 250 mg/day of methylprednisolone) of corticosteroids or the SD (≤ 1.5 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone) at discretion of treating physician. Five hundred seventy-three patients were included: 428 (74.7%) men, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (54-73) years. In the HD group, a worse baseline respiratory situation was observed and male gender, older age, and comorbidities were significantly more common. After adjusting by baseline characteristics, HDs were associated with a higher mortality than SD (adjusted OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.59-3.81, p < 0.001) and with an increased risk of needing MV or death (adjusted OR 2.35, p = 0.001). Conversely, the risk of developing a severe ARDS was similar between groups. Interaction analysis showed that HD increased mortality exclusively in elderly patients. Our real-world experience advises against exceeding 1-1.5 mg/kg/day of corticosteroids for severe COVID-19 with an ARDS, especially in older subjects. This reinforces the rationale of modulating rather than suppressing immune responses in these patients.

MR-guided focused ultrasound in movement disorders and beyond: Lessons learned and new frontiers.

The development of MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has provided a new therapeutic tool for neuropsychiatric disorders. In contrast to previously available neurosurgical techniques, MRgFUS allows precise impact on deep brain structures without the need for incision and yields an immediate effect. In its high-intensity modality (MRgHIFU), it produces accurate therapeutic thermoablation in previously selected brain targets. Importantly, the production of the lesion is progressive and highly controlled in real-time by both neuroimaging and clinical means. MRgHIFU ablation is already an accepted and widely used treatment for medically-refractory Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Notably, other neurological disorders and diverse brain targets, including bilateral treatments, are currently under examination. Conversely, the low-intensity modality (MRgLIFU) shows promising prospects in neuromodulation and transient blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO). In the former circumstance, MRgLIFU could serve as a powerful clinical and research tool for non-invasively modulating brain activity and function. BBBO, on the other hand, emerges as a potentially impactful method to influence disease pathogenesis and progression by increasing brain target engagement of putative therapeutic agents. While promising, these applications remain experimental. As a recently developed technology, MRgFUS is not without challenges and questions to be addressed. Further developments and broader experience are necessary to enhance MRgFUS capabilities in both research and clinical practice, as well as to define device constraints. This clinical mini-review aims to provide an overview of the main evidence of MRgFUS application and to highlight unmet needs and future potentialities of the technique.

Skull Density Ratio as Arm-Allocation Parameter for a Controlled Focused Ultrasound Trial in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) thermoablation is an established therapy for movement disorders. FUS candidates must meet a predefined threshold of skull density ratio (SDR), a parameter that accounts for the efficiency in reaching ablative temperatures. Randomized sham-controlled trials to provide definitive therapeutic evidence employ pure randomization of subjects into active treatment or control arms. The latter design has several general limitations. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that SDR values are not associated with clinically and demographically relevant variables in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). This in turn would allow using SDR as an arm-allocation parameter, separating patients who will receive active FUS treatment and best medical management treatment (BMT). METHODS: We studied a cohort of 215 PD patients who were candidates for FUS subthalamotomy to determine if the SDR was correlated with demographic or clinical variables that could introduce bias for group allocation in a controlled trial. RESULTS: SDR was unassociated with age, gender, and clinical motor features nor with levodopa daily dose in our cohort of PD patients. A negative association with age was found for the female subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in a PD population considered for FUS subthalamotomy treatment, the SDR may be a valid group-allocation parameter. This could be considered as the basis for a controlled study comparing FUS subthalamotomy vs BMT.

Staged Bilateral MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Subthalamotomy for Parkinson Disease.

Importance: Unilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound subthalamotomy (FUS-STN) improves cardinal motor features among patients with asymmetrical Parkinson disease (PD). The feasibility of bilateral FUS-STN is as yet unexplored. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of staged bilateral FUS-STN to treat PD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, open-label, case series study was conducted between June 18, 2019, and November 7, 2023, at HM-CINAC, Puerta del Sur University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, and included 6 patients with PD who had been treated with unilateral FUS-STN contralateral to their most affected body side and whose parkinsonism on the untreated side had progressed and was not optimally controlled with medication. Intervention: Staged bilateral FUS-STN. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were assessed 6 months after the second treatment and included safety (incidence and severity of adverse events after second treatment) and effectiveness in terms of motor change (measured with the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III [MDS-UPDRS III]) in the off-medication state (ie, after at least 12 hours of antiparkinsonian drug withdrawal) compared with baseline (ie, prior to the first side ablation). Secondary outcomes included motor change in patients in the on-medication state (ie, after usual antiparkinsonian medication intake), motor complications (measured with the MDS-UPDRS IV), daily living activities (measured with the MDS-UPDRS I-II), quality of life (measured with the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire), change in dopaminergic treatment, patient's global impression of change (measured with the Global Impression of Change [PGI-C] scale), and long-term (24-month) follow-up. Results: Of 45 patients previously treated with unilateral FUS-STN, 7 were lost to follow-up, and 4 were excluded due to adverse events. Of the remaining 34 patients, 6 (median age at first FUS-STN, 52.6 years [IQR, 49.0-57.3 years]; 3 women [50%]) experienced progression of parkinsonism on the untreated body side and were included. At the time of the first FUS-STN, patients' median duration of disease was 5.7 years (IQR, 4.7-7.3 years). The median time between procedures was 3.2 years (IQR, 1.9-3.5 years). After the second FUS-STN, 4 patients presented with contralateral choreic dyskinesia, which resolved by 3 months. Four patients developed speech disturbances, which gradually improved but remained in a mild form for 2 patients at 6 months; 1 patient experienced mild imbalance and dysphagia during the first week after treatment, which subsided by 3 months. No behavioral or cognitive disturbances were found on neuropsychological testing. For patients in the off-medication state, MDS-UPDRS III scores improved by 52.6% between baseline and 6 months after the second FUS-STN (from 37.5 [IQR, 34.2-40.0] to 20.5 [IQR, 8.7-24.0]; median difference, 23.0 [95% CI, 7.0-33.7]; P = .03). The second treated side improved by 64.3% (MDS-UPDRS III score, 17.0 [IQR, 16.0-19.5] prior to the second treatment vs 5.5 [IQR, 3.0-10.2]; median difference, 9.5 [95% CI, 3.2-17.7]; P = .02). After the second procedure, all self-reported PGI-C scores were positive. Conclusions: Findings of this pilot study suggest that staged bilateral FUS-STN was safe and effective for the treatment of PD, although mild but persistent speech-related adverse events were observed among a small number of patients.

Prospective Long-term Follow-up of Focused Ultrasound Unilateral Subthalamotomy for Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unilateral magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound subthalamotomy (FUS-STN) has been shown to improve the cardinal motor features of Parkinson disease (PD). Whether this effect is sustained is not known. This study aims to report the long-term outcome of patients with PD treated with unilateral FUS-STN. METHODS: We conducted a prospective open-label study of patients with asymmetrical PD who underwent unilateral FUS-STN. All patients were evaluated up to 36 months after treatment. The primary outcome was the difference from baseline to 36 months after FUS-STN in the score of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor part (III) for the treated hemibody in the off-medication state. The safety outcome included all adverse events occurring during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the change in the MDS-UPDRS III score on-medication; subscores of rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor, and axial features; total MDS-UPDRS III; and the MDS-UPDRS part IV. Functional disability and quality of life were assessed using the MDS-UPDRS II and the PDQ39, respectively. Patient impression of change and satisfaction with the treatment were self-assessed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test with subsequent Bonferroni's correction was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with PD were evaluated at 36 months after treatment. The mean (±SD) age at baseline was 56.0 ± 10.1 years, with a mean disease duration of 6.8 ± 2.8 years. The MDS-UPDRS III score for the treated hemibody off-medication was improved by 52.3% from baseline to 3 years (score reduction from 19.0 ± 3.2 to 8.9 ± 3.3, 95% CI 8.7 to 11.6, p < 0.001), and all specific motor features were improved from baseline. No disabling or delayed adverse events were reported. The total MDS-UPDRS III off-medication score was 22.9% lower at 3 years than before treatment (36.8 ± 7.4 vs 27.4 ± 6.2, 95% CI 6.0 to 11.5, p < 0.001). The MDS-UPDRS II, IV, and PDQ39 scores and levodopa dose were equivalent to those at baseline. DISCUSSION: The benefit of unilateral FUS-STN on PD motor features is sustained in the long term. FUS-STN contributes to better clinical control over several years of evolution. NCT02912871/03454425. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence on the utility of focused ultrasound unilateral subthalamotomy in the treatment of people with Parkinson disease.

Eye-of-the-Tiger Sign with an Unexpected Pathological Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of atypical parkinsonisms may be challenging. The eye-of-the-tiger sign on brain MRI, typical of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation, has been anecdotally observed in cases clinically diagnosed as atypical parkinsonisms. OBJECTIVES: To show how clinical syndromes and even neuroimaging sometimes may lead the neurologist to a misunderstanding, just as to emphasize the important role of pathology to establish the final diagnosis in these cases. METHODS: Clinico-pathological case. RESULTS: A 67-year-old-woman presented with progressive painful stiffness and allodynia in her left arm. On examination, she presented parkinsonism without tremor with greater involvement of left limbs. She developed dystonia, with myoclonic tremor and hypoesthesia involving her left arm, as well as an impairment of balance with falls, a significant axial involvement with disabling rigidity, supranuclear gaze abnormalities, facial dystonia, dysphonia, severe dysphagia, and anarthria. There was no response to levodopa. Syndromic diagnosis and findings on neuroimaging are discussed. Afterwards, the underlying pathology is revealed. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first case of neuropathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy with the eye-of-the-tiger sign on brain MRI. The presence of supranuclear vertical gaze palsy further complicated a correct clinical diagnosis. A pathological postmortem study remains essential to establish a definite diagnosis in atypical parkinsonisms.

Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's Disease: Has COVID-19 Related Lockdown Been a Trigger?

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, especially those on dopamine agonists (DA), are at risk of impulse control disorders (ICD). Little attention has been paid to the influence of environmental factors. CASES: Retrospective analysis of consecutive PD patients seen in our outpatient Movement Disorders Clinic during 2 months (September-November 2020) to explore the frequency of ICD during the preceding 2-month lockdown period, and comparison with an equivalent control group (September-November 2019). Among 114 patients assessed, 15 (13%) presented ICD during the lockdown, versus 6 (4.5%, P 0.02) in the control group. When analyzing only patients on DA, ICD occurrence increased to 31% (vs. 9.6% pre-lockdown, P 0.026). ICD during lockdown required drug regime adjustment in 80% (vs. 16.7% pre-lockdown, P 0.014). CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 lockdown, the occurrence of ICD in PD patients taking DA was higher than expected, and with increased severity. Environmental stressors may play a role in ICD presentation in vulnerable patients.

SURINPARK: Safinamide for Urinary Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Urinary symptoms are common, disabling and generally unresponsive to treatment in Parkinson´s disease (PD). Safinamide is approved as an add-on therapy to levodopa to improve fluctuations. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic records of nondemented PD patients seen consecutively in a Movement Disorders Unit (November 2018-February 2019). All were assessed with Scale for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease for Autonomic Symptoms-Urinary subscale (SCOPA-AUT-U) by the attending neurologist, and a month afterwards by an independent researcher blinded to treatment and clinical records in a routine clinical practice setting. Clinical variables were compared among patients who were prescribed safinamide (SA+) for the treatment of motor fluctuations and those with different treatment regimes (SA-). RESULTS: From 169 patients screened initially, 54 were excluded due to severe incontinence, absence of urinary symptoms or previous safinamide treatment. Thirty-five patients were included in SA+ and 79 in SA-. Both groups were comparable in terms of clinical variables, except in basal urinary symptoms, with more severity in the SA+ group. In the follow-up assessment, total SCOPA-AUT-U, as well as urgency, incontinence, frequency and nocturia subscales improved significantly in the SA+ group, while the SA- group remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Safinamide could be helpful in the improvement of urinary symptoms in PD.

Use of the Cardiovascular Polypill in Secondary Prevention of Cerebrovascular Disease: A Real-Life Tertiary Hospital Cohort Study of 104 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of the cardiovascular polypill, a fixed-dose combination treatment, is conceived to improve adherence. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may overestimate it. Studies focusing on cerebrovascular disease and real-life efficacy compared with conventional treatment are lacking. METHODS: This is a retrospective, hospital-based cohort study of acute ischaemic stroke patients who were prescribed a polypill (aspirin 100 mg, atorvastatin 20/40 mg, ramipril 2.5/5/10 mg) versus conventional treatment (aspirin 100 mg and other blood pressure/lipid-lowering agents) in secondary prevention (2017-2018). Clinical records were reviewed 90 days after discharge for stroke recurrence, vascular risk factor control, and safety. Adherence was assessed using the adapted Morisky-Green scale. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included (61% male; mean age 69.7 ± 13.9 years); 54 were treated with the polypill and 50 with conventional treatment. No baseline differences in clinical or demographic variables were detected. No recurrences were registered in the polypill group, compared to 1 recurrence in the conventional treatment group. A significant reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was achieved in the polypill group (12.1 mm Hg) compared to the conventional treatment group (6.8 mm Hg) (p = 0.002). No significant differences were detected regarding the goal of LDL cholesterol ≤70 mg/dL (41 vs. 44%). The adverse events were mild and their frequency was similar in the two groups (9 vs. 2%, ns). Adherence was similarly good in the two groups (93 vs. 88%, ns). Polypill group adherence was similar to that reported in a previous meta-analysis of RCTs (93 vs. 84%, ns). CONCLUSION: In our experience, the cardiovascular polypill achieved a higher reduction in SBP levels and was well tolerated. Adherence was similar to that found in the previous literature, which is remarkable given the real-life setting of our study.

Incobotulinumtoxin A for Sialorrhea in Neurological Disorders: A Real-Life Experience.

Botulinum toxin type A is one of the most useful treatments of sialorrhea in neurological disorders. Evidence for the use of incobotulinumtoxin A (inco-A) in the treatment of sialorrhea is limited. Thirty-six patients with sialorrhea were treated with infiltrations of inco-A into both parotid glands. The severity of sialorrhea was evaluated by the Drooling Severity Scale (DSS), and the Drooling Frequency Scale (DFS). Patients' perceptions of clinical benefit were recorded via the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Following treatment, there was a significant difference in both the DFS and the DSS (p < 0.001). Clinical benefits on the basis of the PGI-I were present in up to 90% of patients.