Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 211(5): W267-W274, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30240292

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and ultrasound with that of standard digital mammography for breast cancer screening of women at intermediate risk who have dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 611 consecutively registered women who underwent screening CESM from 2012 to 2017, BI-RADS scores of the screening modalities were compared with actual disease status, assessed by histopathologic analysis or imaging follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 611 women included, 48.3% (295/611) had family or personal history of breast cancer, the BI-RADS breast density score was C or D in 93.1% (569/611). The mean follow-up period was 20 months. Mammography depicted 11 of 21 malignancies, sensitivity of 52.4%, specificity of 90.5% (534/590), positive predictive value of 16.4% (11/67), and negative predictive value of 98.2% (534/544). CESM depicted 19 of 21 malignancies, sensitivity of 90.5%, specificity of 76.1% (449/590), positive predictive value of 11.9% (19/160), and negative predictive value of 99.6% (449/451). Differences in sensitivity (p = 0.008) and specificity (p < 0.001) were statistically significant. Adjunct ultrasound revealed 73 additional suspicious findings; all were false-positive. In 39 women MRI was needed to assess screening abnormalities; two MRI-guided biopsies were performed and yielded one cancer. The incremental cancer detection rate of CESM was 13.1/1000 women (95% CI, 6.1-20.1). Of eight cancers seen only with CESM, seven were invasive (mean size, 9 mm; two of four cancers lymph-node positive). CONCLUSION: CESM was significantly more sensitive than standard digital mammography for detecting breast cancer in this screening population. No added benefit was found in the performance of ultrasound as an adjunct to CESM screens with negative results. CESM may be a valuable supplemental screening modality for women at intermediate risk who have dense breasts.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Medios de Contraste , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Acad Radiol ; 30(2): 248-254, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527100

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Female carriers of pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) in the BRCA1 /BRCA2 (Breast Cancer gene - BRCA) genes are at a substantially high-risk for developing breast cancer (BC), hence are offered active surveillance scheme based on semiannual breast exam and imaging from age 25 years to facilitate BC early detection (mammography/breast ultrasound depending on the age, and MRI). However, there are not specific guidelines for screening in case of pregnancy or lactation. In the current study, we summarize the experience at the largest high-risk clinic in Israel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of consecutive BRCA-PSV carriers undergoing surveillance as well as diagnostic ultrasound at the Meirav high-risk clinic from January 2014 to 2021 who were pregnant and/or breastfeeding at time of follow-up were identified. Relevant clinical data including results of breast exam, breast ultrasonography, biopsies and histological results were retrieved. Percentage of biopsies with malignancy, cancer detection rate and positive predictive values were calculated. Data is presented in descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 263 BRCA-carriers were included. Of these, 593 breast-ultrasonograms were performed in 263 BRCA-carriers for 292 pregnancies and 409 breast-ultrasonograms for 175 breastfeeding carriers. Of 36 breast biopsies in 292 pregnancies, 4 (PPV = 11%) had BC diagnosed (high grade invasive). Of 175 breastfeeding women, 25 biopsies were performed and 2 (PPV = 8%) were high grade invasive BC. Five of 6 BC were diagnosed in BRCA1 carriers, and 4/6 were screen detected. The rate of pregnancy-associated breast cancer was 6/292 (2.05%). CONCLUSION: The overall detection rate of pregnancy-associated BC in BRCA-carriers is relatively low (2.05%), but still much higher than that in the general population. Two thirds of the BC were detected by screening. Therefore, despite the changes of the glandular breast tissue at time of pregnancy and breastfeeding, screening plays an important role in early detection. Ultrasound should be considered as a screening tool during this period of life of high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Israel/epidemiología , Mutación , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Genes BRCA2 , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Mamografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA