Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 324
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 275: 114236, 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151597

RESUMEN

This retrospective study analyzed 230 pediatric opioid exposures from a statewide poison control center over a 5-year period. Most exposures involved pharmaceutical opioids and children below 2-years-old. Narrative details were reviewed to identify uncommon sources of opioids involved in poisoning and highlight the need for tailored prevention strategies and guidance.

2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 84(1): 20-28, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493376

RESUMEN

Used as a veterinary sedative and not approved for human use, xylazine has been increasingly linked with opioid overdose deaths in the United States. A growing number of people have been exposed to xylazine in the illicit opioid supply (especially fentanyl) or in other drugs, particularly in some areas of the Northeast. Xylazine is an α-2 adrenergic agonist that decreases sympathetic nervous system activity. When combined with fentanyl or heroin, it is purported to extend the duration of the opioid's sedative effect and to cause dependence and an associated withdrawal syndrome; however, data to support these concerns are limited. Despite the escalating frequency of detection of xylazine in people with nonfatal and fatal opioid overdose, direct links to these outcomes have not been identified. Because the strongest causal link is to fentanyl coexposure, ventilatory support and naloxone remain the cornerstones of overdose management. Xylazine is also associated with severe tissue injury, including skin ulcers and tissue loss, but little is known about the underlying mechanisms. Nonetheless, strategies for prevention and treatment are emerging. The significance and clinical effects of xylazine as an adulterant is focused on 4 domains that merit further evaluation: fentanyl-xylazine overdose, xylazine dependence and withdrawal, xylazine-associated dermal manifestations, and xylazine surveillance and detection in clinical and nonclinical settings. This report reflects the Proceedings of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for the Clinical Trials Network convening of clinical and scientific experts, federal staff, and other stakeholders to describe emerging best practices for treating people exposed to xylazine-adulterated opioids. Participants identified scientific gaps and opportunities for research to inform clinical practice in emergency departments, hospitals, and addiction medicine settings.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Xilazina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , National Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.) , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Opiáceos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 85: 59-64, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39236451

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids increasingly utilized for neuropathic pain, possibly to curb opioid prescribing. At the same time, data suggest subsequent increases in misuse and overdose of gabapentinoids, often in mixed overdoses. We sought to determine national trends and characteristics of gabapentinoid prescribing, including co-use with opioids, from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2012 to 2021. Our primary outcome was the trend in ED visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed at discharge. Secondarily, we identified trends in gabapentinoid and opioid co-prescribing and gabapentin and pregabalin prescribing at ED discharge. We examined demographic data and used descriptive statistics, Shapiro Wilke's test, Pearson's Spearman's rho (SR) or Pearson's correlation coefficient (PC) as applicable. Neural networks were used to identify the most important predictors of opioid utilization during the same visit. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, there were an estimated 7,242,694 (0.53% of all ED visits) visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed at ED discharge. Prescriptions increased from a total of 138,479 (0.1%) in 2012 to 893,495 (0.63%) in 2021 (PC: 0.85, p < 0.001). Opioids were co-prescribed in 27.2% of all visits in which gabapentinoids were prescribed, with no change over time (PC: -0.47, p = 0.09). Pregabalin prescription increased linearly over time (PC: 0.64, p = 0.02). The most important predictors of opioid administration or co-prescribing were whether an alternative provider (e.g., consult or nurse practitioner) saw the patient (100%), insurance (94.4%), age (75.9%), and region (75.2%). CONCLUSION: Despite an association of misuse and overdose, often associated with opioids, gabapentinoids were increasingly prescribed at ED discharge. While these agents may be safer alternatives to opioids, misuse may be an associated consequence of increased prescribing, which warrants further investigation.

4.
J Emerg Med ; 66(1): e1-e9, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37919187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its strongest safety warning ("Black Box Warning") for concomitant use of prescription opioids and benzodiazepines due to overdose deaths. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to look at trends of opioid and benzodiazepine co-prescribing in the emergency department (ED) using national data, because recent data are sparse. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of data collected by the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2012 and 2019. Our primary outcome was to determine whether there was a trend in ED visits when opioids and benzodiazepines were co-prescribed at discharge. We also compared the rate of visits when co-prescribing occurred before (2012-2015) and after (2017-2019) the 2016 FDA warning. We identified commonly co-prescribed benzodiazepines and opioids, and the rate of naloxone co-prescribing. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate tests to describe data. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2019, there were 4,489,613 ED visits (0.41% of ED visits) when benzodiazepines and opioids were co-prescribed. There was no trend in the rate of co-prescribing overall, but a decrease in visits after the 2016 FDA Black Box Warning (2012-2015: mean 0.49%; 2017-2019: mean 0.29%; p < 0.0001). There were 7980 ED visits (0.18%) when naloxone was co-prescribed for these visits within this time frame and an increase over time (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that between 2012 and 2019, there was no overall reduction in co-prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines across EDs nationwide, but a decrease after the 2016 Black Box Warning.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Benzodiazepinas , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Naloxona
5.
Ann Emerg Med ; 81(6): 706-714, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36754699

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The influence of workplace mistreatment on the well-being and career satisfaction of emergency medicine residents is unknown. This study examined the relationships between burnout, career choice regret, and workplace mistreatment in a national sample of emergency medicine residents. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a survey study on the prevalence of workplace mistreatment among emergency residents. Residents who reported emotional exhaustion or depersonalization at least once per week were considered to have burnout. Residents who reported dissatisfaction with their decision to become an emergency physician were considered to have career choice regret. Respondents also reported the type (discrimination, abuse, sexual harassment) and frequency of mistreatment over the academic year. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for program characteristics, was used to examine resident characteristics associated with burnout and career choice regret, with the frequency of mistreatment as a covariate. RESULTS: Of the 8,162 eligible residents, 7,680 (94.1 %) participated. About a third of respondents reported burnout (2,188 of 6,902, 31.7%), whereas a minority (224 of 6,923, 3.2%) reported career choice regret. Of the 7,087 responses on mistreatment frequency, 2,117 (29.9%) reported "a few times per year," and 1,296 (18.3%) reported "a few times per month or more." Compared with residents who never experienced mistreatment, residents who reported increasing frequencies of mistreatment were associated with having burnout-from mistreatment a few times per year (OR [odds ratio],1.6; 99% CI [confidence interval], 1.3 to 1.9) to a few times per month or more (OR, 3.3; 99% CI, 2.7 to 4.1). Compared with residents without burnout, residents who reported burnout were associated with having career choice regret (OR, 11.3; 99% CI, 7.0 to 18.1). After adjusting for burnout, there were no significant relationships between the frequency of mistreatment and career choice regret. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace mistreatment is associated with burnout, but not career choice regret, among emergency medicine residents. Efforts to address workplace mistreatment may improve emergency medicine residents' professional well-being.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Emociones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo
6.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 58(5): 547-552, 2023 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553859

RESUMEN

Our aim was to assess the changes in patients presenting with acute alcohol intoxications or positive screens for problem drinking during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic in a seven-hospital health system. A retrospective chart review of emergency department (ED) visits from seven hospitals in the Washington, DC/Baltimore, and MD area from January 2019 to June 2021 is provided. The health system utilizes a validated system for Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for ED patients. We evaluated trends in patients who had a positive SBIRT screen for problem drinking (AUDIT-C score ≥ 3 in women, 4 in men), alcohol misuse (≥5), and those presenting with acute alcohol intoxication before March 2020 and during the early COVID pandemic period. There were 510 648 patients who were screened, ranging from ages of 16 to 95 years during the study period. There was an overall increase in patients who screened positive for problem drinking, alcohol misuse, and acute intoxications. While there was an overall decrease in the total number of ED visits during the start of the pandemic, which later increased near prepandemic levels, alcohol-related presentations as a percentage of total visits increased during the early pandemic period. There was an overall decrease in ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic study period; problem drinking and acute intoxication presentation held steady, leading to an overall increase in proportion compared to pre-COVID-19 levels. Future research should focus on lessons learned during this time and should navigate the postpandemic care of patients with AUD. There was an increase in the proportion of ED visits for alcohol intoxications and positive screens for problem drinking during the COVID-19 pandemic in our seven-hospital system.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación Alcohólica , Alcoholismo , COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/terapia , Intoxicación Alcohólica/diagnóstico , Intoxicación Alcohólica/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Etanol , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 70: 90-95, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245403

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most obstetric emergencies are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). The Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, eliminated constitutional protection of abortion rights, allowing states to swiftly enact laws that can greatly change reproductive medicine. In this post-Roe landscape, the ambiguity and uncertainty being imposed on clinicians regarding the legality of certain interventions may have catastrophic effects. To understand and plan for the changes that will come and attempt to mitigate adverse outcomes, the authors first assessed the current state of pregnancy-related complication care in the ED setting. This study utilized data obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to evaluate trends in pregnancy-related ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that could be impacted by restricted abortion access and trigger laws. The authors subsequently analyzed the legislative changes and translated the pertinent ones to dispel misunderstandings and provide a framework for appropriate medical practice. METHODS: The retrospective study utilized data from the NHAMCS database from 2016 to 2020, encompassing an estimated total of 4,556,778 pregnancy-related ED visits. NHAMCS is a multi-stage probabilistic sample collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using an annual survey of EDs in the United States. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportions and 95% confidence intervals Furthermore, the supreme court decision was analyzed in addition to multiple state laws and legal texts. The findings were summarized and discussed. RESULTS: The majority (79.4%) of all studied visits were for patients between the ages of 18-34 years, capturing those in peak reproductive years. This age group also comprised of the bulk (76.4%) of visits for pathologic pregnancies, including ectopic and molar pregnancies, and 79.8% of visits for a spontaneous miscarriage or threatened miscarriage in early pregnancy. Black patients accounted for 25.7%, white patients 70.1%. Regarding ethnicity, patients were separated into Hispanic and non-Hispanic, with Hispanic patients comprising 27% of all ED visits for included diagnoses between 2016 and 2020. Most visits for complications following an induced abortion occurred in the south (70.8%) and were nearly twice as likely to occur in non-metropolitan areas. Approximately 18% patients presenting with a pathologic pregnancy required admission to the hospital and approximately 50% of those visits for pathologic pregnancies and visits for bleeding in pregnancy had a procedure in the ED (49.8% and 49.5%). There were 111,264 estimated visits in which methotrexate was administered, amounting to approximately 1 in 7 visits for ectopic or molar pregnancy. In this data set, approximately 14,000 miscarriage and early bleeding patients received misoprostol. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-related ED visits comprise of a significant proportion of emergency care. As it relates to many of the trends previously elucidated on, the true extent of the burden cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that contrary to popular belief, Dobbs v. Jackson does not prohibit termination of pregnancy in the setting of life-threatening conditions to the mother, including ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and others, but the resultant uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding the constitutional change is leading to an over-compliance of the law, necessarily obstructing reproductive health care. The authors recommend that physicians be mindful of the rapidly-evolving laws in their particular state, and to also practice in accordance with Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Patient safety must be prioritized.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Espontáneo , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia
8.
J Emerg Med ; 65(3): e188-e198, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652808

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Experts recommend using the lowest effective dose of naloxone to balance the reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression and avoid precipitated opioid withdrawal, however, there is no established dosing standards within the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to determine current naloxone dosing practice in the ED and their association with adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and EBSCO from 2000-2021. Articles containing patient-level data for initial ED dose and patient outcome had data abstracted by two independent reviewers. Patients were divided into subgroups depending on the initial dose of i.v. naloxone: low dose ([LD], < 0.4 mg), standard dose ([SD], 0.4-2 mg), or high dose ([HD], > 2 mg). Our outcomes were the dose range administered and adverse events per dose. We compared groups using chi-squared difference of proportions or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The review included 13 articles with 209 patients in the results analysis: 111 patients in LD (0.04-0.1 mg), 95 in SD (0.4-2 mg), and 3 in HD (4-12 mg). At least one adverse event was reported in 37 SD patients (38.9%), compared with 14 in LD (12.6%, p < 0.0001) and 2 in HD (100.0%, p = 0.16). At least one additional dose was administered to 53 SD patients (55.8%), compared with 55 in LD (49.5%, p < 0.0001), and 3 in HD (100.0%, p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Lower doses of naloxone in the ED may help reduce related adverse events without increasing the need for additional doses. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of lower doses of naloxone to reverse opioid-induced respiratory depression without causing precipitated opioid withdrawal.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Naloxona/efectos adversos
9.
Ann Emerg Med ; 80(6): 509-524, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35940992

RESUMEN

Buprenorphine induction for treating opioid use disorder is being implemented in emergency care. During this era of high-potency synthetic opioid use, novel and divergent algorithms for buprenorphine induction are emerging to optimize induction experience, facilitating continued treatment. Specifically, in patients with chronic fentanyl or other drug exposures, some clinicians are using alternative buprenorphine induction strategies, such as quickly maximizing buprenorphine agonist effects (eg, macrodosing) or, conversely, giving smaller initial doses and slowing the rate of buprenorphine dosing to avoid antagonist/withdrawal effects (eg, microdosing). However, there is a lack of foundational theory and empirical data to guide clinicians in evaluating such novel induction strategies. We present data from clinical studies of buprenorphine induction and propose a neuropharmacologic working model, which posits that acute clinical success of buprenorphine induction (achieving a positive agonist-to-withdrawal balance) is a nonlinear outcome of the opioid balance at the time of initial buprenorphine dose and mu-opioid-receptor affinity, lipophilicity, and mu-opioid-receptor intrinsic efficacy (the "ALE value") of the prior opioid. We discuss the rationale for administering smaller or larger doses of buprenorphine to optimize the patient induction experience during common clinical situations.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Fentanilo , Algoritmos
10.
Ann Emerg Med ; 80(1): 74-83.e8, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717115

RESUMEN

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2022 annual report on the status of physicians training in Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Acreditación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Becas , Humanos , Estados Unidos
11.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 204(7): e61-e87, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609257

RESUMEN

Background: Severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) is highly morbid, costly, and common among hospitalized patients, yet minimal evidence exists to guide inpatient management. Research needs in this field are broad, spanning the translational science spectrum. Goals: This research statement aims to describe what is known about SAWS, identify knowledge gaps, and offer recommendations for research in each domain of the Institute of Medicine T0-T4 continuum to advance the care of hospitalized patients who experience SAWS. Methods: Clinicians and researchers with unique and complementary expertise in basic, clinical, and implementation research related to unhealthy alcohol consumption and alcohol withdrawal were invited to participate in a workshop at the American Thoracic Society 2019 International Conference. The committee was subdivided into four groups on the basis of interest and expertise: T0-T1 (basic science research with translation to humans), T2 (research translating to patients), T3 (research translating to clinical practice), and T4 (research translating to communities). A medical librarian conducted a pragmatic literature search to facilitate this work, and committee members reviewed and supplemented the resulting evidence, identifying key knowledge gaps. Results: The committee identified several investigative opportunities to advance the care of patients with SAWS in each domain of the translational science spectrum. Major themes included 1) the need to investigate non-γ-aminobutyric acid pathways for alcohol withdrawal syndrome treatment; 2) harnessing retrospective and electronic health record data to identify risk factors and create objective severity scoring systems, particularly for acutely ill patients with SAWS; 3) the need for more robust comparative-effectiveness data to identify optimal SAWS treatment strategies; and 4) recommendations to accelerate implementation of effective treatments into practice. Conclusions: The dearth of evidence supporting management decisions for hospitalized patients with SAWS, many of whom require critical care, represents both a call to action and an opportunity for the American Thoracic Society and larger scientific communities to improve care for a vulnerable patient population. This report highlights basic, clinical, and implementation research that diverse experts agree will have the greatest impact on improving care for hospitalized patients with SAWS.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/terapia , Investigación Biomédica , Depresores del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Etanol/efectos adversos , Hospitalización , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/terapia , Alcoholismo/fisiopatología , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sociedades Médicas , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/fisiopatología , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional
12.
J Emerg Med ; 62(5): 668-674, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35370038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Amidst the opioid epidemic, there has been an increasing focus on opioid utilization in U.S. emergency departments (EDs). Compared with other opioids, little is known about the use of tramadol over the past decade. Tramadol has uncertain efficacy and a concerning adverse effect profile compared with traditional opioids. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe trends in tramadol use in U.S. EDs between 2007 and 2018. METHODS: We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2007 to 2018 to examine ED visits by patients 18 years or older in which tramadol was administered or prescribed. We examined trends in demographics and resource utilization and compared these trends with those of traditional opioids. Survey-weighted analyses were conducted to provide national-level estimates. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2018, ED visits in which tramadol was used increased 70.6%, from 1.7% of all ED visits in 2007 to 2.9% in 2018. The largest increases were noted among patients aged 55 through 64 years and 65 years and older. Diagnostic resource utilization increased across the study period. Overall opioid utilization during the study period decreased from 28.4% in 2007 to 17.9% in 2018 (p < 0.001). The use of other specific opioids declined or remained stable between 2007 and 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of traditional opioids decreased from 2007 to 2018, the use of tramadol increased. Increases were largest among older patients, who may be more susceptible to the adverse effects associated with this medication. Further research in the appropriate use of tramadol in the ED setting is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Epidemias , Tramadol , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Ther Drug Monit ; 43(2): 221-228, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298746

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Discovered in the 1960s, the common anthelminthic levamisole has seen widespread use in veterinary applications. Its use rapidly expanded thereafter to include human medical treatments for a variety of acute and chronic disorders. Because of reports of severe adverse effects, the US Food and Drug Administration withdrew levamisole's approval for human use in 2000; however, medical options outside the United States and illicit options worldwide allow continued accessibility to levamisole. The compound is rapidly metabolized in the body, with at least 2 known active metabolites. Levamisole has a broad range of immunomodulatory effects, including both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on immune responses. It is generally well tolerated at therapeutic concentrations, although a variety of autoimmune-related adverse effects have been reported, including agranulocytosis, leukopenia, purpura, and visible necrotized skin tissue. Individuals with levamisole-compromised immune systems are more susceptible to infections, including COVID-19. Since the early 2000's, levamisole has been frequently used as an adulterating agent in illicit street drugs, especially cocaine, fentanyl, and heroin. Although its prevalence has varied over time and geographically, levamisole has been detected in up to 79% of the street supply of cocaine at levels up to 74% by weight. Its presence in illicit drug markets also raises concern over the potential for exposure of children and neonates, although this is supported by only limited anecdotal evidence. Levamisole is not currently included in routine drug testing panels, although a variety of confirmatory testing techniques exist across a range of antemortem and postmortem specimen options. Because of its varying presence in illicit drug markets, both the medical and forensic communities need to be aware of levamisole and its potential impact on toxicological investigations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Drogas Ilícitas/química , Levamisol/farmacología , Levamisol/toxicidad , Cocaína/química , Femenino , Fentanilo/química , Heroína/química , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Levamisol/química , Levamisol/farmacocinética , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/patología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 137-142, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32081556

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We determine how aggregate costs have changed for commonly used emergency department (ED) medications, and assess drivers of cost increases. METHODS: Using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), we identified the top 150 ED medications administered and prescribed at discharge in 2015. We used average wholesale prices (AWP) for each year from 2006 to 15 from the Red Book (Truven Health Analytics Inc.). Average wholesale price per patient (AWPP) was calculated by dividing AWP by drug uses. This was then multiplied by the total drug administrations or prescriptions to estimate the total cost in a given the year. All prices were converted to 2015 dollars. RESULTS: Aggregate costs of drugs administered in the ED increased from $688.7 million in 2006 to $882.4 million in 2015. For discharge prescriptions, aggregate costs increased from $2.031 billion in 2006 to $4.572 billion in 2015. AWPP for drugs administered in the ED in 2015 was 14.5% higher than in 2006 and 24.3% higher at discharge. The largest absolute increase in AWPP for drugs administered was for glucagon, which increased from $111 in 2006 to $235 in 2015. The largest AWPP increase at discharge was for epinephrine auto-injector, which increased from $124 in 2006 and to $481 in 2015. CONCLUSION: Over the course of the study period, the aggregate costs of the most common medications administered in the ED increased by 28% while the costs of medications prescribed at discharge increased 125%.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Estudios Transversales , Epinefrina/economía , Glucagón/economía , Humanos , Pantoprazol/economía , Alta del Paciente , Pravastatina/economía , Estados Unidos
15.
Ann Emerg Med ; 75(5): 648-667, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336429

RESUMEN

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2020 annual report on the status of physicians training in ACGME-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Becas/normas , Internado y Residencia/normas , Acreditación , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
16.
Inj Prev ; 26(5): 439-447, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31551367

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess whether an enhanced category combining suicides with nonsuicide drug self-intoxication fatalities more effectively captures the burden of self-injury mortality (SIM) in the USA among US non-Hispanic black and Hispanic populations and women irrespective of race/ethnicity. METHODS: This observational study used deidentified national mortality data for 2008-2017 from the CDC's Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. SIM comprised suicides by any method and age at death plus estimated nonsuicide drug self-intoxication deaths at age ≥15 years. Measures were crude SIM and suicide rates; SIM-to-suicide rate ratios; and indices of premature mortality. RESULTS: While the suicide rate increased by 29% for blacks, 36% for Hispanics and 25% for non-Hispanic whites between 2008 and 2017, corresponding SIM rate increases were larger at 109%, 69% and 55% (p<0.0001). SIM:suicide rate ratio gaps were widest among blacks but similar for the other two groups. Gaps were wider for females than males, especially black females whose ratios measured ≥3.71 across the observation period versus <3.00 for white and Hispanic counterparts. Total lost years of life for Hispanic, white and black SIM decedents in 2017 were projected to be 42.6, 37.1 and 32.4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Application of SIM exposed substantial excess burdens from substance poisoning relative to suicide for minorities, particularly non-Hispanic blacks and for women generally. Results underscored the need to define, develop, implement and evaluate comprehensive strategies to address common antecedents of self-injurious behaviours.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Autodestructiva , Suicidio , Adolescente , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Minoritarios , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca
17.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 46(6): 671-683, 2020 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897113

RESUMEN

Opioid use, misuse, and risky use contribute to a critically important and complex crisis in current healthcare. Consequences of long-term opioid use, including opioid induced hyperalgesia, physical dependence, and opioid use disorder, can be considered iatrogenic, or partially iatrogenic, in cases where therapeutic opioid exposures were contributory. Research investigation and presumptive clinical action are needed to attenuate the iatrogenic component of the opioid crisis; treatment of individuals already suffering from opioid use disorder will not prevent incident cases. This work will be challenged by a remarkably high degree of complexity involving myriad and highly variable factors along the continuum from initial opioid exposure to long-term opioid use. An organized view of this complex problem should accelerate the pace of innovation and facilitate clinical implementation of research findings. Herein, we propose a theoretical framework and modern nomenclature for characterizing therapeutic opioid exposure and the degree to which it contributes iatrogenically to adverse outcomes. In doing so, we separate the role of exposure from other factors contributing to long-term opioid use, clarify the relationship between opioid exposure and outcomes, emphasize that exposure source is an important consideration for health services research and practice in the areas of pain treatment and opioid prevention, and recommend terminology necessary to quantify therapeutic opioid exposure separately from nonmedical exposure.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Hiperalgesia/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Terminología como Asunto , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Modelos Teóricos
18.
Subst Abus ; 41(4): 463-467, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32031914

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the midst of this national opioid crisis, it has become apparent that there is a large shortage in the workforce of treatment providers equipped to deliver evidence-based care for opioid use disorders (OUD). Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as buprenorphine, are crucial in reducing mortality in those with OUD, and yet prescribers must meet federal waiver requirements under the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000). There are now several pathways for medical schools to satisfy these waiver requirements for all graduates, but this has not yet become widespread. We propose that including a DATA 2000 waiver training within the medical school curriculum is a feasible and effective way to meet eligibility requirements to prescribe buprenorphine. Methods: As part of a longitudinal opioid curriculum requirement, we implemented a DATA 2000 waiver training for all rising Year 4 medical students. One hundred sixty-nine students completed a hybrid (online and in-person) waiver training. The majority completed a pre- and post-survey. Results: The pre-training survey showed 93% of rising Year 4 medical students (112/120) reported participation in care of patients with OUD. Students six month post-training reported a rise in confidence (1.94 to 2.45; p < 0.01) and knowledge (2.27 to 2.76; p < 0.01) regarding MOUD. They also reported their plans to apply for the buprenorphine waiver once licensed and reported being more likely to prescribe buprenorphine for OUD as a result of the training (mean = 3.35; SD = 1.36; 0 = extremely unlikely to 5 = extremely likely). Conclusions: We successfully implemented a DATA 2000 waiver training as a mandatory requirement for the medical school curriculum. Further studies are needed to determine optimal timing, best format, and frequency of reinforcement of MOUD educational content across the undergraduate and graduate medical education continuum.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Estudiantes de Medicina , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Facultades de Medicina
19.
J Emerg Med ; 58(2): 245-253, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005608

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Precipitated opioid withdrawal (POW) after opioid antagonist administration can be challenging to manage in the emergency department (ED), particularly if caused by a long-acting opioid antagonist such as naltrexone. There are no evidence-based guidelines to assist in safely and efficiently managing patients with this syndrome. OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW: To review current practice on the treatment of long-acting antagonist POW and make recommendations on the treatment of this complex disease process. METHODS: A literature search of opioid withdrawal cases precipitated by naltrexone was done using PubMed. One of the authors screened all the results of this search by title and abstract, leading to a final count of 27 articles that were reviewed in full by all authors. English language cases that involved precipitated opioid withdrawal from a long-acting opioid antagonist were included. Data were extracted, including the precipitant involved and dose, severity of opioid withdrawal, treatments rendered, and response to treatment. In all cases where symptoms and signs were described, a Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale score was calculated based on the information available. RESULTS: Twenty-seven papers were included. Naltrexone alone was the primary antagonist reported in 19 of the papers, extended-release naltrexone in two, naltrexone-morphine combination in two, and nalmefene in four. Treatment most commonly included fluid replacement, benzodiazepines, antiemetics, and clonidine. Full opioid agonist treatment, although often suggested, was poorly described. Buprenorphine successfully reduced the severity and duration of withdrawal in several cases. No standardized response scale was used, and response to treatment ranged from 3 to 48 h prior to resolution of clinical effects. CONCLUSIONS: Management of POW from long-acting antagonists is a complex problem with little formal evaluation of treatment options. There is not currently a sufficiently robust body of literature to support an evidence-based guideline. However, use of intravenous fluids, antiemetics, and benzodiazepines is commonly reported as successful and seems to be a reasonable approach until this process is better studied. A treatment strategy using partial agonists such as buprenorphine is emerging and may represent a safe and effective treatment pathway for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/terapia , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Naltrexona/análogos & derivados , Naltrexona/uso terapéutico
20.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol ; 41(3): 152-159, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404634

RESUMEN

The National Association of Medical Examiners convened an expert panel to update the association's evidence-based recommendations for investigating and certifying deaths associated with opioids and other misused substances to improve death certificate and mortality data for public health surveillance. The recommendations are as follows:1. Autopsy provides the best information on a decedent's medical condition for optimal interpretation of toxicology results, circumstances surrounding death, medical history, and scene findings. The panel considers autopsy an essential component of investigating apparent overdose deaths.2. Scene investigation includes reconciling prescription information and medication counts. Investigators should note drug paraphernalia or other evidence of using intoxicating substances.3. Retain blood, urine, and vitreous humor whenever available. Blood from the iliofemoral vein is preferable to blood from more central sites.4. A toxicological panel should be comprehensive, including potent depressant, stimulant, and antidepressant medications. Detecting novel substances present in the community may require special testing.5. When death is attributed to a drug or combination of drugs (as cause or contributing factor), the certifier should list the drugs by generic name in the autopsy report and death certificate.6. The best classification for manner of death in an overdose without any apparent intent of self-harm is "accident."


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Autopsia/normas , Médicos Forenses , Certificado de Defunción , Sobredosis de Droga/diagnóstico , Analgésicos Opioides/análisis , Causas de Muerte , Patologia Forense/normas , Toxicología Forense/normas , Humanos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/normas , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA