Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 57(3): 470-479, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216396

RESUMEN

Objectives: To describe the baseline characteristics of SLE patients requiring biologic therapy in the UK and to explore short term efficacy and infection rates associated with rituximab (RTX) use. Methods: Patients commencing biologic therapy for refractory SLE and who consented to join BILAG-BR were analysed. Baseline characteristics, disease activity (BILAG 2004/SLEDAI-2K) and rates of infection over follow-up were analysed. Response was defined as loss of all A and B BILAG scores to ⩽ 1 B score with no new A/B scores in other organ systems at 6 months. Results: Two hundred and seventy SLE patients commenced biologic therapy from September 2010 to September 2015, most commonly RTX (n = 261). Two hundred and fifty (93%) patients were taking glucocorticoids at baseline at a median [interquartile range (IQR)] oral dose of 10 mg (5-20 mg) daily. Response rates at 6 months were available for 68% of patients. The median (IQR) BILAG score was 15 (10-23) at baseline and 3 (2-12) at 6 months (P < 0.0001). The median (IQR) SLEDAI-2K reduced from 8 (5-12) to 4 (0-7) (P < 0.001). Response was achieved in 49% of patients. There was also a reduction in glucocorticoid use to a median (IQR) dose of 7.5 mg (5-12 mg) at 6 months (P < 0.001). Serious infections occurred in 26 (10%) patients, being more frequent in the first 3 months post-RTX therapy. A higher proportion of early infections were non-respiratory (odds ratio = 1.98, 95% CI: 0.99, 3.9; P = 0.049). Conclusion: RTX is safe and is associated with improvement in disease activity in refractory SLE patients with concomitant reductions in glucocorticoid use. Early vigilance for infection post-infusion is important to further improve treatment risks and benefits.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
4.
J AOAC Int ; 91(2): 408-13, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18476356

RESUMEN

Melamine in pet food (fortified or originally contaminated) was determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD), and ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The limits of detection (LOD) for EIA and HPLC-DAD were 0.02 and 0.1 microg/mL, respectively. The linear ranges of the calibration curves for EIA and HPLC-DAD were 0.02-0.5 and 0.1-500 microg/mL, respectively. The coefficient of determinations (r2) of the standard curves for EIA and HPLC were 0.9991 and 0.9999, respectively. Coefficient of variations from both inter- and intra-assay were <9.31%, and recovery range for all concentrations was between 71 and 105%. The r2 values between the EIA and HPLC-DAD methods for melamine analysis of the fortified and originally contaminated samples were 0.9973 and 0.9885. The r2 values for UPLC-MS/MS with HPLC-DAD and with EIA were 0.9566 and 0.9489, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Triazinas/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA