Evidence-Based Opioid Education That Reduces Prescribing: The 10 Principles of Opioid Prescribing in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Over half of opioid misusers last obtained access to opioids via a friend or relative, a problematic reflection of the opioid reservoir phenomenon, which results from an unused backlog of excess prescription opioids that are typically stored in the American home. We aim to determine if a voluntary educational intervention containing standard opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing ranges for common surgeries is effective in altering postoperative prescribing practice. We utilized a mixed methods approach and sent out a questionnaire to American podiatric physicians, including residents (baseline group A), via email in early 2020 for baseline data; then, we interviewed foot and ankle surgeons and the primary themes of these semistructured interviews informed us to target residents for an educational intervention. We repeated the survey 3 years later in summer 2022 (preintervention group B). We created an opioid guide and emailed it to residents in fall 2022. Another repeat survey was done in spring 2023 (postintervention group C). We used the Mann-Whitney U test to examine differences between the groups among their reported postoperative opioid quantities for a first metatarsal osteotomy surgical scenario. Groups A, B, and C had 60, 100, and 99 residents, respectively. There was no significant difference (p = .9873) between baseline group A and preintervention group B. There was a difference (p < .0001; -5 median) between preintervention group B and postintervention group C (same residency year). In postintervention group C, a majority (91/99) reported viewing the guide at least once, and the number of residents that reported supplementing with NSAIDs also doubled compared to preintervention group B. This novel opioid educational intervention resulted in meaningful change in self-reported postoperative prescribing behavior among residents.

Prospective multicenter assessment of patient preferences for properties of gadolinium-based contrast media and their potential socioeconomic impact in a screening breast MRI setting.

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown how patients prioritize gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) benefits (detection sensitivity) and risks (reactions, gadolinium retention, cost). The purpose of this study is to measure preferences for properties of GBCM in women at intermediate or high risk of breast cancer undergoing annual screening MRI. METHODS: An institutional reviewed board-approved prospective discrete choice conjoint survey was administered to patients at intermediate or high risk for breast cancer undergoing screening MRI at 4 institutions (July 2018-March 2020). Participants were given 15 tasks and asked to choose which of two hypothetical GBCM they would prefer. GBCMs varied by the following attributes: sensitivity for cancer detection (80-95%), intracranial gadolinium retention (1-100 molecules per 100 million administered), severe allergic-like reaction rate (1-19 per 100,000 administrations), mild allergic-like reaction rate (10-1000 per 100,000 administrations), out-of-pocket cost ($25-$100). Attribute levels were based on published values of existing GBCMs. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis was used to derive attribute "importance." Preference shares were determined by simulation. RESULTS: Response (87% [247/284]) and completion (96% [236/247]) rates were excellent. Sensitivity (importance = 44.3%, 95% confidence interval = 42.0-46.7%) was valued more than GBCM-related risks (mild allergic-like reaction risk (19.5%, 17.9-21.1%), severe allergic-like reaction risk (17.0%, 15.8-18.1%), intracranial gadolinium retention (11.6%, 10.5-12.7%), out-of-pocket expense (7.5%, 6.8-8.3%)). Lower income participants placed more importance on cost and less on sensitivity (p < 0.01). A simulator is provided that models GBCM preference shares by GBCM attributes and competition. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at intermediate or high risk for breast cancer undergoing MRI screening prioritize cancer detection over GBCM-related risks, and prioritize reaction risks over gadolinium retention. KEY POINTS: • Among women undergoing annual breast MRI screening, cancer detection sensitivity (attribute "importance," 44.3%) was valued more than GBCM-related risks (mild allergic reaction risk 19.5%, severe allergic reaction risk 17.0%, intracranial gadolinium retention 11.6%, out-of-pocket expense 7.5%). • Prospective four-center patient preference data have been incorporated into a GBCM choice simulator that allows users to input GBCM properties and calculate patient preference shares for competitor GBCMs. • Lower-income women placed more importance on out-of-pocket cost and less importance on cancer detection (p < 0.01) when prioritizing GBCM properties.

American Podiatric Surgeons' Postoperative Multimodal Analgesic-Prescribing Practice: A 2019-2020 National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a common setting for opioid-naive patients to first be exposed to opioids. Understanding the multimodal analgesic-prescribing habits of podiatric surgeons in the United States may be helpful to refining prescribing protocols. The purpose of this benchmark study was to identify whether certain demographic characteristics of podiatric surgeons were associated with their postoperative multimodal analgesic-prescribing practices. METHODS: We administered a scenario-based, voluntary, anonymous, online questionnaire that consisted of patient scenarios with a unique podiatric surgery followed by a demographics section. We developed multiple logistic regression models to identify associations between prescriber characteristics and the odds of supplementing with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, regional nerve block, and anticonvulsant agent for each scenario. We developed multiple linear regression models to identify the association of multimodal analgesic-prescribing habits and the opioid dosage units prescribed at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty podiatric surgeons completed the survey. Years in practice was a statistically significant variable in multiple scenarios. Compared with those in practice for more than 15 years, podiatric surgeons in practice 5 years or less had increased odds of reporting supplementation with an anticonvulsant agent in scenarios 1 (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-5.18; P = .03), 3 (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.55-5.68; P = .001), 4 (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.56-4.12; P < .001), and 5 (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.29-3.32; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Podiatric surgeons with fewer years in practice had increased odds of supplementing with an anticonvulsant. Approximately one-third of podiatric surgeons reported using some form of a nonopioid analgesic and an opioid in every scenario. The use of multimodal analgesics was associated with a reduction in the number of opioid dosage units prescribed at the time of surgery and may be a reasonable adjunct to current protocols.

Patient-Centered Assessment of the Value of Oral Contrast Material.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to measure the value of oral contrast material from the patient's point of view. METHODS: A prospective HIPAA-compliant survey was administered from August 30, 2016, to March 9, 2017, at two outpatient centers to consecutive outpatients immediately after oral contrast material consumption for abdominopelvic CT. The survey included validated measures of temporary health disutility and oral contrast-specific questions vetted by patient advocates with experience in survey design. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The response rate (93% [218 of 234]) and completion rate (100% [218 of 218]) were excellent. When given a hypothetical choice to not drink oral contrast, most subjects (89% [193 of 218]) stated that they would always drink it for fear of missing an important finding, and only 5 (2%) stated that they would never drink it regardless of risk. Twenty (9%) said that the decision to drink oral contrast would depend on the level of risk, with 18 (8%) indicating that they would accept a 0.01% to 1.00% risk for missing an important finding if they did not have to drink oral contrast. Most patients rated the oral contrast taste as tolerable (55% [120 of 218]); a minority rated it bad or terrible (10% [21 or 218]). Thirty-six subjects (17%) experienced concern or unease (8 minimal, 15 mild, 10 moderate, 3 extreme) when they learned that they had to drink oral contrast, and 36 (17%) experienced oral contrast-induced nausea or abdominal discomfort (10 minimal, 15 mild, 10 moderate, 1 extreme). CONCLUSIONS: If oral contrast material has any diagnostic benefit, most outpatients (89%) would rather drink it than accept any risk for missing an important finding.

Percutaneous image-guided pelvic procedures in women with gynecologic cancers: utilization, complications, and impact on patient management.

PURPOSE: Image-guided percutaneous pelvic procedures often play an important role in the management of women with gynecologic cancers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utilization of and indications for these procedures, and quantify their impact on patient management. METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective record review of percutaneous pelvic procedures requested by gynecologic oncology, 2005 to 2015. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: 392 pelvic procedures, including fluid aspiration, core biopsy, and fine needle aspiration, were performed in 225 women. Procedures were performed under sonographic guidance (303/392, 77.30%), CT guidance (87/392, 22.19%), or both (2/392, 0.51%). Pathology results included: no specimen sent (157/392, 40.05%), new cancer diagnosis (55/392, 14.03%), recurrence or metastasis of known primary cancer (107/392, 27.30%), benign tissue (67/392, 17.09%), and nondiagnostic (6/392, 1.53%). In terms of management, some procedures led to oncologic surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy (158/392, 40.31%), cessation of oncologic treatment (36/392, 9.18%), or treatment of infection (10/392, 2.55%). Many procedures were therapeutic (178/392, 45.41%), while a minority were performed for genomics (1/392, 0.26%) or did not impact clinical management (9/392, 2.30%). The number of procedures per year increased over time during the period of data collection. Date of service was a significant positive predictor of a purely therapeutic procedure (OR 1.69 [95 % CI 1.44-1.98], p < 0.0001) and a significant negative predictor of a malignant diagnosis (OR 0.72 [95 % CI 0.64-0.81], p < 0.0001), for each year later in the 10-year cycle. CONCLUSION: In this single institution study, we identified a trend toward increased utilization of image-guided percutaneous pelvic interventions in women with gynecologic cancers. The case mix has shifted over the past 10 years, with procedures for symptom management constituting a larger proportion and diagnostic procedures constituting a smaller proportion of procedures over time.

Extrapleural Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Foot A Case Report.

Solitary fibrous tumors are uncommon mesenchymal neoplasms that were initially described as pleural tumors, but in recent years, numerous extrapleural sites have been reported. A solitary fibrous tumor is characterized as a circumscribed, painless mass with a patternless growth pattern, positive CD34 spindle-shaped cells, bcl-2, and dense keloidal collagen with areas of hypercellularity and hypocellularity. This case report describes a 55-year-old male veteran who presented with a rare manifestation of an extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor of the medial right hallux. Microscopic and immunohistochemical findings were consistent with the previously documented characteristics of solitary fibrous tumors. Complete surgical excision of the tumor is the treatment of choice.