The COVID-19 pandemic and reproductive genetic counseling: Changes in access and service delivery at an academic medical center in the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic widely disrupted the delivery of healthcare services, including genetic counseling. To ensure continuity of care, the reproductive genetic counselors at a large academic medical center in the United States rapidly transitioned their practice from 90% in-person patient consultations to a predominantly telehealth model. The present study describes this transition in regard to patient access to genetic counseling and genetic screening. A chart review of patients seen by the reproductive genetic counselors from January 2020 to August 2020 was completed. The time frame included the three months prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the first five months during COVID-19. Patient demographics and clinical and appointment data were compared between the pre-COVID-19 and during-COVID-19 timeframes. Overall, 88.6% of patients were seen via telehealth during COVID-19 and there was no significant difference based upon patient age (p = .20), indication for appointment (p = .06), or gestational age (p = .06). However, non-English speaking patients were more often seen in-person than by telehealth (p < .001), and more patients residing farther from the clinic were seen via telehealth (p = .004). During-COVID-19 results for prenatal cell-free DNA screening and expanded carrier screening were delayed (p < .001). Additionally, after consenting to screening, patients seen during COVID-19 were more likely to not complete a sample collection for their intended screening when compared to those seen pre-COVID-19 (OR = 6.15, 95% CI = 1.43-26.70, p = .015). Overall, this study supports that access to genetic counseling services and genetic screening can be maintained during a global pandemic like COVID-19. Genetic counselors are well-equipped to pivot swiftly during challenging times; however, they must continue to work to address other barriers to accessing genetic services, especially for non-English speaking populations. Future studies are needed to pose solutions to the obstacles confronted in this service delivery model during a global pandemic.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genotype Prediction Models in a Pediatric Population.

The Toronto Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) Genotype Score and Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor are risk assessment models developed to estimate a patient's likelihood of testing positive for a pathogenic variant causative of HCM. These models were developed from adult populations with HCM based on factors that have been associated with a positive genotype and have not been validated in external populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall predictive abilities of these models in a clinical pediatric HCM setting. A retrospective medical record review of 77 pediatric patients with gene panel testing for HCM between September 2005 and June 2015 was performed. Clinical and echocardiographic variables used in the developed models were collected and used to calculate scores for each patient. To evaluate model performance, the ability to discriminate between a carrier and non-carrier was assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC) and overall calibration was evaluated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic. Discrimination assessed by AUC was 0.72 (P < 0.001) for the Toronto model and 0.67 (P = 0.004) for the Mayo model. The Toronto model and the Mayo model showed P values of 0.36 and 0.82, respectively, for model calibration. Our findings suggest that these models are useful in predicting a positive genetic test result in a pediatric HCM setting. They may be used to aid healthcare providers in communicating risk and enhance patient decision-making regarding pursuit of genetic testing.

Impact of fetal trisomy 21 on umbilical artery Doppler indices.

OBJECTIVES: Umbilical artery (UA) Doppler indices are surrogate measures of placental function, most commonly used to assess fetal wellbeing in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction. Fetuses with trisomy 21 (t21) are reported to have elevated UA Doppler indices, but reference percentiles are currently lacking for this population. We hypothesized that gestational age-specific values of UA Doppler indices in pregnancies complicated by t21 will be elevated compared to established percentiles based on euploid pregnancies. We aimed to assess UA Doppler indices longitudinally in fetuses with t21 in order to demonstrate Doppler patterns across gestation in this population, compare them with euploid fetuses, and investigate their association with pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with confirmed fetal t21 who underwent UA Doppler surveillance antenatally from January 2012 to August 2019. UA Doppler indices, including systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, pulsatility index (PI), and resistance index (RI) were extracted from ultrasound reports or directly from ultrasound images. UA S/D, PI, and RI percentiles by gestational week were created from available observations from our cohort via a data-driven approach using a generalized additive model. A secondary analysis was run to statistically compare t21 values to established percentiles based on observations from a historical population of euploid fetuses. RESULTS: UA Doppler measurements from 86 t21 fetuses and 130 euploid fetuses were included in our analysis. Median (IQR) maternal age in t21 pregnancies and euploid pregnancies were 35 years (29-38) and 30 years (27-33), respectively. As in euploid fetuses, we found a negative association between Doppler indices and gestational age in the t21 fetuses. Maternal tobacco use, obesity, or chronic hypertension had no significant effect on UA Doppler indices. As hypothesized, values for UA S/D ratio, PI, and RI at the 2.5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97.5th percentiles by gestational week were significantly higher in t21 fetuses compared to euploid fetuses (p<.001). Overall, 55.8% (48/86) of the t21 fetuses demonstrated at least one Doppler value above the 95th percentile for gestational age based on euploid reference standard. At birth, eight (9.3%) of the t21 fetuses were small for gestational age. When these pregnancies were removed from analysis, UA Doppler indices remained significantly higher than established percentiles at each week of gestation (p < .001). Only three pregnancies ended in fetal demise in the t21 population, two of which had persistently elevated Dopplers above the 95th percentile per established reference percentiles. CONCLUSIONS: At each week of gestation, UA Doppler indices in t21 fetuses were significantly higher than established percentiles from a euploid population. Reference intervals based on euploid fetuses may therefore not be appropriate for antenatal surveillance of fetuses with t21. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the role and impact of serial UA Doppler velocimetry in the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by fetal t21.