Risk Phenotypes, Comorbidities, Pharmacotherapy, and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in a Cohort with Difficult-to-Treat Depression in Comparison to an Unmedicated Control Group.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15-25% of depressed patients suffer from difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). Patients with DTD require a thorough examination to avoid the oversight of treatable (psychiatric/somatic) comorbidities or (pseudo-)resistance to antidepressant drugs (ADs). Polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 2D6 and 2C19, which play a major role in the metabolism of ADs, may contribute to resistance to ADs. Patients with DTD might benefit from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHODS: We enrolled 109 patients with DTD and 29 untreated depressed controls (UDC). We assessed risk phenotypes, comorbidities, and treatment, including ECT. We also performed pharmacokinetic analyses of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. RESULTS: DTD patients significantly more often suffered from comorbid psychiatric diseases, especially ICD-10: F40-F48 (DTD:40.4%, UDC:17.2%, OR 11.87, p=0.011) than UDC patients. DTD patients receiving ECT were more likely to achieve remission (37.7% vs. 11.8%, OR=3.96, p=0.023). Treatment with ADs did not differ between remitters and non-remitters. No significant differences were observed in the distribution of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variants between both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with DTD appear to experience comorbid neurotic stress and somatoform disorders (ICD-10: F40 - F48) more frequently. Therefore, a comprehensive differential diagnosis is crucial when patients do not respond sufficiently to antidepressant medication. Genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 should be considered.

Neurological soft signs and olfactory dysfunction in patients with borderline personality disorder.

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 2.7-5.9% and is thought to correlate with altered neuroplasticity. The aim of the present study is to investigate possible associations of BPD (-severity) and alterations in neurological soft signs (NSS) and olfactory function. METHODS: For the monocentric observational study, 39 female subjects with a BPD diagnosis and 19 female healthy control subjects were recruited. The groups were matched by age. Olfactory functions were examined using Sniffin' Sticks. NSS were assessed by a standardized test with 50 items. RESULTS: BPD subjects have higher NSS scores in group comparison. By contrast, there are no alterations in the total score of olfactory function, while the BPD subjects scored higher in smell identification. Within the BPD group, the total NSS score was discovered to have a negative correlation with olfactory function. BPD subjects taking antipsychotics show more NSS than those without. We found no significant influence of posttraumatic stress disorder on the NSS or olfactory function. The BPD-severity correlates with NSS. LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional design, we did not have a follow up examination. The sample size was small, and all patients had psychiatric comorbidities. Additionally, we did not perform MRI to connect our findings with possible structural abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed altered NSS in BPD patients, whereas no impairment in the olfactory function was found. Further research is required to establish NSS and smell tests as clinical screening tools in BPD patients and to uncover the disorder's impact on neuroplasticity.

The significance of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of 564 psychiatric patients: Multiple sclerosis is more common than autoimmune-encephalitis.

The analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an essential tool for the differential diagnosis of psychiatric disorders caused by autoimmune inflammation or infections. Clear guidelines for CSF analysis are limited and mainly available for schizophrenia and dementia. Thus, insights into CSF changes in psychiatric patients largely derive from research. We analyzed the clinical and CSF data of 564 psychiatric patients without pre-existing neurological diagnoses from March 1998 to April 2020. Primary aim was to detect previously undiagnosed neurological conditions as underlying cause for the psychiatric disorder. Following CSF analysis, 8 % of patients (47/564) were diagnosed with a neurological disorder. This was the case in 12.0 % (23/193) of patients with affective disorders, 7.2 % (19/262) of patients with schizophrenia, and 4.0 % (23/193) of patients with anxiety disorders. The predominant new diagnoses were multiple sclerosis (19/47) and autoimmune encephalitis (10/47). Abnormal CSF findings without any implications for further treatment were detected in 17.0 % (94/564) of patients. Our data indicates that CSF analysis in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders may uncover underlying organic causes, most commonly multiple sclerosis and autoimmune encephalitis. Our findings imply that the incorporation of CSF analysis in routine psychiatric assessments is potentially beneficial.

Validation of the predictive value of BDNF -87 methylation for antidepressant treatment success in severely depressed patients-a randomized rater-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is essential for antidepressant treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Our repeated studies suggest that DNA methylation of a specific CpG site in the promoter region of exon IV of the BDNF gene (CpG -87) might be predictive of the efficacy of monoaminergic antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and others. This trial aims to evaluate whether knowing the biomarker is non-inferior to treatment-as-usual (TAU) regarding remission rates while exhibiting significantly fewer adverse events (AE). METHODS: The BDNF trial is a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded diagnostic study conducted at five university hospitals in Germany. The study's main hypothesis is that {1} knowing the methylation status of CpG -87 is non-inferior to not knowing it with respect to the remission rate while it significantly reduces the AE rate in patients experiencing at least one AE. The baseline assessment will occur upon hospitalization and a follow-up assessment on day 49 (± 3). A telephone follow-up will be conducted on day 70 (± 3). A total of 256 patients will be recruited, and methylation will be evaluated in all participants. They will be randomly assigned to either the marker or the TAU group. In the marker group, the methylation results will be shared with both the patient and their treating physician. In the TAU group, neither the patients nor their treating physicians will receive the marker status. The primary endpoints include the rate of patients achieving remission on day 49 (± 3), defined as a score of ≤ 10 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24), and the occurrence of AE. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol has received approval from the Institutional Review Boards at the five participating universities. This trial holds significance in generating valuable data on a predictive biomarker for antidepressant treatment in patients with MDD. The findings will be shared with study participants, disseminated through professional society meetings, and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00032503. Registered on 17 August 2023.