Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 31(5): 1107-1117, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32238473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant CKD following surgery for kidney cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but identifying patients at increased CKD risk remains difficult. Simple methods to stratify risk of clinically significant CKD after nephrectomy are needed. METHODS: To develop a tool for stratifying patients' risk of CKD arising after surgery for kidney cancer, we tested models in a population-based cohort of 699 patients with kidney cancer in Queensland, Australia (2012-2013). We validated these models in a population-based cohort of 423 patients from Victoria, Australia, and in patient cohorts from single centers in Queensland, Scotland, and England. Eligible patients had two functioning kidneys and a preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The main outcome was incident eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 12 months postnephrectomy. We used prespecified predictors-age ≥65 years old, diabetes mellitus, preoperative eGFR, and nephrectomy type (partial/radical)-to fit logistic regression models and grouped patients according to degree of risk of clinically significant CKD (negligible, low, moderate, or high risk). RESULTS: Absolute risks of stage 3b or higher CKD were <2%, 3% to 14%, 21% to 26%, and 46% to 69% across the four strata of negligible, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively. The negative predictive value of the negligible risk category was 98.9% for clinically significant CKD. The c statistic for this score ranged from 0.84 to 0.88 across derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple scoring system can reproducibly stratify postnephrectomy CKD risk on the basis of readily available parameters. This clinical tool's quantitative assessment of CKD risk may be weighed against other considerations when planning management of kidney tumors and help inform shared decision making between clinicians and patients.


Asunto(s)
Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Med J Aust ; 207(3): 127-133, 2017 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764630

RESUMEN

Increased early and incidental detection, improved surgical techniques and technological advancement mean that the management of renal mass lesions is constantly evolving. The treatment of choice for renal mass lesions has historically been radical nephrectomy. Partial nephrectomy is now recommended for localised renal masses, owing to favourable renal functional outcomes. Ablative renal surgery confers a significant risk of chronic kidney disease. There are few studies assessing long term outcomes of nephrectomy on renal outcomes, and virtually no studies assessing long term outcomes for less invasive therapies such as ablation. Unless a renal mass is clearly benign on imaging, management decisions will be made with an assumption of malignancy. The content of this review applies to both benign and malignant renal mass lesions. We advocate for improved strategies for kidney function assessment and risk stratification, early targeted referral, and regular screening for chronic kidney disease for all patients after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Ablación por Catéter , Creatinina/sangre , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tamizaje Masivo , Derivación y Consulta , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Electrophoresis ; 34(11): 1663-9, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417432

RESUMEN

The present study was aimed at the identification of proteins that are differentially expressed in the urine of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), those with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and age-matched healthy male control subjects. Using a combination of 2DE and MS/MS, significantly lower expression of urinary saposin B and two different fragments of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor light chain (ITIL) was demonstrated in the PCa patients compared to the controls. However, only one of the ITIL fragments was significantly different between the PCa and BPH patients. When image analysis was performed on urinary proteins that were transferred onto NC membranes and detected using a lectin that binds to O-glycans, a truncated fragment of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 was the sole protein found to be significantly enhanced in the PCa patients compared to the controls. Together, these urinary peptide fragments might be useful complementary biomarkers to indicate PCa as well as to distinguish it from BPH, although further epidemiological evidence on the specificity and sensitivity of the protein candidates is required.


Asunto(s)
alfa-Globulinas/orina , Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Hiperplasia Prostática/orina , Neoplasias de la Próstata/orina , Saposinas/orina , Anciano , alfa-Globulinas/análisis , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel Bidimensional , Glicosilación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Próstata/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Saposinas/análisis , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem
5.
Electrophoresis ; 33(12): 1855-62, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22740474

RESUMEN

Diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently much reliant on the invasive and time-consuming transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland, particularly in light of the inefficient use of prostate-specific antigen as its biomarker. In the present study, we have profiled the sera of patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using the gel- and lectin-based proteomics methods and demonstrated the significant differential expression of apolipoprotein AII, complement C3 beta chain fragment, inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 fragment, transthyretin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and high molecular weight kininogen (light chain) between the two groups of patients' samples. Our data are suggestive of the potential use of the serum proteins as complementary biomarkers to effectively discriminate PCa from BPH, although this requires further extensive validation on clinically representative populations.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Hiperplasia Prostática/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Proteómica/métodos , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/química , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Proteínas Sanguíneas/química , Proteínas Sanguíneas/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Electroforesis en Gel Bidimensional , Glicoproteínas/sangre , Glicoproteínas/química , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Humanos , Lectinas/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA