Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 15(1): 31-8, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19197094

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the type and frequency of chromosomal anomalies and Y-microdeletions among Hong Kong Chinese subfertile men with sperm concentrations lower than 5 million/mL. DESIGN. Retrospective study. SETTING: A reproductive centre in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 295 Chinese subfertile men who underwent both karyotyping and Y-microdeletion studies from 2000 to 2007 were categorised as having non-obstructive azoospermia (n=71), very severe oligospermia (sperm concentration>0 and 2 and <5 million/mL, n=66). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Karyotyping and Y-microdeletion studies. RESULTS: The prevalence of chromosomal anomalies and Y-microdeletions in the study population were 8.5% (25/295; 95% confidence interval, 5.6-12.3%) and 6.4% (19/295; 3.9-9.9%), respectively. The total prevalence of chromosomal anomalies and Y-microdeletions was 13.2% (39/295; 95% confidence interval, 9.6-17.6%) as five cases of non-obstructive azoospermia showed both Y structural alterations and AZFbc deletion. The corresponding figures for chromosomal anomalies in the groups with non-obstructive azoospermia, very severe oligospermia, and severe oligospermia were 21.1% (15/71; 95% confidence interval, 12.3-32.4%), 5.7% (9/158; 2.6-10.5%), and 1.5% (1/66; 0.0-8.2%). While for Y-microdeletions they were 8.5% (6/71; 3.2-17.5%), 8.2% (13/158; 4.5-13.7%) and 0% (0/66; 0.0-4.4%), respectively. The respective overall prevalence rates for chromosomal anomalies and Y-microdeletions in these groups were: 22.5% (16/71; 13.5-34.0%), 13.9% (22/158; 8.9-20.3%), and 1.5% (1/66; 0.0-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings strongly support the recommendation for both karyotyping and Y-microdeletion analyses in subfertile men with sperm concentrations of 2 million/mL or lower before they undergo assisted reproduction treatment.


Asunto(s)
Deleción Cromosómica , Cromosomas Humanos Y , Infertilidad Masculina/epidemiología , Infertilidad Masculina/genética , Aberraciones Cromosómicas Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Bases de Datos Factuales , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Humanos , Cariotipificación , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recuento de Espermatozoides
2.
Clin Biochem ; 39(3): 219-23, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16515778

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify the extra chromosomal material on 46,XX,21p+ for prenatal diagnosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Conventional cytogenetic studies using GTG (G bands by trypsin using Giemsa) and CBG (C bands by barium hydroxide using Giemsa) techniques were performed on chromosomes at metaphase obtained from cultured amniocytes and parental blood lymphocytes. Molecular cytogenetic techniques, QF-PCR (quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction), FISH (fluorescent in-situ hybridization), and DA-DAPI (Distamycin A and 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole) staining, were then used to clarify the extra material present on fetal chromosome 21 p. RESULTS: The extra material on fetal chromosome 21 p has originated from Yqh, most likely at PAR2 (the secondary pseudoautosomal region). The karyotype should be 46,XX,der(21)t(Y;21)(q12;p13)de novo.ish der(21)t(Y;21)(q12;p13) (EST Cdy16c07+). CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the usefulness of molecular techniques in the investigation of rare chromosomal rearrangements.


Asunto(s)
Feto/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Translocación Genética/genética , Adulto , Líquido Amniótico/citología , Células Cultivadas , Bandeo Cromosómico , Cromosomas Humanos Par 21/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Y/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Cariotipificación , Metafase/genética , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA