Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in patients with central nervous system tumours.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a possibility of reseeding cancer cells potentially present in frozen ovarian tissue from patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours? SUMMARY ANSWER: Malignancy reseeding in cryopreserved ovarian tissue from 20 patients with CNS tumours was not detected by histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), molecular biology or xenotransplantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ovarian metastasis potential has been documented in patients with leukaemia, borderline ovarian tumours, advanced breast cancer and Ewing sarcoma. However, data on the safety of transplanting frozen-thawed ovarian tissue from cancer patients with CNS tumours are still lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective experimental study was conducted in an academic gynaecology research laboratory using cryopreserved ovarian cortex from 20 patients suffering from CNS tumours. Long-term (5 months) xenografting was performed in immunodeficient mice. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Subjects enrolled in the study were suffering from one of six types of CNS tumours including medulloblastoma, ependymoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumours, astrocytoma, glioblastoma and germinoma. The presence of malignant cells was investigated with disease-specific markers for each patient in cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian tissue by histology, IHC via expression of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) for quantification of GFAP and ENO2 gene amplification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Serial sections of cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian tissue from 20 patients showed no malignant cells by histology. All samples were negative for NSE and GFAP, although these neural markers were expressed extensively in the patients' primary tumours. Analysis by RT-ddPCR revealed no cancer cells detected in cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian fragments from subjects with astrocytoma, ependymoma, glioblastoma or medulloblastoma. Taken together, the study found no evidence of malignancy seeding in frozen-thawed and xenotransplanted ovarian tissue from patients affected by CNS cancers. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This analysis cannot guarantee complete elimination of disseminated disease from all cryopreserved ovarian cortex, since we are unable to examine the fragments used for transplantation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first study to be conducted in patients with CNS cancers undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation, and clearly demonstrates no tumour seeding in their frozen-thawed and xenografted tissue. This information is vital for doctors to provide patients with meaningful and accurate advice on the possibilities and risks of ovarian tissue reimplantation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique-the Excellence of Science (FNRS-EOS), number 30443682 awarded to M.-M.D. and T.Y.T.N., FNRS grant number 5/4/150/5 and FNRS-PDR Convention grant number T.0077.14 awarded to M.-M.D., grant 2018-042 from the Foundation Against Cancer awarded to A.C., and private donations (Ferrero, de Spoelberch). The authors declare no competing financial interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults.

Chemotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy and ovarian surgery have known gonadotoxic effects that can lead to endocrine dysfunction, cessation of ovarian endocrine activity and early depletion of the ovarian reserve, causing a risk for future fertility problems, even in children. Important determinants of this risk are the patient's age and ovarian reserve, type of treatment and dose. When the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency is high, fertility preservation strategies must be offered to the patient. Furthermore, fertility preservation may sometimes be needed in conditions other than cancer, such as in non-malignant diseases or in patients seeking fertility preservation for personal reasons. Oocyte and/or embryo vitrification and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are the two methods currently endorsed by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, yielding encouraging results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates. The choice of one technique above the other depends mostly on the age and pubertal status of the patient, and personal and medical circumstances. This review focuses on the available fertility preservation techniques, their appropriateness according to patient age and their efficacy in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.

Is Ovarian Tissue Transplantation Safe in Patients with Central Nervous System Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors?

The risk of reseeding malignancy harbored in cryopreserved and transplanted ovarian tissue has been a source of concern. This study aimed to determine the potential relationship between frozen-thawed ovarian tissue transplantation and primary cancer recurrence. Three patients with cerebral primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) were included in this study. One woman gave birth to three healthy babies following reimplantation of her cryopreserved ovarian tissue, but subsequently died due to cancer relapse six years after ovarian tissue transplantation. The second subject died from progressive cancer, while the third is still alive and awaiting reimplantation of her ovarian tissue in due course. Frozen ovarian cortex from all three patients was analyzed and xenotransplanted to immunodeficient mice for five months. Main outcomes were the presence of cancer cells in the thawed and xenografted ovarian tissue at histology, immunostaining (expression of neuron-specific enolase and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)), and reverse-transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) (levels of enolase 2 and GFAP). In conclusion, no malignant cells were detected in ovarian tissue from patients with PNET, even in those who experienced recurrence of the disease, meaning that the risk of reseeding cancer cells with ovarian tissue transplantation in these patients can be considered low.