Long-Term Follow-Up of De Novo Use of mTOR and Calcineurin Inhibitors After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Long-term efficacy and safety of de novo use of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) have been evaluated primarily using registry data. METHODS: This was a pooled retrospective analysis of data obtained from 10 prospective randomized trials in de novo kidney transplant recipients (n = 581) receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) combined with sirolimus (n = 329), everolimus (n = 128), or antimetabolites (n = 124). RESULTS: There were no differences in patient (84.5 versus 80.9 versus 89.7%, P = 0.996), graft (65.4 versus 59.5 versus 73.1%, P = 0.868), and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free (78.1 versus 77.3 versus 79.0%, P = 0.976) survivals, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was lower (6 versus 3 versus 11%, P = 0.024) but treatment discontinuation was higher among patients receiving mTORi (66.0 versus 47.7 versus 31.5%, P < 0.001), respectively. At 5 years, median estimated glomerular filtration rate (49.6 versus 43.9 versus 53.2 mL/min, P = 0.006) was lower and the proportion of patients with proteinuria (53 versus 40 versus 23%, P < 0.001) was higher among patients receiving mTORi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of de novo use of mTORi is comparable with that of antimetabolites in kidney transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor. Apart from the lower cytomegalovirus infection rate, the safety profile is unfavorable, showing higher treatment discontinuation rates and higher incidence of proteinuria.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: The short-term efficacy and safety of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus have been described in several clinical trials. Yet, detailed long-term data comparing the use of everolimus or mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus are lacking. METHODS: This is a 5-y follow-up post hoc analysis of a prospective trial including 288 patients who were randomized to receive a single 3-mg/kg dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus (EVR), and prednisone (rabbit antithymocyte globulin/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (basiliximab/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (basiliximab/mycophenolate, n = 101). RESULTS: There were no differences in the incidence of treatment failure (31.8% versus 40.2% versus 34.7%, P = 0.468), de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (6.5% versus 11.7% versus 4.0%, P = 0.185), patient (92.9% versus 94.1% versus 92.1%, P = 0.854), and death-censored graft (87.1% versus 90.2% versus 85.1%, P = 0.498) survivals. Using a sensitive analysis, the trajectories of estimated glomerular filtration rate were comparable in the intention-to-treat (P = 0.145) and per protocol (P = 0.354) populations. There were no differences in study drug discontinuation rate (22.4% versus 30.4% versus 17.8%, P = 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this analysis in a cohort of de novo low/moderate immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients suggests that the use of a single 3 mg/kg rabbit antithymocyte globulin dose followed by EVR combined with reduced tacrolimus concentrations was associated with similar efficacy and renal function compared with the standard of care immunosuppressive regimen.

Targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The identification of the best strategy to manage cytomegalovirus infection is hampered by uncertainties regarding the risk/benefit ratios of universal prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy, the impact of indirect cytomegalovirus effects and the associated costs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of targeted preemptive therapy according to perceived risk of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation. METHODS: 144 adult kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in this 12-month study. None received cytomegalovirus pharmacological prophylaxis. Only high risk patients (positive donor/negative recipient (D+/R-), use of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, treatment of rejection) received preemptive therapy based on the result of pp65 antigenemia test. Low-risk patients with symptoms related to cytomegalovirus were screened for pp65 antigenemia and treatment initiated if confirmed cytomegalovirus disease. Blinded cytomegalovirus DNAemia was collected weekly during the first three months. RESULTS: The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 34% and cytomegalovirus disease was 17%. The incidence was 25% in D+/R-, 69% in those receiving induction with rabbit antithymocite globulin (r-ATG), 46% in those treated for acute rejection, and 28% in low risk patients. By week 3 DNAemia was observed in 30% of patients who were not treated for cytomegalovirus infection/disease, and values ≥2.169UI/mL showed 61% sensitivity and 85% specificity to detect cytomegalovirus disease (AUC=0.849±0.042, p<0.001). Using multivariate analysis, only anti-thymocyte globulin induction was associated with cytomegalovirus infection/disease whereas only expanded donor criteria and renal function at 30 days were associated with renal function 12 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Targeted preemptive therapy in patients with perceived higher risk for cytomegalovirus infection/disease was effective in preventing severe clinical presentation, including tissue invasive and late cytomegalovirus infection. This strategy is associated with direct and indirect cost-savings.