RESUMEN
New York City has been at the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has already infected over a million people and resulted in more than 70,000 deaths as of early May 2020 in the United States alone. This rapid and enormous influx of patients into the health care system has had profound effects on all aspects of health care, including the care of patients with cancer. In this report, the authors highlight the transformation they underwent within the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology as they prepared for the COVID-19 crisis in New York City. Under stressful and uncertain conditions, some of the many changes they enacted within their division included developing a regular line of communication among division leaders to ensure the development and implementation of a restructuring strategy, completely reconfiguring the inpatient and outpatient units, rapidly developing the ability to perform telemedicine video visits, and creating new COVID-rule-out and COVID-positive clinics for their patients. These changes allowed them to manage the storm while minimizing the disruption of important continuity of care to their patients with cancer. The authors hope that their experiences will be helpful to other oncology practices about to experience their own individual COVID-19 crises.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Hematología/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/organización & administración , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Comunicación , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Hematología/métodos , Humanos , Oncología Médica/métodos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Aislamiento de Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Peripheral blood smear (A) demonstrates increased numbers of plasma cells (representative cells indicated by arrows), (B) demonstrates polytypic nature of plasma cells.
Asunto(s)
Linfadenopatía Inmunoblástica , Leucemia de Células Plasmáticas , Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Linfoma de Células T , Humanos , Leucemia de Células Plasmáticas/patología , Linfadenopatía Inmunoblástica/patología , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Linfoma de Células T/patología , Linfoma de Células T Periférico/patologíaRESUMEN
Proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are two major types of drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Although different combination therapies for myeloma have been developed and achieved high responsive rate, these strategies frequently result in drug resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches to fulfill this unmet medical need. Here, we find that proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Btz) causes cereblon (CRBN) cleavage and that caspase-8 (CASP-8) is responsible for this cleavage. Either inhibition or genetic depletion of CASP-8 decreased the CRBN cleavage upon Btz treatment, which could potentiate the antimyeloma activity of IMiD lenalidomide (Len). This work suggests that administration of CASP-8 inhibitors might enhance the overall effectiveness of Btz/Len-based therapeutic treatment of patients with myeloma. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Caspase-8 activation upon bortezomib treatment results in the cleavage of cereblon, a substrate receptor of the cullin-4 RING E3 ligase, which is responsible for the degradation of two transcription factors, Ikaros family zinc finger protein (IKZF) 1 and IKZF3, in the presence of immunomodulatory drugs including lenalidomide. The administration of caspase-8 inhibitor may enhance the antimyeloma activity of the combination therapy with bortezomib and lenalidomide.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Caspasa 8/metabolismo , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/enzimología , Caspasa 8/genética , Inhibidores de Caspasas/farmacología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Células K562 , Mieloma Múltiple/genéticaRESUMEN
The phase 3 CLARION study compared carfilzomib-melphalan-prednisone (KMP) with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to KMP or VMP for nine 42-day cycles (C). Patients received carfilzomib on days (D) 1, 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 29, 30 (20 mg/m2: C1D1, C1D2; 36 mg/m2 thereafter) or bortezomib on D1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, 32 (1.3 mg/m2; D4, 11, 25, 32 omitted for C5-9). Melphalan (9 mg/m2) and prednisone (60 mg/m2) were administered on D1-4. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Nine hundred fifty-five patients were randomized (intention-to-treat population: KMP, n = 478; VMP, n = 477). Median PFS was 22.3 months with KMP vs 22.1 months with VMP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.906; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746-1.101; P = .159). Median overall survival was similar and not reached in either group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.82-1.43). Overall response rate was 84.3% for KMP and 78.8% for VMP. Complete response rate was 25.9% for KMP and 23.1% for VMP. Minimal residual disease-negative rates were 15.7% (KMP) and 15.5% (VMP). Adverse events (AEs) of interest (any grade) occurring with a ≥5% higher patient incidence in the KMP arm were acute renal failure (13.9% [KMP] vs 6.2% [VMP]) and cardiac failure (10.8% vs 4.3%). Grade ≥3 AE rates were 74.7% (KMP) and 76.2% (VMP). Grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy was lower for KMP vs VMP (2.5% vs 35.1%). Treatment with KMP in CLARION did not yield a statistically significant difference in PFS vs VMP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01818752.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In ENDEAVOR, carfilzomib (56 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (Kd56) demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) over bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here we evaluated Kd56 vs Vd by baseline renal function in a post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis. The intent-to-treat population included 929 patients (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥15 to <50 mL/min, n = 85 and n = 99; CrCL 50 to <80 mL/min, n = 186 and n = 177; and CrCL ≥80 mL/min, n = 193 and n = 189 for Kd56 and Vd arms, respectively). In these respective subgroups, median PFS was 14.9 vs 6.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.320-0.757), 18.6 vs 9.4 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.351-0.652), and not reached (NR) vs 12.2 months (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.434-0.827) for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively; median overall survival (OS) was 42.1 vs 23.7 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.443-0.989), 42.5 vs 32.8 months (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.626-1.104), and NR vs 42.3 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.554-1.009). Complete renal response (ie, CrCL improvement to ≥60 mL/min in any 2 consecutive visits if baseline CrCL <50 mL/min) rates were 15.3% (95% CI, 8.4-24.7) and 14.1% (95% CI, 8.0-22.6) for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively. In a combined Kd56 and Vd analysis, complete renal responders had longer median PFS (14.1 vs 9.4 months; HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.438-1.481) and OS (35.3 vs 29.7 months; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.524-1.577) vs nonresponders. Grade ≥3 adverse event rates in the respective subgroups were 87.1% vs 79.4%, 84.4% vs 71.8%, and 77.1% vs 65.9% for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively. Thus, Kd56 demonstrated PFS and OS improvements over Vd in RRMM patients regardless of their baseline renal function. The ENDEAVOR trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01568866.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Twice-weekly carfilzomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is an effective regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here we evaluated once-weekly carfilzomib with Rd (once-weekly KRd) in NDMM patients. The NDMM patients were enrolled regardless of transplant eligibility. Patients received carfilzomib on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on carfilzomib days (also day 22 for cycles 1-8) for ≤18, 28-day cycles. Enrollment initiated in a carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m2 (20 mg/m2 on cycle one, day 1; 70 mg/m2 thereafter) NDMM dose-expansion arm, which was suspended because of serious adverse events. After evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities in a two-step-up dose-evaluation cohort, an NDMM dose-expansion arm (carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 ) was opened. Fifty-one NDMM patients were enrolled in dose-finding and dose-expansion cohorts. Results are presented for the carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 NDMM dose-expansion arm (n = 33). The grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) rate was 63.6%. Twenty-five patients underwent stem cell collection; 18 proceeded to auto stem cell transplant, and five resumed KRd on study after autoSCT. The overall response rate (ORR) based on best overall response by cycle four was 97.0% (≥very good partial response [VGPR], 69.7%) in the NDMM 20/56 mg/m2 cohort. In patients who did not receive autoSCT (n = 15), the median number of cycles was 16.0; ORR was 93.3% (≥VGPR, 80.0%). At a median follow-up of 8.1 months, median progression-free survival was not reached. Once-weekly KRd (carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 ) had a favorable safety profile and promising activity in NDMM, supporting the use of this regimen in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Combination treatment regimens including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and a corticosteroid are standards of care for initial treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We aimed to evaluate if a sequential treatment program using PI induction followed by IMiD based consolidation and maintenance could achieve similar outcomes with reduced toxicities. This phase 2 study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Car-BiRd regimen: carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) induction until maximum response, followed by lenalidomide, clarithromycin and dexamethasone (BiRd) consolidation until next maximum response, then lenalidomide maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Seventy-two patients, including both transplant eligible and ineligible patients, were enrolled and evaluated for response. The overall response rate to the Car-BiRd regimen was 94% with 83% of patients achieving a ≥ VGPR and 35% achieving a CR/sCR. The rate of CR/sCR increased from 7% with Kd induction to 21% with BiRd consolidation and 35% with lenalidomide maintenance. These results did not meet the study's target endpoint of a CR rate of 55%. The median PFS using this deferred transplant approach was 37.3 months (95% CI 27.9, 52.7) and median OS was not reached with a median follow-up of 60 months. Toxicities were primarily low grade and manageable. Hematologic toxicities were lower than those expected with a combination PI/IMiD protocol. The sequential Car-BiRd regimen is an effective and safe approach for the upfront treatment of MM including patients unfit for transplant.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Claritromicina/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) inevitably relapse on initial treatment regimens, and novel combination therapies are needed. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, an enzyme implicated in growth and survival of MM cells. Preclinical data suggest supra-additivity or synergy between ibrutinib and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) against MM. This phase 1/2b study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus the PI carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). In this final analysis, we report results in patients who received the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; ibrutinib 840 mg and carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 with dexamethasone), which was determined in phase 1. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Fifty-nine patients with RRMM received the RP2D (18 in phase 1 and 41 in phase 2b). These patients had received a median of three prior lines of therapy; 69% were refractory to bortezomib, and 90% were refractory to their last treatment. ORR in the RP2D population was 71% (stringent complete response and complete response: 3% each). Median duration of clinical benefit and median duration of response were both 6.5 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 35.9 months. High-risk patients had comparable ORR and median PFS (67% and 7.7 months, respectively) to non-high-risk patients, whose ORR was 73% and median PFS was 6.9 months, whereas median OS in high-risk patients was 13.9 months and not reached in non-high-risk patients. The most common grade ≥3 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia and thrombocytopenia (17% each); the most common grade ≥3 non-hematologic TEAE was hypertension (19%). In patients with RRMM treated with multiple previous lines of therapy, ibrutinib plus carfilzomib demonstrated anticancer activity within the expected efficacy range. No new safety signals were identified and the combination was well-tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas , Pronóstico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Terapia Recuperativa , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The t(14;16) translocation, found in 3%-5% of newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM), has been associated with adverse outcomes. However, the studies establishing the characteristics of t(14;16) included solely small cohorts. The goal of the current international, multicenter (n = 25 centers), retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of t(14;16) patients in a large, real-world cohort (n = 223). A substantial fraction of patients had renal impairment (24%) and hemoglobin <10 g/dL (56%) on initial presentation. Combined therapy of both immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor (PI) in the first line was used in 35% of patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed in 42% of patients. With a median follow up of 4.1 years (95% CI 3.7-18.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first line therapy were 2.1 years (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and 4.1 years (95% CI 3.3-5.5), respectively. Worse OS was predicted by age > 60 years (HR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.05-2.58]), as well as revised International Scoring System (R-ISS) 3 (vs R-ISS 2; HR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.59-4.24]). In conclusion, based on the largest reported cohort of t(14;16) patients, quarter of this subset of MM patients initially presents with renal failure, while older age and the R-ISS 3 predict poor survival.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Translocación GenéticaRESUMEN
Carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) has significant activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Kd has not previously been evaluated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report a single-arm phase 2 study of 72 patients with NDMM to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Kd induction. Carfilzomib was administered in two dosing cohorts with dosing of 20/45 mg/m2 in the first 25 patients and 20/56 mg/m2 in the subsequent 47 patients. Carfilzomib was administered on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of a 28-day cycle, dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Treatment was continued to maximum response, progression of disease, or regimen intolerability. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), regimen toxicity and impact of carfilzomib on CD34+ stem cell collection yield. Sixty-five pts achieved at least a partial response (PR) for an ORR of 90%. The maximum response achieved was complete response or better in 5 (7%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 42 (58%), PR in 18 (25%) and stable disease in 7 pts (10%). Toxicities were predominantly low grade with 547 grade 1/2 adverse events and 44 grade ≥3 events. The rate of grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events was 11.1% with eight observed events. The activity of Kd described represents the highest rate of overall response and ≥VGPR for any 2-agent combination in NDMM reported to date. Kd demonstrated a safety profile consistent with previously reported carfilzomib studies.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The current study assesses the characteristics and outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, treated with novel agents for hematogenous extramedullary (HEMM) relapse. Consecutive patients diagnosed with HEMM between 2010-2018 were included. Patients' characteristics at diagnosis and at HEMM presentation, response to treatment, survival and factors predicting survival were recorded and analyzed. A group of 127 patients, all diagnosed with HEMM by imaging (87.3%) and/or biopsy (79%), were included. Of those, 44% were initially diagnosed with ISS3, 57% presented with plasmacytomas, and 30% had high-risk cytogenetics. Median time to HEMM was 32 months. In multivariate analysis, ISS3 and bone plasmacytoma predicted shorter time to HEMM (P = .005 and P = .008, respectively). Upfront autograft was associated with longer time to HEMM (P = .002). At HEMM, 32% of patients had no BM plasmacytosis, 20% had non-secretory disease and 43% had light-chain disease. Multiple HEMM sites were reported in 52% of patients, mostly involving soft tissue, skin (29%), and pleura/lung (25%). First treatment for HEMM included proteasome inhibitors (50%), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (39%), monoclonal antibodies (10%), and chemotherapy (53%). Overall response rate (ORR) was 57%. IMiDs were associated with higher ORR (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.02-4.7, P = .04). Median survival from HEMM was 6 months (CI 95% 4.8-7.2). Failure to achieve ≥VGPR was the only significant factor for worse OS in multivariate analyses (HR = 9.87, CI 95% 2.35 - 39, P = .001). In conclusion, HEMM occurs within 3 years of initial myeloma diagnosis and is associated with dismal outcome. The IMiDs might provide a higher response rate, and achievement of ≥VGPR predicts longer survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Pulmón/patología , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Plasmacitoma/patología , Pleura/patología , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Piel/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Autoinjertos , Neoplasias Óseas/sangre , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Hígado/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Especificidad de Órganos , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Plasmacitoma/sangre , Plasmacitoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Plasmacitoma/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Inhibidores de Proteasoma/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is generally recommended to reduce the duration of severe neutropenia; however, data regarding the optimal timing of G-CSFs post-transplantation are limited and conflicting. This retrospective study was performed at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center between November 5, 2013, and August 9, 2016, of adult inpatient autologous PBSCT recipients who received G-CSF empirically starting on day +5 (early) versus on those who received G-CSF on day +12 only if absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was <0.5 × 109/L (ANC-driven). G-CSF was dosed at 300 µg in patients weighing <75 kg and 480 µg in those weighing ≥75 kg. One hundred consecutive patients underwent autologous PBSCT using either the early (n = 50) or ANC-driven (n = 50) G-CSF regimen. Patient and transplantation characteristics were comparable in the 2 groups. In the ANC-driven group, 24% (n = 12) received G-CSF on day +12 and 60% (n = 30) started G-CSF earlier due to febrile neutropenia or at the physician's discretion, 6% (n = 3) started after day +12 at the physician's discretion, and 10% (n = 5) did not receive any G-CSF. The median start day of G-CSF therapy was day +10 in the ANC-driven group versus day +5 in the early group (P < .0001). For the primary outcome, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 11-13 days) in the early group versus 13 days (IQR, 12-14 days) in the ANC-driven group (P = .07). There were no significant between-group differences in time to platelet engraftment, 1-year relapse rate, or 1-year overall survival. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 74% in the early group versus 90% in the ANC-driven group (P = .04); however, there was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of positive bacterial cultures or transfer to the intensive care unit. The duration of G-CSF administration until neutrophil engraftment was 6 days in the early group versus 3 days in the ANC-driven group (P < .0001). The median duration of post-transplantation hospitalization was 15 days (IQR, 14-19 days) in the early group versus 16 days (IQR, 15-22 days) in the ANC-driven group (P = .28). Our data show that early initiation of G-CSF (on day +5) and ANC-driven initiation of G-CSF following autologous PBSCT were associated with a similar time to neutrophil engraftment, length of stay post-transplantation, and 1-year overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutrófilos/citología , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is a reference treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma. The combination of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown efficacy in a phase 1 and 2 study in relapsed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 792 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma to carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Progression-free survival was significantly improved with carfilzomib (median, 26.3 months, vs. 17.6 months in the control group; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.83; P=0.0001). The median overall survival was not reached in either group at the interim analysis. The Kaplan-Meier 24-month overall survival rates were 73.3% and 65.0% in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99; P=0.04). The rates of overall response (partial response or better) were 87.1% and 66.7% in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively (P<0.001; 31.8% and 9.3% of patients in the respective groups had a complete response or better; 14.1% and 4.3% had a stringent complete response). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 83.7% and 80.7% of patients in the carfilzomib and control groups, respectively; 15.3% and 17.7% of patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events. Patients in the carfilzomib group reported superior health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, the addition of carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival at the interim analysis and had a favorable risk-benefit profile. (Funded by Onyx Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01080391.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The presence of certain high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as translocations (4;14) and (14;16) and deletion (17p), are known to have a negative impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 study ASPIRE (N = 792) demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed MM. This preplanned subgroup analysis of ASPIRE was conducted to evaluate KRd vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of 417 patients with known cytogenetic risk status, 100 patients (24%) were categorized with high-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 48; Rd, n = 52) and 317 (76%) were categorized with standard-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 147; Rd, n = 170). For patients with high-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd resulted in a median PFS of 23.1 months, a 9-month improvement relative to treatment with Rd. For patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd led to a 10-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd. The overall response rates for KRd vs Rd were 79.2% vs 59.6% (high-risk cytogenetics) and 91.2% vs 73.5% (standard-risk cytogenetics); approximately fivefold as many patients with high- or standard-risk cytogenetics achieved a complete response or better with KRd vs Rd (29.2% vs 5.8% and 38.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). KRd improved but did not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics. This regimen had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed MM, irrespective of cytogenetic risk status, and should be considered a standard of care in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01080391.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial was a head-to-head comparison of two proteasome inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Progression-free survival was previously reported to be significantly longer with carfilzomib administered in combination with dexamethasone than with bortezomib and dexamethasone in an interim analysis. The aim of this second interim analysis was to compare overall survival between the two treatment groups. METHODS: ENDEAVOR was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were recruited from 198 hospitals and outpatient clinics in 27 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and had received between one and three previous lines of therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive carfilzomib and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (bortezomib group) through a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four), stratified by International Staging System stage, previous lines of treatment, previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, and planned route of bortezomib delivery if assigned to the bortezomib group. Carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m2 thereafter) was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles; bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2) was given as an intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) was given on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 in the carfilzomib group and on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in the bortezomib group. The primary endpoint of ENDEAVOR, progression-free survival, has been previously reported. A stratified log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups for this prospectively planned second interim analysis. Efficacy assessments were done in all randomly assigned patients (the intention-to-treat population) and the safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866, and is no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 1096 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 929 were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group and 465 to the bortezomib group). The cutoff date for this prespecified interim analysis was Jan 3, 2017. Median overall survival was 47·6 months (95% CI 42·5-not evaluable) in the carfilzomib group versus 40·0 months (32·6-42·3) in the bortezomib group (hazard ratio 0·791 [95% CI 0·648-0·964], one-sided p=0·010). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 377 (81%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and 324 (71%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group, and serious adverse events in 273 (59%) patients in the carfilzomib group and 182 (40%) in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were anaemia (76 [16%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 46 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (67 [15%] vs 15 [3%]), pneumonia (42 [9%] vs 39 [9%]), thrombocytopenia (41 [9%] vs 43 [9%]), fatigue (31 [7%] vs 35 [8%]), dyspnoea (29 [6%] vs ten [2%]), decreased lymphocyte count (29 [6%] vs nine [2%]), diarrhoea (18 [4%] vs 39 [9%]), and peripheral neuropathy (six [1%] vs 28 [6%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (1%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group (pneumonia [n=2], interstitial lung disease [n=1], septic shock [n=1], and unknown [n=1]) and two (<1%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group (cardiac arrest [n=1] and pneumonia [n=1]). INTERPRETATION: Carfilzomib provided a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of death compared with bortezomib. To our knowledge, carfilzomib is the first and only multiple myeloma treatment that extends overall survival in the relapsed setting over the current standard of care. This study is informative for deciding which proteasome inhibitor to use for treating this disease. FUNDING: Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc, an Amgen Inc subsidiary.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Causas de Muerte , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Internacionalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) conditioned with high-dose chemotherapy has long been established as the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Despite recent therapeutic advances, high-dose melphalan (HDM) remains the chemotherapy regimen of choice in this setting. Lenalidomide (LEN) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone is recognized as a standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and there is growing support for the administration of LEN as maintenance therapy post-ASCT. In view of the above, the present phase I clinical trial was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose LEN (HDLEN) in patients with RRMM, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of HDLEN when added to HDM before ASCT. Despite administering HDLEN at doses of up to 350 mg/day, the maximum tolerated dose could not be determined, owing to an insufficient number of dose-limiting toxicities in the 21 patients enrolled in the trial. Conditioning with HDLEN plus HDM was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Adverse events following ASCT were as expected with HDM. Median progression-free and overall survival were 10 months and 22 months, respectively, in this population of heavily pretreated patients. Our findings suggest that HDLEN in combination with HDM may offer significant potential as a conditioning regimen before ASCT in patients with RRMM. These preliminary findings are now being evaluated further in an ongoing phase II clinical trial.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/mortalidad , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
A primary analysis of the ASPIRE study found that the addition of carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). This post hoc analysis examined outcomes from ASPIRE in patients categorised by age. In the carfilzomib group, 103/396 patients were ≥70 years old, and in the control group, 115/396 patients were ≥70 years old. Median PFS for patients <70 years old was 28·6 months for the carfilzomib group versus 17·6 months for the control group [hazard ratio (HR), 0·701]. Median PFS for patients ≥70 years old was 23·8 months for the carfilzomib group versus 16·0 months for the control group (HR, 0·753). For patients <70 years the overall response rate (ORR) was 86·0% (carfilzomib group) and 66·9% (control group); for patients ≥70 years old the ORR was 90·3% (carfilzomib group) and 66·1% (control group). Within the carfilzomib group, grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events occurred more frequently among patients ≥70 years old compared with patients <70 years old. Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone has a favourable benefit-risk profile for patients with RMM, including elderly patients ≥70 years old. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01080391.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Here, we explore the significant progress made in the treatment of multiple myeloma, focusing on immunotherapy and the promise it has offered to patients suffering from advanced disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple myeloma, a B-cell malignancy, is characterized by unregulated plasma cell growth in the bone marrow as well as strong immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. mAbs targeting tumor antigens overcome this, increasing T-cell activation, multiple myeloma cell death, and depth of response. Similarly, adoptive T-cell therapy aims to engineer or isolate tumor-specific T cells for a targeted approach. Finally, peptide and dendritic cell/tumor fusion vaccines reeducate the immune system, expanding the immune response and generating long-term memory to prevent relapse of disease. Many of these approaches have been combined with existing therapies to enhance antitumor immunity. SUMMARY: Immunotherapeutic approaches have remarkably changed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, and encouraging patient responses have warranted further investigation into mAbs, adoptive T-cell therapy, vaccines, and combination therapy.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodosRESUMEN
IgM myeloma is a rare hematologic malignancy for which the clinicopathological features and patient outcomes have not been extensively studied. We carried out a multicenter retrospective study in patients with diagnosis of IgM myeloma defined by >10% marrow involvement by monoclonal plasma cells, presence of an IgM monoclonal paraproteinemia of any size, and anemia, renal dysfunction, hypercalcemia, lytic lesions and/or t(11;14) identified by FISH. A total of 134 patients from 20 centers were included in this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 65.5 years with a male predominance (68%). Anemia, renal dysfunction, elevated calcium and skeletal lytic lesions were found in 37, 43, 19, and 70%, respectively. The median serum IgM level was 2,895 mg dL-1 with 19% of patients presenting with levels >6,000 mg dL-1 . International Staging System (ISS) stages 1, 2, and 3 were seen in 40 (33%), 54 (44%), and 29 (24%) of patients, respectively. The malignant cells expressed CD20 (58%) and cyclin D1 (67%), and t(11;14) was the most common cytogenetic finding (39%). The median overall survival (OS) was 61 months. Higher ISS score was associated with worse survival (P = 0.02). Patients with IgM myeloma present with similar characteristics and outcomes as patients with more common myeloma subtypes.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores , Médula Ósea/metabolismo , Médula Ósea/patología , Huesos/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Células Plasmáticas/metabolismo , Células Plasmáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
While proteasome inhibition is a validated therapeutic approach for multiple myeloma (MM), inhibition of individual constitutive proteasome (c20S) and immunoproteasome (i20S) subunits has not been fully explored owing to a lack of effective tools. We utilized the novel proteasome constitutive/immunoproteasome subunit enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ProCISE) assay to quantify proteasome subunit occupancy in samples from five phase I/II and II trials before and after treatment with the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Following the first carfilzomib dose (15-56 mg/m(2) ), dose-dependent inhibition of c20S and i20S chymotrypsin-like active sites was observed [whole blood: ≥67%; peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): ≥75%]. A similar inhibition profile was observed in bone marrow-derived CD138(+) tumour cells. Carfilzomib-induced proteasome inhibition was durable, with minimal recovery in PBMCs after 24 h but near-complete recovery between cycles. Importantly, the ProCISE assay can be used to quantify occupancy of individual c20S and i20S subunits. We observed a relationship between MM patient response (n = 29), carfilzomib dose and occupancy of multiple i20S subunits, where greater occupancy was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving a clinical response at higher doses. ProCISE represents a new tool for measuring proteasome inhibitor activity in clinical trials and relating drug action to patient outcomes.