Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 40(10): 2754-9, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22824939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard of dedicated intensivists providing 24-hr intensive care unit coverage reduces length of stay and in-hospital mortality. A theoretical model of the cost-effectiveness of intensive care unit physician staffing patterns has also been published, but no study has examined the actual cost vs. cost savings of such a program. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether improved outcomes in specific quality measures would result in an overall cost savings in patient care DESIGN: Retrospective, 1 yr before-after cohort study SETTING: A 15-bed mixed medical-surgical community intensive care unit PATIENTS: A total of 2,181 patients: 1,113 patients preimplementation and 1,068 patients postimplementation. INTERVENTION: Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, rates for ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection, and cost of care. RESULTS: Following institution of the intensive care unit physician staffing, the mean intensive care unit length of stay decreased significantly from 3.5±8.9 days to 2.7±4.7 days, (p<.002). The frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia fell from 8.1% to 1.3% (p<.0002) after intervention. Ventilator-associated pneumonia rate per 100 ventilator days decreased from 1.03 to 0.38 (p<.0002). After intervention, the frequency of the central venous access device infection events fell from 9.4% to 1.1% (p<.0002). Central venous access device infection rate per 1000 line days decreased from 8.49 to 1.69. The net savings for the hospital were $744,001. The 1-yr institutional return on investment from intensive care unit physician staffing was 105%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard significantly reduced intensive care unit length of stay and lowered the prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection. A cost analysis yielded a 1-yr institutional return on investment of 105%. Our study confirms that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing model in the community hospital setting improves quality measures and is economically feasible.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hospitales con 300 a 499 Camas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA