Recommendations for reporting tissue and circulating tumour (ct)DNA next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease and molecular characterisation plays an important role in its clinical management. Next-generation sequencing-based panel testing enables many molecular alterations to be interrogated simultaneously, allowing for comprehensive identification of actionable oncogenic drivers (and co-mutations) and appropriate matching of patients with targeted therapies. Despite consensus in international guidelines on the importance of broad molecular profiling, adoption of next-generation sequencing varies globally. One of the barriers to its successful implementation is a lack of accepted standards and guidelines specifically for the reporting and clinical annotation of next-generation sequencing results. Based on roundtable discussions between pathologists and oncologists, we provide best practice recommendations for the reporting of next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer to facilitate its use and enable easy interpretation for physicians. These are intended to complement existing guidelines related to the use of next-generation sequencing (solid and liquid). Here, we discuss next-generation sequencing workflows, the structure of next-generation sequencing reports, and our recommendations for best practice thereof. The aim of these recommendations and considerations is ultimately to ensure that reports are fully interpretable, and that the most appropriate treatment options are selected based on robust molecular profiles in well-defined reports.

Non-small cell lung cancer with MET amplification: review of epidemiology, associated disease characteristics, testing procedures, burden, and treatments.

Introduction: Mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor gene amplification (METamp) is being investigated as a therapeutic target in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed the epidemiology and disease characteristics associated with primary and secondary METamp, as well as the testing procedures used to identify METamp, in advanced NSCLC. Economic and humanistic burdens, and the practice patterns and treatments under investigation for METamp were also examined. Methods: Embase and Medline (via ProQuest), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (2015-2022) were systematically searched. Conference abstracts were searched via Embase and conference proceedings websites (2020-2022). The review focused on evidence from the United States; global evidence was included for identified evidence gaps. Results: The median rate of primary METamp in NSCLC across the references was 4.8% (n=4 studies) and of secondary METamp (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]-mutant NSCLC) was 15% (n=10). Next-generation sequencing (NGS; n=12) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; n=11) were most frequently used in real-world studies and FISH testing most frequently used in clinical trials (n=9/10). METamp definitions varied among clinical trials using ISH/FISH testing (MET to chromosome 7 centromere ratio of ≥1.8 to ≥3.0; or gene copy number [GCN] ≥5 to ≥10) and among trials using NGS (tissue testing: GCN ≥6; liquid biopsy: MET copy number ≥2.1 to >5). Limited to no data were identified on the economic and humanistic burdens, and real-world treatment of METamp NSCLC. Promising preliminary results from trials enrolling patients with EGFR-mutated, METamp advanced NSCLC progressing on an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were observed with MET-TKIs (i.e., tepotinib, savolitinib, and capmatinib) in combination with EGFR-TKIs (i.e., gefitinib and osimertinib). For metastatic NSCLC and high-level METamp, monotherapy with capmatinib, crizotinib, and tepotinib are recommended in the 2022 published NSCLC NCCN Guidelines. Conclusion: Primary METamp occurs in approximately 5% of NSCLC cases, and secondary METamp in approximately 15% of cases previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. Variability in testing methods (including ISH/FISH and NGS) and definitions were observed. Several treatments are promising in treating METamp NSCLC. Additional studies evaluating the clinical, economic, and humanistic burdens are needed.

Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Characteristics of patients in clinical trials may differ from those of real-world patients. Our objective was to describe biomarker testing and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in a real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC, and in the TEMPUS oncology dataset from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Patient characteristics associated with biomarker testing were evaluated in patients with positive biomarkers using univariate logistic regression models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate median survival. RESULTS: Of 9540 patients included, 41.7% had biomarker testing, and 2158 had a positive biomarker result. Men (vs women; odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91), Black patients (vs White; OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97), patients with squamous (OR, 0.22; 95% CI: 0.19-0.25) or unknown histology (OR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.61) (vs non-squamous histology), and patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2+ (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.84) or missing (OR, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.48-0.66) (vs ECOG PS of 0) were less likely to undergo biomarker testing. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN-recommended treatment options (55.7%) had significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.62-0.75). CONCLUSION: More than 50% of patients were untested for biomarkers. Patients who were less likely to be tested included men, Black patients, current smokers, patients with squamous aNSCLC, and patients with an ECOG PS of 2+. Patients with positive biomarkers who received NCCN-recommended treatment options had significantly longer OS and PFS.

Cell-surface and cytokine biomarkers in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Increasing emphasis is being placed on biomarkers as indicators of disease states in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Careful description of the expression of cell-surface markers and cytokines produced by T and B lymphocytes can lead to a more complete characterization of disease activity in patient populations, and serve as an indicator of the patient's response to therapy.

Immunoglobulin heavy light chain test quantifies clonal disease in patients with AL amyloidosis and normal serum free light chain ratio.

BACKGROUND: Serum and urine immunofixation electrophoreses (SIFE/UIFE) are used for clonal detection in plasma cell dyscrasias, while serum free light chain (sFLC) testing provides quantitation of clonal disease. Up to 20% of patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis may present with normal FLC ratio (FLCr). METHODS: We assessed the diagnostic, quantitative and prognostic potential of serum heavy light chain ratio (HLCr) in 199 untreated patients at initial evaluation. RESULTS: An abnormal HLCr was found in 37.2%, abnormal FLCr in 81.9% and positivity by SIFE/UIFE in 94% of patients. HLCr together with SIFE/UIFE identified clonality in 94% patients; the combination with FLCr yielded 100% sensitivity. An HLCr abnormality was significantly over-represented in normal compared to abnormal FLCr group (63.9% versus 31.3%). HLCr did not predict overall survival (OS) (log rank, p = 0.09), while an abnormal FLCr was associated with decreased OS (log rank, p = 0.03). The combined use of both ratios trended toward increased OS in the abnormal HLCr/normal FLCr group (log rank, p = 0.11; Wilcoxon, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, HLCr was not predictive of OS, whereas an abnormal FLCr was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.7, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The HLC assay has potential as a supplemental test to quantify monoclonal protein in patients with normal FLCr results.

Treatment with humanized monoclonal antibodies against CD80 and CD86 combined with sirolimus prolongs renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys.

BACKGROUND: Co-stimulatory blockade has been shown to prolong allograft survival in different transplant models. We investigated the effect of combining humanized anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with sirolimus in cynomolgus monkey renal transplant recipients. METHODS: After renal transplantation, groups of four animals were treated daily with sirolimus, sirolimus and nine weekly doses of mAb, two weekly doses of mAb, or sirolimus and two weekly doses of mAb. RESULTS: Survival was significantly better in monkeys treated with the combination of sirolimus and mAb when compared with treatment with either agent alone (P=0.0067 by log-rank analysis). When combined with sirolimus, nine weekly doses of mAb did not result in an additional survival benefit compared with only two mAb doses (P=0.74). None of the treatment regimens used in this study resulted in development of transplantation tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus can be successfully combined with humanized mAb against CD80 and CD86. Induction with a short course of mAb is effective in prolonging allograft survival in combination with sirolimus.